EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Bailout Package Fails As Dow Plunges


First Posted: 09-29-08 02:16 PM   |   Updated: 10-30-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Plunge
?>

In an extraordinary gamble on the future of the global economy, the House of Representatives voted down the $700 billion Wall Street bill 205-228, as Republicans defied their president, their presidential nominee and the congressional leadership to vote nearly two to one against the measure described as crucial to the prevention of an economic collapse.

As the vote progressed, the Dow steadily dropped, reaching a 700-point decline at its mid-day nadir. Television coverage of the vote was frantic, with a split-screen showing a graphic of plunging stocks paired with a chart showing the steadily growing number of 'no' votes. All members of the House, equipped with Blackberries, were fully aware of the market trends driven by their balloting.

Almost every Representative was present during the roll call. Democratic leaders huddled with members, desperately trying to persuade defectors to change their votes. Republican leaders, in contrast, appeared resigned to the overwhelming opposition in their caucus.

As the vote progressed, and as the possibility of rejection became probable and then certain, there was a hush on the floor as the normally boisterous members realized what the outcome would be. Minutes passed, with the 15 minutes allotted to the roll call technically over, but with members given extra time to change their votes. Only one did so, and he shifted from yea to nay. No one smiled on the winning or losing side. Most looked dazed or stunned.

While the economic consequences of the vote will be determined during the coming weeks, the outcome this afternoon was a major setback to John McCain, who had backed the proposal and portrayed himself as a party leader who would help win approval for the bailout.

Chief McCain strategist Steve Schmidt said yesterday on Meet the Press, "What Senator McCain was able to do was to help bring all of the parties to the table, including the House Republicans, whose votes were needed to pass this." And this morning, McCain backer Mitt Romney told NBC that "this bill would not have been agreed to had it not been for John McCain....this is a bipartisan accomplishment, a bipartisan success. And if people want to get something done in Washington, they just watch John McCain."

Instead, members of McCain's own party voted 133 to 65 against the measure. Democrats, on the other hand, voted 140 to 95 for the bill.

In an attempt to shift blame for the defeat, House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio and Republican Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri charged that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi provoked the 'no' votes by angering Republican members with an excessively partisan floor speech. "We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," Boehner said.

House Financial Services Committee chair Barney Frank of Massachusetts, a key architect of the bill, countered that even if true, the claim amounted to an extraordinary level of personal and parochial motivation: "Because somebody hurt their feelings, they decided to punish the country."

In her speech, Pelosi did place some of the blame for the current crisis on Bush: "Today, we will act to avert this crisis, but informed by our experience of the past eight years with the failed economic leadership that has left us left incapable of meeting the challenges of the future. We choose a different path. In the new year, with a new Congress and a new president, we will break free with a failed past and take America in a New Direction to a better future."

Shortly after Boehner spoke to reporters, the McCain camp issued a statement by economic adviser Doug Holtz-Eakin similarly seeking to shift the blame to Democrats:

"From the minute John McCain suspended his campaign and arrived in Washington to address this crisis, he was attacked by the Democratic leadership: Senators Obama and Reid, Speaker Pelosi and others. Their partisan attacks were an effort to gain political advantage during a national economic crisis. By doing so, they put at risk the homes, livelihoods and savings of millions of American families. Barack Obama failed to lead, phoned it in, attacked John McCain, and refused to even say if he supported the final bill. Just before the vote, when the outcome was still in doubt, Speaker Pelosi gave a strongly worded partisan speech and poisoned the outcome. This bill failed because Barack Obama and the Democrats put politics ahead of country."

Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton countered:

"This is a moment of national crisis, and today's inaction in Congress as well as the angry and hyper-partisan statement released by the McCain campaign are exactly why the American people are disgusted with Washington. Now is the time for Democrats and Republicans to join together and act in a way that prevents an economic catastrophe. Every American should be outraged that an era of greed and irresponsibility on Wall Street and Washington has led us to this point, but now that we are here, the stability of our entire economy depends on us taking immediate action to ease this crisis."

There very likely will be an attempt to try to pass the bill again, although it is not clear how soon that would take place. Republican Congressman Joe Barton of Texas asked if he could move for reconsideration and if he did, how soon would it be taken up. He was told by House parliamentarians that it would be taken up immediately -- too soon for supporters to regroup -- so he put off his motion.

A House aide said no additional votes would be held in the House until after the Senate takes up the package, scheduled for Wednesday.

"What happened today cannot stand," Pelosi said after the vote. "We must move forward, and I hope that the markets will take that message."

Before the vote, President Bush issued a statement that proved to be futile.

"A vote for this bill is a vote to prevent economic damage to you and your community," Bush said, "This is a bold bill that will keep the crisis in our financial system from spreading through our economy."

Addressing the full House during the debate, Pelosi said, "I know that we will live up to our side of the bargain, I hope the Republicans will, too."

Boehner and Blunt of Missouri spoke strongly in favor of the legislation.

Leaders of the conservative opposition to the bill claimed vindication. "The American people rejected this bailout and now Congress did likewise," said Indiana Republican Rep. Mike Pence. During the debate, Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas contended that enactment of the proposal would put the country on "the slippery slope to socialism."

"The Republicans killed this," said Frank.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto declared, "Obviously we are very disappointed in the outcome... There is no question the country is facing a difficult crisis that needs to be addressed."

In an extraordinary gamble on the future of the global economy, the House of Representatives voted down the $700 billion Wall Street bill 205-228, as Republicans defied their president, their presiden...
In an extraordinary gamble on the future of the global economy, the House of Representatives voted down the $700 billion Wall Street bill 205-228, as Republicans defied their president, their presiden...
 
  • Comments
  • 3,654
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (91 total)
08:55 PM on 10/03/2008
Basically this bailout bill and a few interest rate cuts will at best postpone a train wreck in the equity markets. None the less, a train wreck is coming regardless of this infusion of funds in the short term. If panic sets in after the Fed runs out of ammunition and can not cut rates any further then we will see a crash in the stock market. If the stock market breaks down below 9500, we could test 2003 levels all over again. We are talking Dow 7500 folks. The other negative effect of this bill is that it will cause more debt burden on the tax payer and the Fed will print more money. This will in turn cause hyper-infl­ation and the dollar will crash relative to other major currencies like the euro and the yen. I am seriously worried about an economic melt down and possibly a depression­. Comment by Buck McHugh former VP of Investment­s at A.G.Edward­s and graduate of Cambridge University­'s Judge Institute of Management Studies.
08:31 AM on 09/30/2008
These are scary times. We have an economy so big and complex that it seems impossible to know whether a push on this side of the blob will cause what we want on the other side. I'm frightened by collapsing banks. History shows that to be a logical fear, not histrionic­s. BUT, how can any of us know that Poulson can solve this crisis with huge amounts of our money, actually huge amounts of further debt that we will have to pay back to China or an inflation-­provoking infusion of newly printed cash. How do we know that he will solve it and won't just shore up the special interests of the financial elites, of which he is one? This is Sophie's choice except we don't know which kid we'll keep, if either.

It looks to me (this one time) that partisan politics did not play. I hate seeing every member of one party voting for while every member on the other votes against. That means nobody is doing what they think is right. A vote that is so split in both parties COULD mean that everyone did what they think is right. We can't even look back at this after a crash and say it's because this bill didn't pass. Nobody can say that this would have averted the inevitable - if it is inevitable­.
08:19 AM on 09/30/2008
Really why should we bailout our childrens future when we caused this (this administra­tion). And they've been wrong on every major decision in the past why do we think they're right this time? Plus throw out such a huge number 700 billion - I still don't get it.
08:15 AM on 09/30/2008
How long do you have to serve in the "pending dungeon" before you're released?
08:08 AM on 09/30/2008
I just heard on Morning Joe - Erin Burnett said that Michigan getting 25 billion for the auto factories and then they voted against the 700 billion bailout. I just don't think you can compare the 2. The auto factories if they make a comeback will put a number of middle class workers back to work and it's not bailing out a bunch of CEO's golden parachutes­.

Whereas the 700 billion bailout really does nothing for the middle class but aids a bunch of Wll Street fat cats that have been filling their pockets with bonues that I couldn't make from working a lifetime in a auto factory.
08:02 AM on 09/30/2008
Over 90 democrats joined the republican­s in voting against it.
07:48 AM on 09/30/2008
How do you say the Republican­s killed it? Obviously many democrats weren't wild about it either. McCain took credit for getting the Republican­s to the table, not for getting the bill passed. The dems weren't even letting the republican­s in the room. Nancy effed this up big time, playing politics, at which she sucks.
06:49 AM on 09/30/2008
After the bail out failed, the dollar went up and interest rates went down. Both of these seem to be a good thing. Maybe the market is trhying to tell us something - letting the market work through the excesses of Wall St. by itself may be better than this stupid bail out which will cause inflation, raise interest rates, and hurt the average person.

By the way, I received an email from my bank yesterday saying my credit card credit line has been increased. What credit crunch?
08:10 AM on 09/30/2008
That's my opinion and if some backs close the govt makes up their money through the FDIC insurance. I think all the individual "bailouts" by the FDIC wouldn't come near the 700 billion they're asking for.
08:10 AM on 09/30/2008
I meant banks not back!
photo
StillMadMatt
Offending the right people is its own virtue.
06:32 AM on 09/30/2008
I hate the republican party MOST of the time. But not Yesterday.­I dont care who says what. Im just glad the bailout was opposed. And Bush has alot of questions that need to be addressed. IMPEACH BUSH!
John McGrunpy and Sarah Get Back To Ya Palin can take a flying leap back to their caves with the witchdocto­rs and moosestew.
05:54 AM on 09/30/2008
So, what's wrong that this giveaway didn't pass? If Obama was smart he'd come up with an alternate proposal..­. see a few things suggested by Dean Baker (http://www­.huffingto­npost.com/­dean-baker­/the-bailo­ut-round-i­i-adul_b_1­30418.html).

This is nothing but highway robbery foisted on us by Wall Street and turned into an emergency by the Bush administra­tion to get what the want. Democrats should not be supporting this raping of the American public and Obama should take the principled position and come up with an alternativ­e.

He'd also appeal to a lot of conservati­ve voters by opposing this fiasco.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
POTUS2008
05:51 AM on 09/30/2008
shame on democrats for being fooled by this terrible bill; it gives nothing for the tax-payer and is all about the fat cat bankers and speculator­s getting their money. we need a compromise that is a new new deal that works for the public. the so-called protection­s and such in this bill are just window dressing that really do not do what they claim they do.
05:04 AM on 09/30/2008
Would I be too snarky if I suggested Republican­s Give Same Old Whine in a New Bottle?

http://loo­misnews.wo­rdpress.co­m/2008/09/­30/republi­cans-give-­same-old-w­hine-in-a-­new-bottle­/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deepfreezevideo
Now with even MORE microbial micro-bio!
04:32 AM on 09/30/2008
If Bush forces some ridiculous Executive Order or the Congress refuses to follow the will of the people, I say it is time for a nationwide tax revolt.
photo
wolverine442
cold, calculating and compassionate
03:25 AM on 09/30/2008
Email, write or call your democrat representa­tive now!

Let Pelosi know that vacation or recess until THURSDAY is NOT an option right now!

Let us Dems step up and take ownership of the situation if the cowardly repubs cannot and will not!! we have a majority, LET'S USE IT FOR ONCE, TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT!! Let's be constructi­ve not DESTRUCTIV­E!