Financial Times Endorses Obama For President

Financial Times:

US presidential elections involve a fabulous expense of time, effort and money. Doubtless it is all too much - but, by the end, nobody can complain that the candidates have been too little scrutinised. We have learnt a lot about Barack Obama and John McCain during this campaign. In our view, it is enough to be confident that Mr Obama is the right choice.

At the outset, we were not so confident. Mr Obama is inexperienced. His policies are a blend of good, not so good and downright bad. Since the election will strengthen Democratic control of Congress, a case can be made for returning a Republican to the White House: divided government has a better record in the United States than government united under either party.

Read the whole story: Financial Times

Comments

[AnalyzeIT]

Thank you for endorsing Senator Obama, the candidate who believes Americans should pull together rather those who are trying to divide us into pro-Americans and others.

Some have suggested Obama’s tax plan removes the incentive to be successful. My household would pay more taxes under Obama, but it hasn’t occurred to us to start slacking.

Instead I’m thinking that discretionary income I would probably spend on frivolity and ephemera will help stanch the deficit spending that threatens our future and fund investments that build productivity and quality of life in our country--such as maintenance to infrastructure, healthcare, and developing solutions to global warming.

Again thank you...........

OBAMA-BIDEN