Bush Could Block Probes Even After He Leaves Office

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

New York Times   |  CHARLIE SAVAGE   |   November 12, 2008 11:04 PM


When a Congressional committee subpoenaed Harry S. Truman in 1953, nearly a year after he left office, he made a startling claim: Even though he was no longer president, the Constitution still empowered him to block subpoenas.

"If the doctrine of separation of powers and the independence of the presidency is to have any validity at all, it must be equally applicable to a president after his term of office has expired," Truman wrote to the committee.

Read the whole story here.

When a Congressional committee subpoenaed Harry S. Truman in 1953, nearly a year after he left office, he made a startling claim: Even though he was no longer president, the Constitution still empower...
When a Congressional committee subpoenaed Harry S. Truman in 1953, nearly a year after he left office, he made a startling claim: Even though he was no longer president, the Constitution still empower...
 
Comments
158
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

Well, love him or hate him, the time is coming near to say goodbye to George W. Bush. I would like to extend an invitation to anyone who has something to say to this President to post an open letter to GW at http://goodbye.us . This is a project to essentially create a time capsule of feelings and thoughts about the outgoing administration. So please, check it out and share!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 11/19/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 permalink

I am sure a few REALLY CLEVER Lawyers can find a way to bring Bush and Company to Justice!

The problem is where to start with the Bush Administration. A few are:

1. Falsified Documents for war in Iraq
2. Ignored US Constitutional requirement that Executive Branch enforce laws and regulations
3. Torture
4. Corruption of Financial System
5. Corruption in Military Contracts
6. Potential Corruption in Use of $850 Billion Bailout

I find it encouraging that high level people are talking about the subject.
That is real progress!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 11/13/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 permalink

Even OJ received JUSTICE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 11/13/2008

It may stop them from investigating Bush BUT NOT CHENEY!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 11/13/2008

I agree. "W" will be missed,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 11/13/2008

Our country is in crisis for so many different reasons and the democrats want to prosecute the President. This is sad on so many levels.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 11/13/2008

Our country is in crisis for so many different reasons BECAUSE of the Bush administration.

Reclaiming our country includes holding those responsible accountable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 11/13/2008

Uhm, torture is ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!

If you were tortured in another country would you want the people responsible prosecuted??

Me too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 11/13/2008

Wanna bet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 11/13/2008

Bush can run but he can't hide. That sob has sold us out and he needs to pay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 11/13/2008

While it's true the new administration has too many problems to solve. it would seem that there is enough credible information out there, documentation to prove that Bush overstepped his authority. It would also seem that if criminal acts were committed, that would overstep any authority Bush took as president. After all, he wasn't hired to a position of "Criminal-in-Chief". He was hired as an executive. If an executive commits a criminal act, the prosecution of criminal acts takes precedence over any executive authority. Likewise, if a president commits criminal acts, especially crimes against humanity, and those crimes are exposed, he should be treated as a criminal rather than given respect and immunity as a president. Bush has not earned our respect, nor has he earned immunity. Over 4,000 of our finest are dead, parts of our country lie in ruin, our economy is a shambles, and the world has suffered for this, and this administration's complicity has been documented. There should be no immunity from prosecution, even for an ex-president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 11/13/2008

Every moment spent chasing the Bush ghost will be a moment lost working on the problems this country faces.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 11/13/2008
photo

Quite true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 11/13/2008

The pursuit of justice and holding those responsible is an equally important step in reclaiming our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 11/13/2008

No he can't. The Office of the President stays where it is at, when a new President comes in they are the President, the old President holder is just Mr. such and such. President Obama can do whatever he wants with it and as a Constitutional LAw Professor he knows that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 11/13/2008
photo

My friends with the UFO have a probe he won't be able to block.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 11/13/2008

Bring in every possible Bush administration official and grill them all, trials convictions and prison.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 11/13/2008

I think this will be interestingly difficult for the Republicans and their party for future elections if Bush and his administration continue to ignore the law and not show up before congressional hearings. They have nearly destroyed this country and to continue to do so beyond 2009 is stupid and sure to produce continue defeat among the Republican Party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 11/13/2008
photo

Didn't the Scalia ruling with the Bill Clinton subpoena change law?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 11/13/2008
photo

It's going to be interesting to see how this all unfolds.

One thing is for certain: If Bush does try to block things, he will reveal to that twenty some-odd percent who inexplicably still believe in him, that he was up to no good and wants them to remain in the dark.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 11/13/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect