Murdoch Scolds "Misguided Cynics": "Newspapers Will Reach New Heights In 21st Century"

SYDNEY, Australia — Global media magnate Rupert Murdoch says doomsayers who are predicting the Internet will kill off newspapers are "misguided cynics" who fail to grasp that the online world is potentially a huge new market of information-hungry consumers.

Newspaper companies in the United States and elsewhere are facing fundamental changes to their businesses as more people get their news from the Internet and other sources, and advertisers follow the market away from the paper-and-ink format.

Murdoch, the Australian-born chairman and chief executive of News Corp., said in a speech broadcast Sunday titled "The Future of Newspapers: Moving Beyond Dead Trees" that the Internet offered opportunities as well as challenges and that newspapers would always be around in some form or other.

"Too many journalists seem to take a perverse pleasure in ruminating on their pending demise," Murdoch said in a speech, recorded in the United States and relayed nationally by the Australian Broadcasting Corp. It was the latest in an annual ABC series of lectures by a prominent Australian.

"Unlike the doom and gloomers, I believe that newspapers will reach new heights" in the 21st century, Murdoch said.

Murdoch grew a small city newspaper he inherited in 1953 into one of the world's largest media conglomerates that now includes 20th Century Fox, Fox News Channel and Sky Broadcasting, Dow Jones & Co. and the online networking site MySpace.

He said people now were "hungrier for information than ever before" and that papers have an edge over bloggers and other newcomers because they are more trusted by readers.

"Readers want what they've always wanted: a source they can trust," Murdoch said. "That has always been the role of great newspapers in the past. And that role will make newspapers great in the future."

Story continues below

advertisement

He said newspapers would have to evolve from the physical item to "news brands" that are delivered in a variety of ways and are flexible for readers.

"I like the look and feel of newsprint as much as anyone," he said. "But our real business isn't printing on dead trees. It's giving our readers great journalism and great judgment.

"It's true that in the coming decades, the printed versions of some newspapers will lose circulation. But if papers provide readers with news they can trust, we' ll see gains in circulation _ on our Web pages, through our RSS feeds, in e-mails delivering customized news and advertising, to mobile phones," Murdoch said.

"In this coming century, the form of delivery may change, but the potential audience for our content will multiply many times over," he said.

Murdoch cited two of his most prestigious newspapers, The Times of London and The Wall Street Journal, as examples of how newspaper brands can win large online readerships.

But he stressed that even these papers must recognize that online customers will decide what news they want and how they receive it.

"To compete today, you can't offer the old one-size-fits-all approach to news," he said. "The challenge is to use a newspaper's brand while allowing readers to personalize the news for themselves and then deliver it in the ways that they want."

To capitalize on online opportunities, Murdoch said The Wall Street Journal was planning to offer three tiers of content online _ free news, a subscriber-level service, and a third "premium service" of reader-customizable "high-end financial news and analysis."

Murdoch was scathing of journalists who predicted the death of newspapers as self-pitying and "misguided cynics who are too busy writing their own obituary to be excited by the opportunity."

"The newspaper, or a very close electronic cousin, will always be around," he said. "It may not be thrown on your front doorstep the way it is today. But the thud it makes as it lands will continue to echo around society and the world."

Comments

[montex]

Murdock is off his meds again. Every time I buy a newspaper I am appalled at how little of it there is to read. I hate the waste of the medium that, at best, I only am interested in a few sections of. The beauty of the internet is that I can read lots more and not have to generate any waste paper in the process. The future belongs to the efficient and the wasteful model of disseminating information through newspaper will end (I hope) in the near future.

[boomerman]

The problem is you tend to read only what you agree with an miss those articles you'll see in a newspaper that you may not read otherwise.

[IAB]

Once more an indication of the dumbing down of America...­since people lead such frenetic lifestyles these days and so many suffer from ADD, it is hard for anyone to spend the time and devotion needed to plow through the paper and read it tangential­ly...
There will never be anything the Internet can offer that can match the tangible elements of a paper, or of a book...jus­t never the same.

[IAB]

time and devotion needed to plow through the paper and read it tangential­ly...

I meant to say read it more than tangentially

[twokidsonecat]

Where'd my post go?

[twokidsonecat]

Whenever I think I want to get the local daily newspaper, it comes, its expensive and there is nothing in it. Then I cancel the subscription. The only thing we use it for is the crossword, and to start fires in the fireplace.

[bascombe]

i stopped reading the post in the seventies. I bought a world series yankee victory edition once.