Clinton Aides Comfortable With Bill's Vetting, Worried About Press

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Clinton Aides Comfortable With Bill's Vetting, Worried About Press stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11-17-08 03:54 PM   |   Updated: 12-18-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Vetting

Aides and advisers to the Clintons feel comfortable that the vetting of Bill Clinton will not disqualify Hillary from becoming Secretary of State, and argue that the former president could be a tremendous asset both to his wife and Barack Obama in the future administration.

Nevertheless, there is a concern that critical media coverage could sour the Obama and Clinton camp's view of the arrangement and hurt Sen. Clinton's chances of ending up at the post.

In conversations on Monday, officials noted that Bill Clinton has long expected that much of his work during the past eight years would be opened to public scrutiny if his wife were to win the presidential election. Moreover, they added, the former president already had made a substantial share of his financial record public -- including every paid speech he has delivered since leaving the White House -- in accordance with congressional disclosure laws that impact his wife. But there still exists the possibility that a post-presidential arrangement, whether through Clinton's library or global initiative fund, could prove cosmetically problematic and spur enough of a media frenzy to scuttle things.

"The next two or three days will be critical," said one aide. Another figure close to the Clintons noted that they are focused on "trying to weather this storm... If they can limit [the press fallout] around Bill, she'll get the appointment."

Officials told the Huffington Post and other outlets last week that Obama had (informally) offered Clinton the post during their meeting in Chicago. Some subsequent media accounts stated that a formal offer had not yet been extended. But aides say that is a distinction without a difference: Clinton believes, based on her meeting with Obama, that the position is hers if she wants it; moreover, aides say, Obama's transition team would not have gone through with the vetting of the former president (nor would he have agreed to it) if the idea of Hillary at State wasn't crystal clear.

There is lingering concern over Bill Clinton. The Clinton Global Initiative has raised billions of dollars from many international financial and political entities. In addition, both he and Obama (and, on occasion, he and his wife) have had clear policy disagreements that could muddle the message of the next president.

But lost amidst these potential hurdles is another obvious element: Bill Clinton could also be, if tasked correctly, a tremendous asset to Obama, observers say. A renowned diplomat with perhaps the thickest rolodex of officials around the world, the former president could at once help amplify the White House message while serving as a friendly buffer should there be a fissure between Obama and another international leader.

Take, as a case study, negotiations over a Colombia Free Trade Agreement. Clinton has a clear interest in the passage of any such measure, having received $800,000 in speaking fees from an organization promoting the trade deal. In addition, he has spoken out in favor of the Bush administration's approach, contradicting not only Obama but his own wife.

However, Clinton could be a huge help for President Obama should he try to restructure such an arrangement with the Colombians, as seems likely. Clinton is close to President Uribe and has myriad connections to prominent government officials, business leaders, and aid groups in the country. Any fallout between Uribe and the Obama administration could be lessened by Clinton's diplomatic touch, as could frictions that accompany negotiating trade deals or other political arrangements.

"This is the very interesting flip side of the problem people are starting to talk about with Bill Clinton," said Paul Blustein, a trade expert at the Brookings Institute. "The ideal outcome with the Colombia FTA is that it gets renegotiated so that Obama can support it without it looking like he just made cosmetic changes. At the same time, it has to be done in a way that preserves Uribe's dignity... to make sure he can also save his face. And Bill Clinton is certainly a master at that. He has a personal relationship with the two guys involved, which is obviously a big plus... He can go and say 'I feel your pain' [to Uribe] or something to that effect, and be believed. He's good at that."

Certainly, having Bill Clinton as a mediator requires some initial conditions to be met. For starters, his wife would be the one calling the shots -- having too many cooks in the diplomatic kitchen is both problematic and dangerous. Moreover, Bill would have to untangle his financial ties and start publicly adopting positions that were in line with the Obama administration. The former task would cost money -- but that is usually the price of public service. The latter is merely a matter of control and messaging.

"He doesn't have to be supportive or critical," said Rob Shapiro, an undersecretary of commerce in the Clinton White House. "If asked about the contradiction between his position and the president's he ought to say: 'I support the position of the president.' And if they say what about the difference, he should say: 'I support the position of the president.'"

Aides and advisers to the Clintons feel comfortable that the vetting of Bill Clinton will not disqualify Hillary from becoming Secretary of State, and argue that the former president could be a tremen...
Aides and advisers to the Clintons feel comfortable that the vetting of Bill Clinton will not disqualify Hillary from becoming Secretary of State, and argue that the former president could be a tremen...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
2626
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (33 pages total)

"Clinton is close to President Uribe and has myriad connections to prominent government officials, business leaders" ....BC has been lobbying for the CFTA for quite a while, This couple is not a Change we can believe in No B/HC for SoS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 11/18/2008
- maab76 I'm a Fan of maab76 5 fans permalink

With the many varied opinions about this suggested "leak", is it possible that this is the way that PE Obama is rewarding Hillary for her support and campaigning? It builds her image and creds. It permits him to choose someone else if the vetting does not work to his favor. I simply see too many possibilities for the sabotaging of the Obama administration and of its being co-opted by the Clintons. In the end, however, it is the PE who must choose. I hope, however, that he reads and hears the many concerns that have been raised regarding the workability of this taunted selection.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 11/18/2008
- IndyReader I'm a Fan of IndyReader 8 fans permalink
photo

It seems to me that if Bill Clinton is such an International Man of Mystery and Troubleshooting then he should be SoS and not Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

Obama said "that that would be like asking Mickey Mantel to play AAA ball"

Apparently, PE Obama has a lot more respect for one of the all-time greats, than the conc>rn tr0//s on this site. He also has shown to have excellent judgment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 11/18/2008

What is it that people expect by way of a president? Jesus or even the Holy Spirit are not available so whats the next best choice? People seem to be frightfully frightened of Hillary Clinton or the dynamic duo (Bill & Clinton) Some are afraid of Hilary's politics, some are afraid of Bill's style. Some are afraid of Hilary because of her body language self-advertising she did while campaigning.What do they expect? One doesn't enter a competition to lose! In all cases they are afraid of something new.
Former political paths are not necessarily good predictors of the future. There is no doubt that what Obama and company promised will not be the same as what is delivered. Some will not be done due to funding problems, others will be abandoned when closer examination reveals it was a dumb idea to begin with and some will be abandoned due to changing circumstances. It is a certainty that some people will not get what they believe to rightly be the theirs.
America was and in many ways still is a great model for other countries to follow but the delusions of grandure that continue to exist. The alleged "good old days" when the Constitution was being drafted and the Bill of Rights were being formed are past. So wishing for the hem is just a waste of intellect and common sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 11/18/2008
- mafina I'm a Fan of mafina 12 fans permalink

No way, no HRC. This woman is already starting with her baggage and this is not needed in this admin. Too many clintonites getting involved in this admin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 11/18/2008

i think Hillary is a smart choice. She's a very savy woman with lots to offer and Bill regardless of he's misdemeanor was a good president. most of us don't care about his little tryst everyone has skeletons in there closet and he wasn't the first president . Also Bill has good conections that would benefit Obama politically. I didn't vote for the man but i wish him success and the clintons would be a great asset.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 11/18/2008

This is just a disraction to keep our focus away from discussing if HRC should be considered in the first place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 11/18/2008
- MaxxEliot I'm a Fan of MaxxEliot 6 fans permalink

No too much to discuss he already offered her the job....the ball is in HER court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 11/18/2008
- MaxxEliot I'm a Fan of MaxxEliot 6 fans permalink

Clinton Bashing is back Big Time at the Huffington Post...I thought we turned that page on November 4th....let me think....oh yes...Change had come....it is a New Day....a New Beginning. No no no....here at the Huffington Post it is still 1999....so tired and so yesterday and so not in keeping with Obama's message. Have you learned nothing from this man?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 11/18/2008
- ElvisGump I'm a Fan of ElvisGump 7 fans permalink
photo

I think Hillary as Secretary of State is a huge mistake and a missed opportunity.

Think about this instead: Secretary of State James Earl Jones.

Can you imagine our enemies sitting there listening to the voice of Darth Vader as they try to intimidate us? The man will bat 1000 in that job.

And if he's not to busy, Press Secretary Morgan Freeman.

Imagine all the crap that's coming at us as the country free-falls as the economy melts down. Now I would have just as soon had Freeman be the President himself, no offense to Obama, but Freeman just has tons more life experience, but if we could get him in anywhere, parrying with the press would be the next best thing.

To complete a black trifecta, Secretary of Defense Richard Roundtree. Can you dig it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 11/18/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 65 fans permalink

This administration will be all about appearance and posing. You can just see it coming.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

While James Earl Jones, is an excellent choice, Morgan Freeman has much better credentials.

James Earl Jones was an Admiral in Hunt for Red October, and Patriot Games. He is certainly qualified.

But Morgan Freeman has experience playing the President in Deep Impact, G0d in Bruce Almighty and Ne/son Mande/a in the yet-to-be-released film, The Human Factor. A combination of a President, Ne/son Mande/a and G0d is what we really need as SoS. But I bet there would still be conc>rn tr0//s here to criticize that choice too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 11/18/2008

The Republicans had control of all three branches of government 2002 through 2006. The Democrats now need the same control to undo the disastrous policies of those years.

BYW: I haven't heard of any looming threat of foreign funds being funneled through libraries. Can you enlighten on that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 11/18/2008

Oops! This comment was in response to frictionlessmatter3. I posted it in the wrong spot! (Sorry!)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 11/18/2008
- aubrey8 I'm a Fan of aubrey8 5 fans permalink

The Guardian is reporting Hillary will accept. Congrats, outstanding choice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 11/18/2008
- LarBear I'm a Fan of LarBear 30 fans permalink
photo

Big surprise! The MSM tries to spin Bill Clinton into a story and controversy....

Not all of us are gullible enough to fall for this... IMHO, This is more about trying to create a story line to hook viewers/listeners/readers, than substance....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

I dreaded a third term term of Bush so I voted against McCain.

I dread a third term of Clinton. Doesn't anyone remember the turmoil that surrounded the Clinton's for eight years? It doesn't matter if the turmoil was justified, it existed!

Obama will be a one termer if he shows that it is business as usual, in Washinton.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 11/18/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 65 fans permalink

Too late. He wasn't a voice of change in the Senate. And he is surrounding himself with Clintonistas. Smart choice for someone who doesn't have a clue about running a government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

The only turmoil was what was created by those spoiled Republican brats who were so used to having their way in Washington ever since Johnson left.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 11/18/2008
- PaleMail I'm a Fan of PaleMail 12 fans permalink

Bill Clinton raked in billions of dollars from foreign countries for charitable causes, and why was he so successful? Well, his wife was the odds on favourite to become the next president of the USA and the money dished out to Bill couldn't hurt chances for favourable attention from the next White House -- actual or preceived. That is why Hillary as Secretary of State would be a disaster waiting to happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 AM on 11/18/2008

Is it possible that he was so successful because, once upon a time, HE was POTUS? And a pretty good one, at that? (You don't have to agree to everything he did in the White House to know that he was pretty effective.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 AM on 11/18/2008
- exhale09 I'm a Fan of exhale09 77 fans permalink
photo

I find it amazing that while people focus on the "scandal ridden " Clintons, they completely forget ALL that the Clintons DID, or at least TRIED to do that was right for the country and the WORLD.

While I think Bills personal sexual escapade with Monica was just plain STUPID on his part, and I was mad as heck at him for being so stupid, COMPARED to the BUSH Administration's behavior, Bill Clinton was a saint. Over 4000 American soldiers have DIED unnessasarily! 100,000 or more innocent Iraqi's have died due to that unnessasary war. NOT to mention the American lives lost and the suffering that has taken place in New Orleans due to Bush's INCOMPETENCE in running our COUNTRY.

In addition, most of the so-called Clinton scandals were trumpted up swiftboating by republicans and NEVER proven to have any credibility. Republicans spent $7,000,000 going after Bill Clinton to bring him down. Granted, he stupidly gave them some amunition, but they completely blew it up as usual, to epic lying innuendos, with the frenzied media's help...then stoled the 2000 election from Al Gore, gave us George Bush, snoozed as we were attacked on 911, and then took us to war in Iraq and now an ecomomic meltdown...and people are complaining about the Clintons?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 11/18/2008

Why bring back the scandal ridden Clintons to overshadow his administration?

Does Barack understand this is worse than any lobbyists getting the inside track?

Nothing will weigh down his administration more than the Clintons who will undermine him at every turn.

This is not good news for the American people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

With what has happened over the last 8 years, it is pretty clear that CLINTON WON THE COLD WAR. Yes, some people tried to credit Reagan and GHWB, but since GWB has allowed Russia to go back to NOT being a democracy and almost letting the cold war start again, it's pretty clear that CLINTON won it!

The FREE WORLD was a LOT Free-er under the Clintons. May the world be so lucky to have another decade like the 90's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 11/18/2008

Hillary Clinton will have no problem securing the nomination. Democrats control every branch of government. There are no checks and balances against funneling foreign funds through your library, so why is anyone worried this won't go through?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 AM on 11/18/2008

We survived the Republicans doing just that. (Although, barely! Look at our economy now!) The Democrats can now set right much of what the Republicans screwed up while they had control 2002-2006!

The Democrats like this because they want what's best for AMERICAN. The Republicans liked it because they wanted what was best for their pocketbooks and their POWER-MONGERING.

Big difference. That's why no one's worried. (Besides, my library in this little town could use some financial help.)

BTW: I hadn't heard that "funneling foreign funds through your library" was a huge, looming danger. Must've missed something. But, can't be worse than the Republican religious wrong banning books from libraries. (Nobody but me has the right to say what I may or may not read, thank you very much!)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 11/18/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 65 fans permalink

"The Democrats like this because they want what's best for AMERICAN."

Better read your history, hero. Barney Frank and Chris Dodd had their hands in the Fannie Mae mess up to their elbows and fought against controls wanted by the Bush administration.

Think about it. Which party would most want to have loans available to poor people who otherwise couldn't afford to buy a house? Right.

These are the guys and gals in charge now. Good job, dems. Hunker down America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 11/18/2008
- The Ogre I'm a Fan of The Ogre 2 fans permalink

"Democrats control every branch of government."

Since when are there only two branches? What happened to the Judicial Branch, where a clear majority on the Supreme Court and over 60% of federally appointed judges were appointed by Republicans? That branch must not count, anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 11/18/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 65 fans permalink

Unlike senators and staff of the President, judges aren't on the Sunday morning talk shows. And, they have a funny way of not being put in a box by politicians. See Earl Warren.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

The SCOTUS does not have any say in WHO gets allowed to be SoS. They don't have a vote until there is a conflict.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 11/18/2008
- jackstpaul I'm a Fan of jackstpaul 11 fans permalink

I knew Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln was a friend of mine. Mr. President-elect, quit trying to be Abraham Lincoln and focus on today's realities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 AM on 11/18/2008

That makes you how old?

Wasn't Abraham Lincoln around in the 19th century? (Am I lost or isn't this the 21st century? If it isn't, then the last eight years were just an ongoing nightmare, right? Right? . . .)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

Don't you recognize a shot at humor?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 11/18/2008
- exhale09 I'm a Fan of exhale09 77 fans permalink
photo

Hillary would make a fine SoS and if Obama chooses her, he has thought it through and has his good reasons.

Personally I believe she would be better placed in an area where she has had life long PASSION and DETERMINATION ...like Health Care, or Education....to best use her talents.

Having said that...most of the world loves and respects both of the Clintons. It is only in our country that some people still have strong misgivings about the Clintons.

Frankly I felt Bill Clinton's attempt to resolve the Israel/Palestinian conflict was heroic...and compared to Bush's ABSENCE from resolving Foreign issues, or even trying...was pathetically neligent and derilict of duty as far as I'm concerned.

No one can deny that both Hillary and Bill are determined and dedicated to accomplishment, whatever they focus on...whether you like them or not.

No one can deny that putting aside Bill's stupidity about his "personal" failures that brought down his Presidency, his Presidency was a very successful one and our country thrived for eight years as a result, and while he left office in personal disgrace..he also left us with a budget SURPLUS and economic security.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 11/18/2008
- cyndeewi I'm a Fan of cyndeewi 22 fans permalink
photo

LOL... behave Jackstpaul.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 11/18/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 65 fans permalink

Funny. I bet Biden will opine on Lincoln's Gettysburg address being on TV.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 11/18/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (33 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect