Anti-Abortion Groups Invigorated By Obama Win

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Anti-Abortion Groups Invigorated By Obama Win stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVID CRARY | November 11, 2008 04:42 PM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In a Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008 photo, Samantha Scarlata and her son Kade cheer for the cameras at the Vote Yes for Life election celebration in Sioux Falls, S.D. With Democrats now in full control in Washington, tactics for anti-abortion groups are likely to refocus on street protests, grass-roots activism and state legislation. (AP Photo/Doug Dreyer)

NEW YORK — Despite election setbacks on many fronts, anti-abortion leaders sound more defiant than deflated as they brace for a future with fewer friends in high places.

With Democrats soon to be in full control in Washington, tactics for anti-abortion groups are likely to refocus on street protests, grass-roots activism and state legislation. One major three-day protest is scheduled to start in the nation's capital on Jan. 21, a day after Barack Obama's inauguration as president.

"The election forces the pro-life movement to go back to what we do best _ local grass-roots organizing," said the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition. "We will not go silently into the night."

At almost every level, last week's election was a stinging defeat for the anti-abortion movement, starting with Obama's presidential victory. Priests for Life said voters "made a grave mistake," while Mahoney's group, in a refrain shared by many conservatives, contended that Obama will be "the most radical pro-abortion president" in U.S. history.

In Congress, supporters of abortion rights now hold 17 more seats in the House and at least four more in the Senate, according to NARAL Pro-Choice America. And at the state level, voters in Colorado, South Dakota and California defeated ballot measures that would have banned or restricted abortions.

Obama's election also dashed hopes within the anti-abortion movement for possible Supreme Court vacancies over the next four years to be filled by judges who might support reversal of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision establishing a right to abortion.

The overall outcome "brings about feelings of great disappointment, of anger," said the Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life. "But that disappointment and anger are forms of energy. ...I believe a lot of people on the sidelines for last eight years will now get engaged."

Pavone predicted that activists would stage more mass demonstrations and abortion-clinic vigils. He also said the election results shed light on the movement's weak points, and would prompt new efforts to register anti-abortion voters and mobilize clergy to be more outspoken in future campaigns.

Story continues below

Another outlet for activism is the ever-growing network of local pregnancy centers run by anti-abortion staffers who seek to persuade young women with unintended pregnancies to choose adoption or single motherhood over abortion.

"While legislative efforts to protect the unborn and women from abortion may be limited in future years, the work of pregnancy centers is advancing stronger than ever," said Melinda Delahoyde, president of Care Net. Her network supports 1,100 centers, and is concentrating expansion efforts in black and Hispanic inner-city areas.

Delahoyde said she hoped Obama would live up to his campaign rhetoric and reach out to groups with different views, including the anti-abortion movement.

"We have a lot to bring to the table," she said. "Don't exclude us because we don't line up with you on certain issues."

One of those issues is contraception. Under a Democratic-led government, abortion-rights supporters will call on conservatives to join in an effort to reduce abortions by reducing unintended pregnancies. Anti-abortion leaders say they are unwilling to do this if it means abandoning their abstinence-only approach and supporting greater access to birth control for unmarried women.

"We have a totally different view from other side in how we look at sexuality," said Pavone. "That's where there's no common ground."

Although anti-abortion leaders have abandoned any short-term hopes for favorable legislation out of Congress, they are prepared to lobby intensely if Democrats try to push through a long-pending abortion-rights bill called the Freedom of Choice Act. It would likely override scores of state laws that place limited restrictions on abortion _ including parental notification laws and mandatory waiting periods before an abortion.

"We will do everything to be sure it fails _ the damage it would do to the pro-life movement would be immeasurable," said Mahoney. "On the scale of 1 to 10, that's No. 11 of what our job is."

Another priority, Mahoney said, would be to insist that any health-care legislation emerging from the new Congress does not open the door to any federal funding of abortions.

Within the abortion-rights movement, the election results were viewed as a comprehensive victory, and a repudiation of their rivals.

"The hardline, divisive tactics they've used have been resoundingly rejected," said Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. "We'll probably see some splintering within the conservative community. ...I'd hope some of the folks on the right, if their goal is to reduce the need for abortions, would link arms with us."

But for now, anti-abortion leaders are eager to appear undaunted.

"Any time you have a loss like that, you have an opportunity to reassess and come back stronger," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life. "If they want to see this as a big loss that will set us back, that's OK. Our people are very energized, and ready for Round Two."

To Alesha Doan, a University of Kansas political scientist who studies the anti-abortion movement, the feisty response and the vows of street protests make sense.

"I'd be shocked if the pro-life movement stopped protesting _ that's been the area where they've had success in closing some abortion clinics," she said. "If you compromise, you lose the core of the movement."

NEW YORK — Despite election setbacks on many fronts, anti-abortion leaders sound more defiant than deflated as they brace for a future with fewer friends in high places. With Democrats soon to ...
NEW YORK — Despite election setbacks on many fronts, anti-abortion leaders sound more defiant than deflated as they brace for a future with fewer friends in high places. With Democrats soon to ...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
556
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (17 pages total)
- MOregon I'm a Fan of MOregon 27 fans permalink

As an Obama supporter and a Catholic who loves but struggles with her church, it is disheartening to see posts that denigrate the priesthood. The sexual scandal has been one of the greatest tragedies in the Church, yet to lump all priests in the category of sexual predator is to say that all presidents are corrupt by virtue of the last eight years. And for every priest who in his good conscience espouses the sentiments of this article, there are those who see a more larger scoped picture.

The bottom line for me is how we treat our supposed enemies. This is where we need to begin! Pro-choice and anti-abortion folks need to sit down and recognize each as children of God. Where can we agree? Where can we make collaborative difference in light of new technologies that were not available when roe v wade was enacted? Most everyone of us can agree that a ban on late-term abortions based on the fact that an infant is viable after a certain stage, where there is a clause for the life of the mother, can be a life-changing collaborative ground. Why do we always have to demonize the other?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 11/11/2008
- sueinmn I'm a Fan of sueinmn 101 fans permalink
photo

So they want it both ways. Obama to reach across the table yet they are unwilling to accept birthcontrol So does life begin at conception or pre-conception with birthcontrol?, I never understoof that. They are against educating kids which again I never understood. Simply abstinence only approach, well enforce that during the hormonal stages? Also today the husband that only gets sex for child bearing goes elswhere! Oh yes, have sex, many kids and live poor in todays economy. Chastity belts girls and boys?? CASTRATION!
They are not in the family business once the baby enters the world and many people simply cant handle another mouth. much less the other circumstances that cause unwanted pregnancies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

These people may find that Obama is more anti-abortion , in practical terms, than GWB was.

The Abstinence Only Policy is a failed policy. Accurate education may reduce the number of abortions more than this crowd can imagine.

If there is such a thing as "pro-abortion," I haven't heard of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

I was thinking also that if we help build up the economy and give these women more opportunities to financially support themselves and the child then maybe less women will feel they don't have any other choice but to abort. I'm sure there are some women who choose to abort because they just can't see a way to support a child.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 11/11/2008

If the goal is to end abortion then why do these groups oppose birth control? They keep talking about abstinence only but don't they realize how many married, adult women end up having abortions? I would be willing to have my tax dollars used to provide birth control and free tubal ligations to anyone with demonstrated financial need. My own employer provided insurance & prescription drug plan will not cover birth control but it covers Viagra.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 11/11/2008
- fiorastar I'm a Fan of fiorastar 64 fans permalink
photo

Does the "return to grassroots" methods include more of their lovely pro-life bombing of abortion clinics with the intent to kill anyone inside? I can't wait to hear how their recent attacks on Obama for supposedly consorting with "domestic terrorists" are worked over to justify attacks on licensed clinics with American citizens in them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 11/11/2008
- TN I'm a Fan of TN 30 fans permalink

On my post below I meant republicans only say they are pro life. Also, think of the jails they will have to build and the courts they will have to build to hold all of those cases when a woman miscarries and they want to make sure it wasn't provoked by the mother. "Did you eat right?'" "Did you exercise too much" I wish these religious wack jobs would realize they can't vote their way into heaven. Take care of your own family. Control your own behavour and leave people alone. You are not the judge, g o d is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 11/11/2008
- TN I'm a Fan of TN 30 fans permalink

The republicans only say they are pro choice. The reason they will never allow Roe vs. Wade to be overturned is because of SOCIAL PROGRAMS. They think that is socialism. You can't force teenage girls to have babies without pre-natal and post-natal care for the baby. That takes money. Millions don't have insurance. The republicans will never fund programs to help babies, ever.

Why can't these people add.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 11/11/2008
- amluvinit2 I'm a Fan of amluvinit2 12 fans permalink
photo

I am so tired of these people thinking they know what is best for society. In truth, they could do a lot more good for society by putting their energies somewhere else. In Colorado Springs the evangelicals, had a haunted house featuring the horrors of abortion a couple years back, come on now, that's just way over the top. Planned parenthood, doesn't want return clients. And they do more than perform abortions. Yet, they are the target of these groups constantly. Just give it a rest. In Colorado they wanted to pass ammendment 48, saying that life begins at conception, and the day after pill should be banned. I always ask them, when confronted, how many children have they adoopted? And to say that in cases of incest, and rape, it 's not okay to have this procedure, as well as in cases involving the mother's health. I know they feel strongly about life, but all this would lead to is going back 40+ years to back street, and alley abortions. Who am I to judge anyone, and by that I mean, who are they to judge anyone. This is a very private matter, and should remain a private matter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 11/11/2008
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

There are children who have NO HEALTHCARE. They are children in CRUMBLING SCHOOLS, THey are children who go to bed HUNGRY each night

ANd these freaks are OBSSESSED about a womans choice over her OWN BODY. This is the cause they want to fight for?

My suggestion GET A LIFE!!!!!

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 11/11/2008

Hangers or healthy procedures? Take your pick Christians. They need to realize that the arguement is not whether abortion is wrong or not (no one is screaming "Yay abortion!"), it's whether were going to have the healthy way or the dangerous way. Christains don't realize that by overturning Roe v Wade they will just be making women go back to having back alley abortions. It will not eliminate or reduce abortions, it will just give us a whole new set of problems. Then what?

Abortion is a fact of life. PLEASE people, lets move forward and work toward realistic goals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 11/11/2008

Right now .. there are bigger problems facing Americans ....... than this BS ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 11/11/2008

The election forces the pro-life movement to go back to what we do best _ local grass-roots organizing," said the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition.

That, and violating the civil rights of women making difficult CHOICES.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 PM on 11/11/2008
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 611 fans permalink
photo

Nine out of ten times it's a man saying this dangerous nonsense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 PM on 11/11/2008
- paulfree17 I'm a Fan of paulfree17 11 fans permalink

I think it is about time that religious entities that fund political races and ballot measures or perfrom political lobbying lose their tax exempt status. It is one thing for someone to espouse positions and beliefs in their churches, mosques or synagogues and another thing to hire lobbyists and fund ballot measures like Prop 8 in California.

The establishment clause prevents government from establishing a state religion. The people should not have that ability either by adopting amendments that impost their religious beliefs on others.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 11/11/2008
- karela I'm a Fan of karela 106 fans permalink

Absolutely! No more tax breaks for political religious organizations!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 11/11/2008
- sammdphd I'm a Fan of sammdphd 3 fans permalink

that's right! let's just start taxing all these organizations...they talk too much!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 11/11/2008

So it's ok for the anti prop 8 people to protest, but when the anti-choice people protest they should lose their tax exempt status? that attitude or absurdity is exactly why liberal California voted Yes on 8. their's too many extremist out their on the left & right maybe the anti Prop 8 people & the anti-choice people should team up with their protesting they will cover alot of ground. oh yeah maybe the polygamist should join their cause to push for legal bigamy. In America people have a right to protest, a right to worship their gods, & a right to be gay, a right to not change marriage for gays, women have a right to an abortion. If people don't like any of those rights they have a RIGHT to protest. be fair!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 11/11/2008

What tax exempt group is putting money into the political system to fight for equal rights for gay citizens?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 11/11/2008

I'm sorry- I meant what religious organization is putting money into the political system to fight for equal rights for gay citizens?
Churches are tax exempt based on the idea of separation of Church and State- the State does not tell anyone how to pray and Churches are supposed to tend their own flocks and stay out of public, secular policy matters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 11/11/2008
- TheHandyman I'm a Fan of TheHandyman 111 fans permalink
photo

The election forces the pro-life movement to go back to what we do best _ local grass-roots organizing," said the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition. "We will not go silently into the night."

No, Rev., what you do best is to support a stupid notion based on stupid interpretations of some poorly written history book and some morality tales. It is bad enough that you promote ignorance and a cruel idealogy. you also oppose the very things that would make abortion unnescessary! What you love and promote is your own self-indulgence and your own need for control over not only the willyfully ignorant people of your Church but also of the people who don't believe what you believe. If GOD, if there is one, wants to do something about arbortion then GOD will do so. Your saying that GOD speaks to you only proves you are delusional. GOD told me that she created abortion to solve a problem SHE hadn't forseen. So there! Prove it ain't so Rev!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 11/11/2008
- KathyinCT I'm a Fan of KathyinCT 65 fans permalink

"Local grassroots organizing." Is that what they call it when they murder physicians who perform terminations?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 11/11/2008
- karela I'm a Fan of karela 106 fans permalink

They become more irrelevant as they become louder and more aggressive. America is really very tired of all the noise. These people are going to have to accept that they are free to remain pregnant when they conceive and that others are free to make their own choices. I actually think that they have turned more people off than they have turned on to their cause and the results showed up in this election. Jesus never tried in any way to force anything on anyone. He only ever offered. If they want to effect change, they might focus their energies on providing poor young women with medical assistance and financial and emotional support that goes beyond the birth and baby stage. A program like that might win hearts and minds. Their hate and anger never will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 11/11/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (17 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect