Senate to vote on rescue plan with added tax cut

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Senate to vote on rescue plan with added tax cut stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHARLES BABINGTON and ANDREW TAYLOR | September 30, 2008 10:54 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore, left, arrives for a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2008, to discuss a financial bailout plan. From left are, DeFazio, Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, Rep. Mazie Hirono, D-Hi., and Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — In a bold bid to revive President Bush's multibillion-dollar financial rescue plan, Senate leaders scheduled a vote for Wednesday night on a version of the bill that adds substantial tax cuts meant to appeal to Republicans when it reaches the House.

The goal is to net at least 12 more House votes than the rescue proposal received Monday, when lawmakers rocked the political and financial worlds by rejecting it.

The gambit is certain to anger some conservative House Democrats, who object to tax cuts that are not offset with spending cuts. But Senate strategists assume it will gain more House votes than it will lose.

If so, Congress would be poised to pass landmark legislation giving the government billions of dollars to buy deeply discounted mortgage-backed securities that are choking off credit and roiling the markets.

The strategy is risky because some House members might see it as a high-handed move by senators. Senate passage of a bailout measure has seemed assured all along. The showdown is in the House, but now the Senate is trying to force the House's hand.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., called it "a brilliant move" that will "help pick up votes on both sides of the aisle."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's reaction was much cooler. "The Senate has made a decision about how to proceed and what can pass that body," the California Democrat said. "The Senate will vote tomorrow night, and the Congress will work its will."

The new approach, announced Tuesday night by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., would tack large and contentious tax measures to the bailout bill. Senate leaders figure the House will have to approve it because the tax cuts are too appealing to Republicans and the financial rescue plan will still seem essential to most Democrats.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Senate approach uses big, game-changing amendments. House leaders earlier were considering the smallest possible tweaks to the bill in hopes of picking up 12 more votes.

The Senate bill would raise federal deposit insurance limits to $250,000 from $100,000, as called for presidential nominees Barack Obama and John McCain only hours earlier.

House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, praised the move, but many Democrats had signaled approval as well.

McCain, Obama and Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, signaled plans to return to Washington for the Wednesday night vote. If Obama and Biden vote for the measure, it would make it more difficult for Pelosi and other Democrats to reject or change the Senate measure.

The Senate measure will graft the bailout language to a tax bill it approved last week, on a 93-2 vote. It includes: a provision to prevent more than 20 million middle-class taxpayers from feeling the bite of the alternative minimum tax, $8 billion in tax relief for those hit by natural disasters in the Midwest, Texas and Louisiana and some $78 billion in renewable energy incentives and extensions of expiring tax breaks.

In a compromise worked out with Republicans, the bill does not pay for the AMT and disaster provisions but does have revenue offsets for part of the energy and extension measures.

That wasn't enough earlier this year for the House, which insisted that there be complete offsets for the energy and extension part of the package.

The Senate version also may include a measure to require health plans for 51 or more employees to give equal treatment to mental health or addiction if they cover such illnesses. The House and Senate have passed similar mental health parity measures, but none has gone to Bush for his signature.

The surprise move capped a day in which supporters of the imperiled economic rescue fought to bring it back to life, courting reluctant lawmakers with a variety of other sweeteners including the plan to reassure Americans their bank deposits are safe.

Wall Street, at least, regained hope. The Dow Jones industrials rose 485 points, one day after a record 778-point plunge following the House vote.

Amid Tuesday's negotiations, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. chairman Sheila Bair asked Congress for temporary authority to raise the limit on deposits by an unspecified amount. That could help ease a crisis of confidence in the banking system, Bair said.

She said the overwhelming majority of banks remain sound but an increase in the cap would help ease a crisis of confidence in the banking system as well as encourage banks to begin more lending.

Monday's House vote was a stinging setback to leaders of both parties and to Bush. The administration's proposal, still the heart of the legislation under consideration, would allow the government to buy bad mortgages and other deficient assets held by troubled financial institutions. If successful, advocates of the plan believe, that would help lift a major weight off the already sputtering national economy.

Bush renewed his efforts to save the bailout plan Tuesday, speaking with McCain and Obama and making another statement from the White House. "Congress must act," he declared.

Though stock prices rose, more attention was on credit markets. A key rate that banks charge each other shot higher, further evidence of a tightening of credit availability.

The rescue package was Topic A on the presidential campaign trail.

"The first thing I would do is say, 'Let's not call it a bailout. Let's call it a rescue,'" McCain told CNN. He said, "Americans are frightened right now" and political leaders must give them an immediate solution and a longer-term approach to the problem.

Obama issued a statement saying that significantly increasing federal deposit insurance would help small businesses and make the U.S. banking system more secure as well as restore public confidence.

___

Associated Press writers Tom Raum, Ben Feller, Alan Fram and Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — In a bold bid to revive President Bush's multibillion-dollar financial rescue plan, Senate leaders scheduled a vote for Wednesday night on a version of the bill that adds substantia...
WASHINGTON — In a bold bid to revive President Bush's multibillion-dollar financial rescue plan, Senate leaders scheduled a vote for Wednesday night on a version of the bill that adds substantia...
Filed by Nick Graham
 
Comments
2540
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (53 pages total)

Why was my comment deleted? All I said was I feel like a slave in the days of PHAROAHS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 10/04/2008

I feel like a slave in the days of the PHAROAHS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 10/04/2008
photo

It's robbing Peter to pay Paulson!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 10/02/2008

Too bad William Kristols neocon friend and charter member of Kristols 'Old Boys Club' (PNAC), Paul Wolfowitz, got fired from the World Bank job.

The World Bank helps poor nations (USA?) with financial assistance. But now that 'Wolffie" is gone we probably can't expect Wall Street to get any help there either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 10/01/2008


More tax cuts for the wealthy in a bail out for Wall Street?

Banks want removal of the provisions that shed light on their lousy practices and ponzi financing schemes. They are lobbying for more power to cripple credit card holders.

The GOP wants to include provisions in the 'bailout' of the same type that precipitated this "crisis." This puts tens of thousands each on the backs of taxpayers including our children. Yet the rich and the finance industry that have skimmed the middle class into poverty pay nothing.

Tax payers are being "trickle downed" into the poor house.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 10/01/2008

Let's not call it a rescue package either

It is corporate welfare for the rich just as we have welfare for the poor only they don't get that much
for food stamps etc.

Hopefully it will keep Wall St. in the manner to which they have become accustomed.

No cheeseburgers for them.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 10/01/2008

To Congress:
Reaganomics is at the heart of ANY version of Bush's Bailout.

Adding a 'tax cut' that will be offset by inflation and debt is no improvement.

Few disagree that the basic cause of our economic woes is "river up /trickle down" Reaganomics.

Bush & his henchmen have been ardent supporters of such economics. Thus, it comes as no surprise that the proposed Bush remedy for our economic woes is to bail harder to create a massive flood upward.

Nor should we be surprised to find the same politicians who have collaborated with Bush on his every major policy misjudgment, collaborate again for another proposed boondoggle. Their promises to oversee the upward flood, and suggestions that there may be one day some trickle down profits, are neither good enough.

There is no disagreement that economic problems need to be addressed.
The disagreement is about whether more Reaganomics will fix anything.
Though some attempt to portray this disagreement as a battle between those who would do something, and those who would do nothing, such a portrayal is false.

Present another alternative. Devise a policy based on reversing the ills of Reaganomics, instead of compounding those ills. Listen to the proposals of Dennis Kucinich and others.
Make amendments to their plans, NOT Bush's.

Stop insisting the best solution is a compromise to a faulty bailout proposal,
based on hopeless hope that Reaganomics will work 'next time'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 10/01/2008

If they're not going to bailout the rest of us, then screw that! WE ALL GO DOWN TOGETHER! Why should people in Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc. be out of jobs, homeless, struggling while wall street gets a break? This bill only helps the financial analysts. The majority of us get screwed. Or at least appease the public by firing every single CEO, CFO, etc. of these failing companies. If we're doing this to supposedly help the majority and save our economy, we don't need the bozos who ran the economy into the ground to keep their jobs. Oust them!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 10/01/2008

The bailout is backwards. Its premis is that the moneys exchanged for non-liquid assetts will be made available to the general market for investment/loans. This is not a valid assumption. Credit freeze is (in part) created by a lack of belief that the borrower will be able to repay. Injecting moneys does not satisfy that basic underlying concern. rather, the government would institute a large public works program (aka FDR). This would create jobs, injecting cash from the bottom up.

As joblessness falls, so will the sentiment RE the ability of borrowers to repay loans. Businesses, like people, will benefit directly from this program as in they are the coordinators and manufacturers of needed goods to replace/repair infrastructure. Additionally, this would also solve the overall need to replace our crumbling infrastructure (aka a "Build America" program). This being said, it is more likely that a dual program is needed -- a hybrid between the current plan and this one proposed above.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 10/01/2008

Anyone here besides me see shades of the great Roman Empire here? Prepare for the crash citizens of U*S*R because we, your greedy and corrupt leaders have led you down a financial path from which recovery is impossible...We will take your bailout money and make our investments worthy again, then we will pull out our profits and throw you to the lions...All Hail the American Caesars ...

We care not that you cannot afford to live in a decent manner...We have our large homes and our fancy cars and our yachts...It matters not to us that the gas tank on your chariot cannot be filled and your refrigerator is half empty...it matters not that your children cannot afford college, and you cannot get affordable health care...WE are happy and healthy and OUR children are going to college...So we will continue to lead you as lambs to slaughter...HERE citizens, talk about Hollywood some more, be distracted by the war in Ir*aq....while your backs are turned we will get the lions ready......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 10/01/2008

Tom Delay is appearing on MSNBC, the gravitational Gregory show. It's pretty sad for House Republicans when DeLay is the only one available to coddle them. Maybe he is the only left who has not already publicly made a fool of himself over the vote on Monday.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 10/01/2008
photo

Change I seriously doubt.

Nader '08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 10/01/2008

Nader?...Yuck!...Ba*rf!...I will never forget what a real a**h*le this guy was back in 2000.
I believe he had every right to run....but at that very last moment, he should have closed it
up and threw his support behind Gore...or even "just " closed it up because the thought of
Boosh running the country was to be too awful for someone that cares about people like he
claims to. But no, he was stubborn right to the end and he Disgusts me.
He is a small part of the roadmap that troo*ps ended up in IrQ...he's a piece to that puzzle.
His voice and face will always be part of the Boosh 8 years...Nadar=Boosh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 PM on 10/01/2008
photo

Read up on the problems with the 2000/2004 election and the 2000 recounts.

Read up on how Kerry capilulated and the real problems of voter disenfranchisement and problems with voting machines have yet to be addressed. Tune into alternative media for an alternative perspective.

Nader ran on the Green Party ticket in 2000. Getting 5% (?) of the vote gives them federal funds. Nothing wrong with a third party, indeed, considering how close the democrats and republicans are now, rhetoric aside. I, for one, have had it with both of them - this bailout and Obama's support of it was the final straw.

http://peaceandfreedom.org/home/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 10/01/2008
photo

Wow then you remove my post you are joke!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 10/01/2008
photo

I've had two deleted for profanity.. they don't like cussing here :p

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 10/01/2008
photo

Not a single cuss word in my post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 10/01/2008
photo

Amazing....when I write anything bad on something the dems do...not posted, but is for the republicans....once again sensorship at her best.. 2008 the year journalism died

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 10/01/2008

Look, to be honest, I'm not sure what is right or wrong anymore.
But all I REALLY know, is that you cannot trust one word the current PreZ says.
Boosh has become a "nothing" voice out there.
All I really know to...is that I never see all these Washington politicians "scramble"
and work late late late in the night for healthcare????
All I know too is that TONS of money pours into IrQ-related things and now Wllstreet,
but there we are AL*WAYS told that "REAL PEOPLE NEEDS" are too expensive....ie education
and good healthcare...politicians have great healthcare and education for their kids.
All I see is a lot of attention, focus, sweat and tears goes to IrQ or FatCat*_s.
That is what I know for sure...and that's why they have failed us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 10/01/2008
photo

Obama's regurgitating the same urgency for this bailout.. doesn't that make you wonder?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 10/01/2008

Please pardon my naivety about how things work up there, but if O wins
the election, won't he be able to pull back on some of the "money flow"
to certain areas, won't he be able to re-do some things or re-work things
in terms of how this whole bailout gets through in the end?
I'm really really serious, if you or anyone can answer this for me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 10/01/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (53 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect