Frank Predicts Bailout Deal By Sunday

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Frank Predicts Bailout Deal By Sunday stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS and DAVID ESPO | September 26, 2008 11:48 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush delivers remarks to members of the media outside the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, Sept. 26, 2008 in Washington. Bush spoke on the negotiations to finalize legislation on the financial rescue package. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration and Congress anxiously revived negotiations Friday on a $700 billion financial bailout, one day after the largest bank collapse in U.S. history provided a brutal reminder of the risks of failure. Democrats talked optimistically of agreement by the end of the weekend.

"I'm convinced that by Sunday we will have an agreement that people can understand on this bill," predicted Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank, a key Democrat in eight days of up-and-down talks designed to stave off an economic disaster.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi added that "progress is being made," although the day came and went without senior lawmakers from both parties sitting down together.

Neither she nor Frank divulged details at a late-afternoon news conference in the Capitol, though there was word of one fresh Democratic concession.

Pelosi told fellow Democrats during a closed-door meeting that the idea of letting judges rewrite mortgages to help bankrupt homeowners avoid foreclosure won't be a part of the emergency legislation. That provision, pushed by several Democrats, would be a deal-breaker for Republicans whose votes are needed to pass the measure, she said, according to lawmakers at the meeting.

Democrats and Bush administration officials also said they were willing to include House Republicans' idea of having the government insure distressed mortgages _ but only as an option, rather than a replacement for the administration's more sweeping approach.

Democratic and Republican staff aides met into the night on Capitol Hill. They were going line by line through legislative proposals in an attempt to clear the way for lawmakers to bargain over the weekend even as presidential contenders John McCain and Barack Obama agreed during their presidential debate Friday night that Congress must act soon.

Asked directly whether he intends to vote for a rescue plan taking shape in Congress, McCain said, "I hope so. ... sure."

Story continues below
advertisement

"We haven't seen the language yet," Obama said. "I do think there is constructive work being done."

Meanwhile, new details emerged of a remarkably tumultuous White House meeting on Thursday. With the session breaking up in disarray, according to two participants, President Bush issued an appeal, saying, "Can't we just all go out and say things are OK?" The group around the table, congressional leaders as well as McCain and Obama, spurned the presidential request for a publicly united front.

Earlier in the White House meeting, Democrats peppered House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio with questions about the details of an alternative he was backing. At one point, Bush, too, said, "I don't know what the hell they are," recalled one person who was in the room. All the participants spoke on condition of anonymity, saying the meeting was private.

Bush sought to coax the talks back to life on Friday, prodding lawmakers in a morning appearance to "rise to the occasion" _ and quickly.

In a sign of progress, House Republicans dispatched their second-ranking leader, Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri, to join the talks after their objections to an emerging compromise had brought negotiations to a standstill the day before. They demanded "serious consideration" for their plan.

"We want to see a deal happen _ there's no doubt about it," said Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va.

The legislation the administration is promoting would allow the government to buy bad mortgages and other sour assets held by investors, most of them financial companies. That should make those companies more inclined to lend and lift a major weight off the national economy that is already sputtering.

But a significant number of lawmakers, including many House conservatives, say they're against such heavy federal intervention. Under the GOP plan, the government would insure the distressed securities rather than buy them. Tax breaks would provide additional incentives to invest.

The crisis was hardly limited to the U.S.

Bush held a lengthy Oval Office meeting with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown that focused on how the problems were spreading, then said, "I told him the plan is big enough to make a difference, and I believe it will be passed."

Presidential politics weighed heavily and unpredictably on the election-season effort to stave off a full-blown economic crisis.

After announcing earlier in the week he would suspend his campaign and return to the capital until there was an agreement, Republican McCain abruptly reversed course and departed for Friday night's debate with Democratic rival Obama.

There were fresh signs of urgency at both the White House and the Capitol, one day after the rancorous White House session and the collapse of Washington Mutual, the largest failure in U.S. banking history. The Seattle-based institution had invested heavily in the now-moribund mortgage market.

Still, the Dow Jones industrials rose 121 points for the day as investors anticipated a weekend agreement.

In days of negotiations, the administration has accepted demands from lawmakers to give Congress considerable authority to oversee the bailout and require that the government try to renegotiate the bad mortgages it acquires so more borrowers could keep their homes. Paulson also relented to requests to limit the severance packages that corporate executives can receive from firms benefiting from the government bailout.

In addition, rather than provide $700 billion up front, as Paulson initially requested, Congress would approve the funds in stages. Under one approach, $250 billion would be made available at once, with the president able to certify the need for an additional $100 billion on his own authority. The final $350 billion would become available with a second presidential certification, although this time Congress would have authority to block it.

Any compromise is also expected to require the government to obtain partial ownership of any company it invests in.

Democrats, too, signaled they were ready to jettison some of their priorities.

Frank indicated they might ultimately drop a requirement that a portion of any profits from the rescue be funneled to a fund to build housing for low-income people. That mandate, deeply unpopular with Republicans, "is not an essential," Frank said.

While Democrats control a majority of both the House and Senate, their leaders have made it clear they will not force their rank and file to vote without Republican support on a bailout advanced by an unpopular president on an unwilling public.

In an Associated Press-Knowledge Networks poll, only 30 percent of those surveyed expressed support for Bush's package. Forty-five percent were opposed, with 25 percent undecided. The survey was conducted Thursday and had a margin of error or plus or minus 3.8 percentage points. It was conducted over the Internet by Knowledge Networks, which initially contacted people using traditional telephone polling methods and followed with online interviews.

Aides to lawmakers in both parties say telephone calls from constituents are running heavily against the bailout _ in some cases nearly 100-1 against, making the vote a potentially tricky one for a candidate in a competitive race.

___

Associated Press writers Charles Babington, Jim Kuhnhenn and Jennifer Loven contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration and Congress anxiously revived negotiations Friday on a $700 billion financial bailout, one day after the largest bank collapse in U.S. history provided a br...
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration and Congress anxiously revived negotiations Friday on a $700 billion financial bailout, one day after the largest bank collapse in U.S. history provided a br...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
114
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 25 fans permalink

"FAIR MARKETS" NOT "free markets" are WHAT MADE AMERICA GREAT!

GET BACK TO "FAIR MARKETS!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 PM on 09/27/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 25 fans permalink

INCLUDE THIS IN THE BAILOUT!

Excerpt from The Sun:

"The Securities and Exchange Commission can blame itself for the current crisis. That is the allegation being made by a former SEC official, Lee Pickard, who says a rule change in 2004 led to the failure of Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, and Merrill Lynch.

The SEC allowed five firms — the three that have collapsed plus Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley — to more than double the leverage they were allowed to keep on their balance sheets and remove discounts that had been applied to the assets they had been required to keep to protect them from defaults.”


WHY DOESN'T THE SEC PUT BACK THE "UPTICK RULE?"

AS DOING AWAY WITH THAT BROUGHT ON THE CRASHES THIS SUMMER ALL THE WAY TO NOW????

DO IT MONDAY - YOU INCOMPETENT "COOKS."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 09/27/2008
- Wichitan I'm a Fan of Wichitan 2 fans permalink

Better hurry! The Melt Down is turning into a mushroom cloud! (Just kidding, but doesn't that sound familiar?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 09/27/2008
- Wichitan I'm a Fan of Wichitan 2 fans permalink

I can't help but feel that something really sinister is going on beneath the surface. With all the other "distractions" going on, isn't it strange that suddenly Bush, Paulson, and Bernake announce the "crisis du jour" - and it needs to be adddressed and settled quickly - no oversight, etc. How can a situation this massive creep up on so many people?

If the $700 billion is approved, wouldn't it almost prove fatal for the next administration - or seriously hamper getting anything accomplished that needs to done? I'm sure one "Tired Old War Horse" wouldn't be too much to sacrifice to continue their efforts to derail the next administration.

Maybe this will be Bush's swan song - or maybe not!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 09/27/2008
- neo1 I'm a Fan of neo1 3 fans permalink

Yes, I believe you're right. This is that October surprise that's been running around the web for months. I believe it's the government's opportunity to take the last bit of ownership from Americans. If we don't own anything, we won't have any access to holding on to our properties, businesses, or other assets. The government will be in a position to take it all eventually. They've already taken most of our rights and now they want our goods. We must NOW allow this to happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 09/27/2008
- neo1 I'm a Fan of neo1 3 fans permalink

We must NOT allow this to happen....­..........­..........­.is what I meant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 09/27/2008
- yappnmutt I'm a Fan of yappnmutt 70 fans permalink

two thoughts.

what the treasury wants to do can be done with a coupla accounting rules changes(mark to market is a good idea. the present charade could have gone on for a lot longer without it.) . there are certainly enough creative accounting theorists that could devise a way for all this bad debt to be accounted for in a way that does not damage balance sheets like a bomb blast.

whatever the solution congress chooses the root problem will not be affected. consumer credit has been squeezed to the bone. commercial credit has contracted. the problem still remains the dropping amount of available credit. trillions of dollars have been removed from the market. an adjustment has to be made. nothing can really stop the inevitable but they will try mightily.

self interest is the guiding principle of economics. if you think paulson, bush, bernanke, congress or wall street have your interests in mind you would be mistaken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 09/27/2008
- noneIn2008 I'm a Fan of noneIn2008 27 fans permalink

Let's have transparency of Congress. Post the bill on the internet. Put the discussions on CSPAN. Let us see all the special deals being cut for Congress's special interests.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 09/27/2008
- neo1 I'm a Fan of neo1 3 fans permalink

Yes, why can we see what this deal is all about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 09/27/2008

I am not so concerned about the investors and bankers who tried their hand at the crap table. Let them write-down the value if they must, maybe they will learn from these mistakes and review their mortgage applications closer in the future. Buying up the mortgages is not going to give investors the confidence people think it will. Confedence and a strong dollar will come when someone from the government steps up and says No! (Economics 101).

Finally, I found it interesting that when my wife and I applied for a mortgage with a prominent bank last year, with A plus credit, 25% down, excellent loan to value, 2 professional incomes, they tried to convince us to switch from a 15 year fixed, low interest mortgage to a 15 year fixed on 75% of the mortagage and taking the remaining 25% in the form of a adjustible rate mortgage. I guess the commission on the ARM was going to be higher. I stuck with the 15 Fixed for 100%.


Back to my checkbook!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 09/27/2008
- lechatnoir I'm a Fan of lechatnoir 7 fans permalink

a fascinating read about the bailout heist:

http://tinyurl.com/53dkxx

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 09/27/2008

Frank Partnoy's Op-Ed article in the NYT today is exactly right: The Feds should only buyout the loans made to homeowners, not the derivatives and CDS products. Buying out the latter only helps the rich risk takers who have made fortunes on what is nothing more than unregulated gambling. Biying out the former stabilizes house prices and allows people to stay in their homes.

The original proposal would have given Paulson unfettered power to bail out his former cronies with no assurance at all that the taxpayers money would be put back into our economy to solve the emerging credit crisis. Conservative House Republicans were right to oppose this proposal. We need action to solve this crisis but bailing out billionaires solves nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 09/27/2008
- ssg13565 I'm a Fan of ssg13565 27 fans permalink

The 100 to 1 protest that the Congresspeople are getting from their constituents is probably about the original Paulson proposal. This proposal was off the table after the first 5 minutes of the hearings in Congress. Why are we still even talking about Paulson's original proposal?

The adjustable rate mortgages were packaged and sold as Collateralized Debt Obligations to investors including banks. If the mortgages are converted to low, fixed-interest, 40 year mortgages, they will not provide the high returns that the investors assumed when they bought the CDOs. This means that the investments will be worth a lot less than they were originally. This means that investors who bought them, including banks, will have to write-down the value of these investments. This means the Banks will have to raise more capital to make up for the loss. The current crisis is exactly about the inability of banks to raise more capital because investors have lost interest in banks that are hemorrhaging losses.

The only way that these mortgages can be rewritten and still avoid the financial panic is for the government to buy them and then rewrite them. If somebody who fully understands all the interactions between investors, banks, and mortgagees can suggest another way, I would be all ears.

I am not so interested in hearing from people who think that being able to maintain a checkbook makes them economic and investing experts. I don't even claim to be an expert.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 09/27/2008
- JBS I'm a Fan of JBS 17 fans permalink
photo

It may have started out against the Paulson proposal, but overall opposition to ANY Wall Street bailout is gaining strength as people begin to understand just what it means.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 09/27/2008

QUESTION: Where are tey going to get the 700B?

ANSWER: They are going to print it and the more dollars out on the street, the less each is worth (supply & demand) and since each dollar is worth less, the cost of goods go up, up and AWAY (inflation). So if you are thinking, the 700B bailout will save my 150k 401(k), by the time it is all over, your $150k will have the spending power of $50k......­.not so good.

If congress borrows the 700B from another nation, and the loan is to be paid back in dollars, we will just print more .... same result. If we have to pay back in another currency, that's like signing a adjustable rate mortgage without a fixed rate in sight. The same kind of loan that got us into this mess to begin with.

Have you heard about the Super Model who had her U.S. contract payable in the Euros? Not good!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 09/27/2008
- nellie I'm a Fan of nellie 492 fans permalink
photo

On Friday, Cenk Uygur at The Young Turks read a list of 200 economists from top universities who think this whole bailout idea is going to do more harm to the economy than good. Pair that with the impression that Democrats are supporting the president when Republicans are not, and it seems to me that Dems need to rethink this panic mode they're in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 09/27/2008
- jdw1981 I'm a Fan of jdw1981 44 fans permalink
photo

Further proof that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are collaborators. Neither of them is on our side.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 AM on 09/27/2008

Pelosi is a traitor to the American people. Democrat and Republican is just window-dressing to the New World Order.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 09/27/2008
- bayside I'm a Fan of bayside 38 fans permalink
photo

Or..1. Repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Takes about five
minutes to write the statute. This would provide an instant end to the
$9 trillion dollar U.S. debt currently owed to the Fed for borrowing
our own money that they merely print (that's what the Act actually
says). What, you actually thought the country owed $9 trillion to
China for making trinkets? Think again. the Fed buys most of the
Treasury notes that we have to repay - and they use new money hot off
the presses at a cost to them of 4 cents per bill. How do YOU think
the country might fare if $9 trillion in debt were wiped out
overnight? Would we be flowing in new capital? Our own capital? Rather
than the banking cartels flowing in our capital?
.
v - End the vile satanic Internal Revenue Service scam that has
literally destroyed the lives of hundreds of thousands of honest
Americans and transferred the wealth of a nation to a private banking
cartel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 09/27/2008
- neo1 I'm a Fan of neo1 3 fans permalink

Amen and shout it from every rooftop so people will hear you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 09/27/2008
- lechatnoir I'm a Fan of lechatnoir 7 fans permalink

If all the 'new financial instruments' are now worthless, who is gonna say how much the taxpayers get to pay for them and more importantly, just how exactly?

Why do the bankers get to save their butts while Joe Sixpack and family are forced to flee their fraudulent mortgage deals?

Frank and Pelosi hand in hand with the Decider...­can it be anymore obvious?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 09/27/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect