AP: Obama Treasury Pick Geithner Could Calm Markets

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP: Obama Treasury Pick Geithner Could Calm Markets stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM | November 21, 2008 06:34 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Why aren't the government bailouts working?

The presidential transition may be adding to the uncertainty roiling the financial markets. In fact, knowing the names on President-elect Barack Obama's economic team may prove more helpful in calming those stormy markets in the short term than bailout packages that so far haven't had much payoff.

After two days of steep declines, stocks rallied strongly on Friday _ with the Dow Jones industrials surging nearly 500 points _ on news that Obama planned to name New York Federal Reserve chief Timothy Geithner to be treasury secretary.

But that came at the end of another very tough week for the economy.

While Obama likes to say there can be but one president at a time, Americans need to know one is fully on the job. While many different things have contributed to the economic panic spreading worldwide, it doesn't help that the crisis is being played out in the muddled political wilderness of a lame-duck Congress, a departing president and an incoming administration that hasn't yet been formed.

William Galston, who was a White House domestic policy assistant in President Bill Clinton's first term, said Obama is likely to "name the economic team together as a package, so people can see how the pieces fit together and how people are likely to work together."

That could come early next week. It could help bring some clarity to the economic strategy picture, and alleviate what markets hate most: uncertainty.

Geithner has been a top player in the current economic crisis _ helping Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and his team manage the Wall Street bailout.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Having a new administration come in with new faces and new ideas and with a Congress which is firmly behind it could restore confidence as quickly as it has evaporated," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com

"The Bush administration is winding things down and the Obama administration is trying to gear things up. And in the middle of all this, we've got this complete collapse of confidence. And there is a vacuum," said Zandi.

Even with the late-day rally, stock market gains of the past decade have been essentially erased. Credit markets that had thawed briefly have frozen again amid widespread fears of a deep and long recession.

Congress, the administration and the Federal Reserve have hurled well over a trillion dollars at the problem. But while Paulson told Congress this week the U.S. had "turned the corner" in averting a financial collapse, there is little evidence that the economy's downward spiral has been broken.

Obama told CBS' "60 Minutes" in an interview aired last Sunday that, while the government's big financial bailout program may not have worked as hoped, "things could be worse." But, unless Geithner's selection can work wonders, there's little evidence things will be getting much better soon.

Among the mistakes and other reasons cited by economists and financial analysts for why bold steps haven't had much apparent impact so far:

_ Initial market satisfaction with the $700 billion financial bailout passed in October soured after Paulson abandoned his original plan to buy troubled assets from financial institutions and moved to use most of the money instead to invest directly in banks and firms that issue auto, student and credit-card loans. His statement this week that he would leave the final $350 billion of the bailout money for the Obama administration in January raised further uncertainties about the Bush administration's commitment.

_ The steps taken so far have provided little in the way of direct aid to homeowners facing foreclosure or who have lost their homes.

_ Even though the Fed on Oct. 29 slashed its key interest rate to 1 percent _ a level seen only once before in the past half-century _ and is believed to be pondering a further cut next month, there is always a lag time between rate cuts and economic improvements.

_ The collapse of a a $25 billion congressional effort to rescue automakers further rattled markets and raised the specter of Big Three bankruptcies that could ripple through the economy and claim millions of jobs.

_ Many economists fault the administration for allowing Wall Street bank Lehman Brothers to fail, after helping to rescue Bear Stearns and taking over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The failure spooked investors.

_ Rising unemployment and a sharp pullback in consumer spending have overwhelmed multibillion-dollar government efforts. Consumer spending usually accounts for two-thirds of the overall economy, and when it starts to topple, it's hard to keep the dominoes from falling.

_ Tumbling financial stocks have been further driven down by a Wall Street strategy known as short-selling in which investors wager that stocks will fall. Also, investors who borrowed money to buy stocks are being hit with "margin calls" forcing them to sell involuntarily.

"The financial system is still precarious and the real economy is going to get worse before it gets better. That's enough explanation for the markets being extremely nervous," said economist Alice Rivlin, budget director in the Clinton White House and vice chair of the Federal Reserve from 1996 to 1999.

While Obama aides have stayed in close touch with congressional leaders, his camp doesn't seem to have taken a direct role in either the auto-rescue talks or details of a new stimulus package.

That could change with the announcement of his economic team.

"I have friends at the New York Fed who are lyrical about Tim Geithner," said Lyle Gramley, a former Fed governor and now senior economic adviser at the Stanford Group. "He's very, very highly regarded."

But Geithner also has his detractors, based on his role in the rescue efforts by the Fed and Treasury, some of the actions quite controversial.

"I would expect his confirmation hearings to be animated, with some strong opposition asking questions about his involvement in the AIG, Lehman, Goldman, Morgan and Bear decisions by the New York Fed," said Joshua Rosner, managing director at research firm Graham Fisher & Co. in New York.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE _ Tom Raum has covered national and international affairs for The Associated Press since 1973., including five presidencies.

(This version CORRECTS Rivlin term on Fed, 1996 not 1966)

WASHINGTON — Why aren't the government bailouts working? The presidential transition may be adding to the uncertainty roiling the financial markets. In fact, knowing the names on President-elec...
WASHINGTON — Why aren't the government bailouts working? The presidential transition may be adding to the uncertainty roiling the financial markets. In fact, knowing the names on President-elec...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
7
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 136 fans permalink

The knowledge that at long last responsible adults will be returning to Washington on January 20, after years of greed and corruption, should give the markets reassurance and help to stop the economic panic. There are very real and signifigant problems with America, and they will take time to fix, but with the right people finally elected to government, we have better than an even chance that our country and the world will be put back on the right track.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 AM on 11/22/2008
- dgscol I'm a Fan of dgscol 4 fans permalink
photo

What would instill confidence is the public knowing where their money is going. If US investors invest in foreign, higher risk ventures, they should know and politicians should know how much is invested. The stock market should divide activity by foreign/domestic categorization, and foreign investment capped.

Someone should know how much money is invested in the US by foreign nationals, where it is invested and who is investing. Patterns of investiture that destabilize US companies ought to be viewed as an economic attack.

Government money should be forced into sensible domestic investments. Domestic loans should be held by US finance companies that invest in US companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 11/22/2008
- theone718 I'm a Fan of theone718 23 fans permalink
photo

I only know Geithner, Summers and Volker on the team. Goldsbee and Furman as well, I wonder who the rest will be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 AM on 11/22/2008
photo

If calm is what the market needs a truck full of Prozac would do the trick. It's transparency followed by a reality check that's needed. The market is sick but refuses to get a diagnostic. There are untold amounts of toxic (read worthless paper) in the vaults and nobody has a clue how valuable the financial institutions are. Each knows how bad its books are and they are scared to lend to each other because the others could be in a worse shape. The 700 billion was supposed to be used to buy all this junk, but the market quickly realized a hell of a lot more was needed to clean up the mess. Instead of taking the pain, we wasted $350 billion and all we got was a bigger debt burden for the taxpayer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 11/22/2008
- tompoe I'm a Fan of tompoe 20 fans permalink

Baum needs to focus on the fact that America's free market financial system FAILED! What is it about the word, FAILED, he doesn't understand? What Europe and Asia is doing, with or without America, is taking the steps they need to move to a global financial system that will work. We, in the meantime, are trying to tread water, until Obama takes office, and he will then make the decisions Bush was too stupid to make. I say stupid, because raping and pillaging America is stupid. We've been subjected to eight years of his stupidity, and, interestingly, that's all it took to screw up several decades of smart guys raping and pillaging, while at the same time, stemming their greed so as not to implode. Bush is a scum bag that just couldn't resist the greed part.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 11/21/2008
photo

America's "free market system" is not free, and has not been free since colonial days. Predatory Corporate Cronyism is not free market capitalism; it's corporate protectionism. It is by nature parasitic.

As with our central banking system, corporate cronyism works GREAT for the guys at the top. As well it should, since it was designed FOR them. What it is NOT is sustainable. The system is designed to eliminate - no, decimate - the middle class, leaving no one to buy their products. Oops. That's why corporatist central banking schemes have enjoyed such a moveable feast through the centuries: Kill the host, then move on to the next victim. See "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man."

A "global financial system" would simply take corporate cronyism, and fraudulent central banking schemes, GLOBAL, leaving no investor safe because there no where to hide from the corporatocracy's predations. "Global finance" is just a prepackaged scam waiting in the wings for the controlled collapse of the American economy, same as the Patriot act was waiting in the wings for "the new Pearl Harbor."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 11/21/2008
- jake106 I'm a Fan of jake106 4 fans permalink

European and Asian economies are FAILING also. You did know that, right? They FAILED. See, I can type in all caps also. Meanwhile, European and Asian economies are FAILING. That is why it is called a GLOBAL crisis. Because economies across the globe are FAILING. So maybe their systems aren't much better than ours. Maybe we have all been stupid for the last 20-30 years and the chickens are coming home to roost for everyone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 11/22/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect