Obama Election A Roadmap For Democratic Majority

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

STEPHEN OHLEMACHER | November 8, 2008 02:50 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

WASHINGTON — Barack Obama's big victory could provide Democrats with a road map for an even bigger electoral majority in the future _ something that seemed implausible just four years ago.

Obama won in the suburbs of key states, expanded Democratic majorities in big cities and made inroads into rural areas that had been off-limits to Democrats in recent presidential elections. He also proved that a black presidential candidate could make Democratic gains in some of the whitest counties in the nation _ even though in much of the Deep South, his race still appeared to turn voters away.

Nationwide, Republican John McCain won a majority of the white vote in Tuesday's election. But Obama, who will become the nation's first black president, actually fared better than Democratic nominee John Kerry did among white voters in 2004 _ and he did it in some unlikely places, according to an Associated Press analysis of election results.

"Every president wants to build or maintain a coalition for success, to establish a permanent imprint politically," said David Rohde, a political scientist at Duke University. "If the Democrats can avoid screwing up, this can be a politically transformative event."

As expected, Obama did well among low-income voters. But he also won over the wealthiest Americans, despite promising a tax increase for those making more than $250,000 a year. Obama won 52 percent of the vote among those with family incomes of more than $200,000 a year, according to exit polls. That's a 17-point improvement over fellow Democrat Kerry.

Obama also won a majority of the Catholic vote, something Kerry didn't do, even though Kerry would have become just the second Catholic president.

And Obama rocked the youth vote, which has Democrats hoping they can hold onto the voters of the future. Obama won 66 percent of the vote from 18 to 29 year olds, a 12-point improvement over Kerry.

Four years ago, the Democrats were looking at a shrinking electoral map as they suffered through hard-fought losses in Ohio and Florida. Suburban soccer moms seemed to be trending Republican, while much of rural America was solidly red.

Story continues below
advertisement

It turns out those suburbanites weren't so wedded to the Republicans, after all.

Obama did well in key suburban counties in Florida, Ohio, Virginia and Indiana, winning all four states carried by President Bush in 2004. He also made inroads in heavily Republican rural counties, even if he didn't win a majority of the vote in those areas.

In Florida, Obama made significant gains among voters living along the Interstate 4 corridor, a swing area from Orlando to Tampa. He won Osceola County, home to Kissimmee, and Orange County, home to Orlando. Up the Atlantic Coast, Obama also improved on Kerry's numbers in Duval County, home to Jacksonville.

In Ohio, Obama won Hamilton County, home to Cincinnati, a county that Kerry lost in 2004. He also made significant gains in suburban counties in northwestern Ohio as well as those near Columbus in the center of the state.

In Indiana, Obama won a larger percentage of the vote than Kerry in every county, helping him to become the first Democratic presidential candidate to win the state since 1964.

Virginia exemplified Obama's Southern strategy. Obama built a lead in the fast-growing suburbs of Northern Virginia, territory that is more friendly toward Democrats, while limiting his losses in the southern part of the state, which is more Republican.

Much was made of Obama's lack of support among white working class voters in his epic Democratic primary battle with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. And in the general election, Obama did lose among whites without college degrees.

But in many of the nation's most rural, white counties outside the Deep South, Obama did surprisingly well. He didn't always win a majority in those areas, but more often than not, he did better than Kerry did four years ago.

About 1,360 U.S. counties have populations that are more than 90 percent white. Obama won only 249 of those counties, but he received more of the vote than Kerry in nearly eight out of 10 of them, according to the AP analysis.

Obama won in overwhelmingly white counties throughout New England and in parts of the Midwest. He won some of the whitest counties in Iowa, North Dakota, Colorado, Michigan, Wisconsin and his home state of Illinois. He didn't win many of the whitest counties in Kansas or Idaho, but he fared better than Kerry in most of them.

The South and Appalachia were the exceptions.

In Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, and Louisiana, Obama fared worse than Kerry in all 49 counties where whites make up 90 percent or more of the population.

There were similar, but less severe, patterns in the Appalachian states of West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Obama did much better in faster-growing Southern states along the East Coast, such as North Carolina _ where he bested Kerry in two-thirds of the predominantly white counties, and in Virginia, where he out polled Kerry in 22 of the state's 31 predominantly white counties.

Democrats hope the high-growth areas in the South will help them increase their toehold in a region that has largely been shut off to Democrats in the past two presidential elections.

"The people who have moved there are better educated and they make more money. It's just a different demographic mix," said Don Fowler, a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee from South Carolina. "That's the South of 2008."

WASHINGTON — Barack Obama's big victory could provide Democrats with a road map for an even bigger electoral majority in the future _ something that seemed implausible just four years ago. Obam...
WASHINGTON — Barack Obama's big victory could provide Democrats with a road map for an even bigger electoral majority in the future _ something that seemed implausible just four years ago. Obam...
 
Comments
131
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

Postelection poll results CONTRADICT media claims that U.S. is a "center-right" country

http://mediamatters.org/items/200811070013?f=h_latest

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 11/09/2008
photo

How about a road map for a socialist democracy?

Never has our country been as in danger as it is now ... from the inside.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 11/09/2008
- Ohg I'm a Fan of Ohg permalink

The Barack Obama Fan Club is spreading around the world. .....................

http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/11/09/the-barack-obama-fan-club/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 11/09/2008

When will the Dixiecrats wake up, and vote for their on welfare! They have been used by the Repub party since the LBJ era. WAKE UP DIXIECRATS!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 11/09/2008
photo

Doesn't it seem strange that when there is some hint of voter suppression or fraud, it does not seem to help the Democrats!!! It appears to always favor the republicans!

One of the first things I believe Obama should do is to begin to overhaul the elctoral process, getting rid of the electronic machines and confusing ballots. Our vote is a sacred trust, and all should be fairly counted!

Our last two elections were stolen from us! We should support the new President in making sure this never happens again!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 11/09/2008

Voter suppression is most effective among poorer voters, who tend to vote Democratic. Black urban neighborhoods are underserved on election day, and this leads to more problems and longer lines.

Obama needs to pass a new Voting Rights Act before 2010 to make sure that all voters have equal access to the ballot, including secure and plentiful voting booths with a paper trail for ballots.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 11/09/2008

I agree. I feel if they get rid of those electronic machines and the political slight of hand the GOP uses, the Dems would have a permanent majority.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 AM on 11/09/2008
photo

One thing I truly appreciated in this election cycle was that Barack Obama campaigned in RED states. I live in Colorado and it seems like we've had very little reach out from Democrats. How can we decide to go BLUE if we have very little contact with the Democratic candidate? The governor (or former gov.) of Virginia said it best for me on MSNBC one night, he said that they have been waiting for years to be considered.

Barach Obama campaigned across the United States of American. Now that is inspirational. He believes in all of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 AM on 11/09/2008
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 11/09/2008

The theory that only certain states matter is classic Democratic National Committee 'political wisdom", zernaby. Obama did it right and he got a broad mandate not given to any candidate
for a very long time. Hope the DNC gets the hint for the future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 11/10/2008

Take a look at the map that shows which counties had higher Republican vote in 08 than 04 (I forget where I saw it - fivethirtyeight or TruthDig)- they're in a narrow swath from southeast Oklahoma northeast through Arkansas and on up to Kentucky and West Virginia. Forget about the expanse of red in the plains states; senators can be harvested there, but not congressmen or women and hence few electoral votes. If the republicans don't develop a new strategy, they'll wind up in a gomer ghetto in the Ozarks and Appalachia. The mountain west is in play, and the piedmont south is trending Democratic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 AM on 11/09/2008
photo

The past elections were rigged, the exit polls were doctored to "match" the results and nobody knows for sure how anyone voted before.

The anybody but Bush sentiment in 2004 was huge. Kerry got gigantic crowds. If you study the polls, we were robbed. There is ample evidence of election fraud.

It was pretty clear that America had had enough of the GOP in 2006. They didn't steal as much as they could have and made it "stick" so they just took enough seats to ensure the Democrats were hamstrung by the Republicans. We would have had 20-30 more congressional seats by the predictions, so it's clear there was rigging/manipulation and suppression.

2008 was a tsunami and Barack's popularity was undeniable. So was the venom directed at the GOP. Yet, despite the groundswell in registration and election protection efforts, voter suppression ran into the millions and the electronic machines were everywhere, flipping votes from D to R and breaking down only to be "recalibrated" by the manufacturer's own reps. Manufacturers who are GOP donors and cronies with trade secret software.

The game has been rigged but we managed to overcome it because we got out the vote and it was obvious that McCain and Palin supporters were VASTLY outnumbered.

We need to get rid of the machines and stop the voter suppression. It is estimated from the early examinations of the raw data of the exit polls that at least six million votes were stolen from us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 AM on 11/09/2008
photo

Postelection poll results CONTRADICT media claims that U.S. is a "center-right" country

http://mediamatters.org/items/200811070013?f=h_latest

Pelosi and company had better get a "clue".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 AM on 11/09/2008

millions of votes were suppressed and the votes were flipped? where's the evidence? did any of the people whose votes were not recorded correctly talk to the media, a lawyer, or the election commissioner of their state? i think not. almost half of the US population voted. it was the greatest voter turnout in 90 years. anyone who has voter suppression conspiracies probably never lived through the jim crow era where people were turned away from voting who couldn't read, didn't own property, etc.

as far as the venom that was spewed, you only need to look at mccain's campaign where people shouted "kill him" and "terrorist" whenever obama's name was mentioned. what always struck me as peculiar was that you only saw caucasians (well, at least 99% of the crowd) at mccain rallies. when you saw pics of obama rallies, you saw people of all races. mccain was about divisiness. obama was about togetherness.

now what you need to do is ask yourself, do you want to heal this country and support our new president or do you want to continue to hate and divide? it's up to you. i'd rather support our new president and make this country great again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 11/09/2008



Yes We Can!

and.......

Yes We Did!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 11/09/2008

I knew it. hahahahahahahahahah Repubs.

SNAP

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 11/08/2008
photo

Does anyone still want to argue the past elections weren't stolen?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 AM on 11/09/2008

I feel like I keep circling through the same bad dream. Every year there are new laws created that come closer and closer to my front door. It's terrifying. I just want my partner of 13 years to finally be allowed on my Life/Health Insurance at work and for our adoption of 2 boys out of Foster Care to include both our names and be protected. Arkansas just passed a new law on the latter of these matters. It scares the hell out of us. How in the Land of the Free is my family still being left to popular vote and allowed to be dictated by the debate on just how gay I was born and in what scripture it says someone shouldn't lie at another's side. This is my Life, it shouldn't be put up for people to evaluate, give opinion on, and decide its degree of worthiness. Everyone in California was in on the Prop 8 vote, just as they were in all 19 other states where the exact legislation has been passed on an average of 70%. Over and over again, over and over again...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 11/08/2008

Ope! Sorry, Wrong News Story :o) Where Am I???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 AM on 11/09/2008

I actually don't think his majority is sustainable. It only happened because the young saw him not as the status quo against a President with the lowest approvals in history. When a younger Republican comes along in 2012 and Obama is the status quo, his youth vote will go down, his Latino may go down, and because his white vote is where Kerry's is, that going down may bring Obama down. Blacks still turned out at the same low rate as years past. Whites may be motivated to oust Obama in 2012 if he falters. Democrats NEED to get a whole new region. Obama got slaughtered in the south and appalachia and the plains/upper rockies. Dems CAN win Appalachia. Those voters always vote. HILLARY would have won Appalachia. Obama's regionalism is essentially the same as Kerry plus a few more votes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 PM on 11/08/2008

You just don't get it. We the people have spoken. United Sates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 11/08/2008
photo

O.K., Some people will never learn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 11/08/2008
photo

Riiiiiiight... and how many electoral votes did John Kerry win in comparison to Barack Obama?

As long as Barack Obama runs his White House like he does his campaign, he'll be fine for two terms. The Republican Party has no one on the level of Barack Obama except maybe Bobby Jindal, and Barack Obama could easily b eat Bobby Jindal as he did John McCain.

With the John Boehners and Michelle Bachmanns of the Republican Party fighting to obstruct President Obama, I believe that by 2012 there will be too much in-fighting in the Republican Party that Barack Obama could easily top his electoral turnout he got this year and probably turn more red states blue. We saw that after Bill Clinton got elected, in 1996 the Republicans ran Bob Dole who didn't have a chance in H ell of winning because Bill Clinton was popular and doing well. Barack Obama will be a once in a lifetime President, I don't see the Republicans nominating anybody against him that could win except as a s acrificial l amb, and will look forward to 2016.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 PM on 11/08/2008
photo

Well put!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 11/08/2008

Can we talk Michelle into running in 2012? Please? She'd make mincemeat out of Palin!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 AM on 11/09/2008

Lak, are you delusional? Obama won with a landslide! Who cares about Appalachia, they are poorly educated and R_A_C_I_S_T! Get a grip, O won the nom and won the election!

Old PUMAS never die!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 11/09/2008

"First they came¦" is a poem attributed to Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892"1984) about the inactivity of German intellectuals following the Nazi rise to power and the purging of their chosen targets, group after group.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 11/08/2008

into brownshirts ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 11/08/2008

Roadmap, please, the Big O is GPS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 11/08/2008
photo

It turns out a lot of people were suckered by Bush and his team. That they finally woke up and realized it is more a credit to Obama and his team than it is to their intelligence. Sorry . . . but that just seems self-evident. Bush has lied with respect to just about everything he ever says he stood for or was going to do - at least publicly. A large percentage of the populous fell for it.

Frankly, I don't think it was the majority of voters. I think the Republicans stole the 2000 election and suppressed enough votes in 2004 to effectively steal that one as well. I think they tried it again this year, but the Obama campaign and the Democratic party were ready this time, as well as the public just wasn't quite as gullible as they have been.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 11/08/2008

Agree strongly with your last paragraph. I don't think it has ever been the 'majority of voters'
that put Bush at the helm. Would only disagree that the DNC establishment was
necessarily any readier this time. The Obama campaign was brilliant and had every base
covered - not just the overall strategy, the funding, the message, the media - but also
call-in numbers to report problems on election day, a bank of lawyers, caller-lists updated to November 3, extensive pollwatcher activity and training and handouts for every Dem office
and every state specific to the strategy of the campaign, voter transportation, etc. The Obama staff was super-disciplined and tireless.

So when you want to conclude that we as a county are 'over' concerns about machine manipulation and voter shenanigans of various sorts, you have to factor that in. How much of this was the unique excellence of THIS campaign? And may the shenanigans resurface in future campaigns which are less well-run or less well-staffed or well-funded. May future candidates
return to the foolish DNC wisdom that prevailed under Obama came on the scene that only
a few states 'matter' to any win?

Sure hope that Axelrod and Plouffe produce a book which lays out 'line and number' how it was done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 11/10/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect