Wachovia, Wells Fargo Deal Ends Talks With Citigroup

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Wachovia, Wells Fargo Deal Ends Talks With Citigroup stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

SARA LEPRO | 10/ 3/08 10:57 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A Wells Fargo customer walks into bank in Mountain View, Calif., Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008. Wachovia says it agreed to be acquired by San Francisco-based Wells Fargo & Co. in a $15.1 billion all-stock deal. But Citigroup now demands that Wachovia abide by the terms of its earlier deal to buy Wachovia's banking operations. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

NEW YORK — A battle broke out Friday for control of Wachovia, as Wells Fargo agreed to pay $14.8 billion for the struggling bank, while Citigroup and federal regulators insisted that Citi's earlier and lower-priced takeover offer go forward.

The surprise announcement that Wachovia Corp. agreed to be acquired by San Francisco-based Wells Fargo & Co. in the all-stock deal _ without government assistance _ upended what had appeared to be a carefully examined arrangement and caught regulators off guard.

Wells' original offer totaled about $15.1 billion, but since the value of its shares closed down 60 cents Friday, the deal is now valued at about $14.8 billion.

Only four days earlier, Citigroup Inc. agreed to pay $2.1 billion for Wachovia's banking operations in a deal that would have the help of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

The head of the FDIC said the agency is standing behind the Citigroup agreement, but that it is reviewing all proposals and will work with the banks' regulators "to pursue a resolution that serves the public interest."

Citigroup, which demanded that Wachovia call off its deal with Wells Fargo, said its agreement with Wachovia provides that the bank will not enter into any transaction with any party other than Citi or negotiate with anyone else.

Barring legal action, the future of Wachovia will be determined by the bank's shareholders and regulators, which both have to approve a final deal.

It was clear which they preferred Friday, as Wachovia shares climbed as high as 80 percent.

Story continues below

The FDIC is talking out of both sides of its mouth, said Roger Cominsky, partner in law firm Hiscock & Barclay's financial institutions and lending practice. The agency says it stands behind the deal with Citigroup because it hasn't been nixed yet, he said. "But at the same time, they are saying they are reviewing all proposals."

By law, he said the FDIC is required to find the least-costly resolution for taxpayers. The Wells Fargo deal would not rely on any assistance from the government.

The Federal Reserve, which has regulatory oversight of the three big banks, said it hasn't had time to review the proposed sale of Wachovia to Wells Fargo but will work to ensure that all creditors and depositors of Wachovia are protected.

The Fed said regulators will be working with Wachovia and Wells Fargo "to achieve an outcome that protects all Wachovia creditors, including depositors, insured and uninsured, and promotes market stability."

Under Wells Fargo's deal, Wachovia shareholders would receive 0.1991 shares of Wells Fargo for every share of Wachovia stock they own, valuing Wachovia at about $7 per share. This is a nearly 80 percent premium over the stock's Thursday closing price of $3.91. Shares closed at $10 on Sept. 26, the last trading session before the deal with Citigroup was announced.

"This deal enables us to keep Wachovia intact and preserve the value of an integrated company, without government support," Robert Steel, Wachovia's president and chief executive, said in a statement.

In its planned takeover of Wachovia, Citigroup said it would assume $53 billion worth of debt and agreed to absorb up to $42 billion of losses from Wachovia's $312 billion loan portfolio. The FDIC agreed to cover any remaining losses in exchange for $12 billion in Citigroup preferred stock and warrants.

"Wells' deeper and more considered due diligence has probably revealed fewer risky assets and a larger number of higher valued assets than originally thought," said Anant Sundaram, professor of finance at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College in an e-mail to The Associated Press. "Although it is still too early to tell, this could presage a significant shift in market sentiment toward the value of companies such as Wachovia, and may suggest that there has been an overreaction in the downdraft that we saw in the past few weeks. It is a huge shot in the arm for market confidence. It is also a signal that market forces are capable of resolving some aspects of the crisis without undue congressional, and hence, taxpayer, intervention."

The fight for Wachovia comes at a turbulent time for banks and financial firms as they grapple with the ongoing credit crisis, which led to the recent bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and the failure of Washington Mutual Inc.

It also comes at a time of unprecedented government intervention in the financial markets.

Wells Fargo may have decided to make a move as the passage of the government's financial bailout plan seemed imminent, said Donn Vickrey, co-founder and chief analyst at Gradient Analytics.

"At the time they made the decision, it looked a lot more likely that it would pass," he said. "You have the possibility of offloading these loans at a price that is higher than current values."

The failure of the government's proposed $700 billion bailout for financial institutions Monday cast doubt on whether Citigroup would be able to rid itself of some of Wachovia's bad debt.

The proposal would have allowed Citigroup to sell Wachovia's distressed mortgage-related assets to the government for a profit.

Congress approved a sweetened version of the bailout plan Friday and President Bush quickly signed it.

The core of the plan remains little changed from its inception _ the Treasury Department would have $700 billion at its disposal to purchase bad mortage-related securities that are weighing down the balance sheets of institutions that hold them.

But in analyzing the deal, Wells Fargo assumed it would not sell any of the loans to the government.

"We couldn't assume that they would necessarily give us prices equal to what we think the values are," said Chairman Dick Kovacevich in an interview with The Associated Press.

Wells Fargo said it expects to take a $74 billion hit on Wachovia's $498 billion loan portfolio. That values the portfolio at 85 cents on the dollar. But the most troubled real estate loans, known as pick-a-pay _ where borrowers got low introductory rates and were allowed to defer some interest payments until later years _ are worth only an estimated 74 cents on the dollar, according to a fact sheet released by Wells Fargo.

The bank said it expects to incur the majority of credit costs in the next two years, and for the transaction to add meaningfully to earnings after that.

One factor that did play in to the deal was the clarification of a tax rule issued this week by the Internal Revenue Service.

On Tuesday, the IRS issued guidance on a rule allowing companies to offset losses from companies they acquire with tax breaks applied to their profits after the takeover.

"It was an element that gave us clarity on an area of uncertainty," Kovacevich said.

The potentially bigger tax offsets could boost the income of banks that buy other banks with losses from mortgage assets.

"We suspect that the new IRS guidance allowed Wells Fargo to place a higher bid for Wachovia today than it might have been willing to a few days ago," said Jeff Harte, an analyst at Sandler O'Neill & Partners, in a note issued Friday.

Essentially, Wells Fargo could use the $74 billion of tax losses on Wachovia's loan writedowns to offset its own income, which means the bank's taxes could be much lower for several years, said Deutsche Bank analyst Mike Mayo.

In connection with the agreement, Wachovia is issuing Wells Fargo preferred stock representing 39.9 percent of Wachovia's voting power. This increases the probability that the transaction gets consummated quickly and that Wells Fargo will receive a positive shareholder vote, Wells Fargo said.

Wells Fargo plans to issue up to $20 billion of stock, primarily common stock, to maintain a strong capital position.

Charlotte will be the headquarters for the combined company's East Coast retail and commercial and corporate banking business. St. Louis will remain the headquarters of Wachovia Securities.

The combined company will have total deposits of $713 billion and more than 6,500 locations _ more than any other bank in the U.S.

While there is some overlap in states like California and Texas, the deal essentially opens up the entire East Coast to Wells Fargo, giving it a footprint in new markets such as New York and Miami.

In terms of total assets, a combined Wells Fargo-Wachovia would have $1.37 trillion in estimated pro forma assets as of the end of this year. As of June 30, Bank of America Corp. had $2.72 trillion in assets including those of Merrill Lynch & Co., which it is acquiring. Citigroup had $2.10 trillion and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. had about $1.78 trillion, including WaMu's assets.

"This is the transaction that we thought should have been done and makes sense," Mayo said. "The biggest loser, in our view, is Citi, and we suspect that there is no breakup fee since their agreement with Wachovia was not finalized."

Citigroup has not turned a profit for three straight quarters, and lost a total of $17.4 billion in that period after writing down its assets by about $46 billion. That's the most write-downs of any U.S. bank.

While Wells Fargo has logged three straight quarters of profit declines, the bank has been weathering one of the nation's worst credit crises much better than most of its competitors, in part because it had less exposure to the subprime mortgages whose failure undermined the financial sector.

Wachovia shares rose $2.30, or 58.8 percent, to close Friday at $6.21. Wells shares slipped 60 cents to $34.56, and Citigroup shares dropped $4.15, or 18.4 percent, to $18.35.

___

AP Business Writer Jennifer Malloy Zonnas in New York and Economics Writer Martin Crutsinger and Business Writer Marcy Gordon in Washington contributed to this story.

NEW YORK — A battle broke out Friday for control of Wachovia, as Wells Fargo agreed to pay $14.8 billion for the struggling bank, while Citigroup and federal regulators insisted that Citi's earl...
NEW YORK — A battle broke out Friday for control of Wachovia, as Wells Fargo agreed to pay $14.8 billion for the struggling bank, while Citigroup and federal regulators insisted that Citi's earl...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
66
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
photo

So, now I GUESS that Wells-Fargo will take on the Repubican National Committee as one of its debtors, as Wachovia has loaned the RNC $8 million to help republicans in their respective races thorughout the country....

How did GOP get $8 million from Wachovia? http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/9/144138/991/200/625265

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 10/11/2008
- Indubio I'm a Fan of Indubio 25 fans permalink

Citbank can sue but it won't help their situation. They saw a wounded duck and with government help made a crappy offer for part of Wachovia's assets. Wells Fargo came back with an offer that so far and away trumped Citbank's Wachovia/Citbank would likely be subject to a shareholder suit had the Wells Fargo bid not been accepted. If Citibank wants Wachovia there's a way they can do. It's called upping the ante. Considering that the Wells bid uses no public dollars I imagine after a little squawking by FDIC, the government will shut up and go about the myriad other tasks they have on their plate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 AM on 10/05/2008
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 50 fans permalink

2 Citigroup, suit yourself. Wells Fargo has the horses & beat you. If you want to compete, learn the new rules. Get a good team or so, skilled drivers & able bodied people to ride shot gun. Learn about due dilligance again; the rules have changed. Try again when you learn the rules, have the horses to start & at relay stations. good, reliable drivers & shot gun guards with loaed guns, plenty of shells & a good aim. Wells Fargo beat you fair & square. Wipe your nose, quit crying, go home. Rest up & prepare for the next race. Oh, yeah, learn the territory like Wells Fargo did. You were way west of Wall St & Mid-town. It ain't like Canarse out west. Get a map, a horse & guide to lead you when you ride out to learn the territory. It gets rough west of Mount Vernon, NY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 10/04/2008
- suec03 I'm a Fan of suec03 12 fans permalink

I realize saving FDIC funds makes Wells Fargo look like a better deal, but based on my experience as a Wells Fargo employee in the 1980's when they were actively buying up other banks, a Wells Fargo takeover of Wachovia could worsen unemployment here in Southern California. We are saturated with Wells Fargo branches. Wells has a history of aggressively consolidating branches, laying off "surplus" employees, and reducing hours of part-time tellers. I worked 17 hours a week for Wells Fargo while going to school three nights a week and working in the school library on weekends. After the consolidation, I was lucky to get 10 hours a week from Wells Fargo. I had to quit and get a "real" job at Bank of America processing ATM deposits to pay for school, rent, food and gas. Wells Fargo aggressively raised monthly fees on checking accounts, pushing customers into ATM only accounts, and then charged them a fee any time they made a deposit inside the branch.

Citigroup's Citibank is no hero. Watch PBS Frontline's "Secret Life of the Credit Card" to see how Citibank moved their credit card operations to South Dakota to be able to increase their finance charge rates. But they have only two branches in my area, so they would be more likely to keep the Wachovia branches open. I was glad it was JPMorgan Chase that took over Washington Mutual's operations--no Chase branches in my area so little chance of branch closings and layoffs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 10/04/2008

Citigroup needs taxpayer money to buy parts of Wachovia.

No deal is signed with Citi.

Wells Fargo needs none to buy all of Wachovia.

Wachovia agrees to Wells Fargo deal.

Citi decides to use cash it doesn't have to sue.

When are Citigroup shareholders going to draw and quarter their management?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 10/04/2008

Here is an interesting thought. If the FDIC is taking such an activist role with this deal, who says they didn't do something similar with the JP Morgan Chase/Washington Mutual deal? Maybe they scared off a few of the prospective buyers? Maybe they played favorites? Maybe it was payback time for the last time they bailed out some failing investment firm?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 10/04/2008
- WIpatriot I'm a Fan of WIpatriot 36 fans permalink
photo

Matbe...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 10/04/2008
- Wiredwilly I'm a Fan of Wiredwilly 23 fans permalink

The Truth :

9/11 , the War in Iraq , the $ 700 Billion theft of taxpayer money is all about ONE thing : The Central Banks creating a Global monopoly of Banking & Currency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 10/04/2008

Citi group has its own problems to resolve and become viable. I do not see why it wants ti acquire Wachovia and take additional burden. Again, greed isn't it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 10/04/2008
- kj593 I'm a Fan of kj593 4 fans permalink

Not greed. Liquidity. Citi's deposit base is anemic and acquiring Wachovia's 3300 branches would have opened up a new source of funding. But you are correct, Citi has serious problems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 AM on 10/04/2008

Wells Fargo is a great company. Service. Conservative lending practices. If they get bigger, that would be good for America. One of the top 10 banks in the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 10/04/2008
- suec03 I'm a Fan of suec03 12 fans permalink

Maybe Wells Fargo is a great company to you as an investor or high-income depositor, but they were the king of branch closings, employee layoffs and shorting hours when they went on their last bank-buying binge in the late 1980's and 1990's. They aggressively increased monthly fees on checking accounts, assessed costly fees to noncustomers trying to cash a check drawn on a Wells Fargo account, and steered customers to ATM only accounts and charged them penalties if they came in the branch to make a deposit. I hope that in the years since I left they have had an attitude change, but I still expect them to aggressively close "duplicate" branches and layoff employees after a takeover of Wachovia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 10/04/2008
- ming099 I'm a Fan of ming099 7 fans permalink
photo

..........amazing isnt it...........companies that may soon be bankrupt getting pissy with each other over bankrupt companies...........only in America..........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 10/03/2008
- Madmac I'm a Fan of Madmac 17 fans permalink
photo

The Bank is mine. Mine Mine
The Bank is mine. Mine Mine
The Bank is mine. Mine Mine
Don't waste your time because the doggone bank is mine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 10/03/2008
- WIpatriot I'm a Fan of WIpatriot 36 fans permalink
photo

Nice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 10/04/2008

Is The FDIC The Next Meltdown??

1.The FDIC is Incompetent.

The Citigroup offer was like letting a fox raid the henhouse.
The FDIC clearly knew about Wells Fargo interest in the purchase but they rushed to find a suitor. Why? The FDIC fund which now has to cover deposits/accounts up to $250,000 is running dangerously low and a Wachovia failure would have proven disastrous.

Now we are seeing a shotgun wedding fall apart as the bride (Wachovia) runs to the man (Wells Fargo) she wants to marry and not the groom (Citigroup) her father (the FDIC) picked for her.

2. The FDIC is contemplating Violating it's Mandate

The FDIC must, MUST, under law go with the Wells Fargo offer which involves no tax payer money from the FDIC versus leaving taxpayers footing a $12 Billion bill.

For the FDIC to even suggest they are thinking about this is a travesty; but they don't quite know how to deal with the infuriated groom.

3. This is another example of Regulators in Bed with the Regulated.

We need to fix this now. No more fire-sales. No more shotgun weddings. No more undercutting the very principles upon which the FDIC was founded - to insure and protect our deposits.

Optimistic estimates suggest we can expect several more mid-size bank failures before the end of the year. One more large bank failure could push the FDIC over the edge, and the new $250,000 deposit guarantee makes this more likely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 10/03/2008
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

What are you talking about? Of course this sale involves taxpayer money - Wachovia had BILLIONS in toxic assets that taxpayers will be buying from them so the bank that owns them just got a great present.

Why do think it was announced the SAME DAY the bailout was approved? The government has decided there will be a "bad" bank with worthless toxic assets and "good bank" that has all the assets that might be profitable.

We get the "bad" bank and they get the "good" bank.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 PM on 10/03/2008
- WIpatriot I'm a Fan of WIpatriot 36 fans permalink
photo

See? Simple.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 10/04/2008

Citigroup/FDIC

If you do not respect the Wells Fargo deal, then you are the crooks that we think you are! Prove us right if you dare.

The only thing the FDIC should support is a bidding war between Citigroup and Wells Fargo...if Citigroup really wants Wachovia then raise your price.

Most contracts have a grace period it could have been that Citigroup experienced buyers remorse and wanted to back out of the deal would Wachovia try to sue them?

The last thing US citizens want to hear is that CITIGROUP is suing WACHOVIA for accepted a higher offer....have your lawyers bumped their heads or are they smoking crack now!

Get a grip. If you want Wachovia, offer more then Wells Fargo did....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 10/03/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 281 fans permalink
photo

1000'S of Wachovias Customers bought Citi stock and then got SLAMMED with an early morning announcment and Citi stock dropped before the market opened. Wachovia's Traders were making money while their Customers were losing again.

Who ever takes them over should fire the whole managment team of Wachovia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 10/03/2008
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

And the CEO of that bank is from...take a guess...our favorite bank Goldman Sachs!

Before he took that job he worked with Paulson at the Treasury Department.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 10/03/2008

wachoviam you made the right decision for your depositors and employees Citi would have totally desimated things for you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 10/03/2008
photo

Agreed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 10/03/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 281 fans permalink
photo

So laws and contracts don't matter ????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 10/03/2008
- kj593 I'm a Fan of kj593 4 fans permalink

There was no definitive acquisition agreement between Citi and Wachovia. Basically a letter of intent with a standstill provision. At a minimum Citi should have papered this deal by Wednesday. You better believe someone is getting fired at Citi over this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 AM on 10/04/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect