Freddie Mac Asks Government For $13.8 Billion

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Freddie Mac Asks Government For $13.8 Billion stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALAN ZIBEL | November 14, 2008 08:08 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Sept. 25, 2008 file photo, Freddie Mac Chief Executive Office David Moffett testifies before the House Financial Services Committee hearing on the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac takeover on Capitol Hill in Washington. Mortgage finance company Freddie Mac said Friday, Nov. 14, 2008, it is asking the government for $13.8 billion in aid after posting a $25.3 billion loss in the third quarter. (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf, File)

WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac is asking for an initial injection of $13.8 billion in government aid after posting a massive quarterly loss Friday.

The mortgage finance company is making the first request to tap the $200 billion promised by the Treasury Department to keep it and sibling company Fannie Mae afloat after the two were seized by federal regulators in September. Freddie Mac said it expects to receive the money by Nov. 29.

The McLean, Va.-based company posted a loss of $25.3 billion, or $19.44 per share, for the third quarter. The results compare with a loss of $1.2 billion, or $2.07 a share, in the year-ago period.

Analysts were divided about whether Fannie and Freddie's losses would ultimately exceed the government's $200 billion pledge. And that may partly depend on the extent to which Fannie and Freddie are used by the government as a tool to ease the foreclosure crisis.

"There is no way that $200 billion will be sufficient, especially as these companies are called on to, frankly, take losses ... for the good of society," said Josh Rosner, managing director of research firm Graham, Fisher & Co.

Others say it's unlikely that losses will soar so high. "I find it difficult to be believe that it will get that far," said Credit Suisse interest rate strategist Ira Jersey.

Ever since the government takeover, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's debt has suffered from a lack of confidence among international bond investors. They are concerned about whether or not the U.S. government firmly stands behind the companies' debt.

Once the government actually injects money, that could help resolve that uncertainty, said Alex Pollock, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.

Story continues below
advertisement

"It will be a demonstration to the international bond buyers of the government's true commitment to supporting these companies," Pollock said.

Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about half of U.S. mortgage loans. If the companies can pay a reduced premium for their debt sales, that could translate into lower mortgage rates for U.S. consumers.

Freddie Mac's third quarter loss was mainly due to a $14.3 billion charge to reduce the value of tax assets, but also was driven by $9.1 billion writedown on mortgage securities, and $6 billion in credit losses from soaring mortgage delinquency rates and foreclosures.

Freddie Mac said that rising unemployment rates, tightening credit and deteriorating economic conditions "contributed to a substantial increase in the number of delinquent loans," including prime loans made to borrowers with strong credit.

"Continuing home price declines and growing unemployment are now affecting behavior by a broader segment of mortgage borrowers," the company said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing.

Freddie Mac's overall delinquency rate rose to 1.22 percent, from 0.9 percent at the end of June, and 0.5 percent a year earlier. The number of foreclosed properties that Freddie Mac holds rose to 28,000, from 22,000 in June.

Freddie Mac also disclosed a dispute with JPMorgan Chase & Co., which purchased failed thrift Washington Mutual in late September. JPMorgan has refused to take back bad loans made by Washington Mutual, Freddie Mac said in the SEC filing. Both Fannie and Freddie reserve the right to return loans that they discover to be fraudulent.

On Monday, Fannie Mae posted $29 billion loss in the third quarter as it took a massive tax-related charge. Fannie Mae said it may have to tap the government's for help in the coming months.

Both Fannie and Freddie have changed their accounting for their deferred-tax assets, which can emerge from operating losses, and can be used to reduce future tax expenses. Companies must be able to show they will be profitable if they intend to use the tax assets for earnings in later periods.

The companies' new chief executives, Freddie Mac's David Moffett and Fannie Mae's Herbert Allison, were scheduled to testify on Capitol Hill next week, but that hearing was rescheduled until Dec. 9. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is examining the causes of the government takeover.

Both companies have been asked to turn over a long list of documents and e-mail messages concerning the risks the companies took in their mortgage investments, accounting, and compensation for the companies' former CEOs.

WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac is asking for an initial injection of $13.8 billion in government aid after posting a massive quarterly loss Friday. The mortgage finance company is making the first re...
WASHINGTON — Freddie Mac is asking for an initial injection of $13.8 billion in government aid after posting a massive quarterly loss Friday. The mortgage finance company is making the first re...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
23
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Risk management.
Risk management.
Risk management.
Risk management.

What happened to all the risk managers?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 11/14/2008
- Pacojam I'm a Fan of Pacojam 3 fans permalink

They are a bunch of phonies using math that doesn't work. Read the book "Fooled by Randomness".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 11/15/2008

Is anyone else out there getting a little tired of all this bleeding? I have my own business and if I screw up, no one comes to my rescue. I eat it. I learn and do better next time around because I had a learning lesson. These fat cats need a learning lesson. Most of the parents that said to their kids "if you mess up, I won't be around to bail you out." Well, they learned not to mess up. We are setting ourselves up for the fall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 11/14/2008
photo

If they had done some research on the characteristics of black holes they would have seen this coming as I did. And this is just the beginning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 11/14/2008

I have to laugh everytime some financial wizard whines about "their lost profits".

There's simply no "their", there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 11/14/2008
photo

Pretty much. We now see that the profits were just an illusion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 11/14/2008

How about go F yourself Freddie Mac. You and AIG, and AmEx, and GM, and Philly, and everyone else looking to get a piece of the pie on my dime! F YOU!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 11/14/2008
- adamsmith3 I'm a Fan of adamsmith3 17 fans permalink

Considering Obama received the largest donations from Freddie Mac over any other Senate member besides Chris Dodd, I am sure he will kick them down whatever they need.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 11/14/2008

--Part 1B--

One person familiar with AmEx's strategy described the move as "common sense." "How could you possibly pass up the flexibility to be able to access these programs in a highly uncertain and volatile world?" this person said.

It isn't clear if AmEx has applied for taxpayer-funded aid through the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program. One of its bank units is regulated by the federal Office of Thrift Supervision. Some bankers have complained that the OTS hasn't been processing TARP applications quickly enough.

An OTS spokesman said the agency has "devoted significant resources to processing" the 120 to 130 requests it has received. "Any institutions with concerns should discuss those concerns with us."

In the order approving the regulatory change, the Fed described the two bank units as "well capitalized." But the company is expected to quickly turn to the Treasury Department for an investment to bolster its position.

Mr. Chenault said the decision "does not fundamentally change" the company's "core focus on the payments industry," an indication that AmEx isn't interested in acquiring a large commercial bank. If it doesn't buy a bank, AmEx could buy deposits of failed institutions or launch an Internet-only savings program. That strategy usually attracts money from customers who chase the highest rates and don't keep their money in one place for long.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 11/14/2008

--Part 1a--

American Express Co. won fast approval to become a bank-holding company, helping the credit-card giant gain access to a chunk of the $700 billion in federal funds being pumped into financial firms.

The move shows how quickly financial-services firms that have long relied on the capital markets are racing to shore up their funding sources as the credit crisis drags on and economic turmoil spreads around the world.

The specter of a steep recession has fueled investor worries about AmEx's financial position, even though its two bank units already have access to the Federal Reserve's discount window. Last month, the New York company said it could keep itself going for at least a year if it were shut out of the credit markets.

"Given the continued volatility in the financial markets, we want to be best positioned to take advantage of the various programs the federal government has introduced or may introduce to support U.S. financial institutions," Kenneth Chenault, AmEx chairman and chief executive, said in a statement Monday night.

"Everybody wants to be a bank because everybody wants access to government funding," said Craig Maurer, an analyst at Calyon Securities, a unit of Credit Agricole Group.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 11/14/2008

Did anyone see WSJ about AMEX asking for a "handout"?

Here it is:

By ROBIN SIDEL and JON HILSENRATH
556 words
01:35 pm, 11/11/2008
The Wall Street Journal(Internal Content)
English

--Part 2--
Normally it would take months to win regulatory approval for such a switch. The Fed waived its normal procedures to expedite AmEx's application, citing "unusual and exigent circumstances affecting the financial markets." Similar language was used when it allowed Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley to convert from investment banks to bank-holding firms in September.

Banks, thrifts and bank-holding companies have a Nov. 14 deadline to apply for a capital infusion from the government. Fed officials are reviewing applications from a small number of other firms, including GMAC LLC, the auto and home lender.

"Without this status, we do not have access to these important tools," such as government capital, said Toni Simonetti, a GMAC spokeswoman

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 11/14/2008

LOL!

For those who don't speak fluent WallStreetese..."important tools", translated, means "taxpayer money".

Wadda scam.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 11/14/2008
- proggirl I'm a Fan of proggirl 113 fans permalink
photo

I'm worried that as adjunct faculty at two colleges, I have almost a month between semesters from mid-December to early January. During this time, I have little or no income. I usually save for this, but as we all know, this has been a rough year.
I need about $1200 to get me through.
How about it, Freddie Mac? You guys spend more than that on lunch!
Let's write the number out.
$13,800,000,000.00
And that's on top of the last bailout.
The mind boggles.
What arrogance these guys have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 11/14/2008
- BlueZoo I'm a Fan of BlueZoo 44 fans permalink

NONE of these companies should be given one dime until the same management which got them into this mess are ALL fired! It is beyond me how we can possibly justify giving monies to the same people who created this mess. WTF!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 11/14/2008

Remember when Pres. Bush made that offhand commment about Wall Street getting drunk? Guess what...We just turned them into addicts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 11/14/2008
photo

Jeez! I can waste money. If i had several billion dollars, I could blow thru it in a couple of months Ala "Brewster's Millions". But I can't get a bail out, right?

The point I'm making is that after all the programs that have been axed by past administrations, because they were deemed too expensive, or they didn't have the money. Hear these companies come, waddling up to the Federal feeding trough, getting billions while the poor get poorer, more are jobless, no national health care plan. Disgusting!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 11/14/2008

unbelieveable

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 11/14/2008

hell NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 11/14/2008

screw you Freddie Mac!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 11/14/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect