Special Prosecutor Named To Investigate Firings Of US Attorneys

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURIE KELLMAN and MARK SHERMAN | September 29, 2008 09:36 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

In this Oct. 25, 2005 file photo, Assistant U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy speaks to reporters outside U.S. District Court in New Haven, Conn. Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed, Dannehy, a career prosecutor, to direct the probe a prosecutor Monday, Sept. 29, 2008, to pursue possible criminal charges against Republicans who were involved in the controversial firings of U.S. attorneys. (AP Photo/Bob Child, File)

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Michael Mukasey named a prosecutor Monday to investigate whether former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, other Bush administration officials or Republicans in Congress should face criminal charges in the firings of nine U.S. attorneys.

The launching of a criminal inquiry follows the recommendation of internal Justice Department investigators who concluded that, despite denials of the administration, political considerations played a part in the firings of as many as four of the federal prosecutors.

In their 358-page report, investigators said the lack of cooperation by senior officials at the White House and in the Justice Department left gaps in their findings that should be investigated further.

"Serious allegations involving potential criminal conduct have not been fully investigated or resolved," the report said, listing lying to investigators, obstruction of justice and wire fraud among the potential felony crimes.

Mukasey's appointment of Nora Dannehy, the acting U.S. attorney in Connecticut, to continue the inquiry leaves open the possibility that it won't be finished before President Bush leaves office in January.

Senators of both parties who led a congressional probe of the firings praised Mukasey's decision and cautioned Bush against pardoning anyone as he leaves the White House.

"The American people will see any misuse of the pardon power or any grant of clemency or immunity to those from his administration involved in the U.S. attorney firing scandal as an admission of wrongdoing," said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.

The report unsparingly criticized Bush administration officials, Republican members of Congress and their aides for the ousters, which touched off a scandal that stripped the Justice Department of its leadership and sparked a historic showdown in court.

Story continues below
advertisement

The report by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine and Office of Professional Responsibility Director Marshall Jarrett described Gonzales and his deputy, Paul McNulty, as "remarkably disengaged" from the process that led to the dismissal of the prosecutors.

Monday's report was the latest to criticize Gonzales' management of the Justice Department during his 31 months as attorney general. Gonzales quit under fire in September 2007.

In a statement issued by his attorney, Gonzales said: "My family and I are glad to have the investigation of my conduct in this matter behind us and we look forward to moving on to new challenges."

Gonzales' attorney, George Terwilliger, noted that the report found no unlawful conduct. "It seems rather odd," Terwilliger said, "that rather than bring the investigation to a close, the department would escalate the matter to the attention of a prosecutor."

U.S. attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president, but cannot be fired for improper reasons.

The report singled out the removal of U.S. Attorney David Iglesias in New Mexico _ one of the nine _ as the most troubling. Iglesias's firing followed complaints from leading Republican political figures in New Mexico, including Sen. Pete Domenici and Rep. Heather Wilson, about Iglesias' handling of voter fraud and public corruption cases, the report said.

Iglesias, who now works as a paid speaker and practices law part-time, said he thinks criminal investigations should be pursued against Domenici and anyone else who may have broken federal criminal laws. He said he had not yet seen the report.

"I've said all along that these moves were improper and illegal and now it appears that they were criminal as well," he said in an interview. "Our complaints weren't just complaints of disgruntled former employees."

A spokesman for Domenici, who is leaving Congress at the end of the year, did not respond to requests for comment.

Wilson, who cooperated in the internal investigation of the firings, issued a statement in which she said the report's findings were incorrect. She acknowledged contacting Iglesias about possible indictments in a New Mexico case, but she denied complaining about him to anyone in the Bush administration.

Investigators said their inquiry of the firing of Iglesias and others was hampered by the lack of cooperation from Domenici, former White House adviser Karl Rove, former White House counsel Harriet Miers, former Justice Department official Monica Goodling and other key witnesses.

The president's refusal to let Rove, Miers and White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten testify before Congress about the firings touched off a legal fight that is now before a federal appeals court. Most recently a judge ordered Miers to answer questions from the House Judiciary Committee about the firings.

The report concluded that Gonzales' chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, was the person most responsible for developing the plan to fire the prosecutors and said that Sampson's comments to Congress, the White House and others were misleading.

Sampson and others claimed at first that the prosecutors' poor performance inspired their firings. But the report found that Bud Cummins, the U.S. Attorney in Arkansas, was forced out to make way for Timothy Griffin, who had previously been Rove's deputy in the White House political office.

It also said the dismissal of Todd Graves, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, probably resulted from pressure from the office of Republican Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond. Bond was upset that Graves did not intervene in a dispute between the staffs of Bond and Republican Rep. Sam Graves, the prosecutor's brother, the report said.

A spokeswoman for Bond did not immediately return a call for comment.

Investigators found no evidence that Arizona U.S. Attorney Paul Charlton and U.S. Attorney Carol Lam of San Diego were fired for prosecuting Republican members of Congress.

Similarly, the report says Justice Department officials had legitimate concerns about the work of two other prosecutors who were fired _ Margaret Chiara of Grand Rapids, Mich., and Kevin Ryan of San Francisco.

___

On the Net:

Justice Department report: http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/new.htm

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Michael Mukasey named a prosecutor Monday to investigate whether former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, other Bush administration officials or Republicans in Con...
WASHINGTON — Attorney General Michael Mukasey named a prosecutor Monday to investigate whether former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, other Bush administration officials or Republicans in Con...
 
Comments
34
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

U.S. attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president, but cannot be fired for improper reasons,to all you who claim that a president can do as he wish.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 10/01/2008
photo

See Profile I'm not a Fan of AzRealProgressive

You are showing your lack of knowledge. Yes, any president can fire any of the US attorney types, for any reason. They serve at his pleasure. Before you read me your riot act, you should have studied some. This is a fact, all you have to do is look it up. you look like a fool stating different.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are the one showing your lack of knowledge,You are the one looking like a fool....
You are not too intelligent,please.......read below,,,,,

U.S. attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president, but cannot be fired for improper reasons

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 10/01/2008

GET Gonzales!
He lied to this country and radically changed our lives for the worst forever-
Gonzales, Goodling and the rest, need to be in jail.
No pardons, no nothing, to reduce their sentences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 09/30/2008
photo

Better late than never.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 09/30/2008

Congratulations Huffpost for getting a wonderful photograph of this POS SHILL. I have you admit, you know where to get the BEST photographs of people.

LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 09/30/2008
photo

Bush cannot initiate a pardonfest if he is not president. As mush as we have longed for prosecution of crimes we've suspected occurred, that prosecution would no doubt be thwarted by "Bushies" still within the administration and specifically within the DOJ. It would likely be best to start pulling on the loose threads after Dubya leaves office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 09/30/2008

Uh oh, It depends if the special Prosecutor is honest and able to stand up to them because the bribes, threats blackmail etc will come fast and furious ,but Its a start. Gonzalas and the whole corrupt crowd is imploding finally..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 09/30/2008
photo

Can bush pardon anybody if they have not been charged with a crime yet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 AM on 09/30/2008

Yes. Remember Gerald Ford pardoning Nixon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 09/30/2008

Yep, just like in the movies . . . ever notice how it's the minority, either the black guy or the latino, who always gets "it" first?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 AM on 09/30/2008

GruppenAttorney Gonzalez: I vasss just folowink orderz....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 AM on 09/30/2008

LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 09/30/2008
photo

I smell an impending pardon-fest. and the worse it gets for bush, although, really, how much worse can it realistically get? the wider the pardon net will be cast.

after all, what does the BIG W have to lose that'll he'll miss?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 AM on 09/30/2008
- DMcD I'm a Fan of DMcD permalink
photo

Yep, thats probably what this is all about. This might mean something if it were done in the next administration but as it is , it means nothing. I'd like to see Carol Lam (San Diego district) mentioned more , her investigations concerning the Duke Cunningham syndicate came to a screaching halt after her firing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 09/30/2008

Carol Lam went to a lucrative corporate position after being fired, didn't she? She may not be as anxious as Yglesias to get justice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 09/30/2008

If they can hold off the convictions until next president, can Bush do anything? Can he pardon them before there are any findings? What if they conclude that Bush did something wrong- can his pardons in association with this scandal be challenged?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 AM on 09/30/2008
photo

There should be a constitutional amendment on the chief executive's pardon power. It's being abused and in this case it could very well cover up damaging information that could threaten national security via the finance world and adherence to treaties. When there's no accountability the country is ruined from within. A 12 digit defense budget and our worse enemies are within.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 AM on 09/30/2008

Geeezzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!! Finally!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 AM on 09/30/2008

Crikey, it's about time. I will admit, Mukasey is a scary man, too, but the fact that he has forged ahead with this and is not intimidated by the Bush machine is comendable. This may not be over by the time that Bush leaves office, but I hope that Gonzales and all who are responsible are prosecuted. To have our right to a non-partisan judiciary jeopardized is one of the most unforgivable and sins of the Bush administration. The damage to our judiciary is hopefully not permanent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 09/30/2008

Nope. Bush had the right to fire all of them for any reason. Much like Clintin did when he fired even more for no reason. As was pointed out then, he had the power to do it. Nice red herring arguement in an election year when anything no matter how silly makes the news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 AM on 09/30/2008

It is not unusal to fire the federal prosecutors of a previous administration when a new President takes office (as Clinton and many others have), but it is UNPRESEDENTED for the sitting President to fire prosecutors during his time in office. And yes, they serve at the pleasure of the President but the federal prosecutors are not supposed to base their decision on whom to indict according to a political agenda. Just like Monica Goodling was not supposed to hire peolple at the Justice Department based on their love for George Bush. If these people were being pressured by republican operatives to bring charges against democrats to swing an election (and I do beleive that is what happened), then that is illegal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 AM on 09/30/2008

Sorry AZ, this is not Germany where the king can do anything he wants. Otherwise, the king would fire democrats and hire republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 AM on 09/30/2008

The fact that Monica Goodling can be appointed to such a high ranking position right out of law school (Jerry Falwell's school) is an embarassment.

"Name three great things about President Bush" as an AG interview question really helps weed out the incompetent attorneys responsible for prosecuting federal crimes, especially since that question would take a lot, a lot of research to attempt an answer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 09/30/2008
photo

We have placed the complete report on our site in our convenient EasySlide book format.
Loading is very fast and each page includes a highlighted link which you can copy/paste to
reference the page:
http://publicservice.evendon.com/DOJOIG-INSPM.htm

Everything on our site is free and permanent.

Don
Pittsburgh, PA
http://publicservice.evendon.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 09/30/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect