Freddie Mac Paid GOP Consulting Firm $2M To Kill Legislation

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PETE YOST | October 19, 2008 10:59 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Hollis McLoughlin, an executive of DCI, watches a Washington Capitals hockey game Saturday, Oct. 11, 2008, in Washington. Freddie Mac secretly paid DCI, a Washington-based Republican consulting firm, $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie Mae, three years before the government took control to prevent their collapse. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)

WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie Mae, three years before the government took control to prevent their collapse.

In the cross hairs of the campaign carried out by DCI of Washington were Republican senators and a regulatory overhaul bill sponsored by Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. DCI's chief executive is Doug Goodyear, whom John McCain's campaign later hired to manage the GOP convention in September.

Freddie Mac's payments to DCI began shortly after the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee sent Hagel's bill to the then GOP-run Senate on July 28, 2005. All GOP members of the committee supported it; all Democrats opposed it.

In the midst of DCI's yearlong effort, Hagel and 25 other Republican senators pleaded unsuccessfully with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., to allow a vote.

"If effective regulatory reform legislation ... is not enacted this year, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole," the senators wrote in a letter that proved prescient.

Unknown to the senators, DCI was undermining support for the bill in a campaign targeting 17 Republican senators in 13 states, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. The states and the senators targeted changed over time, but always stayed on the Republican side.

In the end, there was not enough Republican support for Hagel's bill to warrant bringing it up for a vote because Democrats also opposed it and the votes of some would be needed for passage. The measure died at the end of the 109th Congress.

McCain, R-Ariz., was not a target of the DCI campaign. He signed Hagel's letter and three weeks later signed on as a co-sponsor of the bill.

Story continues below
advertisement

By the time McCain did so, however, DCI's effort had gone on for nine months and was on its way toward killing the bill.

In recent days, McCain has said Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were "one of the real catalysts, really the match that lit this fire" of the global credit crisis. McCain has accused Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama of taking advice from former executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and failing to see that the companies were heading for a meltdown.

McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, or his lobbying firm has taken more than $2 million from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dating to 2000. In December, Freddie Mac contributed $250,000 to last month's GOP convention.

Obama has received $120,349 in political donations from employees of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae; McCain $21,550.

The Republican senators targeted by DCI began hearing from prominent constituents and financial contributors, all urging the defeat of Hagel's bill because it might harm the housing boom. The effort generated newspaper articles and radio and TV appearances by participants who spoke out against the measure.

Inside Freddie Mac headquarters in 2005, the few dozen people who knew what DCI was doing referred to the initiative as "the stealth lobbying campaign," according to three people familiar with the drive.

They spoke only on condition of anonymity, saying they fear retaliation if their names were disclosed.

Freddie Mac executive Hollis McLoughlin oversaw DCI's drive, according to the three people.

"Hollis's goal was not to have any Freddie Mac fingerprints on this project and DCI became the hidden hand behind the effort," one of the three people told the AP.

Before 2004, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were Democratic strongholds. After 2004, Republicans ran their political operations. McLoughlin, who joined Freddie Mac in 2004 as chief of staff, has given $32,250 to Republican candidates over the years, including $2,800 to McCain, and has given none to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks money in politics.

On Friday night, Hagel's chief of staff, Mike Buttry, said Hagel's legislation "was the last best chance to bring greater oversight and tighter regulation to Freddie and Fannie, and they used every means they could to defeat Sen. Hagel's legislation every step of the way."

"It is outrageous that a congressionally chartered government-sponsored enterprise would lobby against a member of Congress's bill that would strengthen the regulation and oversight of that institution," Buttry said in a statement. "America has paid an extremely high price for the reckless, and possibly criminal, actions of the leadership at Freddie and Fannie."

Nine of the 17 targeted Republican senators did not sign Hagel's letter: Sens. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Christopher "Kit" Bond and Jim Talent of Missouri, Conrad Burns of Montana, Mike DeWine of Ohio, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Olympia Snowe of Maine, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and George Allen of Virginia. Aside from the nine, 20 other Republican senators did not sign Hagel's letter.

McConnell's office said members of leadership do not sign letters to the leader. McConnell was majority whip at the time.

Eight of the targeted senators did sign it: Sens. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, Mike Crapo of Idaho, Jim Bunning of Kentucky, Larry Craig of Idaho, John Ensign of Nevada, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, George Voinovich of Ohio and David Vitter of Louisiana. Santorum, Crapo and Bunning were on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and had voted in favor of sending the bill to the full Senate.

On Thursday, Freddie Mac acknowledged that the company "did retain DCI to provide public affairs support at the state and local level." On Friday, DCI issued a four-sentence statement saying it complied with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations in representing Freddie Mac. Neither Freddie Mac nor DCI would say how much Goodyear's consulting firm was paid.

Freddie Mac paid DCI $10,000 a month for each of the targeted states, so the more states, the more money for DCI, according to the three people familiar with the program. In addition, Freddie Mac paid DCI a group retainer of $40,000 a month plus $20,000 a month for each regional manager handling the project, the three people said.

Last month, the concerns of the 26 Republican senators who signed Hagel's bill became a reality when the government seized control of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae amid their near financial collapse. Federal prosecutors are investigating accounting, disclosure and corporate governance issues at both companies, which own or guarantee more than $5 trillion in mortgages, roughly equivalent to half of the national debt.

Freddie Mac was so pleased with DCI's work that it retained the firm for other jobs, finally cutting DCI loose last month after the government takeover, according to the three people familiar with the situation.

Freddie Mac's problems began when Hagel's legislation won approval from the Senate committee.

Democrats did not like the harshest provision, which would have given a new regulator a mandate to shrink Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae by forcing them to sell off part of their portfolios. That approach, the Democrats feared, would cut into the ability of low- and moderate-income families to buy houses.

The political backdrop to the debate "was like bizarre-o-world," said the second of three people familiar with the program. "The Republicans were pro-regulation and the Democrats were against it; it was upside down."

Sen. Richard Shelby, the committee chairman at the time, underscored that in a statement Wednesday, saying that with Democrats already on their side, it was not surprising that Freddie Mac and Freddie Mae went after Republicans. "Unfortunately," said Shelby, R-Ala., "efforts then to derail reform were successful."

In a sign of bad things to come, Freddie Mac was already having serious problems in 2005. Auditors had exposed massive accounting issues, so improved regulation was one obvious remedy.

Once Freddie Mac's in-house lobbyists failed to keep Hagel's bill bottled up in the committee, McLoughlin responded by secretly hiring DCI.

DCI never filed lobbying reports with Congress about what it was doing because the firm was relying on a long-recognized gap in the disclosure law.

Federal lobbying law only requires reporting and registration when there are contacts with a legislator or staff.

"To have it stealthy, not to let people know who is behind this, in my opinion is unethical," said James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University who long has taught courses about lobbying.

Goodyear is a longtime political consultant from Arizona who resigned from the Republican convention job this year after Newsweek magazine revealed he had lobbied for the repressive military junta of Myanmar.

McLoughlin, Freddie Mac's senior vice president for external relations, was assistant treasury secretary from 1989 through 1992 in the administration of President Bush's father. McLoughlin served as chief of staff to Sen. Nicholas Brady, R-N.J., in 1982 and to Rep. Millicent Fenwick, R-N.J., from 1975-79.

Seven of the 17 targeted Republican senators were in the midst of re-election campaigns in 2006, and according to one of the three people familiar with the program, Freddie Mac and DCI hoped those facing tough races would tell their Republican colleagues back in Washington that "we've got enough trouble; you're making it worse with Hagel's bill."

Five of the seven DCI targets who ran for re-election in 2006 lost, and Senate control switched to the Democrats.

A Freddie Mac e-mail on May 4, 2006 _ the day before Hagel's letter _ details the behind-the-scenes effort that Freddie Mac and DCI generated to hold down the number of Republicans signing Hagel's letter urging a full Senate vote. It said:

"What I'm asking is that DCI get a few of their key well-connected constituents from each state to call in to the DC office of their Republican senators and speak to the (legislative director) or (chief of staff) and urge them not to sign the letter. The following could be used as a short script."

The proposed script read: "We can all agree that Fannie's and Freddie's regulator should be strengthened but unfortunately, S.190 goes too far and could potentially have damaging effects on Georgia's _ example _ home buyers."

According to the third of the three people familiar with the program, "DCI was asked to help keep senators from signing; it was a big part of their effort that year and it was viewed as a success since many DCI targets did not sign the letter."

DCI's progress after the first four months of the campaign was spelled out in a 19-page document dated Dec. 12, 2005, and titled, "Freddie Mac Field Program State by State Summary Report."

A snippet of a senator-by-senator breakdown of the efforts says this about Maine's Snowe:

"Philip Harriman, former state senator, co-chair of Snowe's 2006 campaign, personal Snowe friend, major GOP donor and investment adviser, has written the senator a personal letter on this issue. Dick Morin, vice president Maine Association of Mortgage Brokers, has been in direct contact with Sen. Snowe's committee staff, has sent a letter to Snowe, and is pursuing a dozen(s) of letters from his members."

On Wednesday, Snowe's office issued a statement saying that she "literally gets hundreds of 'Dear Colleague' letters seeking support for their positions that she does not sign. Had this legislation come up for a vote in 2006, she certainly would have considered it on its merits _ as she does every vote. Just last July, she voted for the housing bill that established a new, stronger regulator."

Rosario Marin, a staunch McCain supporter who spoke at the GOP convention in September, was among the people DCI used in carrying out the campaign.

Marin, the U.S. treasurer during the first term of the Bush administration, went to Missouri and to Montana, Burns' state, where she spoke out against Hagel's bill.

At the time, Burns, who ended up losing his re-election bid, was caught up in a Washington influence peddling scandal centering on disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Marin's visit triggered a local newspaper story in which the reporter contacted Burns' staff for comment. Burns' office told the newspaper the senator was not supportive of the latest version of Hagel's bill.

On Wednesday, Marin, now state consumer services secretary in California, issued a statement confirming that her trips to Missouri and Montana were in her capacity as a DCI consultant.

The December 2005 summary listing 17 Republican targets outlines the inroads DCI was making.

"On day one" of the effort, Sen. George Allen of Virginia had not addressed Hagel's bill and his legislative aide for housing was not assigned to it, the report said.

"Today," the report added, "the senator is aware of the issue and ... at the moment he is undecided." Allen's deputy chief of staff "has said that the senator will take into consideration before he decides that Freddie Mac is located in Virginia and is one of the largest Virginia employers."

"Grasstops/opinion leaders James Todd, president, the Peterson Companies wrote to both senators," the report added. "Milt Peterson, the founder and CEO of the company is one of Allen's major donors."

In the end, Allen, who lost his bid for re-election in 2006, did not sign Hagel's letter.

___

On the Net:

DCI: http://www.dcigroup.com/

Freddie Mac: http://www.freddiemac.com/

Fannie Mae: http://www.fanniemae.com

WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie...
WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie...
 
Comments
250
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 permalink

TECHNOLOGY CAN SPUR THE ECONOMY, REMOVE CORRUPTION, AND AVOID MORE BAILOUTS!

FIVE KEY FACTS:

1. American Taxpayers Own Fannie, Freddie, and a group of Banks!
2. Mortgage Companies and Banks were at The CENTER of the Housing and Financial CRISIS!
3. Crisis Continues Because Homeowners can not Afford TRICKY Loans and are Walking Away!
4. The Current FED RATE is 1.5%!
5. Technology and the Internet are Sophisticated Tools for Automating Loans!

Why not use the Internet and the New Taxpayer Owned Banks to provide direct low cost loans using Automation while Eliminating the Corrupt Middle Men (i.e., Mortgage Companies and Banks)?

The rate on the new loans would be 2.5% to 3% to provide the New Taxpayer Owned Banks with a 1% to 1.5% margin!

Automation can be used to verify employment, verify home title, check credit, and do 98% of the loan Preparation. This eliminates all the mortgage fees, all bank fees, all title fees, most verification fees, and most documentation work done via internet and technology.

This could easily be accomplished using today's technology at a much LOWER COST!

The Savings for AMERICANS will spur the Economy more than any added Bailout Plans

The Savings can be used to paying debts, buy American Cars, buy American Real Estate, and all kinds of American goods plus help other countries in crisis by buying their goods!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 AM on 10/21/2008
photo

A couple three problems here;

One is that the unemployment rate is heading towards 7% and beyond, and quickly. Therefore who has the money to buy anything?

Secondly, how do you go about extricating these mortgages form the morass we so blithely refer to as "derivatives"? Nobody really knows who owns what, and where the heck they are.

Thirdly, the Internet is barely secure against hacking in respect to normal commerce, can you imagine the instances of fraud that this may foster?

What we need are some damned adults with an eye for some truly equitable solutions.

Know of any?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 10/23/2008

The lobby firmmpaid to perform the stealth campiagn is the SAMEfirm doing the robo calls for McCain-
Feather Larson & Synhorst DCI - SourceWatch-FLS-DCI has been one of the largest corporate receipents of funds from the ... FLS-DCI has close ties to key White House advisor Karl Rove and others in the ...
www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=FLS-DCI - 33k - Cached - Similar pages
Consultants - The Center for Public IntegrityWASHINGTON, September 26, 2006 " With roots in Republican politics and corporate public relations, FLS-DCI and its sister companies have become a one-stop ...
projects.publicintegrity.org/consultants/default.aspx?act=profiles&pid=9 - 16k -

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 10/20/2008

This may be considered off topic,but the firm has an endorsement from Karl Rove on its home site. The outrageous rhetoric and the robo calls have Rove written all over it. Interesting that the AP article above states that the stealth lobbyists were instructed to "Not leave fingerprints" on the secret mission. Isn't that a pet Rovian phrase?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 10/20/2008


Feather Larson & Synhorst DCI
From SourceWatch
(Redirected from FLS-DCI)

Feather, Larson & Synhorst DCI (FLS-DCI) are "Specialists in Telephone Contact Business." The telemarketing company used to be known as Feather Hodges Larson & Synhorst DCI. In 2000, the Washington DC-based DCI Group was spun off from FLS-DCI.

FLS-DCI has been one of the largest corporate receipents of funds from the Republican National Committee in 2004. FLS-DCI has close ties to key White House advisor Karl Rove and others in the GOP.

.
"Our client list consists of the last five Presidential Campaigns including Bush/Cheney 2000. We also provide services for the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee, and hundreds of Republican State Parties and candidates on all levels, Advisor to President George Walker Bush, Karl Rove's ENDORSEMENT of FLS-DCI reads:

"I know these guys well. They become partners with the campaigns they work with. From designing the program to drafting scripts; from selecting targets to making the calls in a professional, successful way they work as hard to win your races as you do." Sourcewatch-------------------As I said earlier, the vile robo calls are from the SAME firm that was secretly paid $2 million by Freddie Mac to lobby GOP senators to vote AGAINST regulating Freddie Mac. Remember,Rick Davis' firm received over $2 million also, over a period of years from Freddie Mac.BTW, The DCI lobby firm has a home office in Phoenix,Arizona in addition to D.C.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 10/20/2008

Rick Davis' firm received over two million dollars over the years from Freddie Macd. This lobby firm hired to do the stealth campaign mentioned above is DC,.paid ANOTHER $2 million to secretly target GOP Senators to vote AGAINST tightening rules on Freddie Mac. Now JohnMcain hired the CEO of this firm DCI,jusytlast month to organize the GOP convention. DCI is the DCI in the title o FLS-DCI,the firm who is doing the racist robo calls for McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 10/20/2008

Once again we see the pitfalls of blindly worhsipping a system based on greed and why oversight is necessary for Capitalism to function properly, not an evil. Greed begets cheating, which stifles the very competition "free-markets" like to wear pinned to their sleeves. Only through regulation and oversight can their be a level playing field for free-markets to work effectively.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 10/20/2008

The RICO ACT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 10/20/2008



WOW!!!!!!!!

Unbelievable, Just Flooring to say the least.

MSM don't spin what the need to, but thanks to the blogs we can see the real deal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

From HUD (http://www.hud.gov/news/speeches/presremarks.cfm)

Bush (June 18, 2002):

[bq]
We are here in Washington, D.C. to address problems. So I've set this goal for the country. We want 5.5 million more homeowners by 2010 -- million more minority homeowners by 2010. (Applause.) Five-and-a-half million families by 2010 will own a home. [...] But it's going to mean we're going to have to work hard to achieve the goal, all of us. And by all of us, I mean not only the federal government, but the private sector, as well.

[...]

Well, probably the single barrier to first-time homeownership is high down payments. [...] And so I've asked Congress to fully fund an American Dream down payment fund which will help a low-income family to qualify to buy, to buy.
[eq]

President's Home Ownership Policy (http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/homeownership/homeownership-policy-book-execsum.html)

[bq]
The President also believes that government alone can"t close America"s homeownership gap. [...] Many organizations have already responded to the President"s challenge by committing to:


Substantially increase by at least $440 billion, the financial commitment made by the government sponsored enterprises involved in the secondary mortgage market, specifically targeted toward the minority market;

[eq]

This problem had LOTS of involvement from the very TOP - and no doubt with the advice of the many Goldman Sachs players embedded in this Administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

Here's some food for thought people, and this one can be mostly blamed on Carter and the Dem Congress at the time it was passed in 1980 due to heavy pressure from the banking and credit industries.

The relaxing and deregulation of the Usury laws, which snowballed out of control in the 1980's and now we are seeing the full effect from..... PREDATORY LENDING.

How come nobody wants to talk about that? There are probably trillions in debt just from credit cards alone, nevermind all the other predators. Or banks going after people with reverse mortgage loans. Or even giving out legit 2nd mortgages, but tacking on an unregulated and uncontrolled interest rate that spirals to the sky and forces the owner to default. The banks love getting free homes in a good economy. But in a bad economy, OUCH.

And what about AIG, the credit insurer, buying up all those bad credit debts. Sooner or later that's gotta be paid too right? What were they thinking?

What about all the other debts, like medical bills?? You do realize that whole other credit industry that has cropped up around that right? The collection bureau's who do nothing but buy people's debts from each other.

My advice to anyone with a debt collector hounding them, DO NOT feed the animals!! If you owe the hospital $5,000, pay the hospital!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

Sorry, none of this belongs on Carter. That is just plain crazy. From 1977 until 2001 CRA lending was accomplished without causing an international credit crisis. That is a fact. His CRA lending survived the S&L crisis, and other economic downturns.

To accept what you are saying would be to accept that banks had a valid reason to have deposit-only branches within relined communities, and to assume that low-income people can never pay back loans or be worthy of investment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

80% of personal bankrupcies occur because people can't afford to pay their medical bills. And housing was doing pretty well until Phil Gramm and his cronies deregulated it and allowed mortgage holders to bundle and sell them with each new buyer raising the rates to get their cut. That meant that people who could pay their mortgages when they got them, saw them double and triple, that is when they couldn't pay. If you want someone to blame for speculators bidding up the price of gas and the collapse of the housing market give Mr. Gramm and his fellow lobbyist cronies (still working for McPalpatine) their hard earned and extremely well paid credit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

The Freddie and Fannie boondogle is a mess created by Dems and Repubs. Both need to own up to it. But unless you understand what real money is and what makes for a sensible economic system, neither Party will ever make the necessary corrections.

There was a time when banks only lent money to people who were good credit risks.The media claimed that minorities were victims of discrimination. This led Congress to pass and President Jimmy Carter to sign The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, which forced lending institutions to grant mortgages to people whose income, credit histories, and net worth would previously have disqualified them from getting such loans. Clinton put pressure on Fannie and Freddie to get involved, whereby they bought up weak loan portfolios from banks and securitized them for sale on world markets. The seeds of the subprime meltdown were planted by these policies. Overlooked in this scheme is that the dollar is no longer backed by anything of real value, (such as the traditional gold and silver), that "backed " the dollar that was once hailed as 'good as gold' by people who trusted its value. We were hoodwinked by Nixon to go off the precious metl backing completely in 1971 and things have gotten worse for the "good as paper" Federal Reserve note. Paper is paper and gold is gold. If our currecny is debauched, made worthless, new regulations to Freddie and Fannie, and bailouts for banks on Wall Street won't fix anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

You are a BS apologist, how dare you bring up this crap to try and pass off as some kind of blame on the Dems?

If you have ever read anything to do with that Community Reinvestment Act, you would know that it required MORE REGULATION on top of that!!

I cannot believe that people will believe everything they hear on talk radio and then blindly post messages they think are hit pieces to make the Dems look bad.

The Fannie/Freddie problem is ALL the Republican's faults and there's no amount of whining that you, or them, can do to make that fact go away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 AM on 10/20/2008

YEAH!!! How dare you give an actual account of what happened and use that obsolete tool of rationality to explain this problem. You know your suppose to drink the kool-aid like everyone else and put things in simplistic unintellitecual terms like, BLAME BUSH!!! Stop using pragmatism and stick to blind ideology next time pal, you could do some damage by using the truth to explain things.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

By the way, you left out the fact that Freddie was created in 1970, under Nixon's administration. Probably as an attempt to have executive control over things after LBJ did away with Fannie as an executive institution and left it in Congress's hands.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

Also, there's been no mention of usury laws (excessive interest) by the way. But before someone calls me out claiming that I don't know of what I speak in regards to the CRA requiring more regulation....

http://www.federalreserve.gov/dcca/cra/

"The CRA requires that each depository institution's record in helping meet the credit needs of its entire community be evaluated periodically."

"Nor does the law require institutions to make high-risk loans that jeopardize their safety. To the contrary, the law makes it clear that an institution's CRA activities should be undertaken in a safe and sound manner."

"CRA examinations are conducted by the federal agencies that are responsible for supervising depository institutions. Information on this page is related to depository institutions that are examined by the Federal Reserve, mainly state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Reserve."

Now then, how many years (12) did the GOP have total control of Congress, and in such capacity, control to watch over all of this? And how many years (8) did the GOP have control over the White House to keep watch over the Federal Reserve to ensure they followed the CRA requirements?

Face it, Republicans fault no matter how you slice it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 AM on 10/20/2008

Yeah that law worked out pretty well, huh. All you have to do is look at the transcripts from the republicans and democrats when this problem came to light in 2005 to see the contrast of the two parties. Yeah, they controlled Congress, but they needed democratic votes to get reform out of the committees. Face it, this was the result of politicians, not a political party. Wake up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 AM on 10/20/2008

There's a few problems with your arguement. First, CRA loans are not the ones defaulting. Why? Well for starters, the CRA only applies to banks, not mortgage brokers. Banks (not investment banks, just plain old banks) were not tho ones making bad loans. Second, it wasn't Clinton who put pressure on Freddie and Fannie, it was the other way around. F+F saw the big profits investment banks were making off of CDS and wanted a piece, and lobbied for deregulation that would let them play too. (Lost too often in the talk of this crisis was how profitable CDS trading was, right up until the bottom fell out) The loans that are defaulting are not mainly CRA loans, it's loans made by investment bank/ mortgage brokers (not covered by the CRA) who were not obligated to follow the CRA. Blaming CRA is the old favorite from the republican playbook: When in doubt, blame the poor (whith the not so subtle undertone which is blame the minorities) They've used this play to great effect over the years (See: Welfare) to deflect blame from their core base of greedy rich white guys.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

I wanna know when the impeachments start!! It's time for Pelosi to finally put it on the table and use it to clear out these fools from Congress once and for all, and take the Executive along with them for good measure.

As long as I live, I will NEVER vote for another Republican candidate again!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 10/20/2008

See what happens when you vote Republican? Republican= no taxes to the rich, taxes to the middle class and the poor just get poorer. Soon all there will be is either the filthy rich or the very poor if the Republicans had it there way! Vote for our kids, vote Obama/Biden 08"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 10/20/2008

Everybody pass it a long. I hope this article gets news time tonight on all the honest news channels. And local newspapers! Everywhere across the board! Obama/Biden 08" My family is from the south and they always voted democratic and they loved and fought for our country! Obama/Biden 08" !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

I would like to say that this story alone should represent the final "Nail In The Coffin" for McKain and Company, but I fear it will have a boomerang effect, along with all the other Muckracking of the past few cylces, and embolden and re-invigorate the dessicating, fetid sludge-pool that is today's repository of the goulish un-dead, the Republican Party.
Let's not pop those corks just yet folks...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 AM on 10/20/2008

repubs + de-regulation = feed the greed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPRfVD5Q0dI

hope is on the way!
obama biden '08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

Now it is called, "Americans Inc"...
Did taxpayers have a choice?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 10/20/2008

One of the posters below says both Dems and Reps were the bad guys. What we had was a R controlled congress that tried to shrink two quasi government agencies so the private sector could get a better cut of the action. And the Dems wanted to leave them large because they were afraid shrinking them would limit the ability of minorities and first timers to get loans. So, both parties were acting on their ideals, and in the resultant gridlock nothing got done. This is why we need a uniter in there as President. Someone, maybe, who shares the values of most Americans. Someone, maybe, like Obama?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 AM on 10/20/2008

And which canidate and now Party does not take campaign contribution from lobbyist? OBAMA.

And which canidate has those very same Freddie and Fannie Lobbyist running his campagn ansd still takes money from lobbyist? McCain.

The perfect Storm

This problem took huge deficits to flood the world with dollars such that cheap credit was availaible.

It took massive devalution of the dollar due to all the debt, basically insuring inported prices would continue to rise until the world economy collapsed. The massive transfer of U.S. welath to the few in the U.S. and to the foreign Oil Producing countries including Russia.

It took invading Iraq and taking 2 million barrels of oil off the maket to help create the illusion of an oil shortge ( its coming just not now).

It took massive speculation in oil and other commodoties to drive up these prices such that home owners abilty to pay his mortgae was decreased and to raise unemplyement has companies triimmed heir workforces.

It took the shipping of 4.5 million jobs to china, to new plants built with BUSH Tax cut dollars.. again meaning less could now afford to pay for their mortgaes. A Tax cut financed by borrowing from China and the debt of an uneeded war.

Repug policies are responsible for 4 out of 5 the causation events all on their own. On one a case can be made it was both parties.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

Taking money means little to nothing. What they actually do and why - means a whole bunch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

And what about all those countries Bush just granted Visa permission to? The Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia and South Korea will be added to the U.S. Visa Waiver Program. Are they going to come here now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 AM on 10/20/2008

Wow. Shades of Naomi Klein's theory of Disaster Capitalism as expressed in her newest book, which is brilliant by the way. Everyone should read it so they know what to watch for. The tragic thing is this all might have worked had McCain not been so irresponsible as to pick Palin as a running mate. Boy, we are lucky, provided Obama wins the election and carries in lots of new Dems on his now very long and very strong coat tails. This really could have worked. It still could, if the Republicans are able to rig the election. I'm going to begin working the phones with Obama's campaign here in Colorado to make sure we get out a landslide vote. It's the only way to ensure the Republicans won't be able to cheat their way to victory as in 2000 and 2004. Shame on us if Obama loses!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 10/20/2008
photo

Is it really shame on us? I think we worked hard last time but still it was stolen. I have a great fear that there is no way the powers that be are not going to let this reach its conclusion. And I mean no matter who wins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 10/20/2008

Viper & Palemoon -
You both seem to miss the fact that it was John McCain who was pushing for regulation of Freddie Mac in '05 (against many in his own party), while Barack Obama was against it (following his party's leadership as he always has). So, who is the real reformer in this election? I say it is John McCain!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 10/21/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
MAYHEM IN HONDURAS

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — Ousted President Manuel...

Biden: "We Misread How Bad The Economy Was"

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration "misread" the depth...