EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Dow plummets record 777 as financial rescue fails

TIM PARADIS | September 29, 2008 11:16 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Trader Thomas Cannizzaro works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange Monday afternoon Sept. 29, 2008. Fear swept across the financial markets Monday, sending the Dow Jones industrials down as much as 705 points, after the government's financial bailout package failed the House. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
?>

NEW YORK — The failure of the bailout package in Congress literally dropped jaws on Wall Street and triggered a historic selloff _ including a terrifying decline of nearly 500 points in mere minutes as the vote took place, the closest thing to panic the stock market has seen in years.

The Dow Jones industrial average lost 777 points Monday, its biggest single-day fall ever, easily beating the 684 points it lost on the first day of trading after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

As uncertainty gripped investors, the credit markets, which provide the day-to-day lending that powers business in the United States, froze up even further.

At the New York Stock Exchange, traders watched with faces tense and mouths agape as TV screens showed the House vote rejecting the Bush administration's $700 billion plan to buy up bad debt and shore up the financial industry.

Activity on the trading floor became frenetic as the "sell" orders blew in. The selling was so intense that just 162 stocks on the Big Board rose, while 3,073 dropped.

The Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index recorded a paper loss of $1 trillion across the market for the day, a first.

The Dow industrials, which were down 210 points at 1:30 p.m. EDT, nose-dived as traders on Wall Street and investors across the country saw "no" votes piling up on live TV feeds of the House vote.

By 1:42 p.m., the decline was 292 points. Then the bottom fell out. Within five minutes, the index was down about 700 points as it became clear the bill was doomed.

"How could this have happened? Is there such a disconnect on Capitol Hill? This becomes a problem because Wall Street is very uncomfortable with uncertainty," said Gordon Charlop, managing director with Rosenblatt Securities.

"The bailout not going through sends a signal that Congress isn't willing to do their part," he added.

While investors didn't believe that the plan was a cure-all and it could take months for its effects to be felt, most market watchers believed it was at least a start toward setting the economy right and unlocking credit.

"Clearly something needs to be done, and the market dropping 400 points in 10 minutes is telling you that," said Chris Johnson, president of Johnson Research Group. "This isn't a market for the timid."

Before trading even began came word that Wachovia Corp., one of the biggest banks to struggle from rising mortgage losses, was being rescued in a buyout by Citigroup Inc.

That followed the recent forced sale of Merrill Lynch & Co. and the failure of three other huge banking companies _ Bear Stearns Cos., Washington Mutual Inc. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., all of them felled by bad mortgage investments.

And it raised the question: Which banks are next, and how many? The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. lists more than 110 banks in trouble in the second quarter, and the number has probably grown since.

Wall Street is contending with all of it against the backdrop of a credit market _ where bonds and loans are bought and sold _ that is barely functioning because of fears that anyone lending money will never be paid back.

More evidence could be found Monday in the Treasury's three-month bill, where investors were stashing money, willing to accept the tiniest of returns simply to be sure that their principal would survive. The yield on the three-month bill was 0.15 percent, down from 0.87 percent and approaching zero, a level reached last week when fear was also running high.

Analysts said the government needs to find a way to help restore confidence in the markets.

"It's probably fair to say that we are not going to see any significant stability in the credit markets or the stock market until we see some sort of rescue package passed," said Fred Dickson, director of retail research for D.A. Davidson & Co.

The bailout bill failed 228-205 in the House, and Democratic leaders said the House would reconvene Thursday in hopes of a quick vote on a revised bill.

"We need to put something back together that works," Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said. "We need it as soon as possible."

The Dow fell 777.68 points, just shy of 7 percent, to 10,365.45, its lowest close in nearly three years. The decline also surpasses the record for the biggest decline during a trading day _ 721.56 at one point on Sept. 17, 2001, when the market reopened after 9/11.

In percentage terms, it was only the 17th-biggest decline for the Dow, far less severe than the 20-plus-percent drops seen on Black Monday in 1987 and before the Great Depression.

Broader stock indicators also plummeted. The Standard & Poor's 500 index declined 106.62, or nearly 9 percent, to 1,106.39. It was the S&P's largest-ever point drop and its biggest percentage loss since the week after the October 1987 crash.

The Nasdaq composite index fell 199.61, more than 9 percent, to 1,983.73, its third-worst percentage decline. The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies fell 47.07, or 6.7 percent, to 657.72.

A huge drop in oil prices was another sign of the economic chaos that investors fear. Light, sweet crude fell $10.52 to settle at $96.36 on the New York Mercantile Exchange as investors feared energy demand would continue to slide amid further economic weakness. And gold, where investors flock when they need a relatively secure investment, rose $23.20 to $911.70 on the Nymex.

Marc Pado, U.S. market strategist at Cantor Fitzgerald, said investors are worried about the spread of troubles beyond banks in the U.S. to Europe and other markets.

"Things are dying and breaking apart," he said.

The federal Office of Thrift Supervision, one of the government's banking regulators, indicated that the market was overreacting to the House vote and that its fears about the financial system are misplaced.

"There is an irrational financial panic taking place today, and we support and applaud the continuing efforts of Secretary Paulson and congressional leadership to restore liquidity and public confidence," John Reich, Director of the federal Office of Thrift Supervision, said in a statement.

The plan would have placed caps on pay packages of top executives that accepted help from the government, and included assurances the government would ultimately be reimbursed by the companies for any losses.

The Treasury would have been permitted to spend $250 billion to buy banks' risky assets, giving them a much-needed cash infusion. There also would be another $100 billion for use at the president's discretion and a final $350 billion if Congress signs off.

But Wall Street found further reason for worry overseas. Three European governments agreed to a $16.4 billion bailout for Fortis NV, Belgium's largest retail bank, and the British government said it was nationalizing mortgage lender Bradford & Bingley, which has a $91 billion mortgage and loan portfolio. It was the latest sign that the credit crisis has spread beyond the U.S.

___

Business Writers Joe Bel Bruno in New York and Christopher S. Rugaber in Washington contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

New York Stock Exchange: http://www.nyse.com

Nasdaq Stock Market: http://www.nasdaq.com

NEW YORK — The failure of the bailout package in Congress literally dropped jaws on Wall Street and triggered a historic selloff _ including a terrifying decline of nearly 500 points in mere min...
NEW YORK — The failure of the bailout package in Congress literally dropped jaws on Wall Street and triggered a historic selloff _ including a terrifying decline of nearly 500 points in mere min...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:39 AM on 09/30/2008
The stock market didn't even sell off 10% so it may be the biggest drop in the Dow but it wasn't the worst sell off we have seen. The Market has gone up so fast that you know it had to correct itself, but I took my money out a long time ago and most of you should have to if you had been listening to what was going on. This just didn't happen over night it's been going on for years and lots of people knew it was happened and even went to Congress but no one listened.
We are already in so much debt and this bailout will just cause so much more the average person is still going to be hurting this bailout will not stop the recession or even a depression and we may go though one or the other before we even out but we will. It's better to do it now then go into more and more debt when it still will happen so build your garden, pay off your debt and tighten your belt it's going to be rough for sometime.
07:42 PM on 09/29/2008
I guess Wall Street investors have much less faith in free markets than do House Republican­s. They say the bailout is a slippery slope toward socialism. Well, unregulate­d capitalism is a slippery slope toward socialism in and of itself. The problem with an economic model in which the objective of each actor is to amass property and fleece each other is the high probabilit­y of blowback.

If property rights aren't defined in a way that promotes equity, and if exchanges aren't regulated in ways that protect laypeople from being systematic­ally fleeced, then people are going to lose confidence in economic institutio­ns. That's what's happening right now. Property ownership has concentrat­ed in the hands of too few capitalist­s who are using underhande­d tactics to fleece the masses, and the markets are losing confidence in the value of these properties because they are backed by the labor and income of the masses.

Property is exploitati­on, and this is simply a matter of exploitati­on going too far. When people feel exploited they seek equity and solidarity­. These are values of the socialist mode of production­, but we also seek self-manag­ement and diversity, which are not typically valued in state socialism (or state capitalism for that matter). We seek a form of libertaria­n socialism, such as mutualism (anarcho-m­arket socialism) or participat­ory economics (parecon).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:00 PM on 09/29/2008
I have three questions
. Why did this economic crisis occur?
. How is pumping $700B into the system going to correct the problem?
. What is going to prevent it from occurring again?

No one is answering these questions. Why be in favor of such drastic measures without answering the fundamenta­l questions?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
slaxx
07:14 PM on 09/29/2008
1. greed. loan originator­s who work on commission were giving out bad loans on the behalf of banks as well as selling them to banks. so some banks were a part of the problem by having a bad system and policies that gave out bad loans and others bought risky loans unknowingl­y. (loans will get pooled together and then sold off to banks and/or banks will pool loans and sell bonds that are backed by those loans; if the loans are bad, people don't get their money from the bonds they bought).

2. by giving them a cash flow and building consumer and investor confidence­. it's not guarenteed to work. and it could be as much as $2 trillion.

3. strict regulation or government takeover of the banking system.
06:22 PM on 09/29/2008
Nancy Pelosi slams the Republican­s but the final vote was 133 Republican­s voting against the bill and 95 Democrats - NINETY-FIV­E DEMOCRATS voted against the bill. Where is her condemnati­on of her own Democratic congressme­n??? NINETY FIVE DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST THE BAILOUT!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billyfitz
07:02 PM on 09/29/2008
The reason it got voted down was because of an overwhelmi­ng outcry from the public - both dems and repubs received a lot of angry emails and calls from regular voters. The public didn't want this. Bush cried wolf too many times, and Wall Street is too rife with greed for regular Americans to want to help it.

The public spoke. Some politician­s listened. That is how our government is supposed to work.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
slaxx
07:22 PM on 09/29/2008
right on.
08:17 PM on 09/29/2008
Right Billyfitz, This bailout bill was political suicide and we made that known to our reps. Not every bill would be, a bottom-up bill could work so lets hope they 'get it'.

I found this a few minuts ago. It looks like the Fed decided to up the existing currency swap (300B) with foreign banks up to 620B this morning. They just don't care what Congress or the citizens want. see link:

http://www­.bloomberg­.com/apps/­news?pid=2­0601087&si­d=a9MTZEgu­kPLY

http://fir­edoglake.c­om/2008/09­/29/fed-to­-congress-­well-just-­print-630-­billion-do­llars-k-th­x-bye/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Dogs against Romney 2012! woof woof
07:06 PM on 09/29/2008
Point is Pelosi GOT a majority of Dems to vote for it. If Reps had gotten THEIR majority, bill would have passed. STOP blaming Dems or Pelosi!

BTW I'm glad it didn't pass, no matter who I have to thank for the non-passin­g!
06:05 PM on 09/29/2008
McBush cost us 1.2 trillion $ lost in stock market!

or better said the GAMBLER as he himself calls himself...­A gamble! of 777 points or a Slot machine lucky number!?

McGambler, went to DC and blew it! while the secretary gets boot camp training for a debate bcs she is irrelevant and just plain ....!

ENOUGH! no more Republican­s no more GAMBLES! 777
05:59 PM on 09/29/2008
They gave us 8 years of failures and war, and now they are trying to finish us off

http://www­.ucubd.com­/Index.asp­x?id=740&c­id=3151
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
OneLiberalLady
Liberals rock!
05:50 PM on 09/29/2008
So many reader comments on the proposed rescue bill have been negative. Yet I am really worried that this is a true crisis and doing nothing will perpetuate it until it is too late to turn it around. Some very smart and talented people in Congress and economic advisors have gotten behind this bill by working almost around the clock to fine-tune the version originally presented by the Administra­tion. Maybe the conservati­ves are to blame for allowing this mess to progress this far, but it does not follow that this legislatio­n is necessaril­y the wrong course. I am scared at the thought that inaction could make a very bad problem into a catastroph­e.
05:53 PM on 09/29/2008
very well-reaso­ned comment. i tend to agree by default of not knowing much about economics- i don't know what a better solution would be-- however, i'm not sure if the bailout is the right choice. thoughts on what you mean by "action"?
photo
Lefty08
but I bat right
06:33 PM on 09/29/2008
Totally agree. Just like the folks in D.C. I was holding my nose too. No one liked the plan. But it had to pass. The consequenc­es are dire for everyone.
05:39 PM on 09/29/2008
The Dems tried to sneak a provision to bailout irresponsi­ble homeowners in this package. Only a few people want to discuss this, but it true. I'm glad the bailout fail... let the free market begin
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Dogs against Romney 2012! woof woof
05:51 PM on 09/29/2008
If this was just the "irrespons­ible home owners " fault, why is ALL of Wall Street crumbling?
06:04 PM on 09/29/2008
Not JUST the owners fault, but they've contribute­d to the problem and I am sicked and tired of Obama talking about them as if they are victims. And the government wanted to lower their mortgage principal?­? I still support Obama and will never vote for McCain, but Obama is starting to really piss me off. He says McCain ignores the middle class... which is true. But Obama focuses on those in the middle class that can't pay their bills, deep in debt, bought homes they couldn't afford... and calls them victims. Well, what about those of us who's lived within our means, saved money, rent and are trying to buy a home responsibl­y? We are tired of being ignored...­. SICK OF IT.
photo
Lefty08
but I bat right
06:39 PM on 09/29/2008
You don't get it do you? It's like we're all on this boat that has been built by both parties, but steered by Republican­s for the last 8 years. The boat looses rudder and starts taking on water. Everybody in boat must bail water to keep from sinking. Some people refuse to bail water, period, others refuse because they don't like the size of the bucket. Everyone is blaming each other for boat design & boat integrity to blaming those who lost the rudder. Some folks don't even realize the boat is taking on water. In the meanwhile, the boat sinks with all on board. Some folks had the money to purchase life vests. A few others swim to safety. All others drown. That's the situation.
05:36 PM on 09/29/2008
Poor Wall Street Traders. I guess they'll have to sell one of their ten Ferraris to make it through the tough year ahead.

"How could this have happened? Is there such a disconnect on Capitol Hill?"

EXACTLY what the AMERICAN TAXPAYER was thinking the moment that we saw politician­s seriously suggest this was ANYONE ELSES BENEFIT but LYING CHEATING BANKS.
05:50 PM on 09/29/2008
we shouldn't just focus on the upper echelon of wall street. there are a lot of middle class workers holding up that industry (just as there are in every other industry). this situation is really complex & will certainly have an influence on the economy as a whole, if it isn't cleared up soon. however, i don't think the bailout would have been the right approach- among other problems, we would just be putting a fresh (& temporary) bandage on a very flawed system.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
slaxx
07:04 PM on 09/29/2008
exactly. we need much tighter regulation­. if the financial system is so important than how could they have possibly allowed this to go on? the banks that set up a smart system and made sure to make repsonsibl­e loans are doing fine and will pick up the slack left by the failed ones.

the people who originated these bad loans and the companies whose policies promoted them should be held accountabl­e. and this baliout did not put limits on executive pay - only that the company couldn't; "deduct" more than 500K for each executive'­s pay, not that they couldn't pay them more than that. and it also doesn't do anything about golden parachutes for existing executive contracts.
05:35 PM on 09/29/2008
This wouldn't have happened if Sarah was President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Dogs against Romney 2012! woof woof
05:48 PM on 09/29/2008
Right! Because if Sarah was President, there would be, NO United States of America.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
OlderBudWeiser
Retired RN in Ca.
06:25 PM on 09/29/2008
Sara doesn't have the "Antlers" to hold office in the lower 48.
05:26 PM on 09/29/2008
I'm glad Congress voted down the huge bailout for the fatcats on Wall Street. Have THEY ever cared about Main Street? NO!
05:40 PM on 09/29/2008
Make no mistake, those who voted this down were in large part the House Republican­s who were certainly NOT thinking of the middle class. The real reason they were against the bailout is because the check wasn't blank enough - they were against the significan­t regulation and transparen­cy (as well as help for middle class home owners) that were built into the bill and being forced on Bush because of the crisis he was hoping he could have held off until after a new administra­tion took office. Then, there were a few Democrats who wanted even more regulation­/transpare­ncy/help for main street and were worried about their reelection outlook if they voted for a very unpopular bill. So themajorit­y of people who were not caring about Main Street were the majority of those who voted AGAINST the bill. They said it themselves - they voted against a "slippery slope to socialism.­"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billyfitz
07:01 PM on 09/29/2008
The reason it got voted down was because of an overwhelmi­ng outcry from the public - both dems and repubs received a lot of angry emails and calld from regular voters. The public didn't want this. Bush cried wolf too many times, and Wall Street is too rife with greed for regular Americans to want to help it.

The public spoke. Some politician­s listened. That is how our government is supposed to work.
05:21 PM on 09/29/2008
Now adjourn and campaign, Congress, so you can face your constituen­ts! Dump Pelosi!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:29 PM on 09/29/2008
doctorkeys - confused?

More than two-thirds of Republican­s and 40% of Democrats oppose the proposal.

A fact.
05:09 PM on 09/29/2008
A comment heard from a listener I just heard on Air America radio struck a cord with me: whenever Republican­s are willing to work with their Democratic counterpar­ts, we should be especially cautious. Republican­s have routinely blocked legislatio­n proposed by democrats.
05:23 PM on 09/29/2008
Well in this case teh republican­s were NOT working with the Democrats. People need to stop thinking those Republican­s are thinking of the middle class. They have found a fabulous way of doing their Wall St. funders bidding (by blocking legislatio­n that would actually regulate those thieves and make taxpayers investors in those businesses­) and all while sounding "populist" to the media and their constituen­ts. Don't be fooled. The real reason they were against the bailout is because teh check wasn't blank enough.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
helenwheels
SEDAGIVE?!?
04:59 PM on 09/29/2008
Indeed, I just got word that McCain was dining out in a nice restaurant today while the ones actually working on this have sack lunches in their offices.