Senate passes $700B rescue; House votes lured

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Senate passes $700B rescue; House votes lured stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS and CHARLES BABINGTON | October 1, 2008 11:52 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Senate Majority Leader, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., pauses during a news conference on the passage of the Senate version of the bailout package on Capitol Hill Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2008 in Washington. From left, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., Reid, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., and Senate Minority Leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, where Republicans opposition softened.

Senators loaded the economic rescue bill with tax breaks and other sweeteners before passing it by a wide margin, 74-25, a month before the presidential and congressional elections.

In the House, leaders were working feverishly to convert enough opponents of the bill to push it through by Friday, just days after lawmakers there stunningly rejected an earlier version and sent markets plunging around the globe.

The measure didn't cause the same uproar in the Senate, where both parties' presidential candidates, Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, made rare appearances to cast "aye" votes, as did Obama's running mate, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware.

In the final vote, 39 Democrats, 34 Republicans and independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut voted "yes." Nine Democrats, 15 Republicans and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont voted "no."

President Bush issued a statement praising the Senate's move. With the revisions, Bush said, "I believe members of both parties in the House can support this legislation. The American people expect and our economy demands that the House pass this good bill this week and send it to my desk."

The rescue package lets the government spend billions of dollars to buy bad mortgage-related securities and other devalued assets held by troubled financial institutions. If successful, advocates say, that would allow frozen credit to begin flowing again and prevent a deep recession.

Even as the Senate voted, House leaders were hunting for the 12 votes they would need to turn around Monday's 228-205 defeat. They were especially targeting the 133 Republicans who voted "no."

Story continues below
advertisement

Their opposition appeared to be easing after the Senate added $110 billion in tax breaks for businesses and the middle class, plus a provision to raise, from $100,000 to $250,000, the cap on federal deposit insurance.

They were also cheering a decision Tuesday by the Securities and Exchange Commission to ease rules that force companies to devalue assets on their balance sheets to reflect the price they can get on the market.

There were worries, though, that the tax breaks would cause some conservative-leaning "Blue Dog" Democrats who voted for the rescue Monday to abandon it. The bill doesn't designate a way to pay for many of the tax cuts, and Blue Dogs typically oppose any measure that swells the deficit.

"I'm concerned about that," said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the majority leader.

Raising the deposit insurance limit _ along with the SEC's accounting change _ helped House Republicans claim credit for some substantive changes. And with constituent feedback changing dramatically since Monday's shocking House defeat and the corresponding market plunge, lawmakers' comfort level with the package increased markedly.

Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz., who voted "no" on Monday, said he was leaning toward switching, and Rep. Steve LaTourette,R-Ohio, said he was "getting there." Several others were weighing a flip, said Republican officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the lawmakers had not yet announced how they would vote.

Leaders in both parties, as well as private economic chiefs everywhere, said Congress must quickly approve some version of the bailout measure to start loans flowing and stave off a potential national economic disaster.

"This is what we need to do right now to prevent the possibility of a crisis turning into a catastrophe," Obama said on the Senate floor. In Missouri, before flying to Washington to vote, McCain said, "If we fail to act, the gears of our economy will grind to a halt."

Critics on the right and left assailed the rescue plan, which has been panned by their constituents as a giveaway for Wall Street, and has little obvious direct benefit for ordinary Americans.

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., a leading conservative, said the step was "leading us into the pit of socialism."

Sanders, a self-described socialist, said the rescue was fundamentally unfair.

"The masters of the universe, those brilliant Wall Street insiders who have made more money than the average American can even dream of, have brought our financial system to the brink of collapse," Sanders said, and are demanding that the middle class "pick up the pieces that they broke."

Still, proponents argued that the financial sector's woes were already being felt by ordinary people in the form of unaffordable credit and underperforming retirement savings and without the bailout would soon translate into even more economic pain for working Americans, including more job losses.

"There will be no balloons or bunting or parades," when the rescue becomes law, said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., the Banking Committee chairman. But lawmakers will have "the knowledge that at one of our nation's moments of maximum economic peril, we acted _ not for the benefit of a particular few, but for all Americans."

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said the intense, at times contentious, 11-day round of bipartisan talks to craft the bailout _ which followed dire warnings of impending economic meltdown from Bush's economic chiefs to congressional leaders _ was an "extraordinary experience."

"This is the way government's supposed to work, folks, and it did," Gregg said.

The Senate specializes in high-stakes legislating by enticement, and the long list of sweeteners it added was designed to attract votes from various constituencies.

In addition to extending several tax breaks popular with businesses, the bill would keep the alternative minimum tax from hitting 20 million middle-income Americans and provide $8 billion in tax relief for those hit by natural disasters in the Midwest, Texas and Louisiana.

Tax cuts new and old are favorites for most House Republicans. Help for rural schools was aimed mainly at lawmakers in the West, while disaster aid was a top priority for lawmakers from across the Midwest and South.

Another addition, to extend the deductibility of state and local taxes for people in states without income taxes, helps Florida and Texas, among others.

Increasing the deposit insurance cap was a bid to reassure individuals and small businesses that their money would be safe if their banks collapsed. It was particularly geared toward small banks that fear customers will pull their money and park it in larger institutions seen as less likely to fold.

The FDIC would be allowed to borrow unlimited money from the Treasury Department through the end of next year as a way to cover the increased insurance limit. If used, it would be the first time the agency has tapped Treasury for a loan since the early 1990s.

The rescue bill hitched a ride on a popular measure that gives people with mental illness better health insurance coverage. Before passing it, senators voted by an identical 74-25 margin to attach the massive bailout and the tax breaks.

(This version corrects vote breakdown of yes votes to 39 Democrats, 34 Republicans and one Independent.)

WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, whe...
WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, whe...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1456
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

Don't Vote!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAU1vEDXKIQ

Help spread this around.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 10/02/2008

I am totally against this bail out at tax payer expense.In­stead of bailing out business I'd much rather bail out the every day human with a family trying to keep their house and healthy food on the table.I was very disturbed to read a Yahoo news piece today telling about the plans by the u.s. to sell the old embassy in London and buy new land to build a new embassy.Ne­w embassy? Whats wrong with what we already have? Especially if everything is so dire in our country without a bail out.Does anyone else see a problem with this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 10/02/2008
- barriosbabe I'm a Fan of barriosbabe 241 fans permalink
photo

Good point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 10/02/2008

CALL FOR BARNEY FRANK'S RESIGNATION FROM CONGRESS TODAY!! He completely failed in his duties as Financial Services Chairman to oversee Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. ~~~ D.C. tel: (202) 225-5931 ~~~ MA tel numbers: tel: (617) 332-3920 ~~~ tel: (508) 999-6462 ~~~~ tel: (508) 822-4796. ~~~~ This is AN OUTRAGE and he should be behind bars. CALL, CALL, CALL, CALL, ---- DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 10/02/2008

"He completely failed in his duties as Financial Services Chairman to oversee Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac"

He also promoted less regulaition on F & F . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 10/02/2008
photo

Bullcrap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 10/02/2008
photo

First off, Republicans have controlled both houses, for 12 years -- can you comprehend what "control" means. Second, 4 months into Frank becoming Chairman, he passed a bill getting regulation of Fannie/Freddie.

You've gotten lost in all the talking points.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 10/02/2008

NO BAIL OUT!! Force Congress to stay in session and get THIS RIGHT!!! Here is the House of Representatives website: http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.shtml ---- When you call or email, DEMAND an investigation into Barney Frank's role as Chairman of the Financial Services Committee who has oversight of Fannie and Freddie. Great job Barney! RESIGN!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 10/02/2008
- cabgx2 I'm a Fan of cabgx2 4 fans permalink
photo

We are probably borrowing the money from China. So when this all falls apart, which it will, we will owe China $700 billion plus interest. GREAT PLAN....NO­T.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 10/02/2008
- Pupster I'm a Fan of Pupster 12 fans permalink

That's probably true, but China already holds over a trillion dollars of our bonds.

The bailout will help the economy from collapsing and throwing millions out of work. It's necessary, even if we don't like it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 10/02/2008

I would like to urge everyone in this blog to call their Congressional representative to back Rep. Peter DeFazio's (OR-04)No Bailout Bill. This bill has been on of the only rational approach to solving this issue while holding the institutions responsible accountable for their actions.

Simon Johnson, a former chief economist as the International Monetary Fund, stated today in the New York Times of Paulson’s plan, “It’s our view that this package, in a fundamental sense, will not solve the problem.” Other economic analysts noted yesterday that the credit markets around the world were almost entirely dysfunctional even when political leaders and investors assumed that Congress had reached a deal and would easily approve the bailout. There is no reason to believe Paulson’s plan will work.

Alternatives

DeFazio’s alternative is based on five simple principles suggested by William Isaac, the chairman of the FDIC during the previous worst financial crisis in the United States during the 1980s. Mr. Isaac believes Congress can address the current crisis with simple changes to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. Mr. Isaac points out that while we face serious financial challenges today, many banks are still in good shape. This proposal allows Congress to take swift, uncomplicated steps to ensure the financial markets return to working order. After that, we can work to resolve the housing crisis and pass effective job stimulus.

You can view the plan at this link:

http://www.defazio.house.gov/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=441

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 10/02/2008
- Pupster I'm a Fan of Pupster 12 fans permalink

By passing the bill, there will be some leeway in how the funds are used. Better to pass the bill, then persuade the oversight committee of the better plan of how to use the money.

I too would prefer equity with a guaranteed return. But there are smarter people than us to figure out this thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 10/02/2008

You have got to love our Congress. Single digit approval ratings and yet they still don't get it. They are as responsible for this mess as Wall Street greed.

Pelosi should resign
Reid should resign

and shame on McCain and Obama for voting for this with all the pork in it.

But most of all, shame on us for reelecting these people time and time again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 10/02/2008
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 67 fans permalink

Please call on everyone and let them know NOT to vote on this bill. It does nothing for us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 10/02/2008

Bush lobbies furiously to pass the bailout bill. McCain and Obama, please walk side by side with Bush and Cheney and hold hands.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 10/02/2008

So this is the change we can believe in.... You broke my heart Senator Obama. I will never vote for you and I was a huge supporter of yours. The last couple years, I was glued to the news, fascinated by your speeches. I supporter you over Hillary, I donated to you campaign..­.. I would defend you against anyone. BUT NOW... you are no better than "them".... just more of the same. You are all the same, it's just a matter of who it is you want to bailout, and lets ignore the rest of the people in this country.

Here's a message to the citizens of this country: You can live irresponsibly because the government will refer to you as victims and do all they can to bail you out.... But for those that live their lives responsibly, screw you, your government does not care and will ignore your needs.

I will never vote for McCain/ Palin, but I'm venting on Obama/Biden because I really believed in them, but GOD WAS I WRONG !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 10/02/2008
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 67 fans permalink

I feel the same way but I will vote for Obama because we simply cannot have McCain in the office.
We would get from bad to worse. I said from the beginning we should have voted for Kucinich
or Ron Paul but the press decided the nominees for us. We get what we deserve!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 10/02/2008

I felt the same way but Presidentual Politics require this of him to get elected. It's gotta be troubling him. Have faith. To HELL with the rest of em. The way I see it NO INCUMBENTS -NO-WAY NO-HOW NO-MORE OBAMA'S gonna have to get all new teammates. I ain't voting any incumbents PARTYLINES BE DAMED. It's your funeral, you betrayed the trust you need to go.! ALL OF THEM. VOTING REVOLUTION TIME. DEMAND CHANGE OR SUFFER THE SAME.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 10/02/2008
photo

Welcome to this year's version of the Patriot Act. Something that started out a couple of pages long, and in no time became a 450 page monster that was forced through the Senate. With no time for anyone to review it or debate it. And we're going to get just as screwed on this one as we did with the Patriot Act. All kinds of room to plant little details that will benefit the already rich and deliver the final blow to completely kill the middle class in America. We're a democracy - SURE we are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 10/02/2008

yet another huge fraud perpetrated on the american people, in the name of "saving the greatest system in the world."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 10/02/2008

someone else said this on another blog and it''s worth repeating.

if there is going to be a "bailout" then the best thing they could do is just give each american a million dollars.

700 billion for Wall Street or $300 million to americans?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 10/02/2008
- rbarry647 I'm a Fan of rbarry647 84 fans permalink
photo

The amount of pork that had to be added on to this bill to get Republicans to vote for it is embarrassing. How could McCain vote for this with all these new earmarks that he claims to be a Maverick against

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 10/02/2008
- Pdubya I'm a Fan of Pdubya 44 fans permalink

Who put the crap in? Who has the majority vote?

You?

Answers? Yeah, we have a two party system (save for a few exceptions): The complicit and the clueless. They come in both colors.

So do yourself a favor and pull your head out of the sand. You've been conquered by division.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 10/02/2008
- ottonomy I'm a Fan of ottonomy 3 fans permalink
photo

I don't like all the crap added to the bailout to help it pass (and I don't like the bailout to begin with)... and my state got some pork too (millions of $ in timber payments to help our rural schools)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 10/02/2008
- klo I'm a Fan of klo 11 fans permalink

If Mr. McCain and his merry band of republicans are such fiscal conservatives, why did they need additional spending or tax cut incentives in order to pass this stupid legislation?
With the tax cuts and extras that were added, this 700B infusion to get the credit markets moving again will now cost an extra,what, 20-25%?
So, the republicans with their tax cutting and port and fiscal irresponsibility cost us $700B plus another 20-25% because they won't pass the bill otherwise?
Where's the fiscal conservatism in that? And since the little guy and the middle class were going to get screwed anyway, maybe the dems should have stood pat and said, "No. Rather than making the taxpayer pay even more, we'd rather see the markets work this out for themselves with as little interference from us as it can get."
Being skeptical already, I'm really starting to hope the house democrats blink. We'll all take a hit, but it'll work it's way out in the end.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 10/02/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect