What Industries Will Benefit From An Obama Victory? A McCain Victory?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - What Industries Will Benefit From An Obama Victory? A McCain Victory? stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER | November 2, 2008 10:39 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Battered by the financial meltdown, America's business community is anxiously calculating how Tuesday's presidential election will affect it.

Energy, pharmaceutical and telecommunications companies could face tax and other policy changes no matter who wins the White House. The outcome also could determine how well alternative energy developers, generic biotechnology companies, stem cell researchers and others fare.

Labor unions put major resources behind Democrat Barack Obama and could wind up a big winner if he takes the White House. Nuclear power and the coal industry would get a boost if Republican John McCain prevails. Obama promises to raise corporate tax rates and income taxes on families making over $250,000; McCain promises to cut corporate taxes and extend all of President Bush's tax cuts.

A look at how some could fare:

UNIONS

With Obama in office and an expected stronger Democratic majority on Capitol Hill, unions could achieve their top goal of making it easier for workers to organize. Labor wants to winning passage of a measure that would require companies to recognize unions once a majority of employees sign cards expressing support.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce opposes the bill. Steven Law, the group's general counsel, said the elimination of secret ballot votes "creates tremendous incentives for intimidation and harassment." But Bill Samuel, director of government affairs at the AFL-CIO, says, "We see (it) as a way to strengthen the middle class" by enabling more workers to push for higher wages and benefits.

Obama has endorsed the measure; McCain opposes it.

Story continues below
advertisement

___

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND NUCLEAR POWER

Both candidates back expanded use of alternative energy such as solar and wind power _ through greater spending in Obama' case and tax credits in McCain's.

Obama proposes spending $150 billion over 10 years to speed the development of plug-in hybrid cars and "commercial-scale" renewable energy, among other goals.

McCain favors the construction of 45 new nuclear power plants by 2030 and spending $2 billion annually in support of "clean coal."

While McCain has been a critic of government support for ethanol, most analysts think congressional support for the alternative fuel would enable it to survive under a McCain administration.

___

STEM CELL RESEARCH

Few sectors have more to gain on Election Day than the nation's fledgling stem cell companies, which long have bemoaned the administration's policy limiting federal money for embryonic stem cell research. Bush believes the research is immoral because the process of culling the stem cells kills the embryo.

Both Obama and McCain support federal spending on stem cell research and could move to overturn current restrictions.

Industry executives say the policy change would shore up investor confidence in stem cell developers.

"It will relieve a lot of uncertainty among the investment community that we are going to become an outlaw industry," said Richard Garr, chief executive of Neuralstem.

___

BIOTECH GENERICS

Both candidates have endorsed creating a pathway for generic biotech drugs, a long-sought goal for generic drug companies such as Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Mylan Inc.

Unlike traditional chemical drugs, biotech companies such as Amgen Inc. and Genentech Inc. face no generic competition in the U.S. because the Food and Drug Administration lacks authority to approve copies of biotech medicines. That is because biotech drugs, which are made from living cells or bacteria, are more complicated to manufacture than chemical drugs.

Both campaigns have praised generic drugs as a tool to lower health care costs.

"We know that expanding the use of generics and eliminating barriers to that goal must be a centerpoint of any health reform effort," said Dora Hughes, a health care adviser for Obama, at a recent industry conference.

In politics, of course, not everyone is a winner. Some possible losers include:

OIL COMPANIES

Companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp. are likely to face higher taxes under a President Obama, who supports a windfall profits tax.

The two companies did not help their cause by reporting record profits in late October. Still, as oil prices fall, profits are likely to follow suit.

Even if a windfall profit tax is not imposed, at least eight different taxes and fees could be slapped on the cash-rich industry by a Democratic Congress looking for extra revenue, said Kevin Book, an energy analyst at FBR Capital Markets.

They include adopting a surtax on oil and gas production in the Gulf of Mexico and eliminating a 2 percent tax cut included in recent legislation, Book said.

On the other hand, oil companies could profit if McCain wins since he is a big champion of offshore drilling.

___

PHARMACEUTICALS

No matter which candidate wins the White House, the largest drugmakers, such as Pfizer Inc. and Merck & Co. Inc., will struggle to defend lucrative government programs. That includes the Medicare drug benefit, which pays for medications taken by 47 million older people and which provided much-needed revenue to the drug industry last year.

Dozens of insurers now separately negotiate prices with pharmaceutical makers; the government reimburses insurers for the final cost. Though the program has come in under budget, most Democrats say greater savings could be had by letting the government directly negotiate prices with drugmakers.

Obama has pledged to take up the effort, arguing that savings could total up to $30 billion. McCain also supports giving the government power to negotiate prices, but only at the request of individual insurers.

___

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Big telecommunications carriers have forged many deals in the past eight years, such as Verizon Wireless' $28 billion purchase of Alltel Corp., approved with conditions by the Justice Department Thursday.

Such deals will likely face tougher antitrust scrutiny under either an Obama or McCain administration, analysts say.

In fact, some of the more contentious industry deals in recent years _ including the merger of Sirius Satellite Radio and XM Satellite Radio, and Google Inc.'s acquisition of DoubleClick _ might not have been approved under either candidate, says Paul Gallant, a telecom analyst at Stanford Washington Research Group.

___

DEFENSE CONTRACTORS

After years of record Pentagon budgets, defense companies such as Lockheed Martin Corp. and Raytheon Co. face the prospect of slowing military spending.

Big budget deficits are projected to worsen due in part to the financial bailout package approved by Congress. Defense spending will become a prime target for cuts. That could mean trouble for over-budget programs such as the Army's $200 billion Future Combat Systems, which aims to outfit units with high-tech weapons and communications tools.

Both candidates also want to overhaul the contracting process, especially after some high-profile flops such as the Air Force's attempt to award a $35 billion contract for new aerial refueling planes over the past seven years.

McCain has promoted his role in spiking an earlier Boeing Co. contract for the planes. Obama, meanwhile, has suggested that the Pentagon's effort to build a missile defense shield for the United States and its allies could be scaled back.

__

Associated Press writers Matthew Perrone, John Porretto, Joelle Tessler and Stephen Manning contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Battered by the financial meltdown, America's business community is anxiously calculating how Tuesday's presidential election will affect it. Energy, pharmaceutical and telecommuni...
WASHINGTON — Battered by the financial meltdown, America's business community is anxiously calculating how Tuesday's presidential election will affect it. Energy, pharmaceutical and telecommuni...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
115
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
photo

The answer to the question in the headline, the difference will be miniscule.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 11/02/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 270 fans permalink

You act as if McCain would actually do anything he promised.

McCain would simply continue the BushCo, GOP conservative disaster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 11/02/2008

He'd definitely do something, it would just be something hardly worth mentioning that he would consider a testament to his "maverick" tendencies like make ribbed condoms illegal to anyone under 27.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 11/02/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 25 fans permalink

JPM is Going to REFI 80+Billions in Mortgage Loans! Who Will WIN?

Obama's Cabinet Position in Technology: FIRST Project, restore Middle Class and stop "Homeowner Walkaway Crisis!"

FIVE FACTS:

1. American Taxpayers Own Fannie, Freddie, interest in AIG, and group of Banks!
2. Mortgage Companies and Banks are at CENTER of Housing and Financial CRISIS!
3. Crisis Continues Because Homeowners can not Afford "TRICKY Adjustable Loans" and are Walking Away!
4. The Current FED RATE is 1.0%!
5. Technology (Internet) are Sophisticated Tools for Automating 98% of a Loan!

Use Internet, Automation, and New Taxpayer Owned Banks to provide direct low cost loans, Eliminating Corrupt Middle Men (i.e., Mortgage Companies and Mortgage Banks)?

FIXED rate new loans very low interest, perhaps 2.5% to 3.5%.

New Taxpayer Owned Banks will get "1.5% to 2.5% margin!"

Why such low rates? Because Middle men Removed - Direct from FED Money Rate 1.0%!

We FUNDED Corrupt Banks so Fund American Mortgages!

Automation verifies employment, title, credit, and 98% of loan Preparation.

Eliminates mortgage fees, bank fees, title fees, most verification fees, and most documentation work.

Saves more than Bailouts.

Savings: Pay debts, buy American Green Cars, buy Real Estate, and American goods plus help other countries in crisis by buying their goods!

Removes layers of processing, reduces obligations, keeps people in their homes, reduces burden on banks, and stimulates economy!

For some families this could save $500 to $1,500 per month and in some cases more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 11/02/2008
- Teamster I'm a Fan of Teamster 2 fans permalink
photo

The television development of communications began with
an enterprizing individual effort .

At a home workshop.

We have all of this to gain "perhaps".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 11/02/2008
- wagadog I'm a Fan of wagadog 44 fans permalink

Well they left off some key industries that would definitely be favored by Obama's stated policies on Green Technology, High Technology and Scientific Research.

Anything involving smart people who haven't sold their souls to the devil will do quite well under Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 11/02/2008

Great article, although if McCain were to win, I could foresee problems for him with REPUBLICANS on some issues. If Obama wins, the question remains, what will surviving Republicans in Congress do? Will the conservative base begin a "cleansing action" to make the party toe the conservative line? Or will many go along with some of Obama's proposals after putting their finger in the air to see which way the wind is blowing (or maybe out of some conviction)?

www.pontificating-randy.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 11/02/2008

Bush was bad for business from the get go. Even the Onion had it right with it's pathetically hilarious headline: "Our Long Prosperous Nightmare Is Soon To Be Over" or something to that effect.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 11/02/2008

Unions are not an industry; They produce nothing themselves and would be nothing without industry. They are PARASITES ON industry as is most of government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 11/02/2008
- Snwbnny9 I'm a Fan of Snwbnny9 13 fans permalink
photo

I think that just depends on the Union.

Without workers organizing we wouldn't have mandatory lunches, breaks, safety equipment. Our kids would still be working 16 hour days in sweatshops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 11/02/2008
- POTUS2008 I'm a Fan of POTUS2008 5 fans permalink
photo

you are an idiot

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 11/02/2008
- Dystopic I'm a Fan of Dystopic 20 fans permalink
photo

If the employers would do what's right for their employees, Unions would not be necessary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 11/02/2008

I have to agree with you I went to work with a startup company back in the late 70's and every one was on salary and raises were handed out on work merit and productivity. Everyone made better wages than most union shops in the area. Everyone got bonuses for Christmas the first year and the plant expanded double in size for 4 years. The plant was sold after 15 years as the owner was to old. Sold to a co that had to many suits as in top heavy and soon had to be sold again, Again it is facing bankruptcy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 11/02/2008
photo

Hidden Audio: Obama Tells SF Chronicle He Will Bankrupt Coal Industry

"So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.".­.BHO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdi4onAQBWQ

Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was willing to bankrupt a major industry? Would this declaration not immediately be front page news? Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 11/02/2008
- wxman I'm a Fan of wxman 2 fans permalink

Yeah well if you have children or grand children that would be absolutely AWESOME - becuase they could give two hoots about CO2 emissions amd IF YOU THINK THE ECONMY IS PRETTY BAD JUST WAIT UNTIL CLIMATE CHANGE NIGHTMARE CATCHES UP WITH YOU!!

THIS FLOOD, DROUGHT, TORNADO, HEAT WAVE, SMOGGY BREATHLESS DAY BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF THOSE GIANT SEWER SYSTEMS IN THE SKY "BIG COAL"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 11/02/2008
- Snwbnny9 I'm a Fan of Snwbnny9 13 fans permalink
photo

Do you realize that "clean" coal is really just a theory? They can't even do it yet. They just hope they can. And what they do to make coal cleaner is trap the fumes in a porous rock layer underneath the ground. We have no idea what this will do to our planet. And they haven't even managed to do it yet. Plus the conversion of the fumes requires energy making cleaner coal tech produce 30% less energy.

And McCains other big energy idea is more nuc-a-lar power. If a terrorist organization really wanted to kill Americans nuclear power plant destruction would be an easy way to ruin this Country.

We need to invest in new technology. Not more of the same.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 11/02/2008

And what specifically is this "new" technology you speak of?.......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 11/02/2008
- DFL I'm a Fan of DFL 37 fans permalink
photo

I WANT A NEW PRESIDENT WHO CARES ABOUT REGULAR PEOPLE AND NOT ONE WHO CARES ONLY ABOUT OIL COMPANY AND WAR CONTRACTOR PROFITS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 11/02/2008
photo

Are not employee's of oil co. and contractors American voters AND tax payers also?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 11/02/2008

We need regulations how much CEOs should be compensated. I own a business, that means my ultimate compensation should be regulated, yes, the US government should limit those CEOs to take home 100 millions EVEN THEY bankrupted America. I left my Corporate job because the CEO bankrupted the company while she left the job with 10 millions, the rest of the employees lost all their money in company stock.

As a small business owner, I NEVER got any loans or grants fairly from the US government when Fidelity and Exxon Mobile got to pay NO TAX in some counties for 10+ years in the name of bringing jobs but guess what they all LAID OFF big time and still enjoy the tax break from Bush. We need Obama and justice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 11/02/2008

Hmmm. Using history as a guide, which industries benefited during the Clinton years? Virtually all of them. Which industries benefited during the Bush II years? Virtually none of them, with the exception of the military industry which even McCain wants to cut, and the financial industry which has already imploded.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 11/02/2008
- SSN688 I'm a Fan of SSN688 4 fans permalink

One additional industry benefited under the Shrub's administration: The Petroleum Industry. Huge record profits. The actual cost to produce a barrel of crude have not gone up that much. But the sales price has shot way up. Net results - ginormous profits for them.

If the oil industry would have just spent 10% more of their profits into alternative fuels 8 years ago, we could well be on our way to independence from the imported oil and those same companies could have been in a position to create new markets in which they could reap handsome, sustainable profits. NOw, because of their short-sightedness, they will face higher taxes and be left in the cold when some new start-up fills the void.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 11/02/2008

But Sarah said that she & McCain do not support cutting the military budget. Hmmmm.....­it's tough being a Maverick, eh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 11/02/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect