Lieberman Keeps Committee Chair In Senate Vote

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Lieberman Keeps Committee Chair In Senate Vote stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANDREW TAYLOR | November 18, 2008 03:23 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., is questioned by reporters as he walks to the Old Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2008, where his colleagues will vote on party leadership and other matters. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)

WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman will keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee despite hard feelings over his support for GOP nominee John McCain during the presidential campaign.

The Connecticut independent will lose a panel post on the Environment and Public Works panel as punishment for criticizing Obama this fall.

Lieberman's colleagues in the Democratic caucus voted 42-13 Tuesday to approve a resolution condemning statements made by Lieberman during the campaign but allowing him to keep the Homeland Security Committee gavel.

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he had been very angry by Lieberman's actions but that "we're looking forward, we're not looking back."

Added Reid: "This was not a time for retribution, it was a time for moving forward on the problems of this country."

Lieberman's grasp on his chairmanship had gotten stronger since President-elect Barack Obama signaled to Democratic leaders that he's not interested in punishing Lieberman for boosting McCain and criticizing Obama during the long campaign.

"This is the beginning of a new chapter, and I know that my colleagues in the Senate Democratic Caucus were moved not only by the kind words that Senator Reid said about my longtime record, but by the appeal from President-elect Obama himself that the nation now unite to confront our very serious problems," Lieberman said after the vote.

Anger toward Lieberman seems to have softened since Election Day, and Democrats didn't want to drive him from the Democratic caucus by taking away his chairmanship and send the wrong signals as Obama takes office on a pledge to unite the country. Lieberman had indicated it would be unacceptable for him to lose his chairmanship.

Story continues below
advertisement

Lieberman, who was Democratic presidential nominee Al Gore's running mate in 2000, was re-elected in 2006 as an independent after losing his state's Democratic primary to Greenwich businessman Ned Lamont amid intense anti-war sentiment. Lieberman is a strong supporter of the war.

He remains a registered Democrat and aligns with the party inside the Senate, where he supports the party position on most issues other the war.

But Lieberman angered colleagues in signing onto McCain's campaign, touring the country on McCain's campaign plane and speaking on his behalf at the GOP convention in September. Democrats were particularly upset that he had attacked Obama rather than simply saying positive things about McCain.

"There are some (statements) that I made that I wish I had not," Lieberman told reporters. "In the heat of campaigns, that happens to all of us, but I regret that. And now it's time to move on."

"It's time to unite our country," said Lieberman supporter Ken Salazar, D-Colo., said entering the meeting. Salazar and Lieberman's homestate colleague Christopher Dodd led

Salazar added afterwards: "It was very clear people want Senator Lieberman to be part of the caucus."

On the other side were senators who feel that one requirement to be installed in a leadership position is party loyalty.

Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Pat Leahy, D-Vt., and Senator-elect Jeff Merkeley, D-Ore., spoke against allowing Lieberman keep the Homeland Security and Government Affairs post. Reid, Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and John Kerry, D-Mass., were among those speaking in his favor, according to a Democratic aide requiring anonymity to discuss a private meeting.

Some, like Iowan Tom Harkin, still harbor hard feelings for statements Lieberman made during the campaign. Harkin took particular offense when Lieberman said a vote against funding the war in Iraq without a deadline for a troop withdrawal meant Obama had voted to cut off funding for troops in harm's way.

"That's outrageous what he said," Harkin said.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman will keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee despite hard feelings over his support for GOP nominee John McCain during the presidential ca...
WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman will keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee despite hard feelings over his support for GOP nominee John McCain during the presidential ca...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
2244
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (65 pages total)
- Petey131 I'm a Fan of Petey131 29 fans permalink

NO MORE MONEY FROM ME TO THE DNC!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 11/18/2008
- sepiasiren I'm a Fan of sepiasiren 122 fans permalink
photo

But isn't this exactly what Obama promised? Old politics would be to cut off the head of your enemies in a partisan move--Obama will need the Republicans online to get things done--what better way to do that than to throw a bone here or there--our dislike of Republican politics shouldn't make us not see the big picture ladies and gents...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 11/19/2008
- Adam11 I'm a Fan of Adam11 4 fans permalink

I am very Disapointed on this.Mr.Br­ack!

F** Unity.

Lieberman Fought hard for the dawn fall of Obama and Democrats.­.......Hel­lo?

GIVE ME A F*ING BREAK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 PM on 11/18/2008
- sepiasiren I'm a Fan of sepiasiren 122 fans permalink
photo

If we don't unify we are defeated by the Republican­s...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 11/19/2008
- zetacplus I'm a Fan of zetacplus 12 fans permalink
photo

They would unify better by ousting Lieberman. They just effectively splintered their support by supporting Lieberman when the American people--the ones who elected them into office--had demonstrated (and quite loudly) that they did not want Lieberman in the Democratic Party. This is a huge slap in the face to their supporters--they are already acting like the republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 11/19/2008
photo

42 p*tzes supporting one unrepentant, two-faced schm*ck. So Democratic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 PM on 11/18/2008

its tough to see this slime mold linger in the Senate. But I think Barack is probably right. Lieberman will be forever looking over his back and hearing conversations quiet when he enters a room.

Think the Art Of War.

I find it hard to let my anger go. But we are the good guys right? Lets hope and HELP the folks in Connecticut drop his final curtain next time he runs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 11/18/2008
photo

agreed.

Lets hope his Senate career ends in 2012

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 11/19/2008
- sepiasiren I'm a Fan of sepiasiren 122 fans permalink
photo

for the short sighted--the was a strategy--Obama is taking a page from Lincoln, who kept his enemies and rivals close to him--this was smart thing to do--if we start shouting off with their heads because we dislike something someone did or said, how are we unlike the administration we are replacing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 11/18/2008

Lincoln needed to keep his enemies close because the soul of the nation was LITERALLY on the line. Stop spouting out Godfather cliches and get real.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 PM on 11/18/2008
- sepiasiren I'm a Fan of sepiasiren 122 fans permalink
photo

And the soul of the nation isn't on the line now with a BLACK president at the helm and people wanting to secede because they don't want to be lead by a N----r...?

Obama has to prove he isn't an angry black man as the media will portray him, and what better way to do that than to show he won't hold grudges and will willingly put aside the past to work for the greater good...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 11/19/2008
photo

no, he is right.

Lets let Obama work his own internal political strategies.

I think we should judge Obama by the final results, whatever progress he is able to produce.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 11/19/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

I don't fault Lieberman he's always been what he is...

I fault everyone in the entire state of Connecticut that's who we should punish for inflicting this person on America maybe we shouldn't allow them to vote in a national election, for let's see now, how about 40 years..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 PM on 11/18/2008
photo

Only a small minority of Democrats voted for him. He got most of the Republican votes because they knew the Republican candidate had no chance (Lieberman being almost a Republican).

I do agree with you that it is the people's fault in general for voting him in to office. But I don't expect much from a state with many wealthy Republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 11/19/2008
- Sabreen60 I'm a Fan of Sabreen60 62 fans permalink
photo

So many tr0//s. The Dems need 60 votes to have a filibuster proof senate. That's the only reason they let L!eberman caucus and keep his chairmanship.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 11/18/2008
- Plus15 I'm a Fan of Plus15 14 fans permalink

Let's please clarify the numerous newspaper, magazine and blog headlines stating "Democrats Forgive Lieberman" (or thereabouts). Democratic political figures and office holders forgave Lieberman. Democrats, the people, the rank and file have not forgiven Joe Lieberman. Those who forgave him are all the Bush sympathizers and enablers including Reid, Bayh, Pelosi, Hoyer etc who we also don't forgive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 11/18/2008
- sepiasiren I'm a Fan of sepiasiren 122 fans permalink
photo

I think people are being too black and white about this--if you had an enemy wouldn't you want him close and in your control--b­esides--no­w Joe owes Obama--to me ti was a brilliant move--check and mate!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 PM on 11/18/2008
- Sabreen60 I'm a Fan of Sabreen60 62 fans permalink
photo

You are the spokesperson for millions of Dems? Gee, I didn't know that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 11/18/2008
photo

Harry Reid dropped the ball on this, that's what scares me about it.

Obama is the GOOD COP, Harry. You need to be the BAD COP. See?

Oh, why am I wasting my time?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 11/18/2008

Thank you, Reid has not impressed me, ever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 11/19/2008
- stell I'm a Fan of stell 20 fans permalink

The real outrage is that no one had the power to make the vote public. Being a U.S. Senator is probably the lowest kind of job one can have. Make your votes public!!!!! Stand on principle if you support this snake. They are all snakes as far as I'm concerned. This sets a terrible precedent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 11/18/2008

The lack of principle by these jokers is what worries me, hopefully they won't screw up what Obama wants do for the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 11/19/2008
- LWkcma I'm a Fan of LWkcma 5 fans permalink

I understand that Dem. Sens. wanted to support the Pres.-elec­t. Doesn't mean I like it. Barak, you're a bigger man than I am.

Juck Foe

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 11/18/2008
- Bystander I'm a Fan of Bystander 8 fans permalink

Good for Joe! I have to agree with Reid's perspective.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 11/18/2008
photo

For God's sakes libs... get over it. Joe has a constituency in Connecticut that votes democratic on national issues. He's a dem. Man...you guys are unbelievab­le...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 11/18/2008
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

Lieberman quit the Democratic Party and became an Independent. His approval numbers in Connecticut are in the toilet. If voters in Connecticut had an election today, Lieberman would lose. Not that it's relevant to today's vote. The committees in the Senate affect all Americans and Lieberman's job performance as chair is the problem.

There's more to this than punishing Lieberman. This is about having meaningful investigations into what Bush did these past 8 years. Lieberman has been an accomplice towards covering up Bush's trail. With him in charge of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Lieberman is free to block inquiries into the secret no-bid contracts that went to corporations like Halliburton. Halliburton just got another huge contract out of the $700 billion bailout six weeks ago.

We can't possibly turn this nation around with these same people sitting at the gates.

http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/11/schumer-and-durbin-want-lieberman-stripped-of-homeland-security-chair/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 11/18/2008

The Senate is an old boys club full of white men (and women) who have been there too long. Most of them are good friends so I'm not surprised that they voted to keep him by such a large margin.

Seeing Dick Durbin, Chuck Schumer, and Harry Reid nodding approvingly behind Lieberman when he was speaking made me sick to my stomach.

At this point, I'm starting not to care any more. The Dems make me sick with their spinelessness, but what can you do? They know that the progressive part of the party has no where else to turn, so Dems keep thumbing their noses at them and viewing them as some sort of fringe group to keep in the closet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 11/18/2008
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

If you had to do November 4th all over again after knowing what you know from today, who would you have voted for?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 11/18/2008
- j0em0mma I'm a Fan of j0em0mma 39 fans permalink
photo

OBAMA, wtf, are you kidding?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 11/18/2008
- sepiasiren I'm a Fan of sepiasiren 122 fans permalink
photo

Is no one getting that if Obama "punished" Lieberman for voting his conscience then he woudl be no better than the Republicans or Palin who sued her position of power to "punish" her brother-in-law?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 PM on 11/18/2008
- j0em0mma I'm a Fan of j0em0mma 39 fans permalink
photo

Exactly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 11/18/2008

In a word; disgusting display of solidarity among thieves. As far as I'm concerned the entire Democratic leadership is bought off by the Israelie lobby.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 11/18/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (65 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect