SAG Seeks Strike Authorization

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - SAG Seeks Strike Authorization stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

| 11/23/08 01:26 AM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Actor and president of the Screen Actors Guild, Alan Rosenberg, poses for a portrait in this March 17, 2003, file photo taken in Los Angeles. The Screen Actors Guild said Saturday Nov. 22, 2008 that contract talks with Hollywood studios has failed despite the help of a federal mediator and it will now ask its members to authorize a strike. (AP Photo/Ric Francis, File)

LOS ANGELES — The Screen Actors Guild said Saturday it will ask its members to authorize a strike after its first contract talks in four months with Hollywood studios failed despite the help of a federal mediator.

Federal mediator Juan Carlos Gonzalez adjourned the talks between SAG and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers shortly before 1 a.m. after two marathon sessions failed to produce an agreement. No new talks are scheduled.

The SAG, representing more than 120,000 actors in movies, television and other media, said in a statement that it will launch a "full-scale education campaign in support of a strike authorization."

Talks broke down after the studios sought the right to create productions for new media, such as the Internet, using nonunion actors and without paying residuals, said Doug Allen, SAG national executive director and chief negotiator.

Residuals are payments to actors that are made every time a production airs, such as TV reruns. Many SAG members rely on residuals for more than half of their income, Allen said.

"They're asking us to bless a system we believe would be the beginning of the end of residuals, and that's a very scary thought for working actors," he said.

The producers' alliance condemned the SAG decision and said it remains the only major Hollywood guild without a labor deal this year.

"Now, SAG is bizarrely asking its members to bail out the failed negotiating strategy with a strike vote _ at a time of historic economic crisis," a producers' statement said. "The tone-deafness of SAG is stunning."

SAG's national board has already authorized its negotiating committee to call for a strike authorization vote if mediation failed. The vote would take more than a month and require more than 75 percent approval to pass.

SAG wants union coverage for all Internet-only productions regardless of budget and residual payments for Internet productions replayed online, as well as continued actor protections during work stoppages.

But the AMPTP said it was untenable for SAG to demand a better deal than what writers, directors and another actors union accepted earlier in the year, especially now that the economy has worsened.

The producers' group this week said it had reached its sixth labor deal this year, a tentative agreement on a three-year contract with the local branches of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts, accounting for 35,000 workers.

The stagehands alliance accepted Internet provisions that were modeled on agreements with other unions, the producers group said.

Actors in prime-time television shows and movies have been working under the terms of a contract that expired June 30, with the hope of avoiding a repeat of the 100-day writers strike which shut down production of dozens of TV shows and cost the Los Angeles area economy an estimated $2.5 billion.

LOS ANGELES — The Screen Actors Guild said Saturday it will ask its members to authorize a strike after its first contract talks in four months with Hollywood studios failed despite the help of ...
LOS ANGELES — The Screen Actors Guild said Saturday it will ask its members to authorize a strike after its first contract talks in four months with Hollywood studios failed despite the help of ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
225
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- xansam I'm a Fan of xansam 20 fans permalink

how about using non SAG actors for films ect, we will have a whole new talent pool and the overpaid whiners can have there own pity party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 AM on 11/22/2008
photo

Good thought, I'm sure there are many talented and untried writers waiting for their chance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 11/22/2008
- poco767c I'm a Fan of poco767c 348 fans permalink
photo

NOOOOOOO Leave My Shows Alone!! I care nothing for your pay, contract or work conditions. Entertain me!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 11/22/2008
- impik I'm a Fan of impik 19 fans permalink
photo

People are losing their homes and these millionaires want to strike? Unbelievable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 11/22/2008

Surprisingly enough, just like in any industry only a small selection of actors are actually millionaires. This strike is about getting paid royalties for online viewing right? To me, this is understandable since many bit-actors and TV actors don't get the big paycheck and have trouble paying the bills when between gigs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 11/22/2008
photo

Bad, bad PR move by SAG.

You are not going to get public support for a strike in this economy. Take the deal the writers got and be happy you're still working.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 11/22/2008

A SAG strike will affect more than one's TV watching habits. Billions of dollars will be lost. Many people will lose jobs. If the actors strike, the affects could be devastating to thousands of people. The recent writer's strike already hurt a lot of folks tied to this industry. People had to dig into their savings and/or retirement funds just to survive. On top of that, the crashing economy has battered the remains of those funds. This is NOT the time to call for a strike. This IS the time to save face. SAG leadership needs to open their eyes to our current reality. They need to declare that as much as they deserve better, they will accept the same terms as all the other unions have agreed to. That it is in everyone's best interests to keep the machine running along. Three years down the road, they can re-negotiate with all the gusto they have.

The film and television industry is huge. It is not just big stars sitting courtside at Lakers games. It is lighting technicians, grips, special effects folks, security, caterers, rental houses, production assistants, etc. Most of us working in the industry aren't making a killing. We are making a living. We need to keep working in order to feed our children, pay our bills, and pay our mortgages. We can't afford to live through another strike. Hopefully the leaders and members of SAG will consider OUR plight while considering their own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 11/22/2008
- xansam I'm a Fan of xansam 20 fans permalink

true, but nobody ever said actors were particularly intelligent, just greedy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 11/22/2008
photo

I'm a member of SAG. Leadership have go to be out of their minds to propose a strike during this extremely difficult time. Yeh... I'm sure that the public is really going to be behind the Union on this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 11/22/2008
- bola47 I'm a Fan of bola47 6 fans permalink
photo

greedy bast***s.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 11/22/2008
- SiberianRat I'm a Fan of SiberianRat 120 fans permalink
photo

Good grief! I'm in favor of unions/guilds protecting workers' rights, but unless there truly is something terrible happening (seems unlikely since they wouldn't say what the problem is), then it smells of greed. There are many unemployed actors with talent who would love to get work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 11/22/2008
- rudiy I'm a Fan of rudiy 2 fans permalink

I was a union member in my earlier life. I am not sure what the impasse is but the timing is wrong. Thousands of people losing jobs, losing health care, companies in big trouble and will probably start cutting advertizing. It will be hard no matter how much is spent on education to convince anyone to feel sorry formembers of this union.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 11/22/2008

Oy vey is right! How long can they drag this out? It seems kind of selfish for the producers and actors to hamstring the WHOLE INDUSTRY for their petty little negotiation. Especially in light of the economic freefall we are currently witnessing. The entertainment industry is only recession-proof if it is being industrious. If it's safe to say that an agreement WILL be reached, then why not agree without the pain of a strike. C'mon, people! There is plenty of economic suffering for everybody without the self-imposed misery of a strike. Please get back to work, you devils!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 11/22/2008
- sclan5 I'm a Fan of sclan5 2 fans permalink
photo

Sorry Charlie, not buying it.
I just can''t have any sympathy for anyone right now who has a good job. You don't become an actor because you have to feed your family, you become one because you love what you do. If and when you make it big, your payday will come in the form of muli million dollar contracts.­,
Me? I gotta figure out how to pay the mortgage, I have no health insurance, etc. etc.
No room in my brain for an actor pity party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 11/22/2008
- peacekitten I'm a Fan of peacekitten 575 fans permalink
photo

most people had already lost patience with you long before this. to do this now makes no sense. you are not showing yourselves to be team players, or concerned in the slightest about any of the other people in this industry who make it happen behind the scenes for you, and who will suffer WAY more than you. they're already hurting, and now you want to drive them into bankruptcy courts or worse for the sake of something you can come back and bargain for LATER when the people you need it from are in a position to be more generous? you're fools, and worse, you're INCREDIBLY selfish to do this.

pick your battles more wisely. by doing this, you have lost your w a r, and left yourself NO ROOM to bargain in the foreseeable future. you're taking too many innocent people down with you, and the whole industry will suffer. the stage hands, editors, artists, and everyone else you've screwed with this will NOT be your friends when the dust settles.

you have NO support. you have NO chance of winning this one. you have NO right to take everyone else down to satisfy your own egos.

get over yourselves, and get back to work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 11/22/2008
- Maka I'm a Fan of Maka 11 fans permalink

It's pretty hard to sympathize with the actors or the studios when the whole country is in a recession. But, good luck ruining TV for another couple years. I still haven't really gotten back into shows because of the writer's strike last time!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 11/22/2008
- chevyval I'm a Fan of chevyval 14 fans permalink

oy vey already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 11/22/2008
- slayer2369 I'm a Fan of slayer2369 3 fans permalink

I was just beginning to enjoy the television season, and now these a**clowns want to go back out on strike again?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 11/22/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect