White House Tells Banks To Stop Hoarding Money

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - White House Tells Banks To Stop Hoarding Money stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JENNIFER LOVEN | October 28, 2008 07:18 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — An impatient White House prodded banks and other financial companies Tuesday to quit hoarding billions of dollars flowing into their vaults from Washington and start making more loans. Wall Street soared nearly 900 points on bargain-hunting and hopes of a hefty interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve.

The stock market's amazing climb, with its second-largest point gain ever, was a welcome burst of good news for a nation suffering big job losses and seemingly tumbling into a painful recession.

Consumer pessimism reached record levels in October amid rising unemployment, plunging home prices and shrinking retirement and investment accounts. The Conference Board, a private research group, said consumer confidence fell to its lowest point since it began tracking consumer sentiment in 1967.

Hoping to thaw the credit freeze that has chilled the economy, the Bush administration sent banks an unmistakable message to put aside fears and open up loan windows for cash-starved businesses and consumers who have pulled back on spending.

"What we're trying to do is get banks to do what they are supposed to do, which is support the system that we have in America. And banks exist to lend money," White House press secretary Dana Perino said. While there are limits to Washington's power to affect banks' behavior, the White House decided it was time to use its bully pulpit.

"They (regulators) will be watching very closely, and they're working with the banks," Perino said.

Meanwhile, Treasury Department officials met with banking industry representatives to resolve a glitch in the rescue program that has temporarily prevented some 6,000 of the nation's 8,500 banks from applying for government support.

Treasury is buying preferred shares in banks as a way of injecting cash into the institutions. But about 6,000 of the nation's banks don't have publicly traded shares of stock and therefore are not set up in a way to meet Treasury's current qualifications.

Story continues below

Treasury officials at the meeting assured banking industry representatives that they are working to rework the application forms so that both banks with publicly traded stock and privately held institutions can qualify for the program. They said if the Nov. 14 deadline for applying for government support needs to be extended it will be.

Washington has pumped money and confidence-building measures into the system over recent weeks to get lending, the lifeblood of the credit-dependent American economy, flowing freely again and to combat the worst financial crisis since the 1930s. So far, though, it has not worked. While the crucial and much-watched short-term lending rate called the London Interbank Offered Rate, or Libor, has come down, it remains at elevated levels.

On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve is expected to announce a cut in its fed funds rate _ and Wall Street is looking for a drop in the key interest rate by half a point to 1 percent.

At the center of the administration's efforts to thaw credit is the $700 billion financial bailout plan approved by Congress and signed by President Bush earlier this month. Under that law's authority, the administration is doling out $250 billion to banks in return for partial ownership.

The Treasury Department, which is overseeing the massive capital injection program along with the rest of the bailout, will pour $125 billion into nine of the country's largest banks, which account for 50 percent of all U.S. deposits. Anthony Ryan, Treasury's acting undersecretary for domestic finance, said the first payments went out Tuesday. An additional $125 billion will start flowing to other banks within days, he said.

"As these banks and institutions are reinforced and supported with taxpayer funds, they must meet their responsibility to lend, and support the American people and the U.S. economy," Ryan told the annual meeting of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. "It is in a strengthened institution's best financial interest to increase lending once it has received government funding."

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight Committee, asked the banks getting the $125 billion to detail what they are paying their executives and employees, including bonuses.

"I question the appropriateness of depleting the capital that taxpayers just injected into the bank through the payment of billions of dollars in bonuses, especially after one of the financial industry's worst years on record," Waxman said.

The infusion of federal money is to rebuild banks' battered capital reserves so the institutions would feel comfortable resuming more normal lending practices. But that confidence was undercut somewhat when reports surfaced that bankers might use the money to buy other banks. Indeed, the government approved PNC Financial Services Group Inc. to receive $7.7 billion in return for company stock on Friday and, at the same time, PNC said it was acquiring National City Corp. for $5.58 billion.

There is little federal officials can do about it. There is no language in the bailout bill that specifically obligates banks receiving money to increase their loans. Officials had argued that attaching strings to the capital-infusion program would discourage financial institutions from participating.

"The way that banks make money is by lending money," Perino said. "And so they have every incentive to move forward and start using this money."

Other credit-loosening efforts have included:

_A Federal Reserve program, begun Monday, to purchase the short-term debt of businesses, known as commercial paper.

_Temporary guarantees by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. of new issues of bank debt _ fully protecting the money, for a fee, even if the institution fails.

_Emergency loans from the Fed for financial institutions and even other types of companies. The Fed has been repeatedly tapping this Depression-era authority to be a lender of last resort.

_New temporary federal guarantees to assets held in money market mutual funds as of Sept. 19 but not since then.

_A temporary increase in the cap on deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000 on interest-bearing accounts, and unlimited deposit insurance for non-interest bearing accounts, which small businesses often use to cover payrolls and other expenses and which frequently exceed $250,000.

_The Fed's half-point reduction in its target interest rate on Oct. 8, done in conjunction with rate cuts by other central banks around the world.

Meanwhile, layoffs continue. Whirlpool Corp. said Tuesday it will cut 5,000 jobs. That's on top of other recent layoffs of thousands of workers by Xerox Corp., drugmaker Merck & Co. Inc. and financial services firm National City Corp.

___

Associated Press writers Jeannine Aversa, Martin Crutsinger and Christopher S. Rugaber contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — An impatient White House prodded banks and other financial companies Tuesday to quit hoarding billions of dollars flowing into their vaults from Washington and start making more loa...
WASHINGTON — An impatient White House prodded banks and other financial companies Tuesday to quit hoarding billions of dollars flowing into their vaults from Washington and start making more loa...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
80
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- Mnemanth I'm a Fan of Mnemanth 18 fans permalink
photo

Non issue, if the money had been injected into the pocket of Joe the Taxpayer.
Maybe Joe would have been wise and put it into savings (money made and circulated), or investments (money made and circulated).
Maybe Joe would have spent it (money made and circulated).
Maybe Joe... who knows!!
Trickle down economics. Whatever. Money gets into the hands of the greedy few- and that's where the buck stops. And the masses are left holding an empty bag.
"I just don't understand why the economy is a mess!" Duh!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 10/29/2008
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 150 fans permalink
photo

Now that is irksome...

This Administration spends darn near eight years doing everything in their power to shove America's money to the wealthy few, the banks, and the corporations - and now they try and pretend that they don't work for them and are only interested in seeing to it that the banks fulfill their responsibility to America?

That just amazes me...you would think people's heads would naturally start exploding when their hypocrisy hits a certain level.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 10/29/2008
- Mike169 I'm a Fan of Mike169 50 fans permalink
photo

If they didn't want them to hoard the money why didn't they make it a condition of accepting the money? Silly Republicans!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 10/29/2008
- rkimball I'm a Fan of rkimball 5 fans permalink

the white house knew the outcome. trickle down economics never works.

bush wants to give this nation one final & last & complete & total kick in the nuts while it's down, before he leaves office. his legacy will live on for generations to come as they pay for this mess.
mc cain will continue trickle down economics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 10/29/2008
- emerywood I'm a Fan of emerywood 4 fans permalink

Why are the bankers holding back on lending ? Perhaps it is because they know how reckless and greedy they all are. They had just been through the trauma of lending out money. Or, perhaps, they understood the magnitude of the financial implosion better than the general public, and they are holding on to whatever money they now have. They looked up Adam
Smith's book " Wealth of the Nation " and did not find any mention of greed and avarice or CDS, CDO
and credit derivatives and they have completely lost faith in the free market system. Like ordinary investors, they are perplexd and numb. They never thought it was their duty to make the system work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 10/29/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

The bankers know better than to listen to lying Texas swindlers..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 AM on 10/29/2008
- Egalitare I'm a Fan of Egalitare 6 fans permalink
photo

Okay, now I know why this "conversation" between the White House and the Banks seems so familiar:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6u3vwajQ-FY

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 10/29/2008

Why should we blame the banks, when it's quite obvious, the de-regulation of the Bush Administration is again padding their pockets for the future. Distrust has been the issue long before any financial crisis in business policy. You lose= I win..... Well someone has to lose for someone to win; Sorry to say, it has been the middle class displaced worker, foreclosed home owner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 10/29/2008
- TN I'm a Fan of TN 28 fans permalink

Excuse me but why wasn't it written into the "bailout" package what the recipient was supposed to do with our money?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 AM on 10/29/2008
- Egalitare I'm a Fan of Egalitare 6 fans permalink
photo

Sure it was.

But the current "overseers" are still assuming that the corner office folks are making prudent business decisions that will benefit the economy as a whole.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 10/29/2008

With due respect, you need to read the entire Bailout Package passed by Congress.

Paulson, Bernanke and Cox failed to remove the VOTING RIGHTS OF THE BANK EXECUTIVES. They did not want to interfere, was their rationale. PERIOD.

As long as the Bankers, Executives and CEO and their Boards have the VOTING RIGHTS, they can unilaterally dictates how the bailout monies are appropriated. And as long as they retain those VOTING RIGHTS, the STEWARDSHIP OF THOSE BAILOUT MONIES ARE THEIRS. PERIOD.

Another fatal error by Paulson, Bernanke and Cox. They have to go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 10/29/2008
- nezumi I'm a Fan of nezumi 2 fans permalink

"What we're trying to do is get banks to do what they are supposed to do, which is support the system that we have in America. And banks exist to lend money,"

Now that shows financial expertise! Wow, I have to remember that one. Incredible, someone in the white house actually said that. Aren't they cute!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 10/29/2008
- Egalitare I'm a Fan of Egalitare 6 fans permalink
photo

Down right adorable!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 10/29/2008

Perino and her Boss are such A-Holes.

The banks retained the VOTING RIGHTS. Read the bailout package passed by Congress. Democrats who eagerly passed the Bailout, should have made it sure that the VOTING RIGHTS of the Bankers were removed. Failing to do that, these bankers can arbitrarily vote to approve the golden parachute, pay their investors and substantially hoard the rest for themselves, and maybe, just maybe a trickle would be for commercial and personal loans. TRICKLE will be the most that these bank would release to the public to satisfy the FEDS minimum requirements.

Most Repugs went for it, but there were some who were resisting the provisions of the bailouts, but were unable to sustain arguments against the bailout because of political pressures.

VOTING RIGHTS - remember that !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 10/29/2008

It was lack of regulation of the Wall Street speculators and brokerage houses that caused the financial chaos and breakdown; why does anyone think that an unregulated bailout at the whims of a few Wall Street insiders is going to solve the problem. What would begin to restore confidence in the system is for Congress to past CLEAR rules that minimize or eliminate speculation, i.e. leveraging, and to set limits on interest rates that could be charged by mortgage and credit card "bank". STILL NO RULES, STILL NO CONFIDENCE!

And remember, this has nothing to do with your neighborhood banks that makes the loans for small businesses and cars according to sensible banking practices. This has everything to do with the big Wall Street banks that fund company buyouts (and layoffs) and speculative financial products. The White House and the Congress have just robbed the taxpayers again, throwing money to a bunch of gamblers, money that is needed for economic stimulation. And now they talk about lowering the prime rate. That just gives more free money to the speculators, who still charge the taxpayer high rates. And, if people are in fear of losing their jobs, they are not going to take out loans to buy "stuff" to keep the economy moving.

All the people in the Bush Administration and about 90% of Congress should be in jail!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 10/29/2008

Agreed, outside of the housing crisis, even the high gas prices are due to the un-regulated selling of oil futures...For too long people have just been handing their money to gamblers and the bottom finally fell out...So why do we continue to support these gamblers instead of FIXING the problem from the ground up......oh yea because that makes too much sense...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 10/29/2008
- rkimball I'm a Fan of rkimball 5 fans permalink

banks will not be loaning out taxpayers bail out money at risky times although that is what they are supposed to do to stimulate the economy.

many banks will be using bail outs to purchase beaten down properties,banks & corporations to strengthen themselves in future & become healthy again. i can't blame them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 AM on 10/29/2008
- Egalitare I'm a Fan of Egalitare 6 fans permalink
photo

The Progressives of 3 generations ago figured out that businesses hoard their assets in down times and wait for pent up demand to build up. They also know that profit is maximized for the fat cats with great swings in economic activity. If "buy low, sell high" is the rule, then allowing "higher highs" and "lower lows" is ideal.

Problem is that this really only benefits those at the very top. That paradigm cannibalizes EVERYONE below them, not just the poor and working class but the middle class and even near-millionaires as well.

The fat cats at the top of the heap have enough assets to take a big short term loss and wait for the next even bigger boom. Do you?

Let's be honest: regulation, progressive taxation, redistribution of income - whatever you want to call it - takes the highest "theoretical" profits from the very wealthy and spreads the benefit of increased productivity to more people. It doesn't eliminate profitability, and it isn't clear that it reduces them over the long haul.

When all is said and done and Donald Trump has to pay 10% more in total taxes, he will still be able to build golf courses anywhere he wants and yacht to his heart's content. The employees on that course and that boat, however, will be able to live with a lot less stress in their lives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 10/29/2008

The White House can't do that. Who do they think they are ? Banks rule the world, we are merely here to service them, like so many dung beetles pushing about massive balls of capital. Let us be thankful for the little crumbs we are allowed in order to subsist. God bless big finance capital !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 AM on 10/29/2008
- rkimball I'm a Fan of rkimball 5 fans permalink

these are your tax dolllars as well as ours enriching the greedy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 10/29/2008
- FatherWolf I'm a Fan of FatherWolf 21 fans permalink

I get the feeling that Joe the Plumber has more influence than George the Occupant these days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 AM on 10/29/2008
- kfdan I'm a Fan of kfdan 23 fans permalink
photo

The bailout was a give-away ... nothing more! You will not see any advantage for ordinary people ... nor will this bail-sellout-scheme end the serious financial decline ... it's just the beginning!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 AM on 10/29/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect