Hamsters, Exotic Pets May Put Young Children At Risk, Doctors Say

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Hamsters, Exotic Pets May Put Young Children At Risk, Doctors Say stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LINDSEY TANNER | October 6, 2008 07:43 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Feb. 3, 2001 file photo, a hedgehog curls up in the hands of its owner at a hedgehog club exhibit in Anchorage, Alaska. Hedgehogs can be dangerous for young children because their quills can penetrate skin and have been known to spread a bacteria germ that can cause fever, stomach pain and a rash, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics in a new report about dangers from exotic animals. (AP Photo/Al Grillo, File)

CHICAGO — Warning: young children should not keep hedgehogs as pets _ or hamsters, baby chicks, lizards and turtles, for that matter _ because of risks for disease.

That's according to the nation's leading pediatricians' group in a new report about dangers from exotic animals.

Besides evidence that they can carry dangerous and sometimes potentially deadly germs, exotic pets may be more prone than cats and dogs to bite, scratch or claw _ putting children younger than 5 particularly at risk, the report says.

Young children are vulnerable because of developing immune systems plus they often put their hands in their mouths.

That means families with children younger than 5 should avoid owning "nontraditional" pets. Also, kids that young should avoid contact with these animals in petting zoos or other public places, according to the report from the American Academy of Pediatrics. The report appears in the October edition of the group's medical journal, Pediatrics.

"Many parents clearly don't understand the risks from various infections" these animals often carry, said Dr. Larry Pickering, the report's lead author and an infectious disease specialist at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

For example, about 11 percent of salmonella illnesses in children are thought to stem from contact with lizards, turtles and other reptiles, Pickering said. Hamsters also can carry this germ, which can cause severe diarrhea, fever and stomach cramps.

Salmonella also has been found in baby chicks, and young children can get it by kissing or touching the animals and then putting their hands in their mouths, he said.

Story continues below
advertisement

Study co-author Dr. Joseph Bocchini said he recently treated an infant who got salmonella from the family's pet iguana, which was allowed to roam freely in the home. The child was hospitalized for four weeks but has recovered, said Bocchini, head of the academy's infectious diseases committee and pediatrics chairman at Louisiana State University in Shreveport.

Hedgehogs can be dangerous because their quills can penetrate skin and have been known to spread a bacteria germ that can cause fever, stomach pain and a rash, the report said.

With supervision and precautions like hand-washing, contact between children and animals "is a good thing," Bocchini said. But families should wait until children are older before bringing home an exotic pet, he said.

Those who already have these pets should contact their veterinarians about specific risks and possible new homes for the animals, he said.

Data cited in the study indicate that about 4 million U.S. households have pet reptiles. According to the American Veterinary Medical Association, all kinds of exotic pets are on the rise, although generally fewer than 2 percent of households own them.

The veterinarian group's Mike Dutton, a Weare, N.H., exotic animal specialist, said the recommendations send an important message to parents who sometimes buy exotic pets on an impulse, "then they ask questions, sometimes many months later."

But a spokesman for the International Hedgehog Association said there's no reason to single out hedgehogs or other exotic pets.

"Our recommendation is that no animal should be a pet for kids 5 and under," said Z.G. Standing Bear. He runs a rescue operation near Pikes Peak, Colo., for abandoned hedgehogs, which became fad pets about 10 years ago.

___

On the Net:

American Academy of Pediatrics: http://www.aap.org

American Veterinary Medical Association: http://www.avma.org

CHICAGO — Warning: young children should not keep hedgehogs as pets _ or hamsters, baby chicks, lizards and turtles, for that matter _ because of risks for disease. That's according to the nati...
CHICAGO — Warning: young children should not keep hedgehogs as pets _ or hamsters, baby chicks, lizards and turtles, for that matter _ because of risks for disease. That's according to the nati...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
13
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- slobone I'm a Fan of slobone 5 fans permalink

Hey, hamsters wash themselves -- which is more than little kids do. And sorry, they don't scratch. Especially not compared to cats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 10/06/2008

Virtually all food can also carry bacteria.

Perhaps these fearmongers would advise not feeding children.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 10/06/2008
photo

However, according to the same people, these are OK to inject into newborns:
Vaccines contain ingredients such as antifreeze, phenol (used as a disinfectant), formaldehyde (cancer causing and used to embalm), aluminum (associated with alzheimer’s disease and seizures), glycerin (toxic to the kidney, liver, can cause lung damage, gastrointestinal damage and death), lead, cadmium, sulfates, yeast proteins, antibiotics, acetone (used in nail polish remover), neomycin and streptomycin. And the ingredient making the press is thimerosol (more toxic than mercury, a preservative still used in many vaccines, not easily eliminated, can cause severe neurological damage as well as other life threatening autoimmune disease). These vaccines are grown and strained through animal or human tissue, like monkey and dog kidney tissue, chick embryo, calf serum, human diploid cells (the dissected organs of aborted fetuses), pig blood, horse blood and rabbit brain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 10/06/2008

You know what really puts my kids at risk?

No healthcare and Wall Street executives stealing their future so they can install a skating rink in their yards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 10/06/2008

AAAAGGGHHH , the nanny state....Wait , put down taht frog or you will get warts..."With supervision and precautions contact between children and animals is a good thing".. 11% of salmonella is thought to come from animals...The other 89% comes from food ...Children under 5 should not have pets... This insanity reminds one of the hysteria generated by the globalwarming crowd

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 10/06/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 256 fans permalink

Really, the fear state. The Swedes have discovered that too little exposure to germs causes autoimmune diseases like asthma.

How many of the salmonellae cases came from children licking the ground of playing around the toilet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 10/06/2008
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 52 fans permalink
photo

That's also the case that has been made for not dumping children in creches or other institutions to early; however, that seems to get conveniently swept under the carpet.

Most paediatricians I took my son to when he was little would have NO pets at all - deg, cat, canary, goldfish - you name it. Needless to say, they had more than their fair share of hypocondria, which is all right, if you want to live a sensorially deprived existence.

The key to this is common sense and hygiene. Obviously, picking up diseased/injured animals from the roadside and cuddling up to them does not make for sensible parenting, or common anything for that matter. But it does to have pets that are well looked after, wormed, innoculated, well-fed and suitably housed. As it does make sense to supervise young children's interactions with animals because their immune system is still developing.

There is a considerable body of work that states that the relatively recent high incidence of illnesses such as asthma, allergies and eczemas are due to excess zeal with eliminating germs. So, we go from one extreme, which is having too many young children together in an enclosed environment, to another; a highly asseptic domestic set-up. It's any wonder their immune system goes haywire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 10/06/2008
- ZenJu I'm a Fan of ZenJu 40 fans permalink

What a crybaby culture we have now. I grew up with a menagerie of creatures and had the freedom to roam the rivers and forests and roads. My friends and I rough-housed for hours in the outdoors, coming home with assorted scrapes, cuts, bruises, and lots and lots of dirt and mud--and had glorious fun. I pity the moderns. Welcome to your world....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 10/06/2008

I'm sorry, but Phill Gramm's "Nation of Whiner's" comes to mind here. Some ridiculously low fraction of a percentage of children have gotten sick, maybe even died, and so now, there has to be a study and a warning? I'm 24, extremely liberal, and I completely hate how my parents grew up in a world that taught you to be tough, and I live in a nanny state.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 10/06/2008
- lauram I'm a Fan of lauram 6 fans permalink

The world today is not the world you or I grew up in. There are different additives in food, different chemicals and pharmaceuticals in the food and water and toys. Different pathogens (hello MRSA). All this "when I was your age" carping doesn't mean a hill of beans next to what is actually happening when THEY are their age.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 10/06/2008
- Merckx I'm a Fan of Merckx 20 fans permalink
photo

As we learn more, we learn what to eat, not to eat, what to touch, not to touch, etc.
So theoretically we will continue to live longer than our ancestors. What is more disturbing to me while we may live longer chronologically, we are actually living life less. Who cares if we make to 120 if you forgot to actually live during that period.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 10/06/2008
photo

Too true

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 10/06/2008

Eeeuuuuu. Put it down. You don't know where its been.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 10/06/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect