Say It Ain't So, Sarah: Palin Smears Obama With Year-Old Discredited Attack

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Say It Ain't So, Sarah: Palin Smears Obama With Year-Old Discredited Attack stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10- 3-08 10:31 PM   |   Updated: 11- 3-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Palin Top

During an appearance on Fox News this Friday, Sarah Palin claimed that Barack Obama should be disqualified from serving as president because he had once proclaimed that troops in Afghanistan were "air raiding villages and killing civilians."

If the charge seemed oddly and painfully familiar it's because it has been levied at Obama - and subsequently dismissed - several times before during this election season.

The issue stems from a remark the Illinois Democrat made in August 2007, in Nashua, New Hampshire. Speaking to supporters, the Senator called for an increase of U.S. troops in that war zone because, without the influx, operations were being limited to air raids that resulted in many preventable civilian deaths.

"Now you have narco drug lords who are helping to finance the Taliban," Obama said, "so we've got to get the job done there [in Afghanistan], and that requires us to have enough troops that we are not just air raiding villages, and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there."

When the comment was first made, Republicans were eager to mold it into an electoral liability. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and the RNC called it disrespectful and unbecoming of a presidential aspirant.

But within a day, objective observers were knifing through the faux-outrage. The AP fact-checked the claim by pointing out that none other than President Bush himself had bemoaned the excessive loss of innocent Afghani lives and the setback such casualties caused for U.S. military efforts there.

And yet, the GOP couldn't and wouldn't let the canard die. One year after Obama's initial remark, the McCain campaign marked the anniversary by randomly raising it in the form of a biting press release. That charge didn't create many waves. (The Huffington Post wrote an article examining that attack as well.) But the McCain campaign kept at it.

On Thursday night, Palin brought it up directly in the vice presidential debate, and actually intensified the smear. Rather than painting the remark as a gaffe borne of inexperience, as Republicans claimed last year, Palin implied that Obama was slandering U.S. forces as little more than murderers.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Now," she declared, "Barack Obama had said that all we're doing in Afghanistan is air-raiding villages and killing civilians. And such a reckless, reckless comment and untrue comment, again, hurts our cause. That's not what we're doing there. We're fighting terrorists, and we're securing democracy..."

And on Friday, she repeated the line to minimal journalistic resistance.

"Some of his comments that he has made about the war that I think may -- in my world- disqualifies someone from consideration as the next commander in chief," she told Fox News. "Some of his comments about Afghanistan and what we are doing there supposedly- just air raiding villages and killing civilians. That's reckless."

The un-originality of the claim would seem to detract from its general newsworthiness. Not to mention the fact that it appears devoid of any reasonable context. And yet, hours after Palin's appearance on Fox, the headline on the Drudge Report read as follows:

"PALIN: OBAMA COMMENTS DISQUALIFY HIM FOR COMMANDER IN CHIEF"

For more, check out this fact-check video produced by Talking Points Memo when Obama made these remarks last year:

During an appearance on Fox News this Friday, Sarah Palin claimed that Barack Obama should be disqualified from serving as president because he had once proclaimed that troops in Afghanistan were "air...
During an appearance on Fox News this Friday, Sarah Palin claimed that Barack Obama should be disqualified from serving as president because he had once proclaimed that troops in Afghanistan were "air...
 
Comments
2327
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (73 pages total)
photo

The report is out on Trooper gate get here : http://www.adn.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 10/10/2008
photo

A leader who doesn't acknowledge the pain and suffering from air raids that kill innocent civilians in allied lands puts the troops at risk for revenge attacks. The are innocent people that lost their lives because of the US military, to ignore it and sweep it under the rug stokes the idea that Americans view Muslims as sub-human. Forgiveness only comes when wrong doing is acknowledged.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 10/07/2008

Need a good laugh? See the new SARAH PALIN BARBIE DOLL:

http://www.Vaboomer.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 10/07/2008

McCain Vows to Follow Obama to the Gates of ? the White House!
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=3815

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 10/07/2008

Her comments and inferences are reckless and stirring the pot of hatred. She and todd probably have a plan to tanya harding mc cain and that's why she keeps referring to it as the "palin -mccain" campaign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 10/07/2008

Is Sarah Palin stupid or just pretending to be? With the American economy tanking and people losing their lifetime savings in a crashing stock market, all this woman can talk about is Obama's conections with William Ayers? Her cutsey, smiling, winking ways have fast worn out with the American people. She does not have a clue!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 AM on 10/07/2008

Is this why she is on the ticket? To attack Obama and dredge up old smears thave have been debunked too many times now. Does she think that the american people are sto stupid that they do not recall what has been said before? But most importantly why does the McCain/Palin camp spend all their time attacking Obama and not selling thier own campaign and what they will do for us the American people? Because they have no clue, no plan and just don't get it. Say it isn't so Sarah?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 AM on 10/07/2008
photo

"Does she think that the american people are sto stupid that they do not recall what has been said before?"

Yes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 10/09/2008
photo

The McCain/Palin campaign is the most dishonorable campaign I've ever seen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 10/07/2008

discredited my a**! Hold onto your seat MORE TO COME!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 10/06/2008

Liar, Liar, Keatings On Fire!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 10/06/2008

Terrific article. Why is it we have to look to a British journalist to call a spade a spade?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 10/07/2008

"On Thursday night, Palin brought it up directly in the vice presidential debate, and actually intensified the smear...."Now," she declared, "Barack Obama had said that all we're doing in Afghanistan is air-raiding villages and killing civilians. And such a reckless, reckless comment and untrue comment, again, hurts our cause. That's not what we're doing there. We're fighting terrorists, and we're securing democracy...""

____Well, we seem to be air-raiding villages and killing civilians while we fight the terrorist and secure "democracy." Our allies, including President Karzai who finds Ms Palin gorgeous, have complained about these destroyed villages and dead civilians. Even George Bush admits this is a problem!!

Aren't the Afghanis supposed to complain about a lot of dead kids?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 10/06/2008

The truly unfortunate thing is that she will never be challenged because she will not take questions. This is equally bad as taking Sen McCain to task over his 100 years in Iraq comment. The entire context of both statements are being dismissed.

We've had Sen Obama on the national stage for close to two years, yet people say they do not know him. We've had Gov Palin on the national stage for five weeks, though I have yet to hear anyone say that they do not know her. We've heard Sen Obama speak on many issues and we have only had a hand full of interviews and speaches from Gov Palin.

If I had to make a decision based on the above, the decision is an absolute no brainer.

Is it possible to be consistent here? For goodness sakes!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 10/06/2008
photo

Is it me or does she look like a call girl? I am serious she looks like one of the women from like "Executive Escorts" $600.00 in or out calls.

Shessh and that is what the G () P wants as VP a h00ker

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 10/06/2008
photo

Not one I'd pay for.

Not that I... uh... never mind.... :P

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 10/06/2008

That was unnecessary. Besides there is no single way for a $600 call girl to look. You might recall what Gov Spitzer's (of New York) call girl looked like. Google 'Emeprors Club.'

Or, maybe you are just being snarky. Either way it was uncalled for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 10/06/2008
photo

Really she seems to relish the concept of being cheap and easy. The winking and innuedos of s3xuality that ree from her pores is what makes me think she is a call girl.

BTW I have never had a use for a call girl as women tend to not need to pay for s3x.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 10/07/2008

Poor Sarah who reads everything is just a YEAR behind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 PM on 10/06/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (73 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPost Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More

Sam Stein is the White House correspondent for the Huffington Post. Previously he worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Ryan Grim is the senior congressional correspondent for the Huffington Post. He is a former staff reporter with Politico.com and Washington City Paper.
Read More

Jason Linkins is editor of Huffington Post's media commentary blog Eat the Press. He is based in Washington, DC, and previously contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More

Rachel Weiner is Associate Politics Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Katharine Zaleski is the Senior News Editor at the Huffington Post. She is based in New York.
Read More