Senate passes $700B rescue; House votes lured

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Senate passes $700B rescue; House votes lured stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS and CHARLES BABINGTON | October 1, 2008 11:52 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Senate Majority Leader, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., pauses during a news conference on the passage of the Senate version of the bailout package on Capitol Hill Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2008 in Washington. From left, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., Reid, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., and Senate Minority Leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, where Republicans opposition softened.

Senators loaded the economic rescue bill with tax breaks and other sweeteners before passing it by a wide margin, 74-25, a month before the presidential and congressional elections.

In the House, leaders were working feverishly to convert enough opponents of the bill to push it through by Friday, just days after lawmakers there stunningly rejected an earlier version and sent markets plunging around the globe.

The measure didn't cause the same uproar in the Senate, where both parties' presidential candidates, Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, made rare appearances to cast "aye" votes, as did Obama's running mate, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware.

In the final vote, 39 Democrats, 34 Republicans and independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut voted "yes." Nine Democrats, 15 Republicans and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont voted "no."

President Bush issued a statement praising the Senate's move. With the revisions, Bush said, "I believe members of both parties in the House can support this legislation. The American people expect and our economy demands that the House pass this good bill this week and send it to my desk."

The rescue package lets the government spend billions of dollars to buy bad mortgage-related securities and other devalued assets held by troubled financial institutions. If successful, advocates say, that would allow frozen credit to begin flowing again and prevent a deep recession.

Even as the Senate voted, House leaders were hunting for the 12 votes they would need to turn around Monday's 228-205 defeat. They were especially targeting the 133 Republicans who voted "no."

Story continues below
advertisement

Their opposition appeared to be easing after the Senate added $110 billion in tax breaks for businesses and the middle class, plus a provision to raise, from $100,000 to $250,000, the cap on federal deposit insurance.

They were also cheering a decision Tuesday by the Securities and Exchange Commission to ease rules that force companies to devalue assets on their balance sheets to reflect the price they can get on the market.

There were worries, though, that the tax breaks would cause some conservative-leaning "Blue Dog" Democrats who voted for the rescue Monday to abandon it. The bill doesn't designate a way to pay for many of the tax cuts, and Blue Dogs typically oppose any measure that swells the deficit.

"I'm concerned about that," said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the majority leader.

Raising the deposit insurance limit _ along with the SEC's accounting change _ helped House Republicans claim credit for some substantive changes. And with constituent feedback changing dramatically since Monday's shocking House defeat and the corresponding market plunge, lawmakers' comfort level with the package increased markedly.

Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz., who voted "no" on Monday, said he was leaning toward switching, and Rep. Steve LaTourette,R-Ohio, said he was "getting there." Several others were weighing a flip, said Republican officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the lawmakers had not yet announced how they would vote.

Leaders in both parties, as well as private economic chiefs everywhere, said Congress must quickly approve some version of the bailout measure to start loans flowing and stave off a potential national economic disaster.

"This is what we need to do right now to prevent the possibility of a crisis turning into a catastrophe," Obama said on the Senate floor. In Missouri, before flying to Washington to vote, McCain said, "If we fail to act, the gears of our economy will grind to a halt."

Critics on the right and left assailed the rescue plan, which has been panned by their constituents as a giveaway for Wall Street, and has little obvious direct benefit for ordinary Americans.

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., a leading conservative, said the step was "leading us into the pit of socialism."

Sanders, a self-described socialist, said the rescue was fundamentally unfair.

"The masters of the universe, those brilliant Wall Street insiders who have made more money than the average American can even dream of, have brought our financial system to the brink of collapse," Sanders said, and are demanding that the middle class "pick up the pieces that they broke."

Still, proponents argued that the financial sector's woes were already being felt by ordinary people in the form of unaffordable credit and underperforming retirement savings and without the bailout would soon translate into even more economic pain for working Americans, including more job losses.

"There will be no balloons or bunting or parades," when the rescue becomes law, said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., the Banking Committee chairman. But lawmakers will have "the knowledge that at one of our nation's moments of maximum economic peril, we acted _ not for the benefit of a particular few, but for all Americans."

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said the intense, at times contentious, 11-day round of bipartisan talks to craft the bailout _ which followed dire warnings of impending economic meltdown from Bush's economic chiefs to congressional leaders _ was an "extraordinary experience."

"This is the way government's supposed to work, folks, and it did," Gregg said.

The Senate specializes in high-stakes legislating by enticement, and the long list of sweeteners it added was designed to attract votes from various constituencies.

In addition to extending several tax breaks popular with businesses, the bill would keep the alternative minimum tax from hitting 20 million middle-income Americans and provide $8 billion in tax relief for those hit by natural disasters in the Midwest, Texas and Louisiana.

Tax cuts new and old are favorites for most House Republicans. Help for rural schools was aimed mainly at lawmakers in the West, while disaster aid was a top priority for lawmakers from across the Midwest and South.

Another addition, to extend the deductibility of state and local taxes for people in states without income taxes, helps Florida and Texas, among others.

Increasing the deposit insurance cap was a bid to reassure individuals and small businesses that their money would be safe if their banks collapsed. It was particularly geared toward small banks that fear customers will pull their money and park it in larger institutions seen as less likely to fold.

The FDIC would be allowed to borrow unlimited money from the Treasury Department through the end of next year as a way to cover the increased insurance limit. If used, it would be the first time the agency has tapped Treasury for a loan since the early 1990s.

The rescue bill hitched a ride on a popular measure that gives people with mental illness better health insurance coverage. Before passing it, senators voted by an identical 74-25 margin to attach the massive bailout and the tax breaks.

(This version corrects vote breakdown of yes votes to 39 Democrats, 34 Republicans and one Independent.)

WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, whe...
WASHINGTON — After one spectacular failure, the $700 billion financial industry bailout found a second life Wednesday, winning lopsided passage in the Senate and gaining ground in the House, whe...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1456
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
- l.blissett I'm a Fan of l.blissett 5 fans permalink

the only question that remains in my mind about this whole 2 day senate episode is whether the senate leadership when deciding on their tactical manuevers on the jewish new year at all recognized the cruel irony in the fact that Paul Wellstone, were he alive, would have voted a resounding Nay to the final draft of the bill that was drafted in his honor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 10/02/2008

Teriffic, it's wonderful that you know how the dead would vote. All that is heard is how the Republicans are at fault. In the House vote 60% of the Demodrats voted "aye". In the Senate two thirds of the Democrats voted "aye". Do the math this was not a Republican steam roller. Both sides are in this together.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 10/02/2008

"This is the way government's supposed to work, folks, and it did," Gregg said.

Wrong!!!! If the government was working properly this would have never happened in the first place!!! This is government at its worse, but maybe this will be the final chapter before the citizenry cleans house and starts fresh. Like it or not this bailout will not save anything and we are about to reset to zero.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 10/02/2008
- gorgol I'm a Fan of gorgol 31 fans permalink

OUR representatives aren't going to get it...until about TEN MILLION out of work people..MA­RCH ON WASHINGTON­....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 10/02/2008
- gorgol I'm a Fan of gorgol 31 fans permalink

ONE HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION ADDED PORK FOR THE "RUM INDUSTRY".­..SIX MILLION FOR WOODEN ARROWS...i­s this true??? these were added to the BAIL OUT??? to help it pass?? and we're supposed to trust this CROOKS?? and as for PAULSON...­.he came from wall street..he­'s worth over $100 MILLION...­and Bush chose him....DOE­S THAT TELL YOU ANYTHING..­..oh, we haven't seen anything yet....
advice...B­UY CANNED GOODS..LOA­D UP...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 10/02/2008
- Ozarks I'm a Fan of Ozarks 43 fans permalink
photo

SydneylovesherDaddy See Profile I'm a Fan of SydneylovesherDaddy I'm a fan of this user permalink

Quick survey.

How many of you think there is anyway in He-ll that Chris "Tweety" Mathews and Keith "Bed-wetter" Olbermann will opine that Sarah Palin did better than expected in tonight's debate? It'll be full-out negative spin.

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­-
Sidney (sic) maybe you should just watch Billo and Hannity to get the results of your "Quick survey" < I am sure you will be happy with their tallied outcome.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 10/02/2008
- booker52 I'm a Fan of booker52 24 fans permalink
photo

It's a pork laden crap sandwich, they all should be ashamed of their yes votes. This bail out bill does nothing to fix this current situation. NOTHING!!!! It just adds to the national debt. I hope the congress see this and votes it down yet again. I have one question, since when does the senate vote before the house???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 10/02/2008
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 84 fans permalink
photo

Any idiot in Washington who does end this wretched fiasco tomorrow should be RETIRED. How can these idiots justify giving some Rum company in P.R. a 180 million dollar tax break when through what, about 12 presidents now, we still have to listed to candidate DRIBBLE about health care. A country as small as the u.k. has health care for all, and cancer patients DO NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIR MEDS. The sickening greed that consumes everyone who gets to Washington and putrifies what was once a great government NEEDS TO BE CHANGED. None of these people deserve to have their jobs back, NONE OF THEM.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 10/02/2008
- Pdubya I'm a Fan of Pdubya 44 fans permalink

A few patriots in the (R) isle....

http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=JimsJournal.Detail&Blog_ID=ba941c40-dcc0-914f-7353-82ff38b75c53

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 10/02/2008
- Housewife I'm a Fan of Housewife 25 fans permalink

For everybody who has an opinion about this plan, please watch Warren Buffet on last nights edition of Charlie Rose. He gets it and explains it well. He is the most successful businessman of our age. He sees the bailout as an investment.
http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2008/10/01/1/an-exclusive-conversation-with-warren-buffett

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 10/02/2008
photo

He's gonna benefit from this bailout, that's why he likes it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 10/02/2008

We're taking our bailout lead from Bush, the same guy who wanted to privatize Social Security -- the same guy who spooked us with images of mushroom clouds and WMD into attacking Iraq. Are we crazy now to give the Bush, who didn't really win in 2,000, a whopping $700 billion to fool around with in a bailout scheme that in effect amounts to crony capitalism?
Sterling Greenwood
Aspen Free Press

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 10/02/2008

It's suggested by some here that some those against the rescue plan/bailout display a stunning lack of knowledge on the economy by opposing this rescue plan/bailout.

In 1987, the market was at 2,200 and had a bigger one-day percentage drop than the 1929 crash.

Yet, we are still here and the market is over 10,000.

Just 2 weeks ago, we were told that the end was near if we did not pass the bill in 3 days.

Yet, here we are.

Stunning, isn't it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 10/02/2008

A small group of individuals have taken 300,000,000 Americans to the brink of financial disaster.

Had terrorists done this, we would be calling for their heads to roll.

But not in this case. The culprits, at worst, get to walk away to a golden retirement with billions in their pockets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 10/02/2008
- Martee I'm a Fan of Martee 11 fans permalink

This is the first time in modern history a single act of legislation has been watched so closely by so many -- and people should be outraged! You're presented with a self-serving plan -- others try to make some sense of it -- but to get it passed they have to LOAD it up with plenty of PORK! A -- B -- C! Time after time! Where's all that "anti-pork" talk?!??! "Well, not THIS time. We need to pass this bill!" Oh, BROTHER!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 10/02/2008
- Meggie I'm a Fan of Meggie 85 fans permalink
photo

McCain swooped in and added tax cuts for the weasels who were responsible for this mess and then added nice, slick earmarks and pork so it will slide right down those house repub throats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 10/02/2008
photo

Agree, however, earmarks/pork is such a de minimus part of the budget, it really is a non starter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 10/02/2008
- boing007 I'm a Fan of boing007 9 fans permalink

Harper's:

From the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law:

Election officials across the country are routinely striking millions of voters from the rolls through a process that is shrouded in secrecy, prone to error, and vulnerable to manipulati­on…[B]etwe­en 2004 and 2006, thirty-nine states and the District of Columbia reported purging more than 13 million voters from registration rolls…

In Mississippi earlier this year, a local election official discovered that another official had wrongly purged 10,000 voters from her home computer just a week before the presidential primary.

In Muscogee, Georgia this year, a county official purged 700 people from the voter lists, supposedly because they were ineligible to vote due to criminal convictions. The list included people who claimed to have never even received a parking ticket.

In Louisiana, including areas hit hard by hurricanes, officials purged approximately 21,000 voters, ostensibly for registering to vote in another state, but did not provide adequate opportunity to contest the records.

Get ready for another rigged election!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 10/02/2008
photo

Agreed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 10/02/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect


svn