What Industries Will Benefit From An Obama Victory? A McCain Victory?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - What Industries Will Benefit From An Obama Victory? A McCain Victory? stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER | November 2, 2008 10:39 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Battered by the financial meltdown, America's business community is anxiously calculating how Tuesday's presidential election will affect it.

Energy, pharmaceutical and telecommunications companies could face tax and other policy changes no matter who wins the White House. The outcome also could determine how well alternative energy developers, generic biotechnology companies, stem cell researchers and others fare.

Labor unions put major resources behind Democrat Barack Obama and could wind up a big winner if he takes the White House. Nuclear power and the coal industry would get a boost if Republican John McCain prevails. Obama promises to raise corporate tax rates and income taxes on families making over $250,000; McCain promises to cut corporate taxes and extend all of President Bush's tax cuts.

A look at how some could fare:

UNIONS

With Obama in office and an expected stronger Democratic majority on Capitol Hill, unions could achieve their top goal of making it easier for workers to organize. Labor wants to winning passage of a measure that would require companies to recognize unions once a majority of employees sign cards expressing support.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce opposes the bill. Steven Law, the group's general counsel, said the elimination of secret ballot votes "creates tremendous incentives for intimidation and harassment." But Bill Samuel, director of government affairs at the AFL-CIO, says, "We see (it) as a way to strengthen the middle class" by enabling more workers to push for higher wages and benefits.

Obama has endorsed the measure; McCain opposes it.

Story continues below
advertisement

___

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND NUCLEAR POWER

Both candidates back expanded use of alternative energy such as solar and wind power _ through greater spending in Obama' case and tax credits in McCain's.

Obama proposes spending $150 billion over 10 years to speed the development of plug-in hybrid cars and "commercial-scale" renewable energy, among other goals.

McCain favors the construction of 45 new nuclear power plants by 2030 and spending $2 billion annually in support of "clean coal."

While McCain has been a critic of government support for ethanol, most analysts think congressional support for the alternative fuel would enable it to survive under a McCain administration.

___

STEM CELL RESEARCH

Few sectors have more to gain on Election Day than the nation's fledgling stem cell companies, which long have bemoaned the administration's policy limiting federal money for embryonic stem cell research. Bush believes the research is immoral because the process of culling the stem cells kills the embryo.

Both Obama and McCain support federal spending on stem cell research and could move to overturn current restrictions.

Industry executives say the policy change would shore up investor confidence in stem cell developers.

"It will relieve a lot of uncertainty among the investment community that we are going to become an outlaw industry," said Richard Garr, chief executive of Neuralstem.

___

BIOTECH GENERICS

Both candidates have endorsed creating a pathway for generic biotech drugs, a long-sought goal for generic drug companies such as Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Mylan Inc.

Unlike traditional chemical drugs, biotech companies such as Amgen Inc. and Genentech Inc. face no generic competition in the U.S. because the Food and Drug Administration lacks authority to approve copies of biotech medicines. That is because biotech drugs, which are made from living cells or bacteria, are more complicated to manufacture than chemical drugs.

Both campaigns have praised generic drugs as a tool to lower health care costs.

"We know that expanding the use of generics and eliminating barriers to that goal must be a centerpoint of any health reform effort," said Dora Hughes, a health care adviser for Obama, at a recent industry conference.

In politics, of course, not everyone is a winner. Some possible losers include:

OIL COMPANIES

Companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp. are likely to face higher taxes under a President Obama, who supports a windfall profits tax.

The two companies did not help their cause by reporting record profits in late October. Still, as oil prices fall, profits are likely to follow suit.

Even if a windfall profit tax is not imposed, at least eight different taxes and fees could be slapped on the cash-rich industry by a Democratic Congress looking for extra revenue, said Kevin Book, an energy analyst at FBR Capital Markets.

They include adopting a surtax on oil and gas production in the Gulf of Mexico and eliminating a 2 percent tax cut included in recent legislation, Book said.

On the other hand, oil companies could profit if McCain wins since he is a big champion of offshore drilling.

___

PHARMACEUTICALS

No matter which candidate wins the White House, the largest drugmakers, such as Pfizer Inc. and Merck & Co. Inc., will struggle to defend lucrative government programs. That includes the Medicare drug benefit, which pays for medications taken by 47 million older people and which provided much-needed revenue to the drug industry last year.

Dozens of insurers now separately negotiate prices with pharmaceutical makers; the government reimburses insurers for the final cost. Though the program has come in under budget, most Democrats say greater savings could be had by letting the government directly negotiate prices with drugmakers.

Obama has pledged to take up the effort, arguing that savings could total up to $30 billion. McCain also supports giving the government power to negotiate prices, but only at the request of individual insurers.

___

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Big telecommunications carriers have forged many deals in the past eight years, such as Verizon Wireless' $28 billion purchase of Alltel Corp., approved with conditions by the Justice Department Thursday.

Such deals will likely face tougher antitrust scrutiny under either an Obama or McCain administration, analysts say.

In fact, some of the more contentious industry deals in recent years _ including the merger of Sirius Satellite Radio and XM Satellite Radio, and Google Inc.'s acquisition of DoubleClick _ might not have been approved under either candidate, says Paul Gallant, a telecom analyst at Stanford Washington Research Group.

___

DEFENSE CONTRACTORS

After years of record Pentagon budgets, defense companies such as Lockheed Martin Corp. and Raytheon Co. face the prospect of slowing military spending.

Big budget deficits are projected to worsen due in part to the financial bailout package approved by Congress. Defense spending will become a prime target for cuts. That could mean trouble for over-budget programs such as the Army's $200 billion Future Combat Systems, which aims to outfit units with high-tech weapons and communications tools.

Both candidates also want to overhaul the contracting process, especially after some high-profile flops such as the Air Force's attempt to award a $35 billion contract for new aerial refueling planes over the past seven years.

McCain has promoted his role in spiking an earlier Boeing Co. contract for the planes. Obama, meanwhile, has suggested that the Pentagon's effort to build a missile defense shield for the United States and its allies could be scaled back.

__

Associated Press writers Matthew Perrone, John Porretto, Joelle Tessler and Stephen Manning contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Battered by the financial meltdown, America's business community is anxiously calculating how Tuesday's presidential election will affect it. Energy, pharmaceutical and telecommuni...
WASHINGTON — Battered by the financial meltdown, America's business community is anxiously calculating how Tuesday's presidential election will affect it. Energy, pharmaceutical and telecommuni...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
115
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is not the working mans friend, they are behind the illegal workers in the country that drive wages down. They will fight organized labor tooth and nail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 11/02/2008
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 19 fans permalink

The chances of an Obama administration increasing the corporate tax rate zero, although oil companies could see some loopholes or subsidies removed as a token gesture. The excess profits tax is all rhetoric with no reality. As for a broad corporate tax increase there are many Democrats (as well as a lot of Republicans) in congress who support a corporate tax cut (although that won't happen either). The problem right now is that US companies in some sectors are less competitive vs foreign competition because of the tax code. There may be a move to make it easier for unions to organize, but it will take years before unions will be in a stronger position to negotiate for higher pay and benefits- first, because of the very strong positions of US corporations in most sectors, second, because how it would only result in the closing of more factories and stores in many sectors, and third, because of the recession and weak bargaining power for labor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 11/02/2008

He has never said anything about raising the nominal tax rate on corporations, but he did vow to close all the corporate tax loopholes and tax havens that companies now use to remain competitive.

That's even worse than a nominal tax rate increase, and would destroy jobs and wages nationwide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 11/02/2008
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 19 fans permalink

The "closing tax loopholes" rhetoric has been used for decades and with little actual results. Most people don't realize that there is a good reason for most those loopholes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 11/02/2008

Corporations, many of which, taking advantage of loopholes in the tax code, pay no taxes on their profits at all while someone making $20,000 or less is subject to a double digit tax rate. Is that fair? In the 1950's large corporations were taxed at a rate of 90% of profit. Reagan changed that in 1980, and these corporations have paid little or no taxes ever since that time. That was called the Republican Revolution. The Republicans succeeded in convincing the American people to hate the poor and to worship the wealthy and their corporations. Such success gave Republicans substantial power and control over America's vital resources, including its systems of education. With this awesome power, they used their positions in government to funnel taxpayer dollars to their corporate friends and to make themselves wealthy. They created a crony system of government that is so corrupt that a war was created out of thin air to make mega-bucks for certain corporations. If Obama wins, he'll need our help given the fact these Republicans and their corporations will use unprecedented power, amassed over the past thirty years, to destroy newly-elected Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 11/02/2008

Well, Obama says he plans to "bankrupt" all the coal plants in the country, but no mention of that here...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 11/02/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Gotta quote to go with those quote marks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 11/02/2008

He never said he PLANNED to do it. What he did say was that it wouldn't bother him if they did bankrupt themselves. I am sure it's a statement he regrets, especially if he hopes to win Virginia.

Sometimes we say things without thinking. Unfortunately, our elected officials do it a lot more than most of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 11/03/2008

Obama, of course, never said that, but you sure did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 PM on 11/02/2008
- ChescoMom I'm a Fan of ChescoMom 2 fans permalink

Not "plan", just coal plants need to clean up their act controlling greenhouse gases, otherwise face fines. Like a typical Rethug, you balk at having to play nice and not make a mess, preferring to let someone else clean it up--banking, the environmen­t...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 AM on 11/03/2008
- steamboat I'm a Fan of steamboat 44 fans permalink

My wife was a steward in her teaher's union when she taught (now retired)..­....She's deep-down gonna hate seeing energy and pharmaecutical companies pay higher taxes because she looked into her state teacher-pension fund and a very high percentage of it is tied into oil company, other energy, and pharmacutical stocks. Oh well, perhaps they should have been careful what they wished for (LOL)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 11/02/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 267 fans permalink

She'll love it if her money is put to good use. Say in public works programs to build solar and wind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 11/02/2008
photo

And actually lose money on a consistent basis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 11/02/2008
- steamboat I'm a Fan of steamboat 44 fans permalink

Don't hold your breath....­.How many years are we talking? ......I know Teddy didn't want them on Cape Cod....Wil­l you mind them in your backyard? BTW, I'm in truth PRO-alternative energy....­...But having retired from a power-plant (Exelon) I know the realities with supplying ENOUGH energy that must be needed. Which is why I'm PRO-nuclear plants which I'm sure your not.......­..........­.........r­esearch, I'm retired and looking at a housing development outside San Antonio, TX (Kerrville) to live. All the homes are solar. Oh, by the way, Obama is v. nuclear plants. Which I giggle at because his campaign manager/top advisor (David Axelrod) was on advisory board for Exelon's nuclear plants here in Illinois (Dresden, Byron, Quad-Cities)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 11/02/2008
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 19 fans permalink

The best solar stocks are mostly Chinese. The biggest wind company is General Electric, which is so big that increased wind related business won't move that stock as much as other factors. There are some smaller wind companies (OTTR, BWEN) but they are still speculative at this point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 11/02/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 267 fans permalink

See my profile for a ten year plan to 90% solar and wind energy.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research?action=profile

While 80 years is way too long, It's worth reading the European Greenpeace report:
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/reports/energyrevolutionreport

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 11/02/2008

I'd really like to see Lo ck heed invent some suit that Sarah Palin could wear. Then when she spoke she might sound like she knows something.
Anything!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 11/02/2008
- Erdgeist I'm a Fan of Erdgeist 80 fans permalink
photo

We need powerful Unions because corporations have shown that they are unwilling to reward workers for substantial increases in productivity. It is only logical that wages for workers should rise if levels of productivity rise. But this has never been the case -- not without Unions battling. One of the main problems has been American management (e.g., GM and Ford) who couldn't manage to get ducks to go to water. For example, going back to the 1980s, Y.C. Wang, a Taiwanese billionaire bought 13 chemical plants in the U.S. and made substantial profits using U.S. workers (Forbes 7/15/85). This is something American managers couldn't do because they're idiots. The list goes on and on of examples of how American managers are screw ups. Despite this, American workers are the most efficient in the world -- but you would never believe this if you listened to the lies of MSM. This is why we need a rebirth of unionism, to protect the dignity and strength of the American worker (and the nation) against the lies and corruption of American management who, in my book, are unpatriotic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 11/02/2008
- steamboat I'm a Fan of steamboat 44 fans permalink

I'm an old union guy (IBEW) and I agree.....­But I also believe in SECRET-BALLOT voting. And the new unions procedure if implimented is taking that away.....W­on't it be nice to have a couple of goons look over your shoulder and intimidate you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 11/02/2008
- robotfog I'm a Fan of robotfog 23 fans permalink
photo

they wouldn't scare me because I'm insane. I agree with you, however, the secret-ballot is important.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 11/02/2008

Obama's own senior economic adviser published a scholarly paper showing that when you cut corporate taxes, a large portion of that money ends up going toward higher wages for employees. The workers that benefited most were production workers, young workers, low education workers, and UNION workers.

http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/austan.goolsbee/research/cps.pdf

The US treasury published a summary of numerous research papers that came to the same conclusion in December 2007.

All these studies were based on empirical data from the US economy. So they're not voodoo economics, they're real economics.

But according to Obama, no corporate tax cuts are necessary because the many loopholes in the tax code keep our effective tax rate competitive. Of course, he also vowed to close every one of those loopholes, so we can expect corporate wages to stagnate as they deal with all the new taxes they'll be slapped with.

Obama's essentially taking away people's ability to EARN money, and replacing that with a government handout.

Personally, I'd rather benefit from my own wage growth than be forced onto the government dole, but hey, that's me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 11/02/2008
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 19 fans permalink

Most US chemical companies have been seeing record profitability over the past several years, so the example of Y.C Wang isn't impressive. About unions overall, the problem for many/most companies with foreign competition is low competitiveness because of higher labor costs, particularly in depressed markets like autos, auto parts, furniture, and textiles. And increasing labor costs, would only result in more companies going out of business and most companies continuing to invest abroad rather than in the United States. Some union industries have faired well in the last five years, but most of them are commodity related and have seen record profitability. This could change in the next years, however, since commodity prices have crashed, profits will plummet, and workers will be laid off and labor will lose bargaining power. I think any move to strenghen the unions will just result in a weaker industrial base in the US, lower job growth, less gdp growth, and possibly 60-70s style wage-price inflation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 11/02/2008
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 19 fans permalink

Increasing pay for workers will damage the ability of many companies to compete and discourage them to invest, particularly those that have import competition or who export. It would ultimately result in less job creation and more investment abroad than here in the US. Unions have faired well in recent years in the commodity related industries, but with the collapse in commodity prices in the last months and little chance of a reversal any time soon, union workers will be facing more layoffs and a worse bargaining position. GM, Ford, and Chrysler will also layoff a lot of union workers, as they are a major source of their problems. I think that right now unions are still a problem and not a remedy for the US. Maybe if we get a further weakening in the dollar and a strengthening economy three to five years from now, unions will have an opportunity to gain some strength, but certainly not now. It would hurt the economy, not help it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 11/02/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

The flaw in your argument is that the dollar is falling in value. There is a lot of money to be made in the export market. In order for business to take advantage of the situation, they need to increase average wages by hiring more engineers, designers, and sales people. Obama's high mileage cars and solar cells will not design themselves, lots of high-powered engineering talent is necessary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 11/02/2008

Pity whoever inherits the mess. The republican do the same ole same ole has got a load of lazy military contractors sucking the taxpayer dry so we get a massive deficit and you f o o l s talk about lazy citizens. The defence contractors got to beat 'em all. Our boys are gettin' s h o t at just so the duffuses can make more g u n s and a m m o.
Lazy Lazy Lazy
Lazy thinking by this administration is what got us here first. Anyone who thinks other is welcome to contribute to the Rush Limbaugh rehabilitation fund for myopia!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 11/02/2008
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 19 fans permalink

Do you think everyone that works for military contracting companies like Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, SAIC, and Boeing are lazy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 11/02/2008
- hey0there I'm a Fan of hey0there 4 fans permalink

if you worked for like a telcom and the company becomes unionized do you have to join the union even if you didnt want to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 11/02/2008
photo

Only if Vinny saz so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 11/02/2008

Sarah Palin video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1exiyBYnJ00

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 11/02/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 25 fans permalink

DRUDGE is HAVING A PARTY - All TROLLS Invited!

EXIT STAGE LEFT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 11/02/2008

God I'm stupid. If I just treat my kids fairly they will quit asking me for more stuff? Wish someone had explained this to me sooner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 11/02/2008
- pipp I'm a Fan of pipp 3 fans permalink

Oh, that's sad...well it's never too late. Maybe you can start spending some quality time with them instead of just buying them stuff. It only hurts for a little while.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 11/02/2008

The real beneficiaries of an Obama win will be those who are lazy, and don't want to work, but would rather the govt. take that which others work hard for and give it to them.....Y­eah Socialism.­..its for those who can't think and make good decisions on their own, but would rather the govt. take care of them and make their decisions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 11/02/2008
photo

boy you're an idiot. Tax breaks can't go to people who don't work and it's a lie that 40% of American workers don't pay income taxes. Zeroing out doesn't mean they don't pay taxes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 11/02/2008
- SOLERSO68 I'm a Fan of SOLERSO68 36 fans permalink
photo

Yeah...go getem diamond jim? ! whayda gonna do with that windfall in your capital gains tax ? buy a yacht? can i go for ride too?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 11/02/2008

you're tag sums up the attitude of the incumbents all to well my friend.
Capitalism4me.
This is an election for the US President. He is to be a leader for all of us not just you.
And Capitalism should work for all of us
not just you!
It's like coats.
You wear the coat if it's cold-right- that's you wearing the coat.
If you wear the coat when it's hot- wrong- that's the coat wearing you!
I think we've had enough of the elephant s k i n.

We want some genuine donkey!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 11/02/2008
- jrjoyrae I'm a Fan of jrjoyrae 2 fans permalink

If the American public wants to know why they're hurting...

They need to realize they've been gettting SCREWED by an elephant for the past 8 years... (of course you're gonna hurt).

It's time for the healing to begin...

And think aboiut it...

Hell... even Jesus rode on the back of a donkey (he sure was a smart man).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 11/02/2008
photo

WERE READY!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 11/02/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

Nothing will really improve for the American people until we end Corporate "personhood"
and once again become a nation that Serves The People..!

Simple as that...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 11/02/2008

I believe Obama is the man to do that. I doubt that he will forget the millions of people who worked hard 4 him to get to this point will want it any other way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 11/02/2008
photo

How about being people who serve the nation.

It sounds like your theory of government is gimme gimme.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 PM on 11/02/2008
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 11/02/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect