Yahoo firing 1,500 workers; 3Q profit falls 64 pct

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Yahoo firing 1,500 workers; 3Q profit falls 64 pct stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL LIEDTKE | October 22, 2008 12:25 AM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A Yahoo worker waves to another worker outside of Yahoo offices in Santa Clara, Calif., Tuesday, Oct. 21, 2008. Mired in a deep slump, Yahoo will fire at least 1,500 workers to cope with a crumbling economy that dented its third-quarter profit and turned up the heat on the Internet company's management as investors stew over a missed opportunity to sell to Microsoft Corp. for $47.5 billion. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

SAN FRANCISCO — Yahoo Inc. will fire at least 1,500 workers to cope with a crumbling economy that dented its third-quarter profit and turned up the heat on the slumping Internet company's management as investors stew over a missed opportunity to sell to Microsoft Corp. for $47.5 billion.

The purge outlined Tuesday represents a 10 percent reduction in Yahoo's payroll of about 15,000 employees. It's the second time in nine months that Yahoo has resorted to mass layoffs in what so far has been an ineffectual effort to rebound from a financial funk that has left its stock price near a 5 1/2-year low.

Yahoo's housecleaning, to be completed by the end of the year, provides the latest example of how a credit crisis that has already rocked banks and retailers is starting to rattle Silicon Valley, the nation's high-tech heartland.

Online auctioneer eBay Inc. is jettisoning 1,600 jobs while an array of startups are letting go workers to squirrel away more cash as venture capitalists become more cautious with their money. Even Google Inc., a company renowned for its free-spending ways, is starting to cut corners.

"We are going into what is very clearly a recession mode," Blake Jorgensen, Yahoo's chief financial officer, said in a Tuesday interview.

Yahoo felt the squeeze in the third quarter as the Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company earned $54.3 million, or 4 cents per share. That was a plunge of 64 percent from $151.3 million, or 11 cents per share, at the same time last year.

If not for nearly $67 million in one-time expenses and a slightly higher tax rate, Yahoo said it would have made 9 cents per share. That figure matched the average earnings estimate among analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters.

Revenue rose 1 percent to $1.79 billion. After subtracting commissions paid to advertising partners, Yahoo said its revenue stood at $1.32 billion _ about $50 million below analyst estimates.

Story continues below
advertisement

Yahoo's determination to rein in its expenses seemed to please investors, who have been disillusioned with the company's direction for years.

Yahoo shares gained nearly 7.6 percent in extended trading after ending the regular session at $12.07, down 79 cents.

The depressed stock price is particularly galling to Yahoo stockholders, given that Yahoo had a chance to sell to Microsoft for $33 per share in May.

But Microsoft withdrew its offer after Yahoo Chief Executive Jerry Yang balked at the price, arguing his turnaround plan would yield even bigger returns.

Yang's rebuff is now looking like a horrible mistake as online advertisers curtail their spending in anticipation of the worst recession in a quarter century.

Signaling it expects the turbulence to extend well into 2009, Yahoo plans to trim $400 million from its annual expenses of $3.9 billion before January.

"I believe getting Yahoo more fit at this time will provide the flexibility necessary for navigating current conditions and strengthen our position for the future," Yang told analysts during a Tuesday conference call.

Besides pruning its payroll, Yahoo is considering closing some of its U.S. offices and sending some work to lower-paid workers overseas.

Yahoo is approaching these cutbacks much more aggressively than its last round of layoffs in February, when about 1,000 workers were cut loose. Within a few months, Yahoo's payroll had expanded back to where it was before the streamlining.

Like most Internet companies, Yahoo relies on advertising for most of its profits.

Reflecting the downturn, Yahoo lowered its revenue estimates for the remainder of the year. Now Yahoo projects 2008 revenue of $7.18 billion to $7.38 billion _ down from a forecast of $7.35 billion to $7.85 billion issued three months ago.

The downturn hasn't derailed Yahoo's biggest rival, Internet search leader Google, which last week reported a 26 percent increase in its third-quarter profit.

But Yahoo is more vulnerable to advertising cutbacks because its marketing system doesn't work as well as Google's and it is more reliant on billboard-type ads that are more difficult to sell in tough times. Google, in contrast, specializes in text-based ad links that cost advertisers only when the ads are clicked on.

Search advertising bolstered Yahoo during the third quarter, with revenue in that segment rising 17 percent to $438 million. But graphic-rich "display" advertising edged up just 3 percent while ads that Yahoo shows on its partners' Web sites plummeted 10 percent as bank and retailers curbed their spending.

Yahoo hopes to boost its revenue by drawing upon Google's technology for some of the text ads shown on its Web site, but the proposed partnership is in limbo while the U.S. Justice Department investigates whether the alliance would undermine competition. Together, Google and Yahoo control more than 80 percent of the U.S. search advertising market.

Yang told analysts that Yahoo and Google are still trying to persuade U.S regulators to allow the companies work together, but didn't specify a timetable for resolving the impasse.

SAN FRANCISCO — Yahoo Inc. will fire at least 1,500 workers to cope with a crumbling economy that dented its third-quarter profit and turned up the heat on the slumping Internet company's manage...
SAN FRANCISCO — Yahoo Inc. will fire at least 1,500 workers to cope with a crumbling economy that dented its third-quarter profit and turned up the heat on the slumping Internet company's manage...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
30
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

Thats the problem with entrepreneurs !! Even after their company has gone public, they still think of it as "their" company. I am surprised Jerry Yang is not inundated with lawsuits !!

Jerry shouldve sold @ 33. As a CEO, his job was to look out for his shareholders and not his own ego !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 10/22/2008

It only depends on how you go public. The way Google went public, it is still "their" company and they can override the shareholders. The Google shareholders basically got the shaft. I could direct you to other companies that did a great job about taking the money and keeping the control. It's only a matter of how smart you are about it (and how dumb your stockholders are).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 10/22/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

KTM: agree completely.

Dual Class of shareholders is a "neon sign" for companies with poor corporate governance. of course there could be exceptions. but, IN GENERAL, its best to avoid investing on companies that exhibit these kind of poor corporate governance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 10/22/2008
- Harrier I'm a Fan of Harrier 10 fans permalink

I enjoy the Yahoo search engine an features over google-It woud be simple for me to increase profits

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 10/22/2008

The Yahoo search engine is the Google search engine.... repackaged.

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 10/22/2008

"Yahoo is considering closing some of its U.S. offices and sending some work to lower-paid workers overseas." that is so cold.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 10/22/2008
- hey0there I'm a Fan of hey0there 4 fans permalink

after seeing the damage that mass outsourcing has wreaked on this country you get jerks like Yang who still want to take american jobs and ship them overseas. and unabashedly say it. unbelievable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 AM on 10/22/2008
- Paralogos I'm a Fan of Paralogos 11 fans permalink

He doesn't see them as "American jobs". He sees them as "Yahoo jobs". And therein lies the problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 AM on 10/22/2008

He can't ship overseas jobs to America, you see... there is not enough H1B visas available.

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 10/22/2008

The internet boom is busting. Good luck finding another job - yahoo guy leaving work in tshirt and shorts. Probably hasn't worked a day in his life anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 AM on 10/22/2008
- IzzyCA I'm a Fan of IzzyCA 16 fans permalink
photo

I work in high tech. We may dress casually, but believe me, we work long hours. And those of us spared the latest layoffs (I don't work at Yahoo, but at another high profile internet company who shall remain unnamed) are finding our workload increasing, without any increase in pay. Yahoo was known for being a good company to work for, hiring some of the best people. Except the top management, of course....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 AM on 10/22/2008
- thedirtman I'm a Fan of thedirtman 18 fans permalink

In the first part of the decade there was a website called unemployedit.com. The forum was filled with 100s of IT workers posting questions on how to go about finding another job or a new career when thousands of dollars were stilled owed on an education now useless.

People are disposable in a profit world. Nothing more than a commodity to be traded liked hogs on the market. All the 12 hour days people spent working for nothing are immediately forgotten as labor is driven out to pasture.

Yes, IT people do work hard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 10/22/2008

republican economics at work

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 10/21/2008
- Paralogos I'm a Fan of Paralogos 11 fans permalink

This isn't "republican economics". This is the Silicon Valley management style. When things are going well, you staff up like crazy to be prepared for best-case scenarios of growth. When things slow down, you lay people off left and right. Investors love it. Employees historically tolerate it, becasue, at least in Silicon Valley, if you were any good, if one shop laid you off, there'd be another doing something slightly different who was hiring just down the street.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 AM on 10/22/2008
- gypsy508 I'm a Fan of gypsy508 9 fans permalink

Yahoo has been a poorly run company for years and it's been obvious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 10/21/2008
- Vere15 I'm a Fan of Vere15 17 fans permalink
photo

YOUR HEADLINE IS OFFENSIVE

They are part of a mass layoff

They were not FIRED

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 10/21/2008

good point Vere15

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 10/21/2008

I fail to see the difference. There are a bunch of euphemisms for the same thing. Losing your job (WFR, layoffs, RIF, increasing synergies, whatever). Firing does not necessarily imply that it was due to poor performance, and all the others do not make losing your job any less painful.

It is like the difference between calling someone mendacious or calling them a liar. One is considered less offensive than the other. They come down to the same thing in the end.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 10/22/2008
- Vere15 I'm a Fan of Vere15 17 fans permalink
photo

I realize to the individuals involved, they would feel that the they had been put on the scrap heap either way. However, for things like Unemployment Insurance adjudicators and other new prospective employers, the term "fired" implies that they have lost their job due to their own fault and would require further investigation. The correct term layoff carries no such mixed message - in this case, they lost their job through no fault of their own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 AM on 10/23/2008
photo

Yahoo has been all downhill anyway, since they X'ed their free-for-all news boards a couple of years ago and subsistuted dorky Q&A boards for teens....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 10/21/2008
photo

Just once, I'd like to see some CEO's "golden parachute" fail to open. (Well, I guess that did happen with Enron execs....)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 10/21/2008
- groucho I'm a Fan of groucho 24 fans permalink
photo

Just what I was thinking, I wonder if the exec's in the company gave up a % of their income, I bet a lot of "yahoos" jobs could have been saved. I don't' know what Yahoo's exec to worker pay difference ratio is, but my guess is it's like every other corporation. At least 100%
I bet the execs can hardly sleep knowing they just made a lot of people jobless in the worst economy since the 1930's. But the idea of giving anything up in this country is so off limits.
Witness the war in Iraq, they don't even talk about it anymore during the debates. People are dying for nothing over there, and most Americans still run around in their big shiny cars and do whatever they want. I'm so sick of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 10/21/2008
photo

.. Another one bites the dust!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 10/21/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

thank you Jerry Yang for refusing to take up MSFT's offer of 32$/share. Where is the stock price now ?:)
hmmm 12$. good going buddy !!

Problem is Jerry Yang forgets its a public company. He is still stuck in the days thinking its "his" company !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 10/21/2008
photo

The game isn't over yet. Microsoft is headed for a HUGE fall. All their products are quickly becoming commodities that will be filled by cheaper (i.e. free). In addition, copyrights are hemorrhaging value with each passing day.

Microsoft thought they could control the Internet and make it their own. Happily, they failed and will suffer the same fate as Control Data Corp, Sperry-UNIVAC, Digital Equipment and all the other companies of yore that failed to change with the technology environment.

I have no pity for Microsoft. Most computer experts will tell you that Microsoft was responsible for setting progress in Computer Science back one or two decades.

I give even odds as to which company, Microsoft or Yahoo, will survive the next ten years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 10/21/2008
- BillCarson I'm a Fan of BillCarson 5 fans permalink
photo

Did a 5 year comparison chart. Interestingly, neither Yahoo or MicroSoft beat the S&P500. Most of the tech stocks (except for Apple) have been dogs since the 2001 crash.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&s=YHOO&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=msft&c=^GSPC
...ironica­lly using yahoo finance. (note: may have to "cut&paste" this link)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 AM on 10/22/2008

Yahoo... the new AOL.

On the internet there can be only one.

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 10/21/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect