EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Say It Ain't So, Sarah: Palin Smears Obama With Year-Old Discredited Attack


First Posted: 10- 3-08 10:31 PM   |   Updated: 11- 3-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Palin Top
?>

During an appearance on Fox News this Friday, Sarah Palin claimed that Barack Obama should be disqualified from serving as president because he had once proclaimed that troops in Afghanistan were "air raiding villages and killing civilians."

If the charge seemed oddly and painfully familiar it's because it has been levied at Obama - and subsequently dismissed - several times before during this election season.

The issue stems from a remark the Illinois Democrat made in August 2007, in Nashua, New Hampshire. Speaking to supporters, the Senator called for an increase of U.S. troops in that war zone because, without the influx, operations were being limited to air raids that resulted in many preventable civilian deaths.

"Now you have narco drug lords who are helping to finance the Taliban," Obama said, "so we've got to get the job done there [in Afghanistan], and that requires us to have enough troops that we are not just air raiding villages, and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there."

When the comment was first made, Republicans were eager to mold it into an electoral liability. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and the RNC called it disrespectful and unbecoming of a presidential aspirant.

But within a day, objective observers were knifing through the faux-outrage. The AP fact-checked the claim by pointing out that none other than President Bush himself had bemoaned the excessive loss of innocent Afghani lives and the setback such casualties caused for U.S. military efforts there.

And yet, the GOP couldn't and wouldn't let the canard die. One year after Obama's initial remark, the McCain campaign marked the anniversary by randomly raising it in the form of a biting press release. That charge didn't create many waves. (The Huffington Post wrote an article examining that attack as well.) But the McCain campaign kept at it.

On Thursday night, Palin brought it up directly in the vice presidential debate, and actually intensified the smear. Rather than painting the remark as a gaffe borne of inexperience, as Republicans claimed last year, Palin implied that Obama was slandering U.S. forces as little more than murderers.

"Now," she declared, "Barack Obama had said that all we're doing in Afghanistan is air-raiding villages and killing civilians. And such a reckless, reckless comment and untrue comment, again, hurts our cause. That's not what we're doing there. We're fighting terrorists, and we're securing democracy..."

And on Friday, she repeated the line to minimal journalistic resistance.

"Some of his comments that he has made about the war that I think may -- in my world- disqualifies someone from consideration as the next commander in chief," she told Fox News. "Some of his comments about Afghanistan and what we are doing there supposedly- just air raiding villages and killing civilians. That's reckless."

The un-originality of the claim would seem to detract from its general newsworthiness. Not to mention the fact that it appears devoid of any reasonable context. And yet, hours after Palin's appearance on Fox, the headline on the Drudge Report read as follows:

"PALIN: OBAMA COMMENTS DISQUALIFY HIM FOR COMMANDER IN CHIEF"

For more, check out this fact-check video produced by Talking Points Memo when Obama made these remarks last year:

During an appearance on Fox News this Friday, Sarah Palin claimed that Barack Obama should be disqualified from serving as president because he had once proclaimed that troops in Afghanistan were "air...
During an appearance on Fox News this Friday, Sarah Palin claimed that Barack Obama should be disqualified from serving as president because he had once proclaimed that troops in Afghanistan were "air...
 
  • Comments
  • 2,324
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (73 total)
10:36 PM on 10/10/2008
The report is out on Trooper gate get here : http://www­.adn.com/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
11907281
06:50 PM on 10/07/2008
A leader who doesn't acknowledg­e the pain and suffering from air raids that kill innocent civilians in allied lands puts the troops at risk for revenge attacks. The are innocent people that lost their lives because of the US military, to ignore it and sweep it under the rug stokes the idea that Americans view Muslims as sub-human. Forgivenes­s only comes when wrong doing is acknowledg­ed.
01:48 PM on 10/07/2008
Need a good laugh? See the new SARAH PALIN BARBIE DOLL:

http://www­.Vaboomer.­com
01:37 PM on 10/07/2008
McCain Vows to Follow Obama to the Gates of ? the White House!
http://sat­iricalpoli­tical.com/­?p=3815
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:36 PM on 10/07/2008
Her comments and inferences are reckless and stirring the pot of hatred. She and todd probably have a plan to tanya harding mc cain and that's why she keeps referring to it as the "palin -mccain" campaign.
07:05 AM on 10/07/2008
Is Sarah Palin stupid or just pretending to be? With the American economy tanking and people losing their lifetime savings in a crashing stock market, all this woman can talk about is Obama's conections with William Ayers? Her cutsey, smiling, winking ways have fast worn out with the American people. She does not have a clue!
05:51 AM on 10/07/2008
Is this why she is on the ticket? To attack Obama and dredge up old smears thave have been debunked too many times now. Does she think that the american people are sto stupid that they do not recall what has been said before? But most importantl­y why does the McCain/Pal­in camp spend all their time attacking Obama and not selling thier own campaign and what they will do for us the American people? Because they have no clue, no plan and just don't get it. Say it isn't so Sarah?
11:20 AM on 10/09/2008
"Does she think that the american people are sto stupid that they do not recall what has been said before?"

Yes.
12:30 AM on 10/07/2008
The McCain/Pal­in campaign is the most dishonorab­le campaign I've ever seen.
10:42 PM on 10/06/2008
discredite­d my a**! Hold onto your seat MORE TO COME!!!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
10:29 PM on 10/06/2008
Liar, Liar, Keatings On Fire!!!
02:12 PM on 10/07/2008
Terrific article. Why is it we have to look to a British journalist to call a spade a spade?
10:24 PM on 10/06/2008
"On Thursday night, Palin brought it up directly in the vice presidenti­al debate, and actually intensifie­d the smear...."­Now," she declared, "Barack Obama had said that all we're doing in Afghanista­n is air-raidin­g villages and killing civilians. And such a reckless, reckless comment and untrue comment, again, hurts our cause. That's not what we're doing there. We're fighting terrorists­, and we're securing democracy.­..""

____Well, we seem to be air-raidin­g villages and killing civilians while we fight the terrorist and secure "democracy­." Our allies, including President Karzai who finds Ms Palin gorgeous, have complained about these destroyed villages and dead civilians. Even George Bush admits this is a problem!!

Aren't the Afghanis supposed to complain about a lot of dead kids?
09:53 PM on 10/06/2008
The truly unfortunat­e thing is that she will never be challenged because she will not take questions. This is equally bad as taking Sen McCain to task over his 100 years in Iraq comment. The entire context of both statements are being dismissed.

We've had Sen Obama on the national stage for close to two years, yet people say they do not know him. We've had Gov Palin on the national stage for five weeks, though I have yet to hear anyone say that they do not know her. We've heard Sen Obama speak on many issues and we have only had a hand full of interviews and speaches from Gov Palin.

If I had to make a decision based on the above, the decision is an absolute no brainer.

Is it possible to be consistent here? For goodness sakes!
08:47 PM on 10/06/2008
Is it me or does she look like a call girl? I am serious she looks like one of the women from like "Executive Escorts" $600.00 in or out calls.

Shessh and that is what the G () P wants as VP a h00ker
09:10 PM on 10/06/2008
Not one I'd pay for.

Not that I... uh... never mind.... :P
09:57 PM on 10/06/2008
That was unnecessar­y. Besides there is no single way for a $600 call girl to look. You might recall what Gov Spitzer's (of New York) call girl looked like. Google 'Emeprors Club.'

Or, maybe you are just being snarky. Either way it was uncalled for.
06:06 PM on 10/07/2008
Really she seems to relish the concept of being cheap and easy. The winking and innuedos of s3xuality that ree from her pores is what makes me think she is a call girl.

BTW I have never had a use for a call girl as women tend to not need to pay for s3x.
08:32 PM on 10/06/2008
Poor Sarah who reads everything is just a YEAR behind.