iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

AIDS Patient Reportedly Cured

PATRICK McGROARTY | November 13, 2008 01:35 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
German hematologists Eckhard Thiel, left, and Gero Huetter of Berlin's Charite Medical University attend a news conference about a successful treatment of a HIV infected patient in Berlin, on Wednesday, Nov. 12, 2008. (AP Photo/Michael Sohn)

BERLIN — An American man who suffered from AIDS appears to have been cured of the disease 20 months after receiving a targeted bone marrow transplant normally used to fight leukemia, his doctors said.

While researchers _ and the doctors themselves _ caution that the case might be no more than a fluke, others say it may inspire a greater interest in gene therapy to fight the disease that claims 2 million lives each year. The virus has infected 33 million people worldwide.

Dr. Gero Huetter said Wedneday his 42-year-old patient, an American living in Berlin who was not identified, had been infected with the AIDS virus for more than a decade. But 20 months after undergoing a transplant of genetically selected bone marrow, he no longer shows signs of carrying the virus.

"We waited every day for a bad reading," Huetter said.

It has not come. Researchers at Berlin's Charite hospital and medical school say tests on his bone marrow, blood and other organ tissues have all been clean.

However, Dr. Andrew Badley, director of the HIV and immunology research lab at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., said those tests have probably not been extensive enough.

"A lot more scrutiny from a lot of different biological samples would be required to say it's not present," Badley said.

This isn't the first time marrow transplants have been attempted for treating AIDS or HIV infection. In 1999, an article in the journal Medical Hypotheses reviewed the results of 32 attempts reported between 1982 and 1996. In two cases, HIV was apparently eradicated, the review reported.

Huetter's patient was under treatment at Charite for both AIDS and leukemia, which developed unrelated to HIV.

As Huetter _ who is a hematologist, not an HIV specialist _ prepared to treat the patient's leukemia with a bone marrow transplant, he recalled that some people carry a genetic mutation that seems to make them resistant to HIV infection. If the mutation, called Delta 32, is inherited from both parents, it prevents HIV from attaching itself to cells by blocking CCR5, a receptor that acts as a kind of gateway.

"I read it in 1996, coincidentally," Huetter told reporters at the medical school. "I remembered it and thought it might work."

Roughly one in 1,000 Europeans and Americans have inherited the mutation from both parents, and Huetter set out to find one such person among donors that matched the patient's marrow type. Out of a pool of 80 suitable donors, the 61st person tested carried the proper mutation.

Before the transplant, the patient endured powerful drugs and radiation to kill off his own infected bone marrow cells and disable his immune system _ a treatment fatal to between 20 and 30 percent of recipients.

He was also taken off the potent drugs used to treat his AIDS. Huetter's team feared that the drugs might interfere with the new marrow cells' survival. They risked lowering his defenses in the hopes that the new, mutated cells would reject the virus on their own.

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infections Diseases in the U.S., said the procedure was too costly and too dangerous to employ as a firstline cure. But he said it could inspire researchers to pursue gene therapy as a means to block or suppress HIV.

"It helps prove the concept that if somehow you can block the expression of CCR5, maybe by gene therapy, you might be able to inhibit the ability of the virus to replicate," Fauci said.

David Roth, a professor of epidemiology and international public health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said gene therapy as cheap and effective as current drug treatments is in very early stages of development.

"That's a long way down the line because there may be other negative things that go with that mutation that we don't know about."

Even for the patient in Berlin, the lack of a clear understanding of exactly why his AIDS has disappeared means his future is far from certain.

"The virus is wily," Huetter said. "There could always be a resurgence."

(This version CORRECTS spelling of doctor's name to Huetter throughout.)

BERLIN — An American man who suffered from AIDS appears to have been cured of the disease 20 months after receiving a targeted bone marrow transplant normally used to fight leukemia, his doctors...
BERLIN — An American man who suffered from AIDS appears to have been cured of the disease 20 months after receiving a targeted bone marrow transplant normally used to fight leukemia, his doctors...
Filed by Marcus Baram  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scottowego
11:17 AM on 11/15/2008
What I don't understand is why all these treatments cost so much? After over twenty years and all those wonderful lives lost here in the US and overseas (especially Africa) why do we not have a cure or even a vacine? It sounds like the bone marrow transplant in Germany was done on a guess that it might work. Not because of any real studies or research. Hopefully genetic research will help with a lot of illnesses in the future. I'm not fat but a little overweight yet I was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and inherited high cholesterol. My doc put me on Lipitor. Got the first prescription filled and my jaw dropped. It's over 100 bucks a month! My insurance doesn't cover much (maybe ten dollars). The pharmaceutical companies have to be mass producing the stuff. Why does it cost so much? And I'm really furious with Bush for passing laws the prohibit Americans from buying their drugs in Canada- American made drugs that actually cost less in Canada or Mexico than here in the country where they are made!
03:19 AM on 11/15/2008
i ALSO BELEIVE THERE IS A CRE FOR EVERY SINGLE AILMENT IN OUR LIFE ..EXCEPT OLD AGE AND DEATH
03:18 AM on 11/15/2008
I beleive the eprson has got cured,and the other jelous doctors can keep their jelousy quite.

a good example
visit this link,and see terminal ilnesses being cured

TRISTEM
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alieninvader
04:53 PM on 11/14/2008
"Cure" is American medicine's least favorite word. When someone has type II diabetes or high blood pressure then changes their diet and lifestyle, and the diabetes goes away, Doctors still don't say they are cured. They don't want short term patients, they want long term clients. The last time they cured anything was when penicillin was invented.
photo
Big0725
Large...........but definitely NOT in charge!
05:19 PM on 11/14/2008
Well said!

There isn't any profit in a cure.
11:18 AM on 11/15/2008
This is why the Europeans are providing the cures. They have a non profit based health care system.. whereas profit rules and cures are not allowed.

When was the last time an American doctor found a cure for anything????? Please some one tell me?????

Profit has to leave the medical system ...period.
photo
EvenSteven88
Don't worry, ObamaCare covers Tinfoilitis
06:08 PM on 11/14/2008
Or they don't want to be sued for malpractice for using "overly" optimistic language when describing a prognosis. Remember, there are always two sides to every story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alieninvader
07:55 PM on 11/14/2008
Sorry, but I don't buy that. If someone goes to the doctor for strep throat and is given antibiotics which makes the strep throat go away, they are cured. If they come back with another bout of strep, no one gets sued, it's just a relapse or another bout.

The lack of the word cure takes control and optimism out of the patient's hands. I used to be obese. If a doctor had told me that obesity is a disease and that there was no cure, just symptom management, I never would have made the lifestyle changes necessary to cure the "disease".
photo
Killjoy
I'm perfect in my imperfections
03:49 PM on 11/14/2008
Yeah nice try..where is the camera? If you believe this your as thick as Palin.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
donttasemebro
I am the 99%
04:20 PM on 11/14/2008
And you know different, why?
photo
Killjoy
I'm perfect in my imperfections
10:46 PM on 11/15/2008
Key words don key words. One guy appears to be cured of AIDs. please

I can put that statment to everything.. It appears donttasemebro have intelligents. but I could be wrong. There is not cure for aids. You can only slow it down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alieninvader
04:42 PM on 11/14/2008
Appropriate name.
photo
Killjoy
I'm perfect in my imperfections
10:47 PM on 11/15/2008
Yeah...thanks alieninvader
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NYCBri
01:38 PM on 11/14/2008
I saw this on PBS Nova a long time ago. The people that are immune (if they get the gene from both parents) or resistant (if they get the gene from 1 parent) are all descended from a group of people that survived the Black Death (combination of the bubonic and pneumonic plague) in Europe.

The same ability that their cell walls have to prevent HIV from attaching prevented the plague from infecting their ancestors hundreds of years before.

I love it! Evolution at work within the human race!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric8869
03:41 PM on 11/14/2008
Yes that was fascinating
12:35 PM on 11/14/2008
I wonder what's going to happen to that marrow donor?

I remember a crappy Michael Crichton (Rest in Peace) book I got last year ("Next") that described a dystopia in which folks whose bodies produce beneficial cells or biochemical substances could lose the rights to control their own bodies because of the way gene patenting law has been progressing.

It's more than a bit of a slippery slope, but it does make me wonder what would become of someone whose marrow produces a cure for a major disease.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
01:26 PM on 11/14/2008
It is like science fiction. The recipient ends up having two DNAs: his blood and bone marrow becomes 100% donor's DNA. But the donor is not in danger of becoming everyone's cure.

Bone marrow transplants are now done by using stem cells filtered from the donor's blood--no drills involved. The donor needs to match the recipient in extensive genetic testing. There are large numbers of willing donors in Germany--it has been promoted heavily there. Their stem cells are often flown to the US for transplant. They sit in a baggie in a nice warm bath and then get infused into the recipient. In time, the stem cells find their way to the bone marrow and begin reproducing themselves. In 6 to 10 months, the recipient's blood becomes 100% donor. Then the new blood goes to town against the disease. Sometimes it works. Sometimes the disease comes back.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:35 PM on 11/14/2008
The marrow that has the mutation is not a cure but it is valuable. One in a thousand has the HIV blocking receptor mutation so finding someone who 1) has the mutation and 2) whose marrow is compatible with the patient is a real lottery.
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
08:05 AM on 11/15/2008
"One in a thousand has the HIV blocking receptor mutation"

The number is closer to one in a hundred.

"so finding someone who... 2) whose marrow is compatible with the patient is a real lottery."

This is the real challenge, finding a donor and recipient whose tissue types match. That's why the bone marrow donor in this study will not experience a major disruption in his life. He is only able to donate his marrow to a very few people -- not everyone who has AIDS.
12:33 PM on 11/14/2008
This is very good news. Any progess along the AIDS front is welcome.

While not a first line of treatment as the good doctor said, the data he has gathered could be monumental.

http://billmel8er.wordpress.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biskitdaddy
Romnesia is covered under Obamacare!
12:09 PM on 11/14/2008
What everyone needs to understand is the U.S. medical community, along with the pharmaceutical companies, don't want to cure ANYTHING! All they want to do is babysit your diseases by prescribing you medications costing you several hundreds of dollars a month, benefitting no one but the companies themselves so they can continue to reap billions of dollars in profits. There is no profit motive in curing a disease, only in keeping a patient on prescription medication. Don't expect to see this in America anytime soon, if ever; be prepared to go to Germany if you need the treatment.
12:20 PM on 11/14/2008
Stop perpetuating this canard. Cures of dieases are lucrative, too. And no doctor would ever purposely avoid looking for a cure just so some ppl could line their pockets.

Besides, every doctor looks for lifestyle changes to deal with most illnesses first. Your doc tells you to stop smoking, drinking too much, eating the wrong foods, and not exercising. All before the meds come into it.

Stop lying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PinkMoore
12:54 PM on 11/14/2008
I don't believe it's a lie. It's pretty well known that the pharma companies and specialty doctors don't want cures because it's big business for them. If there was a cure for many diseases, they'd be out of business. I can't believe that you would say that a doctor would tell you to change your lifestyle if you came to them with a case of cancer or some other life-threatening disease.

I can see your typical general practitioner telling you that if you have something that is manageable, but you just don't go around telling someone to change their lifestyle in order to combat deadly diseases.

And on top of that, you can sit there and take the best care of yourself, eat right, don't smoke, excercise, etc. and drop dead from various causes.

There's big business and big money in diseases.
01:35 PM on 11/14/2008
No, you're the L I A R!

And this is something that proves it!

http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/thebeautifultruth/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biskitdaddy
Romnesia is covered under Obamacare!
02:06 PM on 11/14/2008
Seems strange to me that a pharmaceutical company can market a drug and make all kinds of claims as to what disease(s) it can cure, however if I market a natural herbal remedy that has been documented over thousands of years to cure something, I have to put all kinds of disclaimers on the packaging so the FDA police don't come calling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cimarron
12:04 PM on 11/14/2008
McGroarty is a typical contemporary journalist. H
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cimarron
12:00 PM on 11/14/2008
McGroarty is a typical contemporary journalist. He needed to find a view contrary to the major finding that he is reporting. Eureka. The director of a nationally respected medical facility conjectured "... tests (at a German hospital) have probably not been extensive enough." That purely speculative statement wastes the reader's time.

McGroarty, if you are going to recite conjecture, at least provide it from researchers rather than from administrators.

Antitheses should be evidence-based.
11:36 AM on 11/14/2008
In America due to the lack of Universal healthcare, the medical research industry is ran by pharmasutical companies as opposed to legitimate research grants. If we had universal healthcare in this country, there would be a much bigger incentive for the government to fund this type of research that could save millions of lives because it would save the government money. We have some really jankey perrogatives here. Maybe one day we could move on to finding a cure for cancer or influenza. Or maybe all of the genetic diseases that affect a large percentage of babies born everyday. How about finding cures for serious mental disorders like autism? Perhaps malaria?
Our healthcare system can be rebuilt! We have the technology!
10:58 AM on 11/14/2008
This will be the end of the world as we know it. Some big drug company will create a so called cure that will really be a virus and turn us into zombies or vampires.

All jokes aside, this is really big news and I guess kudos for being cured.
10:37 AM on 11/14/2008
Maybe the Arts & Theater & Fashion could conjure up another "Gala" benefit to raise serious money for A CURE. And hey for them it will be another reason to get dressed up in very expensive clothes, drink expense champagne, and at the end of the day "feel really good about themselves." IT'S A WIN-WIN for the whole world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jinxykb
11:17 AM on 11/14/2008
Or they could sit at home in their pajamas, type on their computers and complain about it.
10:31 AM on 11/14/2008
World AIDS Day is right around the corner. But unfortunately the science here is complex AND IF in fact HIV has been eradicated from the patient. The procedure of just modifying an infected person's uninfected cell IS expense. All the proves is that HIV does in fact have an achilles heel. Something the scientific community and researchers knew about but not much money was either donated or invested to flesh it out.