Waxman Ousts Dingell From Energy Chair In Bruising Dem Fight

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Waxman Ousts Dingell From Energy Chair In Bruising Dem Fight stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANDREW TAYLOR | November 20, 2008 08:45 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif. walks away after talking to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 20, 2008, after the House Democratic Caucus elected him as Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee over long standing chairman, Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

WASHINGTON — Democrats steered the House toward more aggressively tackling global warming and other environmental problems Thursday, toppling veteran Michigan Rep. John Dingell, a staunch supporter of Detroit automakers, from an important energy panel in favor of California liberal Rep. Henry Waxman.

The switch could help President-elect Barack Obama on Capitol Hill with one of his favored issues: trying to curb global warming by limiting greenhouse gas emissions. But Waxman's combative stance on climate change and other issues also could alienate Republicans and moderate Democrats, making it harder to get the bipartisan support Obama will need.

Waxman is an avid environmentalist and booster of health care programs _ and a home-state ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He defeated Dingell on a 137-122 vote in the Democratic Party caucus, capping a bruising intraparty fight.

The Energy and Commerce panel is one of the most important House committees, with sweeping jurisdiction over energy, the environment, consumer protection, telecommunications and health care programs such as Medicaid and the popular State Children's Health Insurance Program.

Dingell has been the top Democrat on the panel for 28 years and is an old-school supporter of Detroit's carmakers and other big industries such as electric utilities. His bitter battles with Waxman over clean air issues date to the Reagan administration and were recently revived as Waxman complained that the committee has been too slow to address global warming.

Dingell comes from an era of autocratic committee chairmen and has had to adapt to a House in which power is consolidated around Pelosi, who has clashed with him in the past. Last year, in a move that undercut Dingell's power on the global warming issue, she created a special panel led by Massachusetts Rep. Edward Markey to make the case for bigger reductions in greenhouse gases. Pelosi did not publicly take sides in the new vote, but her support of Waxman was well known and played a role in the strong tally.

Waxman was the candidate of change in a year dominated by that theme. He likened the first years of the Obama administration to a once-in-a-generation opportunity to get things done in Washington.

"The argument we made was that we needed a change for the committee to have the leadership that will work with this administration and members in both the House and the Senate in order to get important issues passed in health care, environmental protection, in energy policy," Waxman said after the vote.

Story continues below
advertisement

Dingell congratulated Waxman in a statement issued after the vote, and promised to work closely with him on a smooth transition and on the issues before the committee. He said his commitment to his constituents will not change.

"That commitment to protecting and creating jobs, to providing health care for all Americans, to working to getting our state and nation's economy back on track is a fight I will continue to wage in Washington," Dingell said.

Waxman, 69, has a lengthy congressional resume of aggressive investigations and legislative action.

Dingell's reputation for putting Detroit's auto interests above all else didn't help his campaign to keep his job _ especially as automakers seeking a bailout have been taking a public relations pounding on Capitol Hill.

His defenders said he had done nothing to deserve being dumped, pointing to a long list of accomplishments and the panel's busy workload over the past two years, including successfully enacting an energy bill that would raise automobile fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2020.

Driving Waxman's bid was the issue of global warming, a top issue for Obama. Waxman is expected to move legislation with tougher emissions standards than Dingell would have.

Environmentalists say Dingell has acted too slowly on global warming. A bill he released last month was a poke in the eye to Waxman and Pelosi, D-Calif., since it would prevent states, including California, from setting tougher auto emissions standards than the federal government.

"Waxman's victory is a breath of fresh air _ of clean air. It was a stunning defeat for the corporate lobbyists on K Street," said Frank O'Donnell, president of Clean Air Watch. "It shows that a majority of the House Democrats are ready to work with the incoming Obama administration on effective global warming legislation."

Still, taking on global warming will be anything but a cakewalk. A controversial "cap and trade" mechanism in which permits are sold is tantamount to a huge tax on carbon dioxide emissions and will face resistance from coal state Democrats and moderate party members _ to say nothing of Republicans.

"This decision sends a troubling signal from a majority that has promised to govern from the center," said House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio. "They moved away from Chairman Dingell because he is committed to approaching energy and environmental issues in a manner that protects American jobs."

Bill Kovacs, a vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said Dingell brought a balanced and methodical approach to environmental policy and sought the input of the regulated industries.

It's the difference of "one trying to keep everyone in the system and one knowing exactly where they want to go and how they are going to get there," Kovacs said.

___

Associated Press writer Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Democrats steered the House toward more aggressively tackling global warming and other environmental problems Thursday, toppling veteran Michigan Rep. John Dingell, a staunch suppor...
WASHINGTON — Democrats steered the House toward more aggressively tackling global warming and other environmental problems Thursday, toppling veteran Michigan Rep. John Dingell, a staunch suppor...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
257
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)

I don't mind Waxman getting the chairmanship, but I would like to know why he has continuously blocked federal funds to the Los Angeles Metro Rail System preventing them from building a light rail from Santa Monica to downtown Los Angeles, something that is desperately needed in L.A.

Might it have something to do with the rail going through Westwood and Beverly Hills???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

There was an e x p l o s i o n of natural gas which made him very scared of drilling through that corridor. I believe he has changed his mind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 11/20/2008

You know, it's easy to cheer this, but I'd like to remind everyone that the American auto industry is responsible for 1 in 10 jobs in America (Big 3, large suppliers, mom and pop suppliers, services, etc...). John Dingell has a strong record supporting the environment as well as American manufacturing.

Additionally, I'm concerned about the growing non-science based ideology of 'sustainability' on the left. While sustaining our civilization long-term requires changes, many of my fellow progressives believe things that are scientifically invalid because it fits in with a rigid view of the world based on environmentalism and alternative lifestyles. Let's not become rigid ideologues to match our friends on the right, please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

John Dingell let the industry pursue the SUV when people like Arianna Huffington pointed out a long time ago all of the economic, political, and environmental effects of continuing that policy. Giving the industry what they wanted only made them and the country weaker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 11/20/2008

John Dingell didn't 'let' the auto industry pursue the SUV. The auto industry made millions and millions of them because Americans wanted to buy them. That's called 'fulfilling a need or desire,' and it's one of the tenets of the free market. We can argue about whether or not a free market is a good thing all day and nobody would come out on top because it's a complex issue that requires a complex answer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 11/20/2008
- Bullwinkie I'm a Fan of Bullwinkie 16 fans permalink

So you don't think environmental science is valid?

Do you believe in economics? that one I have doubts about and is called a soft science, but E S is considered a hard science.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 11/20/2008

Environmental Science is certainly a science, but many people I know favor environmental policies based on much softer evidence than I believe is required in order to make good policy decisions.

I'll take organic food as an example. Many (most?) progressives I know believe organic food is better for their health and tastes better, when multiple studies have shown that organic food appears to have no short or medium term impact on health, and that people simply cannot tell an organic fruit or veggie apart from a conventional one in a blind taste test.

Moving beyond the health of the individual, organic food is really a luxury of the west that the third world simply cannot afford. If Americans began consuming only organic food, we would have to dramatically increase the acreage of farmland required to feed ourselves, completely offsetting the environmental benefits of lower pesticide use. If the world consumed only organic food, we would have to convert an area equal to the brazilian rain forest in order to meet the worlds food demands, and that food would be priced out of the range of hundreds of millions of people who live near starvation.

I have had this conversation with people who simply refuse to accept that what I am saying can be true, even after I present well sourced evidence. When you ignore well sourced evidence in favor of your gut feelings, you are guilty of putting ideology over science.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 11/20/2008

Waxman looks like the pet rat that turns into the bad guy in Harry potter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

Peter Pettigrew aka wormtail!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

He's not a beauty, but he is a really good guy. Have some respect.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 11/20/2008

I like him and respect him.

He still looks like the Harry Potter guy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 11/20/2008
- sylar I'm a Fan of sylar 2 fans permalink

ok, wth is going on with this guy's face?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 11/20/2008
- 700rpm I'm a Fan of 700rpm 6 fans permalink

This kind of attitude is why we end up with pretty politicians instead of thoughtful leaders. You who think there is some kind of correlation between what one looks like and what one's intelligence is astound me. The relationship between the two attributes is as often inverted as not. And btw, what do you see when you look in the mirror? Immaturity that judges by appearances, or thoughtful intelligence? Just asking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 11/20/2008
- POTUS2008 I'm a Fan of POTUS2008 7 fans permalink
photo

This great, We are getting the pieces into place to move quickly the moment Obama is in office!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 11/20/2008

Way to go HOUSE Dems! Now Senate, how about Chris Dodd? I think it is time for change there. I can't believe he pushed through a huge AIG bail out but refuses to loan $25B to the auto industry so they can finish making a plug in hybrid! Japan and China are already on their way and we are going to let them steal it from underneath us? Its time for change and that also means the Chairs of Congress! Promote for performance, not on senority!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 11/20/2008
- NickNas I'm a Fan of NickNas 6 fans permalink

It is CLEAR by the comments that the new direction the country is taking is RIGHT ON!!!!!

The more they complain about the Good Ole Boys loseing control over us all the better it means things will be for US!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 11/20/2008

Hell yeah more cowbell! This is what I am talking about! Wax on wax off... it's time to get the energvironmental agenda moving in the right direction and this is a most excellent choice! OK Pelosi, that's one demerit removed from your otherwise below average performance... keeping going Grandma California and get some more demerits removed!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 11/20/2008
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 172 fans permalink

"Driving Waxman's bid was the issue of global warming, a pet cause of President-elect Barack Obama."

Pet cause? Who writes this stuff?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 11/20/2008
- brendanm I'm a Fan of brendanm 3 fans permalink

Good question.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 11/20/2008
- Myshkin57 I'm a Fan of Myshkin57 17 fans permalink

Yeah... you know... thee environment is like getting new uniforms for the high school football team.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 11/20/2008
- SeanOcali I'm a Fan of SeanOcali 30 fans permalink
photo

LOL! I thought the same thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 11/20/2008
- Bruupo I'm a Fan of Bruupo 13 fans permalink

Yes, it's a lot like saying that Blofeld's pet cause was destroying the world, while constantly tending to his cat was merely a crusade of supreme importance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 11/20/2008

You beat me to it. "Pet cause" of Barack Obama's? How about "pet cause" of the world? How about "a pressing matter of survival to the world" while we're at it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

The vote was via secret ballot. Too bad the Dems want to take the secret ballot away from union membership voting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 11/20/2008

Another arrogant "progressive" who refuses to look at science before he legislates

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 11/20/2008
- samiam4285 I'm a Fan of samiam4285 3 fans permalink

Specify, please?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 11/20/2008
- SeanOcali I'm a Fan of SeanOcali 30 fans permalink
photo

Scientists like Limbaugh and Hannity will fill you in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 11/20/2008

That's right. Global warming is only just one theory. Like evolution and gravity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 11/20/2008
- flabingo I'm a Fan of flabingo 7 fans permalink

I am reading "Friedmans book, "Hot, Flat, and Crowded" Every American should have to read this book to get a driver's license

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 11/20/2008
- crablover I'm a Fan of crablover 20 fans permalink

Congratulations, Congressman Waxman. I hope you continue to expose the failure of the Bush administration to protect America from eco-hazzards.

As for Dingell -- for heaven's sake man, you're 82 years old! Haven't you been in the Senate long enough?
Michigan could use some younger bodies and sharper minds in that Senate seat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 11/20/2008

House. Not Senate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 11/20/2008

This guy is another example of why we need term limits. If not, could we at least have mental status testing for these old dinosaurs who are making decisions about our futures? Is he still competent???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 11/20/2008

Waxman looks like he should be gnawing on a big hunk of cheese.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 11/20/2008
- bmwracer I'm a Fan of bmwracer 2 fans permalink

LMFAO.

Or a carrot... "What's up, Doc?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

Not nice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 11/20/2008

The photo on the homepage reminds me of Tubbs and Edward of BBC's League of Gentlemen- "Are you local? This is a local shop for local people. We'll have no trouble here!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 11/20/2008
- flabingo I'm a Fan of flabingo 7 fans permalink

This is the most important news of the day!!!! Great for America. Democrats got it right

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 11/20/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect