Blind Activists Plan Protest Of Julianne Moore Movie

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Blind Activists Plan Protest Of Julianne Moore Movie stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN NUCKOLS | September 30, 2008 07:28 PM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this image released by Miramax Pictures, Julianne Moore, right, and Mark Ruffalo are shown in a scene from "Blindness." (AP Photo/Miramax Films, Ken Woroner)

BALTIMORE — Blind people quarantined in a mental asylum, attacking each other, soiling themselves, trading sex for food. For Marc Maurer, who's blind, such a scenario _ as shown in the movie "Blindness" _ is not a clever allegory for a breakdown in society.

Instead, it's an offensive and chilling depiction that Maurer fears could undermine efforts to integrate blind people into the mainstream.

"The movie portrays blind people as monsters, and I believe it to be a lie," said Maurer, president of the Baltimore-based National Federation of the Blind. "Blindness doesn't turn decent people into monsters."

The organization plans to protest the movie, released by Miramax Films, at 75 theaters around the country when it's released Friday. Blind people and their allies will hand out fliers and carry signs. Among the slogans: "I'm not an actor. But I play a blind person in real life."

The movie reinforces inaccurate stereotypes, including that the blind cannot care for themselves and are perpetually disoriented, according to the NFB.

"We face a 70 percent unemployment rate and other social problems because people don't think we can do anything, and this movie is not going to help _ at all," said Christopher Danielsen, a spokesman for the organization.

"Blindness" director Fernando Meirelles, an Academy Award nominee for "City of God," was shooting on location Thursday and unavailable for comment, according to Miramax. The studio released a statement that read, in part, "We are saddened to learn that the National Federation of the Blind plans to protest the film `Blindness.'"

The NFB began planning the protests after seven staffers, including Danielsen, attended a screening of the movie in Baltimore last week. The group included three sighted employees.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Everybody was offended," Danielsen said.

Based on the 1995 novel by Nobel Prize winner Jose Saramago, "Blindness" imagines a mysterious epidemic that causes people to see nothing but fuzzy white light _ resulting in a collapse of the social order in an unnamed city. Julianne Moore stars as the wife of an eye doctor (Mark Ruffalo) who loses his sight; she feigns blindness to stay with her husband and eventually leads a revolt of the quarantined patients.

The book was praised for its use of blindness as a metaphor for the lack of clear communication and respect for human dignity in modern society.

Miramax said in its statement that Meirelles had "worked diligently to preserve the intent and resonance of the acclaimed book," which it described as "a courageous parable about the triumph of the human spirit when civilization breaks down."

Maurer will have none of it.

"I think that failing to understand each other is a significant problem," he said. "I think that portraying it as associated with blindness is just incorrect."

The protest will include pickets at theaters in at least 21 states, some with dozens of participants, timed to coincide with evening showtimes. Maurer said it would be the largest protest in the 68-year history of the NFB, which has 50,000 members and works to improve blind people's lives through advocacy, education and other ways.

The film was the opening-night entry at the Cannes Film Festival, where many critics were unimpressed.

After Cannes, Meirelles retooled the film, removing a voice-over that some critics felt spelled out its themes too explicitly.

Meirelles told The Associated Press at Cannes that the film draws parallels to such disasters as Hurricane Katrina, the global food shortage and the cyclone in Myanmar.

"There are different kinds of blindness. There's 2 billion people that are starving in the world," Meirelles said. "This is happening. It doesn't need a catastrophe. It's happening, and because there isn't an event like Katrina, we don't see."

___

Miramax is a division of The Walt Disney Co.

BALTIMORE — Blind people quarantined in a mental asylum, attacking each other, soiling themselves, trading sex for food. For Marc Maurer, who's blind, such a scenario _ as shown in the movie "Bl...
BALTIMORE — Blind people quarantined in a mental asylum, attacking each other, soiling themselves, trading sex for food. For Marc Maurer, who's blind, such a scenario _ as shown in the movie "Bl...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
112
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- Mattie I'm a Fan of Mattie 48 fans permalink

for the love of god, just make it stop! This is absurd!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 10/01/2008
- jules23 I'm a Fan of jules23 14 fans permalink

Blindness and sight has been a metaphor in art and writing for a very long time. I don't think this is because of some agenda to keep the blind man down, but because sight is such a significant factor in terms of how most people see the world. Therefor saying "I see", means "I understand". If someone says "I see", are they being prejudice against blind people? If we are going to try to purge all these kinds of metaphors from the english language, we are going to end up with art that is very very bad, and language similar to Newspeak in "1984". We will also expend a lot of energy on battles, that I'm not sure need to be fought.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 10/01/2008
- maca I'm a Fan of maca 20 fans permalink

Folks, this movie isn't about blind people as they function in society today; it's about a plague that strikes EVERY person suddenly blind, so there's no one around who can help you, or even explain what's happening, because they're blind, too. Of course there would be utter chaos, and of course people would be going nuts trying to survive. I've done a lot of work with a local organization for the blind, so I'm probably as supportive of their challenges as any sighted person could be. But to condemn this movie as making some kind of "blind people are crazy" statement is absurd. The movie isn't saying blind people are crazy; it's saying people in any absolute panic situation could go crazy and fight like animals to survive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 10/01/2008

maca - I agree with you and I really wish NFB would not have let this movie become so personal to their cause. I realize that "blindness en masse" is being used as a metaphor but I am also excited at the prospect of the general (viewing) public stopping and really asking themselves "what if?". My husband has been through simulation and it created such a depth of understanding ... now we can BOTH laugh when I think I'm setting the coffee cup on the counter and, instead, it crashes to the floor. Maybe I'll be disappointed in the details of how blindness is portrayed in this movie, but at least people are talking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 10/01/2008
- TheBlackCat I'm a Fan of TheBlackCat 249 fans permalink
photo

Exactly!! This movie is based off a NOBEL PRIZE winning book, Blindness, by Jose Saramago and is a compelling and metaphorical look at a societal breakdown. The NFB are reaching for something that is just not there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 10/01/2008

Come on people. There was no conspiracy against blind people in making this movie. There was no intention to portray blind folks as being monsters, or inhuman.

There IS, however, intention to portray people that can see that are suddenly afflicted with a disease, en masse, that causes EVERYONE to go blind as being monsters and inhuman.

I don't know about you, but if myself and the majority of those around me could see, and suddnely NONE of us could...yeah, I would go crazy too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 10/01/2008

I am a legally blind person (Retinis Pigmentosa, simply put - degenerative tunnel-vision) and I have been anxiously waiting for this movie to be released BECAUSE of the attention it would draw from normal-sighted people. I welcome people to consider how devastating the loss of sight would be to every teeny little detail of their survival.

I was really surprised to read that NFB took this stance and I made my phone calls to the National office as well as my local Commission for the Blind to let them know a different perspective ... Namely, that "we" want people to know how it would be to suddenly go blind. It's what every one of us blind people have gone through the moment we were told this is our situation.

For all those making jokes ... just know that they hurt. I've spent 18 years (so far) losing my sight and learning how to substitute just to get along. Yes, we can go to movies. There are provisions for having the film (or theater for that matter) described in great detail. Personally, going into public is more hassle than it's worth. People you have no idea ...

Anyway, I have great hope that the publicity will cause even more people to see the movie and then REALLY SEE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 10/01/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 63 fans permalink

Good for you and good luck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 10/01/2008

Perhaps a major point in their protest was to counter the tragic view of blindness that many, including yourself, hold. Blindness doesn't need to be a tragedy; plenty of blind people live perfectly normal and satisfying lives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 10/01/2008

GoodbyeBlueMonday - Thanks for your response. Though I find it presumptuous, you know what? You are right. I do think my blindness is a tragedy. I know what I've had to sacrifice because of it AND I know what I've accomplished in spite of it. Look up the word. No where does it include self-pity as you've implied. I never said that life is unsatisfying and I challenge your comment "live perfectly normal" with blindness, That's laughable. I've lived "perfectly normal" and this is not it.

The news of NFB's protest doesn't seem to be eliciting a counter view of blindness. IMO, it would be more effective to use the movie as an opportunity to educate people or at least garner empathy and/or curiosity for how it really is living in THIS society sans vision?

I "presume" you have your vision -- OR -- you share blindness but are VERY defensive of your worth to society. I don't question my self-worth. I do, however, care enough to speak up and educate those not living with blindness-related obstacles, whenever I can. So far, it has been appreciated and enlightening. Plus, it's always fun to share the myriad of crazy (and embarrassing), blindness-related experiences I'm having ... living the life.

Perhaps you're the one needing to develop a realistic view of blindness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 10/01/2008

I bet the producers didn't see that one coming...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 10/01/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 63 fans permalink

When I saw your comment I just shrugged.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 10/01/2008
- PhDiva I'm a Fan of PhDiva 20 fans permalink

I am a sighted person and have no affiliation with the blind community. I am absolutely disgusted by the mean-spirited and insensitive comments on this board, which attack an already vulnerable community. I had no idea that there was so much discrimination towards the blind.

I was going to see this movie. However, now that I know about the protest, I will boycott it in support of the blind community.

I am an African American, and I know how damaging disparaging representations can be. I support the protesters, and I am proud to do so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 10/01/2008

So, you were okay with the movie until you discovered that some folks on the planet were offended by it?

FYI, I'm offended by oxygen. Can you please boycott that as well?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 10/01/2008
- Yani I'm a Fan of Yani permalink

Thanks for your support.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 10/03/2008
- alguien I'm a Fan of alguien 16 fans permalink
photo

why don't you at least view the movie before you form an opinion of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 10/01/2008

Good grief, at least read the book if you're not going to see the movie. Don't you think you should know what you're boycotting?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 10/01/2008
- Clavis I'm a Fan of Clavis 38 fans permalink

It would be funny if the protestors ended up picketing outside the wrong buildings...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 10/01/2008
- PhDiva I'm a Fan of PhDiva 20 fans permalink

I can SEE that you are evil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 10/01/2008

Go ahead and protest. It won't amount to a hill of beans. Too many people are sick of people crying victim. We got bigger problems than caring whether your feelings are hurt. Grow up. We all get our feeling hurt now and then. It's part of being an adult.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 10/01/2008

I only wish it were a matter of hurt feelings, like on a school playground; instead, this movie perpetuates the absolute worst myths and misconceptions about blind people, This movie and the depictions of blind people will truly harm the lives of real people. Please note the difference.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 10/01/2008
- 2warvet I'm a Fan of 2warvet 13 fans permalink
photo

I have only seen movie trailers, but I am guessing that any rational person who views this movie will see the difference between a movie and real life. I am also guessing that the only thing the protest will do is enhance the profit of the producers.

In my opinion it is not likely to make people look at someone who is blind differently just because they saw this movie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 10/01/2008

OK, I'll bite. How does this movie "truly harm the lives of real people." This is a work of fiction. And if you think a work of fiction can really do that, then you are stretching your melodrama a bit thin. I see this movie to be a study about people, not just blind people, about people in general who react to a circumstance that is beyond their control and completely debilitating. I can't agree that it "perpetuates the absolute worst myths and misconceptions about blind people." That is just more melodrama designed to perpetuate the myth that this movie is designed to victimize people. Your statement sounds wonderful, but it is just plain empty rhetoric.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 10/01/2008

Have you read the book on which this movie is based? Obviously not. Before being offended, at least do the research. The book, and presumable the movie, is about human beings trying to cope during a terrifying experience, not about a bunch of blind people running amok while swinging axes. Geez.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 10/01/2008

Wow! It's really depressing to see how insensitive and abusive people can be towards differently-abled folks. I'd like to think it's simply because people feel "safe" to vent online and not because they don't respect blind people's struggle to have their humanity recognized. For example using the word "blindness" to mean ignorance makes it seem like blind people are ignorant. So yes, the allegory in the book is already perpetuating that idea. The movie just makes it worse. Just like using the words "lame" or "retarded" to mean stupid or bad, perpetuates the idea that differently-abled folks are stupid or bad. A good test is, would you use those words in that way around a friend who was disabled or around someone who was disabled? If not, then you shouldn't use them elsewhere.

If you would like to learn more about the ~50 years of struggle for dignity and recognition by people in the Disability Rights Movement you can check out either of these sites:

http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/collections/drilm/
(look at the Introduction, Related Resources, Artists with Disabilities)
or
http://americanhistory.si.edu/disabilityrights/welcome.html
(A project by the Smithsonian)

Both have a little history about the movement and interviews with activists and artists with disabilities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 10/01/2008

Cripes people! Get a grip. It's just a MOVIE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 10/01/2008
- PhDiva I'm a Fan of PhDiva 20 fans permalink

Yes, and they have the right to protest it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 10/01/2008

Indeed. And I have a right to mock their easily offended selves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 10/01/2008

You'd like to believe the myth that losing one sense makes your other ones keener.

In this case, the opposite is true - these individuals have sadly allowed their lack of sight to manifest itself as lack of insight as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 10/01/2008
- YA I'm a Fan of YA 5 fans permalink

This protest is ridiculous. You can't express yourself creatively anymore without offending somebody. If the goal of society was to remove all sources of offense, it would become incredibly oppressive in its boredom and forced conformism.
If you're blind and you're offended by a work of fiction showing actors playing blind people in unrealistic situations, I have got bad news for you. Your blindness is not your biggest problem. You should probably start being offended by movies who depict stupid people too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 10/01/2008
- jazzman I'm a Fan of jazzman 228 fans permalink
photo

The book 'Blindness' from which this movie is taken is a masterpiece. It's hard to believe that people would take this allegory as a statement about 'blind people' specifically. It's about people everywhere and the blindness in the movie is reference to any situation in which people can not see their way out clearly. Case in point: The current financial meltdown. What you have happening in the world markets is that people are scrambling every which way with no one knowing quite what to do or who to trust or which way to turn. In such chaos panic and survival instincts override civilized behavior and humans can be reduced to the most objectionable behavior. The blindness could just as easily stand for an ideology like Facism that infects a population and blinds everyone reducing them to animal like behavior. The book is a story about an epidemic that infects everyone including the leaders and brings about a chaotic situation. It's not about 'blind people.' Let's put away this politically correct nonsense and look beyond the pettiness of the 'disability' crowd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 10/01/2008
- PhDiva I'm a Fan of PhDiva 20 fans permalink

The allegory is not neutral; it relates to an actual physiological condition. The filmmakers could have made a better film in which they explore the allegory in a less offensive manner. They failed, and the blind community has the right to protest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 10/01/2008

Goodness, an allegory based on physical conditions?! Those b*stards!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 10/01/2008
- strifeknot I'm a Fan of strifeknot 14 fans permalink

Have you actually seen the film or read the novel?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 10/01/2008

so how come no complaint about the novel....the source material for this film.

I saw the trailer...frankly it reminded me a little of a novel I read in school called "The Day of The Triffids".­...another story about the breakdown of society after an event in which .most of the population is blinded.

I don't recall anyone from CNIB showing up at my school complaining about the depiction of the blind in that instance either. But if it's wrong, it's wrong...right??

As sincere as organizations sound when they are complaining about the depiction of this or that in a film....there's always this whiff of opprotunisim as usually one can point to various examples of the same themes being explored in a literary setting but...hey it's a book and who reads anymore???

The film will either fly or it will tank on it's own merits.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 PM on 10/01/2008

Society has already broken down because our leadership is blinded by greed and power. Maybe the movie is meant to be an allegory. I guess you would have to see it ti find out. NAH

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 10/01/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect