Senate passes $700B rescue; House votes lured

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Senate passes $700B rescue; House votes lured stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS and CHARLES BABINGTON | October 1, 2008 11:52 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Senate Majority Leader, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., pauses during a news conference on the passage of the Senate version of the bailout package on Capitol Hill Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2008 in Washington. From left, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., Reid, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., and Senate Minority Leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, where Republicans opposition softened.

Senators loaded the economic rescue bill with tax breaks and other sweeteners before passing it by a wide margin, 74-25, a month before the presidential and congressional elections.

In the House, leaders were working feverishly to convert enough opponents of the bill to push it through by Friday, just days after lawmakers there stunningly rejected an earlier version and sent markets plunging around the globe.

The measure didn't cause the same uproar in the Senate, where both parties' presidential candidates, Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, made rare appearances to cast "aye" votes, as did Obama's running mate, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware.

In the final vote, 39 Democrats, 34 Republicans and independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut voted "yes." Nine Democrats, 15 Republicans and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont voted "no."

President Bush issued a statement praising the Senate's move. With the revisions, Bush said, "I believe members of both parties in the House can support this legislation. The American people expect and our economy demands that the House pass this good bill this week and send it to my desk."

The rescue package lets the government spend billions of dollars to buy bad mortgage-related securities and other devalued assets held by troubled financial institutions. If successful, advocates say, that would allow frozen credit to begin flowing again and prevent a deep recession.

Even as the Senate voted, House leaders were hunting for the 12 votes they would need to turn around Monday's 228-205 defeat. They were especially targeting the 133 Republicans who voted "no."

Story continues below
advertisement

Their opposition appeared to be easing after the Senate added $110 billion in tax breaks for businesses and the middle class, plus a provision to raise, from $100,000 to $250,000, the cap on federal deposit insurance.

They were also cheering a decision Tuesday by the Securities and Exchange Commission to ease rules that force companies to devalue assets on their balance sheets to reflect the price they can get on the market.

There were worries, though, that the tax breaks would cause some conservative-leaning "Blue Dog" Democrats who voted for the rescue Monday to abandon it. The bill doesn't designate a way to pay for many of the tax cuts, and Blue Dogs typically oppose any measure that swells the deficit.

"I'm concerned about that," said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the majority leader.

Raising the deposit insurance limit _ along with the SEC's accounting change _ helped House Republicans claim credit for some substantive changes. And with constituent feedback changing dramatically since Monday's shocking House defeat and the corresponding market plunge, lawmakers' comfort level with the package increased markedly.

Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz., who voted "no" on Monday, said he was leaning toward switching, and Rep. Steve LaTourette,R-Ohio, said he was "getting there." Several others were weighing a flip, said Republican officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the lawmakers had not yet announced how they would vote.

Leaders in both parties, as well as private economic chiefs everywhere, said Congress must quickly approve some version of the bailout measure to start loans flowing and stave off a potential national economic disaster.

"This is what we need to do right now to prevent the possibility of a crisis turning into a catastrophe," Obama said on the Senate floor. In Missouri, before flying to Washington to vote, McCain said, "If we fail to act, the gears of our economy will grind to a halt."

Critics on the right and left assailed the rescue plan, which has been panned by their constituents as a giveaway for Wall Street, and has little obvious direct benefit for ordinary Americans.

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., a leading conservative, said the step was "leading us into the pit of socialism."

Sanders, a self-described socialist, said the rescue was fundamentally unfair.

"The masters of the universe, those brilliant Wall Street insiders who have made more money than the average American can even dream of, have brought our financial system to the brink of collapse," Sanders said, and are demanding that the middle class "pick up the pieces that they broke."

Still, proponents argued that the financial sector's woes were already being felt by ordinary people in the form of unaffordable credit and underperforming retirement savings and without the bailout would soon translate into even more economic pain for working Americans, including more job losses.

"There will be no balloons or bunting or parades," when the rescue becomes law, said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., the Banking Committee chairman. But lawmakers will have "the knowledge that at one of our nation's moments of maximum economic peril, we acted _ not for the benefit of a particular few, but for all Americans."

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said the intense, at times contentious, 11-day round of bipartisan talks to craft the bailout _ which followed dire warnings of impending economic meltdown from Bush's economic chiefs to congressional leaders _ was an "extraordinary experience."

"This is the way government's supposed to work, folks, and it did," Gregg said.

The Senate specializes in high-stakes legislating by enticement, and the long list of sweeteners it added was designed to attract votes from various constituencies.

In addition to extending several tax breaks popular with businesses, the bill would keep the alternative minimum tax from hitting 20 million middle-income Americans and provide $8 billion in tax relief for those hit by natural disasters in the Midwest, Texas and Louisiana.

Tax cuts new and old are favorites for most House Republicans. Help for rural schools was aimed mainly at lawmakers in the West, while disaster aid was a top priority for lawmakers from across the Midwest and South.

Another addition, to extend the deductibility of state and local taxes for people in states without income taxes, helps Florida and Texas, among others.

Increasing the deposit insurance cap was a bid to reassure individuals and small businesses that their money would be safe if their banks collapsed. It was particularly geared toward small banks that fear customers will pull their money and park it in larger institutions seen as less likely to fold.

The FDIC would be allowed to borrow unlimited money from the Treasury Department through the end of next year as a way to cover the increased insurance limit. If used, it would be the first time the agency has tapped Treasury for a loan since the early 1990s.

The rescue bill hitched a ride on a popular measure that gives people with mental illness better health insurance coverage. Before passing it, senators voted by an identical 74-25 margin to attach the massive bailout and the tax breaks.

(This version corrects vote breakdown of yes votes to 39 Democrats, 34 Republicans and one Independent.)

WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, whe...
WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, whe...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1456
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (28 pages total)

Doesn't anyone in Washington have a conscience?

This bill should have been free of all provisions except those that helped homeowners with mortgages and their retirement accounts and freed up money for credit

By giving it to the race tracks and manufacturers it leaves less for promises made to the middle class. While we weren't looking our Congress gave more tax relief to the more well off by eliminating the effects of the alternative mininum tax which affects only those earning more than $75K and gave Wall Street the ability to do cook the books with inflated values on sub-prime zero value loans.

I would like to see all of the names of all the pork proposers on the internet for all to see - the OFC told me these items would have been put in other bills and have been funded for many years. I doubt the public knows that they were paying for these things for years.

That says a lot about the need for government transparency in DC. Every bill should be voted on its own merit and items that benefit special groups should be applied for through a grant type process with a Federal Budget line item to cap the spending on these items

EMAIL YOUR OUTRAGE TODAY TO ALL OF YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 10/03/2008
- Carrie-On I'm a Fan of Carrie-On 4 fans permalink
photo

This is all terrible. Fiduciary appropriations originate in the House not the Senate . We have been held hostage to Bush's senators; all of them. This is their way of disguising all kinds of BS spending .

More Texas millionaires were made out of the S&L Crisis than ever. Fortunes were made as the distressed balance sheets dumped assets.

This is no different. It does very little for Americans. Very little. They want u to buy into the fact that your "payrolls are in jeopardy" big insurers going to fail! on and on! Fear mongers. The anthrax is going to get you . . . . terrorism is going to get you . . .let us protect and serve . . . .

Read this:

http://tinyurl.com/4twh9u

Last night the senate added ~$150,000,000,000 to the infamous salvation bill...full of PORK...including wooden arrows, and tax incentives ... Leave it to our Senators. Therefore, we must assume that a "bailout" wasn't necessary; all of this was just a game to get last minute obligations to lobbyists taken care of without a lot of public hoopla. Or else, how will our nation survive?

If there's enough money, they can immediately establish a national health care program. NOW.

Call your House member to let them know how you are aware of this letter, that you are aware of the Senate's actions and the seriousness if they vote for the "senate" bill - or email them, NOW (http://www.house.gov/)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 10/03/2008

I feel let down by both presidential candidates neither had the insight or courage to stand up for the common man/woman and vote no to this ridiculous bailout. I am disgusted and now totally undecided about which deserves my vote. I don’t see either one providing real change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 10/02/2008

It is time to introduce the "Proxmire Act" which will be very applicable to this bill. Any person found connected will be subject to the same sentence, 20 years, and $ 1 million per affected party. This has to be added to the bill immediately.

Once the facts come out it will be beyond importance, such as next month when the banks and brokers want another $ 700 Billion and the 15 months thereafter that they will do the same.

The other situation is "fair value" I doubt anyone understands that, but basically, If a person invested $ 45.00 in a given financial endeavor, they may now get $ .45 Cents. and have no restitution while the criminals flea the country with their profits. The exception is the rest of the world is already aware.

Since this is for the Bankers and Brokers, they still persist in doing the same lame "push" to buy more yet. The game plan appears to take every last cent.

There is and has been no regulations on anything the people in charge are all hand picked by the vary same as the those committing the crimes. On top of that there is no proper accounting of the bailouts already given, with no paybacks.

Every Congress person and Senate person that voted for this has to be charged with the same crimes as their buddies that did it.

Maybe they can also explain why they bailed out AIG, "Warren Buffet".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 10/02/2008
- boing007 I'm a Fan of boing007 9 fans permalink

Speaking of unconscionable, Mayor Bloomberg wants to change the law so he can run for Mayor of New York one, two, three more times. Friendly Fascist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 10/02/2008
- MyTake I'm a Fan of MyTake 30 fans permalink
photo

To these Senators that voted against this bailout, thank you for your efforts. Senator Shelby exhibited excellent logic on this matter whenever he was interviewed on the Lou Dobbs show.

Allard (R)
Barasso (R)
Brownback (R)
Bunning (R)
Cantwell (D)
Cochran (R)
Crapo (R)
DeMint (R)
Dole (R)
Dorgan (D)
Enzi (R)
Feingold (D)
Inhofe (R)
Johnson (D)
Landrieu (D)
Nelson (FL) (D)
Roberts (R)
Sanders (I)
Sessions (R)
Shelby (R)
Stabenow (D)
Tester (D)
Vitter (R)
Wicker (R)
Wyden (D)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 10/02/2008
- mtflyer I'm a Fan of mtflyer 8 fans permalink

I wonder how much campaign funding was promised to supporters of this sellout of the American public by the beneficiaries (banksters)? I am interested as to how my two WV senators voted. If they supported it, I will never vote for them again. I hope people around the country will do the same with theirs.
Regardless of whether or not this thing passes or works, we are so far in the hole financially we cannot give tax cuts (which wouldn't even make a monthly payment on many, many mortgages) without driving us even closer to the brink. Af we let them get away with this, we are nothing more than lemmings racing to our own destruction!
Oh and no provision to address the mortgage crisis-are we supposed to believe that the banksters will help people out of the goodness of their hearts? GET REAL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 10/02/2008
- CNBCSucks I'm a Fan of CNBCSucks 3 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 10/02/2008
photo

THE SKY IS NOT FALLING
HASTE MAKES WASTE
545 in congress--they're all corrupt
canada is looking better every day

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 10/02/2008
- John51 I'm a Fan of John51 10 fans permalink

or you could stay and help change America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 10/02/2008

Good point John51,

I bet we're on the opposite side of the political spectrum, be certainly have the same goal with this corrupt monstrosity.

Tell you what. If this bill gets crammed down our throat, I'll make you a wager. I'll bet you I can get more Republicans thrown out of office than you can of Democrats. It's going to be interesting to see which base will hold their representatives accountable.

Good luck to us all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 10/02/2008
- esquire07 I'm a Fan of esquire07 25 fans permalink

The "Bailout" Bill will do nothing to save the Economy... it is as big of a lie as was the illegal occupation of Iraq.

The Bill will make the fat cats richer, and do nothing to help the struggling poor and lower middle classes.

It will NOT work. It is like putting a band-aid on a bullet wound to the head.

The System NEEDS to crash. It is the only way to wake up Americans to the need to stop ENDLESS consumerism, growth, and greed.

Bush is lying (again) and Congress (with lower ratings than W) is lying. The Bill is designed to help the riches of the rich who have already bought and paid for Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 10/02/2008

I agree, but why did Obama vote for it? That's what I don't understand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 10/02/2008
- mtflyer I'm a Fan of mtflyer 8 fans permalink

AMEN!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 10/02/2008

Did anyone see Dianne Feinstein's speech in favor of the bailout? Such condescension toward her constituents. She is proud of herself for voting yes, even though she received 85,000 calls asking her to vote no.

But those people don't know that the bill has been changed since Paulson's original plan, she said. Over and over again, she said that we just didn't understand. Utter nonsense. Breathtaking arrogance. Complete disdain for the people of California.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 10/02/2008
photo

Now that the adults have voted it's back the kindergarten.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 10/02/2008

I'm not for the rich, but I am for business. Tax cuts for businesses give them more money to reinvest and grow which creates jobs. That is the issue McCain should be talking rather than this nonsense about pork. Obama's got it right. Corporate tax cuts stimulate growth which ultimately creates jobs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 10/02/2008
- John51 I'm a Fan of John51 10 fans permalink

That would be great except that same tax cuts go to corporations that create jobs in China and else where. I suggest that these corporations move entirely to China (or elsewhere)and do business under the laws and protection of the Chinese (or other) Government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 10/02/2008

Absolutely. Targeted tax cuts for firms with domestic operations only is the way to go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 10/02/2008

Agenda for the Wall St. fat cats after the bill passes the house:

1. Issue extra big xmas bonuses extra early (xmas in October)
2. Pop the champaign
3. make reservations at the best manhatan steakhouses for prime rib.
4. go to Scores (the t*ty bar)
5. Fly to Europe for an early vacation
6. ask for more money

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 10/02/2008
- scared4ALL I'm a Fan of scared4ALL 10 fans permalink

Monday at 5 pm will be last day you can register. Tell everyone. The children will thank you.

Voteforchange.com

For you to speak out on important issues like the bailout>>>

Congress link:
http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/index.htm

Capitol switchboard:
(202) 224-3121

Media:

Paul Colford,
Director of Media Relations: info@ap.org

cnnnewsroo­m@cnn.com,
countdown@­msnbc.com,
hardball@msnbc.com,
nightly@nbc.com,
phil.griff­in@nbc.com­,
steve.capu­s@nbc.com,
Jeff.zucke­r@nbcuni.c­om,
rfournier@ap.org,
a.latour@wsj.com,
a.murray@wsj.com, darren.mcd­ermott@wsj­.com,
j.fry@wsj.com,
kudlow@cnbc.com,
wsj.ltrs@wsj.com,
abrams@msnbc.com, advocate@t­hebulletin­.us, byork@nati­onalreview­.com, byork@thehill.com,
ccrawford@cq.com, comments@m­claughlin.­com, ElRushbo@e­ibnet.com, evening@cb­snews.com, Foxreport@­foxnews.co­m,
ftn@cbsnews.com,
gretawire@fox.com,
Hannity@fo­xnews.com, hemmer@foxnews.com, hume@foxnews.com, igcolonel@­hotmail.co­m, irena.brig­anti@foxne­ws.com, jocelyn.au­stin@foxbu­siness.com­, Joe@msnbc.com,
joetalksho­w@aol.com, letters@ch­arleskraut­hammer.com­, lou@loudob­bsradio.co­m, me@glennbeck.com, mitch.davi­s@foxnews.­com, netaudr@abc.com, Ontherecor­d@foxnews.­com, oreilly@fo­xnews.com,
race08@msnbc.com, richard.wh­ite@foxnew­s.com, robert.fin­nerty@foxn­ews.com, Special@fo­xnews.com,
stu@glennbeck.com, suzanne.sc­ott@foxnew­s.com, ureport@fo­xnews.com, weekendliv­e@foxnews.­com, AndyMart20@aol.com,
bsmith@pol­itico.com, lindamulle­r@buchanan­.org, LouDobbs@cnn.com,
jake.tappe­r@abc.com, rachel@msnbc.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 10/02/2008
photo

that 'communicate with your congress website' that you just posted contained this sentence: Members of Congress listen to their constituents and care about constituent opinions. riiiiiiiiiiight
I have emailed all of my representatives for the last 3 days and faxed my house representative today to no avail....they simply don't care what we think

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 10/02/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect