Bailout deal breaks down; Paulson back to Capitol

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JENNIFER LOVEN and JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | September 25, 2008 11:37 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

President Bush, center, meets with Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., far left, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., far left, and congressional leaders in the Cabinet Room of the White House Thursday, Sept. 25, 2008, in Washington to discuss the proposed bailout of the financial industry. Also seated with them from left to right, Minority Leader John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — A Republican rebellion stalled government efforts Thursday to avoid economic meltdown, a chaotic turnaround that disrupted the choreography of am extraordinary White House meeting meant to show joint resolve from the president, the political parties and the presidential candidates.

After six days of intensive talks on the $700 billion financial industry bailout proposed by the Bush administration, with Wall Street tottering and presidential politics intruding six weeks before the election, there was more confusion than clarity.

An apparent breakthrough was announced with fanfare at midday by key members of Congress from both parties _ but not top leaders. Wall Street cautiously showed its pleasure, with the Dow Jones industrials closing 196 points higher.

But the good news and the market close were followed by a rash of less-positive developments.

Washington Mutual Inc. was seized by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in the largest failure ever of a U.S. bank, after which JPMorgan Chase & Co. Inc. came to its rescue by buying the thrift's banking assets.

And a late-afternoon White House summit bringing together President Bush, presidential contenders John McCain and Barack Obama, and top congressional leaders, described as "a full-throated discussion" by one person in the room and "a contentious shouting match" by McCain's campaign, broke up with conflicts in plain view.

Conservatives were in revolt over the astonishing price tag of the proposal and the hand of government that it would place on private markets.

Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, emerged from the White House meeting to say the announced agreement "is obviously no agreement." McCain's campaign issued a statement saying, "the plan that has been put forth by the administration does not enjoy the confidence of the American people as it will not protect the taxpayers and will sacrifice Main Street in favor of Wall Street." The White House, too, acknowledged there was no deal, only progress.

Story continues below
advertisement

Meanwhile a group of House GOP lawmakers circulated an alternative that would put much less focus on a government takeover of failing institutions' sour assets. This proposal would have the government provide insurance to companies that agree to hold frozen assets, rather than have the U.S. purchase the assets.

Inside the White House session, House Republican leader John Boehner announced his concerns about the emerging plan and asked that the conservatives' alternative be considered, said people from both parties who were briefed on the exchange. They spoke on condition of anonymity because the session was private.

Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, the feisty Democrat who has been leading negotiations with Paulson, reacted angrily, saying Republicans had waited until the last moment to present their proposal.

Meanwhile McCain, who dramatically announced Wednesday that he was suspending his campaign to deal with the economic crisis, stayed silent for most of the session and spoke only briefly to voice general principles for a rescue plan.

Weary congressional negotiators then resumed working into the night, joined by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson in an effort to revive or rework the proposal that Bush said must be quickly approved by Congress to stave off potentially "a long and painful recession." They gave up after 10 p.m. EDT, more than an hour after the lone House Republican involved, Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama, left the room.

Talks were to resume Friday morning on the effort to bail out failing financial institutions and restart the flow of credit that has begun to starve the national economy.

The Bush administration plan's centerpiece remained for the government to buy the toxic, mortgage-based assets of shaky financial institutions in a bid to keep them from going under and setting off a cascade of ruinous events, including wiped-out retirement savings, rising home foreclosures, closed businesses and lost jobs.

The earlier bipartisan accord establishing principles and important details would have given the Bush administration just a fraction of the money it wanted up front, subjecting half the $700 billion total to a congressional veto. The treasury secretary would get $250 billion immediately and could have an additional $100 billion if he certified it was needed, an approach designed to give lawmakers a stronger hand in controlling the unprecedented rescue.

The Bush administration had already agreed to several concessions based on demands from the right and left, including that the government take equity in companies helped by the bailout and put rules in place to limit excessive compensation of their executives, according to a draft of the outline obtained by The Associated Press.

Democrat Obama and Republican McCain, who have both sought to distance themselves from the unpopular Bush, sat down with the president at the White House for the hourlong afternoon session that was striking in this brutally partisan season. By also including Congress' Democratic and Republican leaders, the meeting gathered nearly all Washington's political power structure at one long table in a small West Wing room.

"All of us around the table ... know we've got to get something done as quickly as possible," Bush declared optimistically at the start of the meeting. Obama and McCain were at distant ends of the oval table, not even in each other's sight lines. Bush, playing host in the middle, was flanked by Congress' two Democratic leaders, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

But neither Bush, McCain nor Obama have been deeply involved so far in this week's scramble to hammer out a package. The meeting was intended more to provide bipartisan political cover for lawmakers to support a plan in the face of an angry public and their own re-election bids in six weeks.

At day's end, Frank said he told Paulson "this whole thing is at risk if the president can't get members of his own party to participate."

Layered over the White House meeting was a complicated web of potential political benefits and consequences for both presidential candidates.

McCain hoped voters would believe that he rose above politics to wade into successful, nitty-gritty dealmaking at a time of urgent crisis, but he risked being seen instead as either overly impulsive or politically craven, or both. Obama saw a chance to appear presidential and fit for duty but was also caught off guard strategically by McCain's surprising gamble in saying he was suspending his campaigning and asking to delay Friday night's debate to focus on the crisis.

___

Associated Press writers Deb Riechmann, Martin Crutsinger, Christopher Wills and Beth Fouhy in Washington and researcher Judy Ausuebel in New York contributed to this story.

(Corrects quote in 13th paragraph, Weary congressional ..., to 'painful' instead 'deep' recession.)

WASHINGTON — A Republican rebellion stalled government efforts Thursday to avoid economic meltdown, a chaotic turnaround that disrupted the choreography of am extraordinary White House meeting m...
WASHINGTON — A Republican rebellion stalled government efforts Thursday to avoid economic meltdown, a chaotic turnaround that disrupted the choreography of am extraordinary White House meeting m...
 
Comments
308
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)

Interesting comments by Newt which is completely opposite Bush/Paulson and both houses. Watch his 3 part interview with Greta on the Tube. We have input from Buffet and you can check into Ron Paul too. There has to be a right way to do this and they better get it right. Newt says McCain has left the Republican standard and if Dems introduced this bill, every Republican would say no way. Buffet throws a quick bank behind Goldman, FDIC needs $$$ to guarantee deposits, Johnny Mac's on the fence with Obama and the rest of us wait to see which way the chips fall. Crap, I'll be dead before this dept gets paid. BTW, called my broker earlier today, and he sounds like he's drooling over a bailout.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 PM on 09/25/2008

If the Republicans can't make sure their Wall Street CEO friends don't get their bonus they are not going to support a bill to fix this financial crisis.

That's all it comes down to. The GOP saving their rich friends. I love hearing them talk about free enterprise no regulation because that is the very reason we are in this mess. They are to stupid to even see it.

John McCain is the most unethical person to run for the office. I thought GW was bad but McCain is showing America what he is made of. Pure greed and corruption. Save my friends on Wall Street is his motto and he is living up to it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 09/25/2008

Most people are against bailing out Wall Street. But here comes both parties agreeing with it.

Another reason to vote 3rd Party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 09/25/2008

Citizens of America:

We no longer have a representative government. Our system of governance has officially become Facist. Every elected official who signs on to this proposal does so in direct violation of his oath of office and is a willing participant in a capitalistic coup d' etat. What we are witnessing is the consummation of a orchestrated objective by international bankers to siege total control of the U.S. monetary system. This scorn was imposed upon us by the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank, a private banking consortium, owned and operated primarily by foreigners having no allegiance to this country. The very existence of the Fed is unconstitutional and known to every member of Congress as such and yet they enable the rape of this country's assets by these thieves. The financial stability of this country will never be accomplished until the constitutional mandate of Congress controlling the issuance of currency is restored. Any negotiations absent of terms of abolishing the Fed and restoring that responsibility are futile and lacking in intentions.

Today I weep for my country and I am furious at those whom we entrusted to serve its interests. The enemy and weapon of mass destruction has been residing here all along. I'm mad as hell and cocked and loaded for the revolution.

Next up, the ratification of the North American Union. Stay tuned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 09/25/2008

Goldman Sachs MOTTO : YOU DON'T NEED TO CONTROL YOUR OWN MONEY....give it all to us and we'll leave you what you need to live on. Ok you don't need health care because if you are not healthy - too bad for you, you pee-on - we will have killed unions and you will be tossed to side of road - so just die fool. And as for all those oldsters , Goldman Sachs has this message " you are old and non productive - so just die- we don't need you, unless its as fertilizer" Goldman Sachs message on military - it is a grand opportunity to make more monopoly money and it lightens the load of the poor on economy by using them as cannon fodder and has the added advantage that we don't pay for it - you do. And Golly gee it means us old guys can buy more young chicks and some of us geezers like them really young so we want so much power that you can't even think of rebuking or denying us. Thier prune faced wives dripping in diamonds sit quietly and watch.Goldman Sachs " we support McCain because he will take an axe thru the supreme court to get rid of pesky protections that prevent us from consolidating our power".
This is the GREED CULTURE and it has always been a battle between them and the majority. There is no morality in the Greed Culture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 09/25/2008

Once upon a time, say, oh, less than 12 months ago, I was castigating Congress for giving Bush another $70 billion for his war.

Am I supposed to be happy with giving away $250 billion because it's not $700 billion?

No.

This deal still reeks of corruption and bought influence. America is on one side and Congress is on the other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 09/25/2008

I have a question - why not wait until there is a collapse and then the government could immediately send money to the banks so they stay in business? They could do that instantaneously if congress already authorized them to do it in an emergency.

We might have a day where people couldn't access their accounts, although this wouldn't happen because some banks don't need a bailout, but at least we wouldn't have this "preemptive strike" when we don't know for sure what will happen.

The last "preemptive strike" lead us into war with Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 09/25/2008

Most of the world doesn't know about the 65 Trillion Dollar Credit Swap Defaults still looming. It dwarfs the mortgage crises.

The info is on http://coinage.me


Where the flaws are articulated in detail unlike anything you see on the news, such that you can understand them and so the workings are not obfuscated with complexity. A detail solution is provided to fix the foundation, which everyone else speaking about the problem seems to lack.

Many people only see the appearances they do not see the fundamental flaw in the system itself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 09/25/2008
photo

They are all insane!
Stop voting for these people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 09/25/2008

First bit of sense I've heard from you in a while. Cheers!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 09/25/2008

Let Warren Buffett Manage the Financial Bailout
Congress is rightly concerned about how and who will manage the bailout. There is no doubt that banks should not be given blank checks at arbitrary pricing for their toxic assets. Also, the Senior Executives of banks benefiting from the bailout must also agree to forgo bonuses for a number of years.

The markets need a quick positive signal from Congress, delays could bring down the entire financial world. Congress should pass a simple bailout package without getting bogged down into the hows and whys. They should request Warren Buffett to manage the entire bailout package. He is the shrewdest investor and will drive hard bargains with banks before giving them a dime. Let him impose conditions as he deems fit. He is already of the opinion that bankers will have to give up bonuses for a while.

Going by Warren's track record, an investment of $700 billion of tax payers money will probably come back to the treasury as $1 trillion. All he needs is a handful of good people to help him manage this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 09/25/2008

where's barack? is he holding the camera?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 09/25/2008

he's the hardest working guy in America. Does Obama have to do everything?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 09/25/2008

Okay?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 09/25/2008
photo

The only one in the room with sense enough to work one of those things!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 09/25/2008

Let Warren Buffett Manage the Financial Bailout

Congress is rightly concerned about how and who will manage the bailout. There is no doubt that banks should not be given blank checks at arbitrary pricing for their toxic assets. Also, the Senior Executives of banks benefiting from the bailout must also agree to forgo bonuses for a number of years.

The markets need a quick positive signal from Congress, delays could bring down the entire financial world. Congress should pass a simple bailout package without getting bogged down into the hows and whys. They should request Warren Buffett to manage the entire bailout package. He is the shrewdest investor and will drive hard bargains with banks before giving them a dime. Let him impose conditions as he deems fit. He is already of the opinion that bankers will have to give up bonuses for a while.

Going by Warren's track record, an investment of $700 billion of tax payers money will probably come back to the treasury as $1 trillion. All he needs is a handful of good people to help him manage this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 09/25/2008

Ever notice how when their is a crisis Bush has to get others involved to solve it. He called his dad and Bill Clinton for the tsunami, and now he is calling McCain and Obama for the wall street fiasco. I know why he called Obama, to pick his brain because so far he has already implemented some of Barack's ideas but why McCain he is just as clueless as Bush. I gues so he won't feel left out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 09/25/2008

He brings in other, more respected people to stand behind him, because otherwise he would look like a fool if he went out in front of reporters and said: "I'm here, and I know what to do to help."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 09/25/2008

McCain-Palin have nowhere to go now but down, and I will tell you exactly how this will happen. They can run away from President Bush, but they cant run away from the Republican Party. The Republicans will be regarded from now on as "the party that wrecked America." Over the weeks ahead, as carnage in the economy and the financial markets ramps up, it will become increasingly clear. It is important that this meme be spread through the internet. I urge all commentators to adopt and spread the idea that the Republicans are "the party that wrecked America." It will work because it is the truth. Use it freely.Get the meme going.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 09/25/2008

Bootcamp: In a way it doesn't matter does it? Nothing will be able to be accomplished because all the money will be tied up and our debt will be astronomical. We have to fight this bail-out if we really want anything even approaching a progressive agenda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 09/25/2008

All Obama has to do is quote Ronald Reagan's line from 1980: "Are you better off now than you were four or eight years ago?"

If Obama asks Americans: "Are you better off now under Bush than you were eight years ago?" the only appropriate response is:

"Is that a trick question?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 09/25/2008

Laissez-faire economic policy is what is wrecking America. I think this election may play out just the opposite of how you describe. The reason the administration was so anxious to get the legislation passed immediately is because they believe that this move will lift confidence in the markets across the globe in time for the election, and as a result will appear to have been a brilliant move by the Republicans, and McCain will continue to associate himself with the Bush camp more closely. Amongst the neo-con voters, Bush is still held in high regard. The neo-con voters will come out in full force to support McCain in November as a result of this, because it will appear to them that Bush policy saved their 401(k)s. I was hoping the Dems, since they are in the majority, would have used this opportunity to stave off any final vote on this legislation at this time. There is still time to wait to see whether what Paulson and Bernanke are projecting will really come to pass. I hope I am wrong and you are right. I know Obama is up in the polling now. I just hope he can pull it off if the economy gets back up and running.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 09/25/2008
- kae I'm a Fan of kae permalink

well thank god Huffpo ran such extensive coverage of the Eliot Spitzer hooker scandal

I'd love to hear his view on all this

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 09/25/2008

I've thought this too. I've thought that I wished there was Eliot out there to speak on this subject. Where are the voices of outrage?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 09/25/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
MAYHEM IN HONDURAS

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — Ousted President Manuel...

Biden: "We Misread How Bad The Economy Was"

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration "misread" the depth...