Wall Street Journal Makes Rightward Veer With News Hire

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Wall Street Journal Makes Rightward Veer With News Hire stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11-12-08 03:13 PM   |   Updated: 12-13-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Wsj

Via Michael Calderone at Politico comes the news that the Wall Street Journal has hired Gerard Baker, a self-styled "right-wing curmudgeon" from the Times Of London, as the paper's new deputy editor-in-chief, where he will have oversight of the Journal's news coverage. Calderone says that the move "surprised some staffers because of his strong, right-wing political views." No doubt the surprise wore off after those staffers remembered recent events and said to themselves, "Oh, that's right! The Wall Street Journal was recently acquired by Rupert Murdoch after a protracted battle with the hopeless Bancroft family!"

And, in case you were wondering precisely what sort of right-wing ideologue you were getting at the Journal, and whether it made it more or less likely that the paper's famed editorial tilt would bleed its way into the news coverage, E&P's Greg Mitchell is here to remind you that Baker famously penned a column titled "Obama: is America ready for this dangerous left winger?" back in February 2008, in which he fulminated on a worldview that he claimed Obama espoused, one that included a fundamental lack of love for his country:

There is a caste of left-wing Americans who wish essentially and in all honesty that their country was much more like France. They wish it had much higher levels of taxation and government intervention, that it had much higher levels of welfare, that it did not have such a "militaristic" approach to foreign policy. Above all, that its national goals were dictated, not by the dreadful halfwits who inhabit godforsaken places like Kansas and Mississippi, but by the counsels of the United Nations.


Though Mr Obama has done a good job, as all recent serious Democrats have done, of emphasising his belief in American virtues, his record and his programme suggest he is firmly in line with this wing of his party.

To make matters worse, Baker isn't particularly gifted with news instincts of intelligence or precision: "Though [Obama] talks with great eloquence about the future, he sounds for all the world like one of the long line of Democrats from George McGovern to Walter Mondale to Michael Dukakis, who became history by espousing policies and striking a rhetorical pose that was well out of the mainstream of American politics."

That said, if there's one area in which Baker truly excels, it's definitely the production of batpoopy-wack videography. We hear that stuff is recession-proof!

Via Michael Calderone at Politico comes the news that the Wall Street Journal has hired Gerard Baker, a self-styled "right-wing curmudgeon" from the Times Of London, as the paper's new deputy editor-i...
Via Michael Calderone at Politico comes the news that the Wall Street Journal has hired Gerard Baker, a self-styled "right-wing curmudgeon" from the Times Of London, as the paper's new deputy editor-i...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
156
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
photo

I cancelled my WSJ subscription when my bird refused to_crap on it.....he felt it was redundant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 11/13/2008

Really? It gave my parrot diarrhea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 AM on 11/13/2008
- realmeows I'm a Fan of realmeows 8 fans permalink

Wolf_Larsen and ErnestineBass, I love your witty posts about the WSJ! By the way, your birds are smarter than the people who subscribe to the WSJ.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 AM on 11/13/2008
- honeydiva I'm a Fan of honeydiva 19 fans permalink

and now 0 has a special paper to ignore. (I'm sure over the years there are going to be a few more)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 11/13/2008
photo

So this is what is to become of the WSJ, an American icon undergoing "murdocisation" or the glorification of the lowest common denominator.
Baker will find an appealing audience with the far right wingers of his ilk with his gutter journalsm so apt at distorting realities see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx43Fcdh7iM.
Obama must come true on his plan to elevate education in America to save, us a generation or two down the road, from the obtusis ignorus inslularis pathology that prevails in some parts of the nation now to be force fed in their righteous beliefs by anything for a buck Murdoch (I have read that he cringes at some Fox programming, but I guess as long as the ROI...).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 11/13/2008
- AllenD I'm a Fan of AllenD 36 fans permalink
photo

I wonder if Bloomberg would be interested in publishing a business daily.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 11/12/2008
photo

Dead tree media are history. Why bother?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 AM on 11/13/2008
- ricitizen I'm a Fan of ricitizen 17 fans permalink
photo

I've just canceled my subscription. But I'll be keeping my subscription to the Financial Times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 11/12/2008

Te FT isn't much better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 11/12/2008
- DB55 I'm a Fan of DB55 5 fans permalink

The FT endorsed Obama - they're quite a bit better!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 11/12/2008
- Quaoar I'm a Fan of Quaoar 28 fans permalink
photo

The WSJ was already pretty far to the right editorially. I'm not sure that this will be a big change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 11/12/2008

I've been reading the WSJ on and off for 30 years and they news was pretty good. The editorial page i never looked at.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 11/12/2008
photo

Me too. Can't live without the business coverage -- especially Heard on the Street -- but would never read the news or op-ed there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 AM on 11/13/2008
photo

Rightward veer? They must have hit something verrrrrry hard verrrrrry quick, as you can't get anymore right than the WSJ has been.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 11/12/2008
photo

There is a difference between right wing and outright l y i n g right wing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 11/12/2008
- xargaw I'm a Fan of xargaw 32 fans permalink

No, it's really pretty much all lying right wing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 11/12/2008
- lbcny I'm a Fan of lbcny 7 fans permalink
photo

do you think it will have a "page six" ?

It will be as respectable as the NY Post.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 11/12/2008
photo

Ya mean the the WSJ is a right-wing rag?

Even MORE of one since Rupert Murdock bought it?

Say it ain't so!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 11/12/2008

Who cares? The whole generation that devours the right-wing version of the news thing will stop generating profits in 3-5 years, and formats will have to be switched.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 11/12/2008
- AllenD I'm a Fan of AllenD 36 fans permalink
photo

Another once proud paper is about to be marginalized as a propaganda spewing fish wrap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 11/12/2008
- dukeitout I'm a Fan of dukeitout 3 fans permalink

So the WSJ is getting a right wing editor. This isn't news. The editors have always been way right and I and thousands of other subscribers have always made it a point to avoid reading the editorials. They are typically uninteresting and predictable. However, the newspaper has historically had a wall between the editors and the writers and has been an excellent newspaper. I've subscribed for another year and hope that the editors keep their distance from the guys that do the reporting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 11/12/2008

I, too, subscribe and have the same view as you. The posting, though, said "he will have oversight of the Journal's news coverage". If his opinions infect the news pages, that is scary. If that wall between news and opinion develops cracks, I will take my business elsewhere. OTOH, I suspect many readers share the same opinion you and I do. If Murdoch were to do that, he would kill the value of his investment. And Murdoch is, if nothing else, a savvy businessman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 11/12/2008
photo

You'll be sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 PM on 11/12/2008

It's all about the promotion of deregulation to turn the US into a feudal economy.
Whatever wedge issue they need to use to get the people to support causes against their own financial interest is irrelevant to them. They know better but they will continue to seek out those that don't know better until those people find themselves on the streets, broke, homeless or in jail and wondering how they got there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 11/12/2008
photo

I can't figure out if Murdoch is S a t a n or just one of S a t a n 's arch d e mons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 11/12/2008

As if it hadn't already been down that path... the WSJ will now go the way of FAUX NEWS in terms of credibility....

Time to cancel my subscription

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 11/12/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect