Anti-Abortion Groups Invigorated By Obama Win

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Anti-Abortion Groups Invigorated By Obama Win stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVID CRARY | November 11, 2008 04:42 PM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In a Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008 photo, Samantha Scarlata and her son Kade cheer for the cameras at the Vote Yes for Life election celebration in Sioux Falls, S.D. With Democrats now in full control in Washington, tactics for anti-abortion groups are likely to refocus on street protests, grass-roots activism and state legislation. (AP Photo/Doug Dreyer)

NEW YORK — Despite election setbacks on many fronts, anti-abortion leaders sound more defiant than deflated as they brace for a future with fewer friends in high places.

With Democrats soon to be in full control in Washington, tactics for anti-abortion groups are likely to refocus on street protests, grass-roots activism and state legislation. One major three-day protest is scheduled to start in the nation's capital on Jan. 21, a day after Barack Obama's inauguration as president.

"The election forces the pro-life movement to go back to what we do best _ local grass-roots organizing," said the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition. "We will not go silently into the night."

At almost every level, last week's election was a stinging defeat for the anti-abortion movement, starting with Obama's presidential victory. Priests for Life said voters "made a grave mistake," while Mahoney's group, in a refrain shared by many conservatives, contended that Obama will be "the most radical pro-abortion president" in U.S. history.

In Congress, supporters of abortion rights now hold 17 more seats in the House and at least four more in the Senate, according to NARAL Pro-Choice America. And at the state level, voters in Colorado, South Dakota and California defeated ballot measures that would have banned or restricted abortions.

Obama's election also dashed hopes within the anti-abortion movement for possible Supreme Court vacancies over the next four years to be filled by judges who might support reversal of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision establishing a right to abortion.

The overall outcome "brings about feelings of great disappointment, of anger," said the Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life. "But that disappointment and anger are forms of energy. ...I believe a lot of people on the sidelines for last eight years will now get engaged."

Pavone predicted that activists would stage more mass demonstrations and abortion-clinic vigils. He also said the election results shed light on the movement's weak points, and would prompt new efforts to register anti-abortion voters and mobilize clergy to be more outspoken in future campaigns.

Story continues below

Another outlet for activism is the ever-growing network of local pregnancy centers run by anti-abortion staffers who seek to persuade young women with unintended pregnancies to choose adoption or single motherhood over abortion.

"While legislative efforts to protect the unborn and women from abortion may be limited in future years, the work of pregnancy centers is advancing stronger than ever," said Melinda Delahoyde, president of Care Net. Her network supports 1,100 centers, and is concentrating expansion efforts in black and Hispanic inner-city areas.

Delahoyde said she hoped Obama would live up to his campaign rhetoric and reach out to groups with different views, including the anti-abortion movement.

"We have a lot to bring to the table," she said. "Don't exclude us because we don't line up with you on certain issues."

One of those issues is contraception. Under a Democratic-led government, abortion-rights supporters will call on conservatives to join in an effort to reduce abortions by reducing unintended pregnancies. Anti-abortion leaders say they are unwilling to do this if it means abandoning their abstinence-only approach and supporting greater access to birth control for unmarried women.

"We have a totally different view from other side in how we look at sexuality," said Pavone. "That's where there's no common ground."

Although anti-abortion leaders have abandoned any short-term hopes for favorable legislation out of Congress, they are prepared to lobby intensely if Democrats try to push through a long-pending abortion-rights bill called the Freedom of Choice Act. It would likely override scores of state laws that place limited restrictions on abortion _ including parental notification laws and mandatory waiting periods before an abortion.

"We will do everything to be sure it fails _ the damage it would do to the pro-life movement would be immeasurable," said Mahoney. "On the scale of 1 to 10, that's No. 11 of what our job is."

Another priority, Mahoney said, would be to insist that any health-care legislation emerging from the new Congress does not open the door to any federal funding of abortions.

Within the abortion-rights movement, the election results were viewed as a comprehensive victory, and a repudiation of their rivals.

"The hardline, divisive tactics they've used have been resoundingly rejected," said Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. "We'll probably see some splintering within the conservative community. ...I'd hope some of the folks on the right, if their goal is to reduce the need for abortions, would link arms with us."

But for now, anti-abortion leaders are eager to appear undaunted.

"Any time you have a loss like that, you have an opportunity to reassess and come back stronger," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life. "If they want to see this as a big loss that will set us back, that's OK. Our people are very energized, and ready for Round Two."

To Alesha Doan, a University of Kansas political scientist who studies the anti-abortion movement, the feisty response and the vows of street protests make sense.

"I'd be shocked if the pro-life movement stopped protesting _ that's been the area where they've had success in closing some abortion clinics," she said. "If you compromise, you lose the core of the movement."

NEW YORK — Despite election setbacks on many fronts, anti-abortion leaders sound more defiant than deflated as they brace for a future with fewer friends in high places. With Democrats soon to ...
NEW YORK — Despite election setbacks on many fronts, anti-abortion leaders sound more defiant than deflated as they brace for a future with fewer friends in high places. With Democrats soon to ...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
556
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (17 pages total)
- rixter1965 I'm a Fan of rixter1965 7 fans permalink

I followed a truck, part of a COVENANT TRUCKING, that bore a sticker reading...

IT'S A CHILD NOT A CHOICE!

To which I would counter:

IT'S A WOMAN NOT A WOMB!

We can all agree that abortion is an unfortunate choice and traumatic for all involved, but so is unwanted pregnancy. And declaring by legal fiat that women must carry pregnancy to full term, that birth control is "immoral," and that the "unborn" have greater rights than women or infants and children who ARE BORN and deserve support is not good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 11/11/2008
- awcbuddy8 I'm a Fan of awcbuddy8 8 fans permalink

The unborn do not have greater rights than women, they have the right to life which every person on this earth is entitled to have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 11/11/2008
- ralph10 I'm a Fan of ralph10 24 fans permalink
photo

Until after they're born.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 11/11/2008
- Gail54 I'm a Fan of Gail54 4 fans permalink

No-the woman has the right to choose

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

You are right...the fetus doesn't have the rights of a woman. The woman has the right to choose a safe, legal abortion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 11/11/2008

Me, too. I am INVIGORATED. And I'm a pro-choice feminist. No one is in favor of abortion. But women have been having them, or giving them, or giving them to themselves, throughout human history. When do abortion rates drop? ONLY when there is sex education to appropriate age groups in school and in society in general, and pregnancy prevention is promoted. Want to end abortion? Support safe sex, pregnancy prevention, and sex education. Those who oppose sex education can only blame themselves for an increase in unwanted pregnancies resulting in abortions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 11/11/2008
- Halter I'm a Fan of Halter 9 fans permalink
photo

What happened to states rights? Oh that's right, only when convenient.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 11/11/2008
- Gail54 I'm a Fan of Gail54 4 fans permalink

2 States tried and lost!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

I thought it was 3.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 PM on 11/11/2008
- piquet I'm a Fan of piquet 14 fans permalink
photo

"Anti-abortion leaders say they are unwilling to do this if it means abandoning their abstinence-only approach and supporting greater access to birth control for unmarried women."...

I'm sorry, but if they can't concede on something as pedestrian as a condemn. Then yeah "there is no common ground". Or chance for that matter...that's just stupid to expect an abstinent society.
Whether you like or not Christians we're animals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 11/11/2008
- IHIRB I'm a Fan of IHIRB 2 fans permalink
photo

Not to mention the fact that it completely disregards a woman's health. Abstinence-only doesn't teach about STDs, things like HPV which can lead to cervical cancer... But it's not really about women. It's about other people controlling the lives of others.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 11/11/2008

"Anti-abortion leaders say they are unwilling to do this if it means abandoning their abstinence-only approach and supporting greater access to birth control for unmarried women."...

This of course is the crux of their belief. It is less about the life of the unborn and more about all those immoral women having sex. They want to control women's lives. If they were truly concerned about the life of the unborn, they would be willing to come to some common ground to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 11/11/2008

Hey, here's an idea......while the pro-unborn-rights folks are getting themselves energized - how about y'all working to make LIFE a little bit better for the ones that are ALREADY HERE???! Just a thought....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 11/11/2008

I like that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 11/11/2008

That's what I wonder, in all the years since Roe how many republicans have been in the high office and why didn't they ever do anything about what they claim to be so important to them. They just lie to get the far left fundy vote. I am a Christian, and I am pro life but I am also pro choice. We all will answer for our sins. Obama is also pro life, and he also believes in pro choice, you can be both, even though there are so many idiots out there that say otherwise. Women have been getting abortions since the children of Eve. Only difference now is that they don't have to kill themselves to get one, I hate abortion being used for birth control, but once again, it's a womans choice.

All those hate mongers out there who are already labeling our new president are going to find out just what kind of man he is.

It will be so great to be able to be proud of our president. Don't you agree?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

Absolutely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 11/11/2008

As a mother of 6 children it is obvious that the concept of the sanctity of life is something any pro-life advocate dare not to challenge as to my understanding or acceptance of. Nonetheless Iam an advocate of a woman maintaining her right of autonomy of her body & reproductive choice. Of my 6 children only 3 were planned. They were however all wanted as I was able to choose wheither I would sustain or terminate their lives. This is my strength/right as a women & inhances my commentment to those I bring forth. This responsibility for their well being falls ultimately only to me. No one, I repeat no one has any moral justification to cast any judgement upon my decision. It will be me alone who will reconcile to my children the curcumstances/quality of their lives. No government nor church @ this point in time has any justification to make this choice as both entities have minimal regard for the viable support of women & children. So for all those pro-life,fundamentalist,christians put your money behind your mouths & support mothers through legislation that supports living children so that any women regardless of her status is able to support her children as well as her children deserve. You might be shocked by the drop in abortions when women are actually afforded viable alternatives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

yeah, because that fact was in their minds to begin with. No, they are far more preoccupied with taking women's rights away not providing solutions that makes sense

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 11/11/2008

It's called being "radicals."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 11/11/2008
- CarbonDate I'm a Fan of CarbonDate 5 fans permalink
photo

Why is there still an anti-choice movement out there? They should have been rendered obsolete by eight years of Jesus W. Bush, right? Why is there still abortion after all this time? Have the anti-choicers given that question *any* thought?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 11/11/2008
- bth94131 I'm a Fan of bth94131 6 fans permalink

When are they going to learn that they need to focus on convincing women not to have abortions instead of making it illegal? Denmark has abortion on demand, but a much lower abortion rate. How? Through education of their bodies and protection. If the pro-life people are really interested in reducing abortion they need to focus on prevention and education.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 11/11/2008

Opposing abortion and birth control are means of subjugating women, and the unspoken goal of the pro-life movement in this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

To quote the late George Carlin, "Pro-life is Anti-Woman"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 11/11/2008
- drkazmd65 I'm a Fan of drkazmd65 56 fans permalink
photo

Problem with you logic bth,... they don't really want to reduce abortion so much as they want to dictate their own narrow moral standard on others.

Their narrow moral standard goes kinda' like this. A woman's place in the world is to meekly bow to the will of her man and/or her church, and do the quiet & needed work of producing and raising the children. Any woman that doesn't think that this her one, and only, mission in life is obviously godless. Because she is godless,... she must be forced to accept the will of those that know better,...

For her own good of course.

The Pro-Life movement in a lot of ways is more of a removal of choices (for others) that the core believers don't like, than it is pushing a choice for life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 11/11/2008
- Collielady I'm a Fan of Collielady 91 fans permalink
photo

They reject prevention and education because that involves talk about sex. It's not the fetus that's the real issue. It's the sex they cringe from.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 11/11/2008

Well it's a little too late to get rightious. Obama's looking at 3 appointments to the SC, maybe more if Scalia chokes on a meatball. Looks like Roe v. Wade's gonna be around for at least a couple more decades sucka's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 11/11/2008
- TN I'm a Fan of TN 28 fans permalink

During the election I kept thinking about the economy, the war and the money our kids and their kids will pay for this mess. I keep forgetting about the Supreme Court, Oh thank you, thank you, this is soo good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

That was my biggest fear about a McCain/Palin win - them having the ability to appoint judges to the SC. I even had a couple of nightmares about it. Luckily I'm sleeping much better these days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 11/11/2008

"tactics for anti-abortion groups are likely to refocus on street protests, grass-roots activism and state legislation."

don't forget bombings and killings!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 11/11/2008

I'm surprised they haven't erected a statue of Eric Rudolph already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 11/11/2008
- awcbuddy8 I'm a Fan of awcbuddy8 8 fans permalink

When's the last time that happened?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 11/11/2008

I say good luck with that state legislation route, if this recent election is any indication of how effective that will be. South Dakota shot down a second attempt at anti-choice legislation, as did the Colorado "Defining a Person" initiative, which would have undermined Roe v. Wade.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 11/11/2008
- pbfishtaco I'm a Fan of pbfishtaco 12 fans permalink
photo

This has been their paycheck since Roe v. Wade. They make more $$$$$ when they're the aggrieved minority fighting against those Godless people..... It's easier to fundraise then. Although, since their bread-and -butter middle class is shrinking, and the economy is in the tank for some time to come, they may well have to stick with more street theater, and less K St.

How much do the directors of these organizations make from their gullible, well-intentioned followers? Are they all "volunteers", like James Dobson, or Pat Robertson? I'm sure they all live like paupers pouring every cent into their righteous cause.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 11/11/2008
- pup sydney I'm a Fan of pup sydney 15 fans permalink

You should see how motivated are the pro-choice groups instead!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 11/11/2008

Its nobodys business what a woman does with her body,this is an issue that wouldnt be that big of a deal if the religious leaders didnt scream against it.But the religious leaders think they know when life begins so they scream antiabortion and the cattle follow.If the right is gonna preach limited government maybe it should start acting like it and start by staying out of this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

Is there anyone out there that calls themself "Pro- Abortion?" I mean, who really wants to see more abortions, what women are out there "demanding" them militantly? The language is so overwrought, it would be nice to be able to discuss this like big grown up people!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 11/11/2008
- grandma58 I'm a Fan of grandma58 25 fans permalink
photo

May we please call them

Pro - Birth ?
Anti Life ?

May we ask them to define abortion ? Are they meaning all abortion, spontaneous as well as induced?

When they pro-life can we over and over ask them what life they have made a commitment to? What low income mom have they decided to adopt until her children are raised? What deformed child living in an institution have they taken home to raise in a loving family? What meth or HIV infected child have they adopted?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

I never call them "pro-life" anymore...only "anti-abortion"

It would be nice if they actually cared about these babies that have been born and spent some of their time helping them. It seems after birth...the child is no longer any concern of theirs at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 11/11/2008

It has been suggested here that the religious entities who fund these pro-life groups should lose their tax status. I agree completely.

In a somewhat related note, none of the comments made by any of the pro-life representatives in this article approaches the inflamatory remarks made by Arcdiocese of Boston cardinal Sean O'Malley, who repeats a Planned Parenthood slur common among right wingers:

"My joy [that an African-American has been elected President] however, is tempered by the knowledge that this man has a deplorable record when it comes to prolife issues and is possibly in the pocket of Planned Parenthood which in its origins was a very racist organization to eliminate the blacks, and it’s sort of ironic that he’s been co-opted by them. "

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles_of_faith/2008/11/omalley_on_obam.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 11/11/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (17 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect