Banks Promise They Won't Use Bailout Money For Pay

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Banks Promise They Won't Use Bailout Money For Pay stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOHN DUNBAR | November 13, 2008 05:20 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Some of the nation's largest banks sharing in the $700 billion government bailout of the financial industry tried to assure lawmakers Thursday they are using the money to make more loans and help financially strapped homeowners avoid foreclosure.

Barry L. Zubrow, chief risk officer with JP Morgan Chase & Co., told the Senate Banking Committee that a portion of the $25 billion capital infusion it received from the Treasury Department was being deployed to "expand the flow of credit" and to assist with rewriting residential mortgages for up to 400,000 families.

Zubrow and executives with Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. told the committee that none of the $75 billion they have received collectively from the government is being used to pay salaries or bonuses.

"The committee has asked whether (bailout) funds would be spent on executive compensation," said Jon Campbell, regional banking president for Wells Fargo & Co. in his testimony. "The answer is no. Wells Fargo doesn't need the government investment to pay for bonuses or compensation."

Some of the executives said bonuses this year will be lower because of the economic downturn.

"Employee compensation will be dramatically affected by changes in the overall economic and financial environment and our performance for the full year, but it certainly will not increase as a result of receiving TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) funds," said Gregory Palm, general counsel for Goldman Sachs.

Bank of America's board has decided that this year's bonus compensation pool will be reduced by more than 50 percent, Anne Finucane, a marketing and corporate affairs executive, told the committee.

Finucane said Bank of America originated more than $50 billion in mortgage loans in the third quarter of 2008 but acknowledged that "we are lending less than we were a year ago."

Story continues below

Campbell said Wells Fargo's commercial real estate loans are 37 percent above a year ago.

Despite the reassuring words, lawmakers pressed hard for commitments to more lending.

"Let me say as clearly as I can," said committee chairman Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. "Hoarding capital and acquiring healthy banks are not _ I repeat are not _ reasons why Congress authorized $700 billion in emergency funding."

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said he and other lawmakers are looking at requiring banks to make more loans as a condition for taking part in the $350 billion second half of the bailout. Congress can block release of the second $350 billion. It also can rewrite the law to put new conditions on its use.

"Any new capital injections must come with tougher requirements," he said.

Treasury already has lent or committed $290 billion of the first half. Democrats are working on a bill they hope to pass next week that would devote another $25 billion to the beleaguered auto industry, with the specific intent of helping General Motors Corp. avoid bankruptcy.

The banking executives also were questioned about using bailout money to acquire other banks.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, noted that Cleveland-based National City Bank was denied Treasury funds, only to be taken over by PNC Financial Services Group Inc. of Pittsburgh on the same day that PNC was approved for $7.7 billion in bailout money.

"The taxpayer funds that would have been allocated to National City were instead allotted to PNC," Brown said.

The executives said their banks have no new acquisitions planned beyond the spate of mergers that occurred before Congress passed the bailout bill.

WASHINGTON — Some of the nation's largest banks sharing in the $700 billion government bailout of the financial industry tried to assure lawmakers Thursday they are using the money to make more ...
WASHINGTON — Some of the nation's largest banks sharing in the $700 billion government bailout of the financial industry tried to assure lawmakers Thursday they are using the money to make more ...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
227
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (11 pages total)

Riiiiiiiight...and "the check's in the mail..."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 11/13/2008
- spinns17 I'm a Fan of spinns17 53 fans permalink

he took care of 9 banks .(all friends ).i would love to be able to punch him in the nose .lol oh wait i cant say that on here .lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 11/13/2008
photo

If you believe this, I've got some swampland in Iraq to sell you...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 11/13/2008

this is the biggest toilet bowl of crap to flushed down the pipe in oh ... about two months, since the bailout was announced

MONEY IS FUNGIBLE

the money does not have to directly go to bonuses or operating expenses it helps the companies defray the cost of overhead and general losses in other areas and; as such will be used for bonuses

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 11/13/2008

"We Promise" FOFLMAO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 11/13/2008
photo

Banks "promise"?


Isn't letting corporations police themselves and make empty promises business as usual for the current administration?

Sheesh, fool me once shame on me fool me twice......won't get fooled again........unless it involves making money for my corporate buddies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 11/13/2008

Paulson's BABY, AIG, sure got their share before he suddenly decided to change his original lame plans to merge banks by throwing tax payer $$ at them. Congress approved this....DO NOT FORGET THAT!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 11/13/2008
- spinns17 I'm a Fan of spinns17 53 fans permalink

we need a protest going on here .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 11/13/2008

We need members of Congress to do their JOB for a change. That job is representing the PEOPLE. If they can't do that because of their own person greedy connections, then I say we do not need a Congress. They simply cost us more money!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 11/13/2008
- scooperss I'm a Fan of scooperss 77 fans permalink
photo

We certainly DO NOT ned the current crop of so called *people's representatives*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 11/13/2008
- spinns17 I'm a Fan of spinns17 53 fans permalink

brought to you by the bushwhacker president.he can blame this problem on obama to lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 11/13/2008
- bdl0715 I'm a Fan of bdl0715 8 fans permalink

Any bank that applies for the money, like to auto companies, if they get involved, should be required to fire all executives and board members with no severance package. All travel for meetings, getaways, conferences, etc should not be allowed.

You can't just hand these thieves a check and expect them to be honest about how they spend it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 11/13/2008
- kathy001 I'm a Fan of kathy001 87 fans permalink

If the banks are not using the bailout funds as intended then one of two things has gone wrong - either Congress did not stipulate how the money was to be used or the banks are continuing their fraudulent and corrupt ways. If Congress did not stipulate how the money was to be used then we need a whole new Congress - let's just start from scratch because those guys are apparently too stupid to know when to come in out of the rain, much less enact laws and such. If the banks are continuing their fraudulent and corrupt ways, then PROSECUTE them and take the bank over.

As for those bonuses that are being paid, all monies the bank had should have been accounted for when bailout funds were allocated, including anything set aside for bonuses. However much a bank had set aside for bonuses should have been deducted from their bailout allocation. The bank could then choose to use that money for bonuses or for actually running the bank - their choice.

What's so hard to figure out here? Honestly, this is turning into just another cluster-f**k - just like I knew it would.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 11/13/2008
- msjimmied I'm a Fan of msjimmied 62 fans permalink
photo

Bonuses when you've run your company into the ground? This is wrong on so many levels. As taxpayers we should be funding this?!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 11/13/2008
- kathy001 I'm a Fan of kathy001 87 fans permalink

I absolutely agree. But I really don't think the government could stipulate that they were not allowed to pay bonuses - that really would have been taking too much control. However, there should have been some kind of control set up to make sure that the banks could not just hang on to money earmarked for bonuses without a penalty of some kind.

And, of course, this begs the question, if these bonuses are based on past performance that turned a profit, then why are the banks going bust? How do you go bust when you've turned a profit? Making sense of these bonuses - any kind of real world sense - is impossible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 11/14/2008
- Robin08 I'm a Fan of Robin08 23 fans permalink

Promise my ass. Why isn't that a condition to receiving the money? I knew this bailout was crock.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 11/13/2008
- mivogo I'm a Fan of mivogo 14 fans permalink

What was the punishment for those at AIG who took a high-priced junket after they received billions in bailout money? Obama said they should be fired. Were they? Was their ANY consequences? If not, why in heck does anyone think it won't happen again, or hefty, unearned bonuses given, etc?
What am I missing here?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 11/13/2008
photo

Obama nor any other Govt. official can fire them !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 11/13/2008

If AIG can't (or won't) rein in their upper management, they don't deserve our support.

Let them fail...they brought it on themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 11/13/2008
- mivogo I'm a Fan of mivogo 14 fans permalink

Government, which means us, are now part owners of AIG. So, as Obama says, "Yes we can!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 11/13/2008
- jollyelle I'm a Fan of jollyelle 18 fans permalink

They promise!!!! .................. oh well then

and Karl Rove was subpoenaed by Congress........

and Lieberman is a Democrat

and Sarah Palin makes sense when she speaks

and the Iraq War is for spreading Democracy.........

Yeah, that's right........................................now, look to the right and left...........has everyone gone insane?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 11/13/2008
- spinns17 I'm a Fan of spinns17 53 fans permalink

after all this mess is over .there better be someone in jail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 11/13/2008

Sure thing....dream on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 11/13/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect