Freddie Mac Paid GOP Consulting Firm $2M To Kill Legislation

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Freddie Mac Paid GOP Consulting Firm $2M To Kill Legislation stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PETE YOST | October 20, 2008 12:16 AM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Hollis McLoughlin, an executive of DCI, watches a Washington Capitals hockey game Saturday, Oct. 11, 2008, in Washington. Freddie Mac secretly paid DCI, a Washington-based Republican consulting firm, $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie Mae, three years before the government took control to prevent their collapse. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)

WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie Mae, three years before the government took control to prevent their collapse.

In the cross hairs of the campaign carried out by DCI of Washington were Republican senators and a regulatory overhaul bill sponsored by Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. DCI's chief executive is Doug Goodyear, whom John McCain's campaign later hired to manage the GOP convention in September.

Freddie Mac's payments to DCI began shortly after the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee sent Hagel's bill to the then GOP-run Senate on July 28, 2005. All GOP members of the committee supported it; all Democrats opposed it.

In the midst of DCI's yearlong effort, Hagel and 25 other Republican senators pleaded unsuccessfully with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., to allow a vote.

"If effective regulatory reform legislation ... is not enacted this year, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole," the senators wrote in a letter that proved prescient.

Unknown to the senators, DCI was undermining support for the bill in a campaign targeting 17 Republican senators in 13 states, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. The states and the senators targeted changed over time, but always stayed on the Republican side.

In the end, there was not enough Republican support for Hagel's bill to warrant bringing it up for a vote because Democrats also opposed it and the votes of some would be needed for passage. The measure died at the end of the 109th Congress.

McCain, R-Ariz., was not a target of the DCI campaign. He signed Hagel's letter and three weeks later signed on as a co-sponsor of the bill.

Story continues below
advertisement

By the time McCain did so, however, DCI's effort had gone on for nine months and was on its way toward killing the bill.

In recent days, McCain has said Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were "one of the real catalysts, really the match that lit this fire" of the global credit crisis. McCain has accused Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama of taking advice from former executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and failing to see that the companies were heading for a meltdown.

McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, or his lobbying firm has taken more than $2 million from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dating to 2000. In December, Freddie Mac contributed $250,000 to last month's GOP convention.

Obama has received $120,349 in political donations from employees of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae; McCain $21,550.

The Republican senators targeted by DCI began hearing from prominent constituents and financial contributors, all urging the defeat of Hagel's bill because it might harm the housing boom. The effort generated newspaper articles and radio and TV appearances by participants who spoke out against the measure.

Inside Freddie Mac headquarters in 2005, the few dozen people who knew what DCI was doing referred to the initiative as "the stealth lobbying campaign," according to three people familiar with the drive.

They spoke only on condition of anonymity, saying they fear retaliation if their names were disclosed.

Freddie Mac executive Hollis McLoughlin oversaw DCI's drive, according to the three people.

"Hollis's goal was not to have any Freddie Mac fingerprints on this project and DCI became the hidden hand behind the effort," one of the three people told the AP.

Before 2004, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were Democratic strongholds. After 2004, Republicans ran their political operations. McLoughlin, who joined Freddie Mac in 2004 as chief of staff, has given $32,250 to Republican candidates over the years, including $2,800 to McCain, and has given none to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks money in politics.

On Friday night, Hagel's chief of staff, Mike Buttry, said Hagel's legislation "was the last best chance to bring greater oversight and tighter regulation to Freddie and Fannie, and they used every means they could to defeat Sen. Hagel's legislation every step of the way."

"It is outrageous that a congressionally chartered government-sponsored enterprise would lobby against a member of Congress's bill that would strengthen the regulation and oversight of that institution," Buttry said in a statement. "America has paid an extremely high price for the reckless, and possibly criminal, actions of the leadership at Freddie and Fannie."

Nine of the 17 targeted Republican senators did not sign Hagel's letter: Sens. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Christopher "Kit" Bond and Jim Talent of Missouri, Conrad Burns of Montana, Mike DeWine of Ohio, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Olympia Snowe of Maine, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and George Allen of Virginia. Aside from the nine, 20 other Republican senators did not sign Hagel's letter.

McConnell's office said members of leadership do not sign letters to the leader. McConnell was majority whip at the time.

Eight of the targeted senators did sign it: Sens. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, Mike Crapo of Idaho, Jim Bunning of Kentucky, Larry Craig of Idaho, John Ensign of Nevada, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, George Voinovich of Ohio and David Vitter of Louisiana. Santorum, Crapo and Bunning were on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and had voted in favor of sending the bill to the full Senate.

On Thursday, Freddie Mac acknowledged that the company "did retain DCI to provide public affairs support at the state and local level." On Friday, DCI issued a four-sentence statement saying it complied with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations in representing Freddie Mac. Neither Freddie Mac nor DCI would say how much Goodyear's consulting firm was paid.

Freddie Mac paid DCI $10,000 a month for each of the targeted states, so the more states, the more money for DCI, according to the three people familiar with the program. In addition, Freddie Mac paid DCI a group retainer of $40,000 a month plus $20,000 a month for each regional manager handling the project, the three people said.

Last month, the concerns of the 26 Republican senators who signed Hagel's bill became a reality when the government seized control of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae amid their near financial collapse. Federal prosecutors are investigating accounting, disclosure and corporate governance issues at both companies, which own or guarantee more than $5 trillion in mortgages, roughly equivalent to half of the national debt.

Freddie Mac was so pleased with DCI's work that it retained the firm for other jobs, finally cutting DCI loose last month after the government takeover, according to the three people familiar with the situation.

Freddie Mac's problems began when Hagel's legislation won approval from the Senate committee.

Democrats did not like the harshest provision, which would have given a new regulator a mandate to shrink Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae by forcing them to sell off part of their portfolios. That approach, the Democrats feared, would cut into the ability of low- and moderate-income families to buy houses.

The political backdrop to the debate "was like bizarre-o-world," said the second of three people familiar with the program. "The Republicans were pro-regulation and the Democrats were against it; it was upside down."

Sen. Richard Shelby, the committee chairman at the time, underscored that in a statement Wednesday, saying that with Democrats already on their side, it was not surprising that Freddie Mac and Freddie Mae went after Republicans. "Unfortunately," said Shelby, R-Ala., "efforts then to derail reform were successful."

In a sign of bad things to come, Freddie Mac was already having serious problems in 2005. Auditors had exposed massive accounting issues, so improved regulation was one obvious remedy.

Once Freddie Mac's in-house lobbyists failed to keep Hagel's bill bottled up in the committee, McLoughlin responded by secretly hiring DCI.

DCI never filed lobbying reports with Congress about what it was doing because the firm was relying on a long-recognized gap in the disclosure law.

Federal lobbying law only requires reporting and registration when there are contacts with a legislator or staff.

"To have it stealthy, not to let people know who is behind this, in my opinion is unethical," said James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University who long has taught courses about lobbying.

Goodyear is a longtime political consultant from Arizona who resigned from the Republican convention job this year after Newsweek magazine revealed he had lobbied for the repressive military junta of Myanmar.

McLoughlin, Freddie Mac's senior vice president for external relations, was assistant treasury secretary from 1989 through 1992 in the administration of President Bush's father. McLoughlin served as chief of staff to Sen. Nicholas Brady, R-N.J., in 1982 and to Rep. Millicent Fenwick, R-N.J., from 1975-79.

Seven of the 17 targeted Republican senators were in the midst of re-election campaigns in 2006, and according to one of the three people familiar with the program, Freddie Mac and DCI hoped those facing tough races would tell their Republican colleagues back in Washington that "we've got enough trouble; you're making it worse with Hagel's bill."

Five of the seven DCI targets who ran for re-election in 2006 lost, and Senate control switched to the Democrats.

A Freddie Mac e-mail on May 4, 2006 _ the day before Hagel's letter _ details the behind-the-scenes effort that Freddie Mac and DCI generated to hold down the number of Republicans signing Hagel's letter urging a full Senate vote. It said:

"What I'm asking is that DCI get a few of their key well-connected constituents from each state to call in to the DC office of their Republican senators and speak to the (legislative director) or (chief of staff) and urge them not to sign the letter. The following could be used as a short script."

The proposed script read: "We can all agree that Fannie's and Freddie's regulator should be strengthened but unfortunately, S.190 goes too far and could potentially have damaging effects on Georgia's _ example _ home buyers."

According to the third of the three people familiar with the program, "DCI was asked to help keep senators from signing; it was a big part of their effort that year and it was viewed as a success since many DCI targets did not sign the letter."

DCI's progress after the first four months of the campaign was spelled out in a 19-page document dated Dec. 12, 2005, and titled, "Freddie Mac Field Program State by State Summary Report."

A snippet of a senator-by-senator breakdown of the efforts says this about Maine's Snowe:

"Philip Harriman, former state senator, co-chair of Snowe's 2006 campaign, personal Snowe friend, major GOP donor and investment adviser, has written the senator a personal letter on this issue. Dick Morin, vice president Maine Association of Mortgage Brokers, has been in direct contact with Sen. Snowe's committee staff, has sent a letter to Snowe, and is pursuing a dozen(s) of letters from his members."

On Wednesday, Snowe's office issued a statement saying that she "literally gets hundreds of 'Dear Colleague' letters seeking support for their positions that she does not sign. Had this legislation come up for a vote in 2006, she certainly would have considered it on its merits _ as she does every vote. Just last July, she voted for the housing bill that established a new, stronger regulator."

Rosario Marin, a staunch McCain supporter who spoke at the GOP convention in September, was among the people DCI used in carrying out the campaign.

Marin, the U.S. treasurer during the first term of the Bush administration, went to Missouri and to Montana, Burns' state, where she spoke out against Hagel's bill.

At the time, Burns, who ended up losing his re-election bid, was caught up in a Washington influence peddling scandal centering on disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Marin's visit triggered a local newspaper story in which the reporter contacted Burns' staff for comment. Burns' office told the newspaper the senator was not supportive of the latest version of Hagel's bill.

On Wednesday, Marin, now state consumer services secretary in California, issued a statement confirming that her trips to Missouri and Montana were in her capacity as a DCI consultant.

The December 2005 summary listing 17 Republican targets outlines the inroads DCI was making.

"On day one" of the effort, Sen. George Allen of Virginia had not addressed Hagel's bill and his legislative aide for housing was not assigned to it, the report said.

"Today," the report added, "the senator is aware of the issue and ... at the moment he is undecided." Allen's deputy chief of staff "has said that the senator will take into consideration before he decides that Freddie Mac is located in Virginia and is one of the largest Virginia employers."

"Grasstops/opinion leaders James Todd, president, the Peterson Companies wrote to both senators," the report added. "Milt Peterson, the founder and CEO of the company is one of Allen's major donors."

In the end, Allen, who lost his bid for re-election in 2006, did not sign Hagel's letter.

___

On the Net:

DCI: http://www.dcigroup.com/

Freddie Mac: http://www.freddiemac.com/

Fannie Mae: http://www.fanniemae.com

WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie...
WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie...
Filed by Marcus Baram  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
250
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
photo

Read a little bit:

"I set an ambitious goal. It's one that I believe we can achieve. It's a clear goal, that by the end of this decade we'll increase the number of minority homeowners by at least 5.5 million families. (Applause.)

Some may think that's a stretch. I don't think it is. I think it is realistic...." - President Bush

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021015-7.html

Federal Reserve Board data show that:

More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions. -

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html

In June 2002, the President challenged the nation to create 5.5 million new minority homeowners by 2010. Since the President's challenge, 2.2 million minority families have joined the ranks of homeowners, and we are on track to meet the 5.5 million goal.

The Administration is working to make homeownership more affordable and more accessible. Government should do everything it can to help families find the security, dignity, and independence that come with owning a piece of the American Dream. - Alphonso Jackson

http://www.hud.gov/offices/cir/test042105.cfm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 10/19/2008
photo

how many of this 2.2 million have lost their home or are in foreclosure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 10/19/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 440 fans permalink
photo

Fannie Mae acquired twice as many homes through foreclosure as it sold in the first quarter, regulatory filings show, and late payments on its home loans—a harbinger of foreclosures—almost doubled in the past year. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the country's second-biggest mortgage finance company, together owned a record $6.9 billion of foreclosed homes on March 31, compared with $8.56 billion held by all 8,500 U.S. commercial banks and savings and loans. Foreclosed houses sell at an average discount of about 20 percent, according to economists Ethan Harris and Michelle Meyer at New York-based Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. At that rate, the two mortgage companies stand to lose $1.39 billion on the foreclosed houses they currently own.Both companies were chartered by Congress and bundle home loans into securities to sell to investors and use cash from the sales to fund mortgage lenders. Together, they own or guarantee about half of the $12 trillion of mortgages in the U.S.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-re-fannie-unsold-home-0803aug03,0,2646891.story

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 10/19/2008
- Daly I'm a Fan of Daly 19 fans permalink

Amazingly the home ownership was a good idea however letting people who have never had the responsibilty of ownership a bit of education could have help with the first lesson being stay away from predatory lenders and getting comfortable with the new payment before getting into something else.

When you get a new house the banks pile on with offers of all sorts lots of credit card and loan offers and now we are blaming the people that just wanted the american dream of owning a house; what about the banks that tricked the people into getting predatory loans and pile on with the loans.

Lets stop blaming the rookies; the smartest guys in the room, the wall street mba with the education that cost more than many of the houses that were purchased they could have managed this better but wtf; the ones that know better, they are getting the help NOW while the working masses can speak loudly with their votes.

O/B 08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 10/19/2008
photo

This could be the death knell of the Republican party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 10/19/2008

You betcha'!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 10/19/2008
- PCdoc I'm a Fan of PCdoc 7 fans permalink
photo

I'm not so sure. Maybe I'm just getting cynical, but the average voter seems to have a very short memory. Who knows what will be the hot button topic in the next election and you know the RNC is already gearing up for it and how they can blame everythng on the Democrats

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 10/19/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 440 fans permalink
photo

It's all about "me" with Republicans, or haven't you gotten that yet? MY taxes, not going to "them"--those "minorities", through "government handouts". They haven't realized that by thinking they are voting to protect their pocket book they are destroying themselves and the nation. They don't see who is really in their pockets because they fall for the "tax and spend liberal" B.S. every time EVEN WHEN IT ISN'T TRUE -- because it suits their personal greed, doncha see?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 10/19/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 440 fans permalink
photo

I think the YPM voter fraud will be the death knell--if it gets reported, that is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 10/19/2008

The devil is in the details.

And what we need is a sunshine Administration.

Who knows? This America thing just may work if allowed to function honestly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 10/19/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV 123 fans permalink

2 MILLION DOLLARS is not chump change...I don't care how you look at it.

This act is treasonous and dangerous to the American way of life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 10/19/2008

Of course we all new this. This is another reason Republicans vote against legislation that could have benefited this Country in a lot of ways.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 10/19/2008
photo

IMO, the 2006 F&F bill that was reported out of the senate committee was a bad bill and should have been modified.

The house, with broad bipartisan support passed a F&F bill in 2005. A compromise by the senate leadership would have resulted in a bill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 10/19/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 440 fans permalink
photo

It was a bad bill. That is why it was rejected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 10/19/2008

I suspect we will all be learning even more about the fleecing of America that's gone on under GOP rule in the month's ahead!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 10/19/2008

This is so corrupt, it is reprehensible.

PAYING OUR LEGISLATORS TO KILL MEASURES THAT WOULD ULTIMATELY PROVIDE PROTECTION TOTHE AMERICAN PEOPLE?

Will the Atty. General be investigating this?

This is no different than what John McCain did when pressuring regulators to let Keating slide, thereby insuring that Keating could literally rob people of their life's savings.

McCain had to know that what he was doing then would result in harm to the American people.
He had to have known.

Not only did 20,000 lose their life's savings, but Americans were bilked to the tune of BILLIONS, because of Keatings' bankruptcy filings, that WE THE PEOPLE were FORCED to pay for.

How are these pay offs any different than the pay offs that Keating gave to McCain?

And the media promotes the notion that raising the Keating scandal is somehow unfair?
UNFAIR TO WHOM?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 10/19/2008
- DLB I'm a Fan of DLB 41 fans permalink
photo

Talk about $2 million of wasted money. Hagel's bill, the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, passed the Senate Banking Committee on a party line vote; all republicans voted for it, all democrats voted against it. And it was the fact that no democrat in that committee voted for the bill that killed it. Frist knew bringing it to the floor was useless, because of the democrats, not the republicans.

Not all lobbying is successful, and this lobbying was a waste of $2 million.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 10/19/2008
- GingerB I'm a Fan of GingerB 82 fans permalink
photo

Republicans are SCUM!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 10/19/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 440 fans permalink
photo

Greedy corporate scum.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 10/19/2008

Lobbying is nothing more than bribery, and should be outlawed in all forms, that is if anyone really cared what direction the country was moving.

http://www.ronnierayjenkins.com/topics/deathinappalachia/Empty_Chairs/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 10/19/2008
- Daw8it I'm a Fan of Daw8it 23 fans permalink
photo

Another welfare program in America:

Alaska Permanent Fund - https://www.pfd.state.ak.us/

why is this not an issue?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 10/19/2008

Um how exactly is it welfare? Welfare is when you take money from the many to support the few. This money is taken from no individual and is given to every resident.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 10/19/2008
- GingerB I'm a Fan of GingerB 82 fans permalink
photo

Magically appearing money? I want some of that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 10/19/2008

Socialism is to take from the few (the rich) and give to the many (poor). What you just described in the bailout of the banks where the money is taken from the many (the taxpayers) and given to the few (the bankers, brokers, etc).

Also, does money grow on trees in Alaska? The money for the permanent fund comes from somewhere. Taxes on the oil companies? Fees for resource extraction? Taxpayers?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 10/19/2008
- GingerB I'm a Fan of GingerB 82 fans permalink
photo

Alaska gets $1.84 back for each dollar of tax collected from it.

The Alaska Permanent Fund just adds to the welfare.

Alaska is nothing BUT a welfare state (like many other "red" states).

You couldn't pay me enough to move to Palin's Place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 10/19/2008

That's fine. The fewer people there are, the more $$ we Alaskans get.

Please learn more about this issue before you go off on it (not just Ginger, but the rest of you). A portion of profits from oil production was placed in an account and invested. The dividends from those investments (interest) are divided among eligible Alaska residents.

We pay taxes on those dollars, so the federal government actually benefits from this program. If those dollars simply went back into the state coffers, the feds would see nothing from them.

If you want to compare apples to apples, Alaska is more like a developing nation. We have very little infrastructure and many villages are only accessible by air. Try to imagine how expensive it is to live here and all the challenges that go in to day-to-day life in a place that doesn't even have proper sanitation in a good portion of the state.

As for being a welfare state, aren't we all? Alaska does get a huge portion of federal dollars per capita, but we also have the most federally-owned land. Tell ya what, you petition the feds to release most of that land to the state and we'll stop taking so many federal $$s - deal?

Palin is not representative of all Alaskans, so please don't paint us with the same brush. There are plenty of folks who feel like our state has been hijacked by her ilk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 10/19/2008
- TXfemmom I'm a Fan of TXfemmom 211 fans permalink

Well, now that the rest of the country knows that Alaska has been milking their taxes, the Alaskans won't get any additional money. Let them use their Permanent Fund for their needs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 10/19/2008
- TXfemmom I'm a Fan of TXfemmom 211 fans permalink

Well, now McCain's people were responsible for it.

However, I am angry that the Dems did not support the tightening and oversight. Shame on them, as well.

In the end, it was the Republican lobbying firm and the Republicans who killed it, and a lot of Republicans were enriched by it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 PM on 10/19/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV 123 fans permalink

Elliot Spitzer, though admittedly a poor husband, has written that each and every governor in every state begged George W. Bush to regulate these lending institutions TO PROTECT the consumers and he flatly refused to do it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 10/19/2008
- IowaKid I'm a Fan of IowaKid 18 fans permalink
photo

Exactly correct!!! Spittzer got into trouble because he bucked the system and was on Wall Streets buts all the time. They shut him up huh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 10/19/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 440 fans permalink
photo

However, I am angry that the Dems did not support the tightening and oversight. Shame on them, as well.

You have this wrong. The bill was opposed because it would have weakened the regulation, not strengthened it. It called for an "outside, independent" regulator, which would have removed Congressional oversight altogether, thereby further pushing more Federally insured mortgages into the securities marketplace. The Democrats were right to oppose it. The Republicans opposed it for other reasons--the effect it would have on the private market to compete.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 10/19/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 440 fans permalink
photo

This article is particularly egregious in that not only did it not go into explanation about WHY the Democrats opposed it, it also does not detail how little of the "financial crisis" was actually due to Fannie and Freddie. We already know, have read the report very recently, that it was the private mortgage market that caused the collapse.

This is an example of Pete Yost and the AP helping Republicans to "pass the buck" onto not only McCain, but also onto Democrats, in order to save their own skins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 10/19/2008

It says in the article why the Dems did not support it: "Democrats did not like the harshest provision, which would have given a new regulator a mandate to shrink Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae by forcing them to sell off part of their portfolios. That approach, the Democrats feared, would cut into the ability of low- and moderate-income families to buy houses".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 10/19/2008
photo

Add - in a responsible manner.

CRA lending had been done since 1977 without causing a credit crisis. This a fact.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 10/19/2008
- Chillinout I'm a Fan of Chillinout 125 fans permalink
photo

The Democrats opposed it because they wanted to get more lower-income people into houses. Of course they didn't know about all of the predatory lending practices that were going on at the time.

People try and simplify this whole economic crisis, and it is not at all simple. No one person or entity is responsible. It was an industry wide meltdown.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 10/19/2008
photo

This is false.

President Bush wanted to get 5.5 million minority families into new homes by 2010. The 2005 F&F reform bill included no language that would restrain that effort, and only language that would accelerate that effort.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 10/19/2008
- DickTater I'm a Fan of DickTater 57 fans permalink
photo

people seem unable to wrap their head around how HUGE, how un-american, how multi-pronged the attack on american citizens by corporations/rich.

"hagel's bill.....brings greater oversight and tighter regulation to Freddie and Fannie, and they used every means they could to defeat Sen. Hagel's legislation every step of the way."

The global financial and corporate giants have a lot of "means". Even on their worst days, they have a 1000 times more 'means' than the avg citizen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 10/19/2008

Gee ...I guess someone should be hung, huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 10/19/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 440 fans permalink
photo

Yes, the Republicans who allowed the deregulation in private markets and who then tried to push through legislation to DESTROY Congressional oversight of Fannie and Freddie and make it possible to loan to riskier borrowers rather than to low-risk low- to moderate-income people, and to then sell off even greater numbers more Federally insured mortgages into the private market, and particularly to Asian investors! Thank God the Democrats fought against it!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 10/19/2008
- JestMe I'm a Fan of JestMe 6 fans permalink

There is so much to do to punish those who have stolen our nations security from us all, and at the same time set an example, for others to ponder .

Some of it will have to be under the radar as all good justice is.

What do they call it when somebody who is truly guilty, but seemingly above the reach of justice, gets terminated?

Is it just called "justice"?

Karma?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 10/19/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect