Senate to vote on rescue plan with added tax cut

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Senate to vote on rescue plan with added tax cut stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHARLES BABINGTON and ANDREW TAYLOR | September 30, 2008 10:54 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore, left, arrives for a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2008, to discuss a financial bailout plan. From left are, DeFazio, Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, Rep. Mazie Hirono, D-Hi., and Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — In a bold bid to revive President Bush's multibillion-dollar financial rescue plan, Senate leaders scheduled a vote for Wednesday night on a version of the bill that adds substantial tax cuts meant to appeal to Republicans when it reaches the House.

The goal is to net at least 12 more House votes than the rescue proposal received Monday, when lawmakers rocked the political and financial worlds by rejecting it.

The gambit is certain to anger some conservative House Democrats, who object to tax cuts that are not offset with spending cuts. But Senate strategists assume it will gain more House votes than it will lose.

If so, Congress would be poised to pass landmark legislation giving the government billions of dollars to buy deeply discounted mortgage-backed securities that are choking off credit and roiling the markets.

The strategy is risky because some House members might see it as a high-handed move by senators. Senate passage of a bailout measure has seemed assured all along. The showdown is in the House, but now the Senate is trying to force the House's hand.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., called it "a brilliant move" that will "help pick up votes on both sides of the aisle."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's reaction was much cooler. "The Senate has made a decision about how to proceed and what can pass that body," the California Democrat said. "The Senate will vote tomorrow night, and the Congress will work its will."

The new approach, announced Tuesday night by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., would tack large and contentious tax measures to the bailout bill. Senate leaders figure the House will have to approve it because the tax cuts are too appealing to Republicans and the financial rescue plan will still seem essential to most Democrats.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Senate approach uses big, game-changing amendments. House leaders earlier were considering the smallest possible tweaks to the bill in hopes of picking up 12 more votes.

The Senate bill would raise federal deposit insurance limits to $250,000 from $100,000, as called for presidential nominees Barack Obama and John McCain only hours earlier.

House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, praised the move, but many Democrats had signaled approval as well.

McCain, Obama and Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, signaled plans to return to Washington for the Wednesday night vote. If Obama and Biden vote for the measure, it would make it more difficult for Pelosi and other Democrats to reject or change the Senate measure.

The Senate measure will graft the bailout language to a tax bill it approved last week, on a 93-2 vote. It includes: a provision to prevent more than 20 million middle-class taxpayers from feeling the bite of the alternative minimum tax, $8 billion in tax relief for those hit by natural disasters in the Midwest, Texas and Louisiana and some $78 billion in renewable energy incentives and extensions of expiring tax breaks.

In a compromise worked out with Republicans, the bill does not pay for the AMT and disaster provisions but does have revenue offsets for part of the energy and extension measures.

That wasn't enough earlier this year for the House, which insisted that there be complete offsets for the energy and extension part of the package.

The Senate version also may include a measure to require health plans for 51 or more employees to give equal treatment to mental health or addiction if they cover such illnesses. The House and Senate have passed similar mental health parity measures, but none has gone to Bush for his signature.

The surprise move capped a day in which supporters of the imperiled economic rescue fought to bring it back to life, courting reluctant lawmakers with a variety of other sweeteners including the plan to reassure Americans their bank deposits are safe.

Wall Street, at least, regained hope. The Dow Jones industrials rose 485 points, one day after a record 778-point plunge following the House vote.

Amid Tuesday's negotiations, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. chairman Sheila Bair asked Congress for temporary authority to raise the limit on deposits by an unspecified amount. That could help ease a crisis of confidence in the banking system, Bair said.

She said the overwhelming majority of banks remain sound but an increase in the cap would help ease a crisis of confidence in the banking system as well as encourage banks to begin more lending.

Monday's House vote was a stinging setback to leaders of both parties and to Bush. The administration's proposal, still the heart of the legislation under consideration, would allow the government to buy bad mortgages and other deficient assets held by troubled financial institutions. If successful, advocates of the plan believe, that would help lift a major weight off the already sputtering national economy.

Bush renewed his efforts to save the bailout plan Tuesday, speaking with McCain and Obama and making another statement from the White House. "Congress must act," he declared.

Though stock prices rose, more attention was on credit markets. A key rate that banks charge each other shot higher, further evidence of a tightening of credit availability.

The rescue package was Topic A on the presidential campaign trail.

"The first thing I would do is say, 'Let's not call it a bailout. Let's call it a rescue,'" McCain told CNN. He said, "Americans are frightened right now" and political leaders must give them an immediate solution and a longer-term approach to the problem.

Obama issued a statement saying that significantly increasing federal deposit insurance would help small businesses and make the U.S. banking system more secure as well as restore public confidence.

___

Associated Press writers Tom Raum, Ben Feller, Alan Fram and Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — In a bold bid to revive President Bush's multibillion-dollar financial rescue plan, Senate leaders scheduled a vote for Wednesday night on a version of the bill that adds substantia...
WASHINGTON — In a bold bid to revive President Bush's multibillion-dollar financial rescue plan, Senate leaders scheduled a vote for Wednesday night on a version of the bill that adds substantia...
Filed by Dave Burdick
 
Comments
200
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi paid her husband's real estate and investment firm nearly $100,000 from her political action committee over the past decade, a practice that she voted to ban last year and that her party condemned as part of the "culture of corruption" when Republicans did it.

The Washington Times is reporting that the California Democrat's husband, Paul F. Pelosi, owns Financial Leasing Services Inc., which has received $99,000 in rent, utilities and accounting fees from the speaker's "PAC to the Future" over the PAC's nine-year history.

Last year, Pelosi supported a bill that would have banned members of Congress from putting spouses on their campaign staffs. The bill banned not only direct payments by congressional campaign committees and PACs to spouses for services including consulting and furndraising, but also "indirect compensation," such as payments to companies that employ spouses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 10/01/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 permalink

THEY WANT NO TAXES FOR TWO YEARS!

Tom Delay the old Repub House Leader said he wants the CAPITAL GAINS TAX REDUCED TO ZERO FOR TWO YEARS!

That would be the BIGGEST BAILOUT IN OUR HISTORY!

IT WOULD MAKE THE $700 BILLION LOOK LIKE A peanut!

ANOTHER REPUB TAKE FROM THE MIDDLE CLASS!

OBAMA CAN KISS HIS PACKAGES GOODBYE!

DON'T LET THEM DO THIS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 AM on 10/01/2008

I am a life-long democrat but I am wondering if they are all corrupt! Go to www.stopthehousingbailout.com Listen to the 200 economists who say it is not necessary for the taxpayers to take on the toxic debt. President Jefferson said "our leaders will become corrupt" if the people do not pay attention. We must wake up NOW. Contact everyone on your social network sites and tell them to go to www.stopthehousingbailout.com Get the facts. follow the links.

The democrats may be so full of fear that they can not hear the voices of people over the shouts of the self-interested bailout-mongers. We need a louder, and clearer, voice. www.stopthehousingbailout.com NOW

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 09/30/2008

What happened to BIPARTISAN? If the supporters of the bill get 6 Republicans and 6 more Democrats to vote for it, then it will STILL be held against the Democrats. Instead, they should say "If Congress wants this to happen, they need to promise half-plus-one of the votes needed, and we will allow Democrats to provide half-plus-one. After that, people can vote as they like."

Bad enough that we'll have financial fall-out, without adding political fall-out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 09/30/2008

I'd like to know why both Obama and McCain support raising the FDIC limit to 250K. This agency is already sure to run short funds with the limit at 100K. What they are proposing will boost the money they go begging to the treasury for by 21/2 times. Where else will the money come from? There is no reason to cover anyone with deposits that are over the current limit. The current amount has been in place for decades and if there is anyone who isn't aware of what it is or how it works, the burden should be on them not the taxpayers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 09/30/2008

Absurd. FDIC insurance should be limitless. Bank deposits should never be at risk. FDIC runs out of money, they ask for more.

Think about the nonsense that happened last week as folks panicked - people were removing cash from one institution just to open another account at an alternate institution to get insurance from the same place, the FDIC. It appeared last week that there was going to be a "run on the banks."....and then any loss of confidence starts to mushroom.....

Insure it all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 09/30/2008
photo

Suzy on CNN: "your money is ABSOLUTELY safe up to $100,000 in FDIC guaranteed banks."

WRONG. The FDIC is funded ONLY to $45BILLION. (In comparison AIG bailout was $85BILLION)

In the nineties some i_diot decided that banks could reduce their FDIC payments. I mean, no one was expecting $600TRILLION (10X world GDP) in derivatives to c_rash..............

Two or three more banks go down and the FDIC will be asking the taxpayer for a BAILOUT. If there is a wave of bank c_rashes, we the people will lose, again.

~
Oh, by the way: the US Mint, on Thursday, had to cancel sales of the ONE OUNCE GOLD BULLION COIN. They ran out of stock and it will take time to ramp up production from suppliers. The Canadian Mint has it's own manufacturing processes that were humming along happily.

Check and see if they do mail-order.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 09/30/2008

I told my husband we should start buying gold and bury it in the backyard. Then I saw this article, too. So much for Plan B.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 09/30/2008

Bush is panicked. That should be the first sign that this bailout stinks. If I hear McCain say "Americans are frightened" one more time, I'm going to scream. Push fear to get things they want! They're too worried about all the foreign investors instead of the people who voted hem into office. Let's have a look at the bank's books. How many foreclosures are home flippers who bought multiple homes while the lending gravytrain was still on the tracks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 09/30/2008
photo

So George Bush has now REPUDIATED the final plank of the neocon pyramid scheme he stood for. Republican MARKET FUNDAMENTALISM is now totally discredited.

Cheney/Bush is crawling to taxpayers and begging Congress for a socially funded bailout for his rich buddies who cannot cut it on their own.

Privatize profits/Socialize debt

~
Capitalist weenies.
~

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 09/30/2008

BTW... I did not vote for the Bush

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 09/30/2008
photo

Don't blame the house flippers and poor folk over-extending themselves not considering what would happen when values fell.

It is not even the mortgage lenders fault.

It is the fault of those that disguised poor quality debt and resold it as AAA paper. It is Wall Street fraud, and no heads are rolling, no arrests are made and no one is taking the blame.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 09/30/2008

Blogging today at firedoglake.com, Ian Welsh says that the bailout's failure is the first successful shot in the next class war and signals that America has rejected the opportunity to solidify its role as the world's largest plutocracy " a country run by the rich for the rich. He says this was the most significant victory against US plutocracy in 30 years! He also points out that there are plenty of things that can be done to reduce our suffering and to have the US come out of this stronger than ever, with an economy that works for everyone and not just the rich.

http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/30/paulson-bailout-failure-first-shot-in-the-next-class-war/

In fact, he offers a 7-Step Program that he says will also yield "Democratic generational control of Congress" --

1) Scrap the Paulson bill.
2) Start from scratch and write a good bill that is a Main-Street bailout
3) Take it to a vote, let the Republicans kill it or veto it
4) Run an election on "this is how we will handle the crisis: in a way that takes care of ordinary people"
5) Reap the electoral benefits
6) Follow through
7) Control Congress for a generation

http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/30/the-7-step-program-for-democratic-generational-control-of-congress/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 09/30/2008

There IS no bail out. ANY bail out is just raising the debt due on a Credit Card & ultimate folly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 09/30/2008

every time my president attempts to speak, i cringe....he has abused the trust of the people; he exudes ineptitude. no credibility whatsoever. how can the people have confidence in an economy under this man's watch? send him into cheney's bunker.

i am not one of the one percent who has benefitted from the tenure of this clown, so i guess i don't really care whether this latest scare tactic emergency is worked out under his watchless watch or falls upon his successor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 09/30/2008

McCain is an even scarier prospect, if that is possible..................

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 09/30/2008
photo

Wall St. Journal:
September 30, 2008, 3:49 pm

Atlanta Fed"s Lockhart Assumes Bailout Plan Is Dead

"Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Dennis Lockhart on Tuesday put low odds of success on congressional efforts to pass a government program aimed at stabilizing financial markets. "

source: http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/09/30/atlanta-feds-lockhart-assumes-bailout-plan-is-dead/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 09/30/2008

We don't need no stinkin' insurance. Note how these corrupt politicians keep saying: Every American would receive $250,000 in the event of a bank failure. How incredibly dishonest. You wouldn't receive a penny more than what you had in the bank.

You're traveling through another dimension -- a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's a signpost up ahead: your next stop: the Twilight Zone!

Why are the Democrats doing this? How much money have they been promised by Wall Street? Is it a straight percentage kick-back? Why are they making Bush's financial disasters a Democratic issue?

If we lived in Baltimore, for example, and had an economy built on selling drugs and weapons (kind of like we do), and that economy failed, wouldn't that be the right time to move in and start over. Nobody to buy new homes? Great, we can go back to growing our own produce so we don't have to eat the poisoned and diseased kind that our grocery stores are importing from poor third world countries. Let's make our own tractors, cars and shoes. Buy locally and sell locally. There is no "need" for any business to sell to the world. The only benefit to that is more money for the rich and slavery for the masses.

No Wall Street Bailout.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 09/30/2008

this parallel universe stuff is real; where are these people living/coming from?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 09/30/2008

Washington, D.C., the city our Founding Fathers built in a swamp.

The irony of that never fails to make me laugh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 09/30/2008

The banking industry is already hard at work in writing this bailout for themselves. That's why it should be rejected. We can't trust Congress to do the right thing. They don't know what that is.

http://counterpunch.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 09/30/2008

Thanks! Pieces like this help shed light on an otherwise dark and secretive process.

By law, judges are required to recuse themselves from hearing a case when a conflict of interest exists.

If every member of the House and Senate were held to the same standard, ever wonder how many would be left to vote on this "bail out" issue? Twenty? A dozen? Less?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 09/30/2008

Let's be honest and call a spade a spade. This is a bailout, not a rescue. McCain and others who think that changing the facade improves its substance are beyond out of touch. Masking the bill that was defeated yesterday, by adding cosmetic changes like FDIC coverage increases are token modifications. Until a majority of House Reps deal with the public's wrath, this bailout will and should again go down to defeat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 09/30/2008

McCain would say that reality is "in the tank" for Obama. He has never let it get in his way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 09/30/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect