Bailout Fails In The House

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bailout Fails In The House stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | September 29, 2008 11:15 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., center, and House Majority Whip Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., left, leave after a news conference on the failed vote on the financial bailout package on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Sept. 29, 2008. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — In a vote that shook the government, Wall Street and markets around the world, the House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation's financial system, leaving both parties' lawmakers and the Bush administration scrambling to pick up the pieces. Dismayed investors sent the Dow Jones industrials plunging 777 points, the most ever for a single day.

"We need to put something back together that works," a grim-faced Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said after he and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke joined in an emergency strategy session at the White House. On Capitol Hill, Democratic leaders said the House would reconvene Thursday, leaving open the possibility that it could salvage a reworked version.

Senate leaders showed no inclination to try to bring the measure to a vote before they could determine its fate in the House. President Bush, meanwhile, was scheduled to make a statement on the rescue plan Tuesday morning, the White House said.

All sides agreed the effort to bolster beleaguered financial markets, potentially the biggest government intervention since the Great Depression, could not be abandoned.

But in a remarkable display on Monday, a majority of House members slapped aside the best version their leaders and the administration had been able to come up with, bucking presidential speeches, pleading visits from Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and urgent warnings that the economy could nosedive without the legislation.

In the face of thousands of phone calls and e-mails fiercely opposing the measure, many lawmakers were not willing to take the political risk of voting for it just five weeks before the elections.

The bill went down, 228-205.

The House Web site was overwhelmed as millions of people sought information about the measure through the day.

Story continues below
advertisement

The legislation the administration promoted would have allowed the government to buy bad mortgages and other sour assets held by troubled banks and other financial institutions. Getting those debts off their books should bolster those companies' balance sheets, making them more inclined to lend and ease one of the biggest choke points in a national credit crisis. If the plan worked, the thinking went, it would help lift a major weight off the national economy, which is already sputtering.

Hoping to pick up enough GOP votes for the next try, Republicans floated several ideas. One would double the $100,000 ceiling on federal deposit insurance. Another would end rules that require companies to devalue assets on their books to reflect the price they could get in the market.

In the meantime, Paulson said he would work with other regulators "to use all the tools available to protect our financial system and our economy."

"Our tool kit is substantial but insufficient," he said, indicating the government intended to continue piecemeal fixes while pressing Congress for broader action.

Stocks started plummeting on Wall Street even before Monday's vote was over, as traders watched the rescue measure going down on television. Meanwhile, lawmakers were watching them back.

As a digital screen in the House chamber recorded a cascade of "no" votes against the bailout, Democratic Rep. Joe Crowley of New York shouted news of the falling Dow Jones industrials. "Six hundred points!" he yelled, jabbing his thumb downward.

The final stock carnage far surpassed the 684-point drop on the first trading day after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

In the House, "no" votes came from both the Democratic and Republican sides of the aisle. More than two-thirds of Republicans and 40 percent of Democrats opposed the bill. Several Democrats in close election fights waited until the last moment, then went against the bill as it became clear the vast majority of Republicans were opposing it.

Thirteen of the 19 most vulnerable Republicans and Democrats in an Associated Press analysis voted against the bill despite the pleas from Bush and their party leaders to pass it.

In all, 65 Republicans joined 140 Democrats in voting "yes," while 133 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted "no."

The overriding question was what to do next.

"The legislation may have failed; the crisis is still with us," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a news conference after the defeat. "What happened today cannot stand."

Republican leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, the minority leader, said he and other Republicans were pained to back the measure, but in light of the potential consequences for the economy and all Americans, "We need to renew our efforts to find a solution that Congress can support."

Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., said there was scant time to reopen legislation that was the product of hard-fought bipartisan negotiations.

"What happened today was not a failure of a bill, it was a failure of will," said Dodd, the Banking Committee chairman. "Our hope is that cooler heads will prevail, people will think about what they did today and recognize that this is not just scare tactics _ it's reality."

A brutal round of partisan finger-pointing followed the vote.

Republicans blamed Pelosi's scathing speech near the close of the debate _ which assailed Bush's economic policies and a "right-wing ideology of anything goes, no supervision, no discipline, no regulation" of financial markets _ for the defeat. It was not much different from her usual tough words against the president and his party.

"We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," Boehner said.

Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the whip, estimated that Pelosi's speech changed the minds of a dozen Republicans who might otherwise have supported the plan.

That amounted to an appalling accusation by Republicans against Republicans, said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services Committee: "Because somebody hurt their feelings, they decide to punish the country."

More than a repudiation of Democrats, Frank said, Republicans' refusal to vote for the bailout was a rejection of their own president.

Indeed, many GOP lawmakers spurned Bush's urgent calls for action. "We have a gun to our head," said Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, R-Fla., who opposed the bill. "This isn't legislation _ it's extortion."

The two men campaigning to replace Bush watched the situation closely _ from afar _ and demanded action.

In Iowa, Republican John McCain said his rival Barack Obama and congressional Democrats "infused unnecessary partisanship into the process. Now is not the time to fix the blame; it's time to fix the problem."

Obama said, "Democrats, Republicans, step up to the plate, get it done."

Lawmakers were under extraordinary pressure from powerful outside groups, which gave notice they considered the legislation a "key vote" _ one they would consider when rating members of Congress.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said opponents of the bailout would pay for their stance.

"Make no mistake: When the aftermath of congressional inaction becomes clear, Americans will not tolerate those who stood by and let the calamity happen," said R. Bruce Josten, the Chamber's top lobbyist, in a letter to members.

The conservative Club for Growth made a similar threat to supporters of the bailout.

"We're all worried about losing our jobs," Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declared in an impassioned speech in support of the bill before the vote. "Most of us say, 'I want this thing to pass, but I want you to vote for it _ not me.'"

"We're in this moment, and if we fail to do the right thing, Heaven help us," he said.

If Congress doesn't come around on a bailout, more pressure would fall on the Federal Reserve.

The Fed, which has been providing billions in short-term loans to squeezed banks to help them overcome credit stresses, could keep expanding those loans to encourage lending. And, it could keep working with other central banks to inject billions into financial markets overseas.

It also has the power to expand emergency lending to other types of companies and even to individuals if they are unable to secure adequate credit.

___

Associated Press writers Jeannine Aversa, Jim Abrams and Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — In a vote that shook the government, Wall Street and markets around the world, the House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation's financial system, leavin...
WASHINGTON — In a vote that shook the government, Wall Street and markets around the world, the House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation's financial system, leavin...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1596
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (44 pages total)

The bailout is a crock, and anyone with a brain should be able to see this for what it is. It's a short term fix. It isn't going to fix what's wrong. Any of our lawmakers that vote for this bailout should be run out of town. They have used scare tactics to convinced the American public we need this. It's a social program for the wealthy. It's a d**n shame we can't foreclose on the ones that created this mess. Just go in and liquidate all of their assets. And I mean every last one of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 10/01/2008

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." Albert Einstein

We got into this mess to a large extent due to over borrowing. We will not get out of this mess by continue to over borrow. We need to get off credit like a bad drug. There will be withdrawals, but the end result will be far, far better than living lives of indebtedness and constant need for more credit. No Bailout in any form!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 09/30/2008
photo

Yesterday I felt encouraged by the Republican resistance to the Bush Administration's audacious play for 700 billion dollars with no strings attached. But today, after hearing about the bail-out's demise and the stock market tumble, I was a bit perplexed to hear right-wing talking heads claim that they did not vote for it because they were ANGRY AT PELOSI!?! What p***ys. How pathetic of me to expect candor--like, "We have had enough of this administrations inept thrashing and incompetent governing!" But noooooooooo. It's Pelosi's fault. You have got to be kidding me. How wrong of her to point out the blundering dunderheads responsible for this mess. ACCOUNTABLITY? No way. Don't expect THAT from the CORRUPTLICANS THAT WERE AT THE REIGNS OF THIS MESS.

http://stockmarketcrash08.com/?p=374

Wake up America--there is only one reason that those republicans voted against this horrid manifestation of corruption, and that is the same reason that the Democrats voted against it--because their constituents told them that they better or they’re toast!!

We have the ability to put these corrupt money-changers in their place--let's do it.

Bye-bye Corruplicans.

Obama/Biden '08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 09/30/2008
- wordvarc I'm a Fan of wordvarc 29 fans permalink

It doesn't matter. It's already done...without oversight or regulation.

w printed and pumped $630 billion into the world economy hours BEFORE the vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 09/29/2008
- buddbo1 I'm a Fan of buddbo1 16 fans permalink
photo

For all of McCains's efforts, to suspend his campaign to go to Washington in order to get Republican votes on this bailout , he only got 65 members to vote for it (133 Republicans voted against it). On the other hand 140 Democrats supported the bill (95 Democrates voted against it).
Thus, Bush nor McCain could rally their party to support the bill. The results of the fallout will be at the feet of the republicans who delivered this mess, with years of deregulations, and failures to place checks and balances. Thus, they will be left to clean it up!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 09/29/2008

“Is this the United States Congress or the Board of Directors of Goldman Sachs?” Rep. Dennis Kucinich Rejects $700 Billion Bailout

http://www.democracynow.org/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 09/29/2008

What if the bailout is done bottom up instead of top down?

The toxic mortgage packages are toxic because after all the 'slicing' and 'dicing' performed by the financial wizards and the combining into packages, no one knows what's in the package. Buying one of these packages is like buying a horse, sight unseen.

So Instead of buying toxic mortgage packages from the companies holding them, the Feds could open up a 'FEMA' type office which makes the mortgage payments for whichever defaulting homeowner applies for aid and qualifies. The Feds would then own the property instead of the toxic mortgage waste paper and could either rent it back to the defaulting homeowner or sell it later when the price recovers.

The above approach has transparency whereas buying toxic paper has none. The Feds and Congress would have a handle on the value of real property and oversight of the bailout process would work. Toxic packages have no handle.

Also the bailout would directly aid the defaulting homeowner not the financial wizards that created the problem. Voters would support such a bailout and our representatives would not be afraid to vote 'yes'.

Wall Street would get a trickle up benefit as each toxic waste began paying off again. Wall Street firms would be able to revalue their mortgage packages back to their original purchase price as money from the bailout trickles up. Then they would again have ample reserves to cover their financial activities and the credit freeze would thaw.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 09/29/2008
- wordvarc I'm a Fan of wordvarc 29 fans permalink

I like this!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 09/29/2008
photo

You're smart. I like you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 09/30/2008
- NapaNose I'm a Fan of NapaNose 6 fans permalink

"Heck of a job, Whoover!". . .yet another example of W expecting others to bail him out of his failures. Remember Harker Petroleum?. . and every other venture he has ever been involved in. Daddy's money (and Daddy's friends) buys his way in and usually the same buy his way out. . .guess some people have finally had enough. . .hope we can still save a nation, though. . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 09/29/2008
photo

ok this has become RIDICULOUS immature and adolescent!!! or how ever you spell all those words I didnt get to go to college because i wasn't a Rich Kid with a spoon stiking out of my mouth when i was born!!!!!
Republicans didnt sign the Bailout agreement Because of Something Madam speaker Said!!!??
I just seen this on TV! ARe you Kidding me you selfish A--holes The Republicans have no concern about the Middle Class and Low income families What so Ever this is Proof Positive!
That is Horrifing to even try to believe that! OMG GROW up you Bleeper Bleeperser's are talking about My Life here. My Money!! My Chidrens Money and you throw a temper tantrum now? PAAAALEASE Grow up!!!
Im telling you the White house needs to be Cleaned OUT and all new People brought in Im sick of this Shiat, I am so freaking angry right now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 09/29/2008
- Pquilson I'm a Fan of Pquilson 9 fans permalink

I would remind you that 95 Democrats voted against the bailout.
The Democrats could have passed the bill without Republicans, but, of course, did not, because if it does not work, then they could not blame the Republicans. How transparent can one get?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 09/29/2008

They ALL need to be voted out in November. Remember, WE THE PEOPLE can effect change, this is our moment! THIS IS OUR MOMENT, America.

Vote 'em all out and bring in fresh perspectives and new faces. Obviously the people we have elected are incompetent to get the people's business done.

I for one, will not vote for one incumbent, local or federal in November.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 09/29/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 25 fans permalink

--AFTER NEARLY 70 YEARS OF "FAIR MARKETS" (1931 TO 2000) AFTER THE DEPRESSION--

---------TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS AND FREE MARKETS DID US IN IN 8 YEARS------------


----------­----------­START "IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS" WEDNESDAY!­----------­---------

----------­-------EVE­N HIS OWN PARTY DOES NOT RESPECT HIM!------­----------­----

----------­-------EVE­N WALL STREET DOES NOT RESPECT HIM!------­----------­-------

-----------------HE HAS DRIVEN US INTO CHAOS AND OFF A CLIFF!----­----------­---

----------­----------­----------­INCLUDE CHENEY AND ROVE------­----------­----------­---------

HAVE LOST OVER 40% OF MY RETIREMENT TO THESE "COOKS" AND THEIR TRICKS!

McCain has suspended his campaign once!

So did Romney prior to pulling out!

So did Hillary prior to pulling out!

So the NEXT LOGICAL STEP IS FOR McCain TO GET OUT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 09/29/2008
photo

If you care about our veterans and this country of ours...

...Don't vote for John McCain.

McCain voted against our troops MANY times in the senate.

John McCain voted AGAINST 20 million dollars for veteran care facilities.

John McCain voted AGAINST $322 million for safety equipment for our troops in Iraq.

John McCain voted AGAINST $1 billion dollars in new equipment for the National Guard.

John McCain voted AGAINST Jim Webb's G.I. Bill.

John McCain voted AGAINST $430 million for veterans outpatient care.

Barack voted FOR all of these troop support initiatives.

They deserve better than McCain.

We deserve better than McCain.

SUPPORT OUR TROOPS AND VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT

Obama VS. McCain: Who Should You Vote For?
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/matthewhencke/gG5tH5

If You Are Thinking About Voting For John McCain/Sarah Palin...
...First Ask Yourselves These Questions:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/matthewhencke/gGxVK9

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 09/29/2008
- nachtengel I'm a Fan of nachtengel 3 fans permalink
photo

We all have to remember that the republicans are not going to go quietly and this is far from over.

What these sheisters did today was setup up one hell of a check mate position for McCain to easily walk into.

Be careful what you say about today's vote, because there is no reason why it ended up this way then very good strategy. How could it have ended this way so perfectly. Pelosi gave them the scapegoat they needed. It seemed choreographed even.

What am i yamering about you ask?

This is the perfect setup for McCain to walk in on Thurdsday, when we know a resolution will magically get voted on by the Reps, and McCain cain claim to save the day.

If I was the Obama camp I would jump in now, and do the very same the very second it passes. And work out that it was Obama not McCain who got BOTH sides to come back and really nail this thing. McCain wasted his air time doing nothing and Obama has the advantage and needs to seize this now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 09/29/2008

Package that should be passed immediately by the Congress to meet the financial crisis:

1) The US treasury will back up all contracts or agreements of all US banks up to any maximum amount done by each individual bank for its previous one year period.
2) The US government will keep for its general account all profits prorated during this period.
3) All Americans will be asked to voluntarily put a cap on all their earrings prorated during this period up $250,000 per year including all emoluments as bonuses, options, and other payments; and likewise golden parachutes prorated differently per months and years outstanding.
4) To all those not volunteering #3 aforementioned, then those will be required to do the same at twice said amount.

WhatIIThink

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 09/29/2008
- arthur2008 I'm a Fan of arthur2008 5 fans permalink

John McCain is a leader?

Here is the roll call vote on the bailout from his state and Sarah's:

ALASKA
Republicans " Young, N.
ARIZONA
Democrats " Giffords, N; Grijalva, N; Mitchell, N; Pastor, N.
Republicans " Flake, N; Franks, N; Renzi, N; Shadegg, N.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 09/29/2008
- wordvarc I'm a Fan of wordvarc 29 fans permalink

Thanks for the GOP roll call in the Palin-McSame home states.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 09/29/2008
- ranchosx I'm a Fan of ranchosx 4 fans permalink

talk about party over country. They are putting the country at risk,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 09/29/2008
- bayside I'm a Fan of bayside 35 fans permalink
photo

The neo nazis are not fooling anyone but the liberal dems in congress. Blue dog dems know cons know..So how do you bring a country down so it is easily controlled ,made into slaves. 1.steal surplus of country..d­one..2.ste­al and corrupt stock market, making our money worthless giving leeway to amero..Done 3.Take our homes and make us ,pay the crooks , making the super rich richer and us very poor. Do they care, they are leaving office
Stop the bailout. , deliberate We are not told what the bailout will be used for.
If there is a bailout , restructured so that it is transparent, includes checks and balances, requires that those who profited from reckless finance speculation pay for cleaning up the mess.
We have seen panic throughout the Bush administration and it has never led to a good end. The military attack on Iraq was caused by a drum beat of war that included a massive misinformation campaign. The Patriot Act, which has severely undermined civil liberties was passed without most members of Congress even reading it. Now, this bailout is being pushed in Wall Street panic. Will this prevent irresponsible investment in the future?
The U.S. economy needs revitalization. But, a mass bailout of the financial community will not create the new economy we need. If billions are spent on bad investments it will result in there being no funding available for what is needed to create an economy

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 09/29/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (44 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect