Citigroup Bailout: Feds Offer Massive Rescue Package To Financial Giant

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Citigroup Bailout: Feds Offer Massive Rescue Package To Financial Giant stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post/NYT/AP/WSJ
First Posted: 11-23-08 04:59 PM   |   Updated: 12-24-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Citigroup

The government unveiled a bold plan Sunday to rescue troubled Citigroup, including taking a $20 billion stake in the firm as well as guaranteeing hundreds of billions of dollars in risky assets.

The action, announced jointly by the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., is aimed at shoring up a huge financial institution whose collapse would wreak havoc on the already crippled financial system and the U.S. economy.

The sweeping plan is geared to stemming a crisis of confidence in the company, whose stock has been hammered in the past week on worries about its financial health.

"With these transactions, the U.S. government is taking the actions necessary to strengthen the financial system and protect U.S. taxpayers and the U.S. economy," the three agencies said in a statement issued Sunday night. "We will continue to use all of our resources to preserve the strength of our banking institutions, and promote the process of repair and recovery and to manage risks," they said.

It is the latest in a string of high-profile government bailout efforts. The Fed in March provided financial backing to JPMorgan Chase's buyout of ailing Bear Stearns. Six months later, the government was forced to take over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and throw a financial lifeline _ which was recently rejiggered _ to insurer American International Group.

Critics worry the actions could put billions of taxpayers' dollars in jeopardy and encourage financial companies to take excessive risk on the belief that the government will bail them out of their messes.

The $20 billion cash injection by the Treasury Department will come from the $700 billion financial bailout package. The capital infusion follows an earlier one _ of $25 billion _ in Citigroup in which the government received an ownership stake.

As part of the plan, Treasury and the FDIC will guarantee against the "possibility of unusually large losses" on up to $306 billion of risky loans and securities backed by commercial and residential mortgages.

Story continues below

Under the loss-sharing arrangement, Citigroup Inc. will assume the first $29 billion in losses on the risky pool of assets. Beyond that amount, the government would absorb 90 percent of the remaining losses, and Citigroup 10 percent. Money from the $700 billion bailout and funds from the FDIC would cover the government's portion of potential losses. The Federal Reserve would finance the remaining assets with a loan to Citigroup.

As a condition of the rescue, Citigroup is barred from paying quarterly dividends to shareholders of more than 1 cent a share for three years unless the company obtains consent from the three federal agencies. The agreement also places restrictions on executive compensation, including bonuses.

The once mighty company had at one time been the largest U.S. bank by assets.

Citigroup has seen its shares lose 60 percent of their value in the past week, reflecting a crisis of confidence among skittish investors. They are worried all the risky debt on Citigroup's balance sheet will turn into losses as the economy worsens and the markets stay turbulent _ losses that could be nearly impossible to reverse.

Citigroup is such a large, interconnected player in the financial system that if it were to collapse it would cause further damage to already fragile financial and economic conditions. The company has operations stretching around the globe in more than 100 countries.

Analysts consider Citigroup the most vulnerable among the major U.S. banks _ especially after it failed to nab Wachovia Corp., which was bought instead by Wells Fargo & Co. That was a missed opportunity for Citi to gets its hands on much-needed U.S. deposits that would bolster its cash position.

Citigroup was especially hard hit by the meltdown in risky, subprime mortgages made to people with tarnished credit or low incomes. Foreclosures on those mortgages spiked, leaving Citi and other financial companies wracking up huge losses on the soured investments. The company has failed to turn a profit during the past four quarters and has announced plans to slash thousands of jobs.

* * * * *

The New York Times has more coverage of the "radical" bailout plan:

Federal regulators approved a radical plan to stabilize Citigroup in an arrangement in which the government could soak up tens of billions of dollars in losses at the struggling bank, the government announced late Sunday night.


The complex plan calls for the government to back about $306 billion in loans and securities and directly invest about $20 billion in the company. The plan, emerging after a harrowing week in the financial markets, is the government's third effort in three months to contain the deepening economic crisis and may set the precedent for other multibillion-dollar financial rescues.

Citigroup executives presented a plan to federal officials on Friday evening after a weeklong plunge in the company's share price threatened to engulf other big banks. In tense, round-the-clock negotiations that stretched until almost midnight on Sunday, it became clear that the crisis of confidence had to be defused now or the financial markets could plunge further.

Whether this latest rescue plan will help calm the markets is uncertain, given the stress in the financial system caused by losses at Citigroup and other banks. Each previous government effort initially seemed to reassure investors, leading to optimism that the banking system had steadied. But those hopes faded as the economic outlook worsened, raising worries that more bank loans were turning sour.

More coverage from Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal.

AROUND THE WEB

Michelle Malkin : Citigroup bailout being hatched?

MSNBC: Bush sees more moves like Citigroup bailout

MISH'S Global Economic Trend Analysis : Citigroup Bailout Terms of Agreement

The government unveiled a bold plan Sunday to rescue troubled Citigroup, including taking a $20 billion stake in the firm as well as guaranteeing hundreds of billions of dollars in risky assets. Th...
The government unveiled a bold plan Sunday to rescue troubled Citigroup, including taking a $20 billion stake in the firm as well as guaranteeing hundreds of billions of dollars in risky assets. Th...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
2913
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (58 pages total)

Enron and its connection to today's financial disaster:

In 2002, the world's smartest investor (and my pick for president this year), Omaha billionaire Warren Buffett, issued his annual letter to the shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway. In it, he called derivatives "financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal."

Few people heeded Buffett's warning. In fact, some of America's most important financial players dismissed him out of hand. In September 2002, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Harvey Pitt, and James Newsome, chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, sent a letter to a pair of U.S. senators in which they declared that financial derivatives were not a danger. Instead, they said that derivatives "have been a major contributor to our economy's ability to respond to the stresses and challenges of the last two years." Further, they declared that a then pending Senate proposal to regulate derivatives could increase "the vulnerability of our economy to potential future stresses."

http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2008/09/24/from-enron-to-the-financial-crisis-with-alan-greenspan-in-between.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 11/24/2008

The long term solution to the financial crisis is therefore to move beyond the "growth at all costs" economic model to a model that recognizes the real costs and benefits of growth. We can break our addiction to fossil fuels, over-consumption, and the current economic model and create a more sustainable and desirable future that focuses on quality of life rather than merely quantity of consumption. It will not be easy; it will require a new vision, new measures, and new institutions. It will require a redesign of our entire society. But it is not a sacrifice of quality of life to break this addiction. Quite the contrary, it is a sacrifice not to.

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4645

We need a new economic vision for the 21st Century. This article discusses that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

New favorite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 11/24/2008

That sounds all great and everything, but where it gets icky is the definition fo quality of life. Most CEO's are out to make money and be successful and to tell people that not having a 5 million dollar home but instead take that one million dollar home is not exceptable to most people. It is to me, but you can not and will not stop greed in the hearts of humanity. Most people could care less about mankind or the lack of resources for the rest of the world. They just want to take and take.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 11/24/2008

Any corporation that is "too big to fail" - i.e. its failure would be damaging to the economy - is too big period. Capitalism is supposed to be based on competition, and competition means failure when you make stupid decisions or fail the American people on whom their existence depends. Corporations have far too much power in America - apparently enough power to take money out of our wallets at their whim. These are the very people who increase interest rates outrageously if we miss a payment, and lobbied congress so that credit card debt cannot be included in bankruptcy. And now they want us to bail them out?

This is a bellwether for our nation - huge corporations should be allowed to fail so that smaller institutions can take over and compete across smaller markets. We should initiate limits on corporate power - including the removal of rights that have been bestowed upon them that are only due to a real human being. It will be a great day when we remove the term "corporation" from our lexicon.

We learned with Germany and the Soviet Union that there need to be limits to governmental power. It's vital that we learn the American lesson - that there need to be limits on financial power in the private sector - especially when they have the government in their back pocket.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

New favorite. Corporations have too many rights, even the same as a human being's. This is wrong. Corporations are used by the execs like condoms ondirtywhores who make theirpimps money but are left to go down to disease and spread it across the rest of the country. The execs, thepimps, get away untouched as everybody else is left in their disease. Corporations are in the middle of a most unholy three way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 11/24/2008

Gee, is that why they're raising my credit card interest rate by 5%, when I've never once made a late payment? Guess it's high time to pay it off and close the dang account, no more money from me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 11/24/2008
- Trittydi I'm a Fan of Trittydi 75 fans permalink
photo

According to the details of the "new" bankruptcy law - any credit arm you deal with can raise your rates if you are late to pay any bill. This means if you pay your electric bill late, or make a car payment late - even one time - the credit card companies can hike THEIR rates on you. The congressmen and women who voted for this are the ones to worry about. A lot of Dems voted for it.
*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Assemble the list and post it like the antiabortionists did with doctors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 11/24/2008
- LAThinker I'm a Fan of LAThinker 17 fans permalink

This is the legacy of W


http://www.ucubd.com/Index.aspx?id=740&cid=3168

It will take some time to clean this mess, but I am optimistic

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 11/24/2008

why 20 billion? when I need a little help to get by I don't need money for the next 20 years...I just need money to get by for a few months, to reorganize and pay debts. How does a company get 20 billion in the hole and nobody noticed 5 years ago? Why do they need 20 BILLION DOLLARS? can we start off "small" like say 1 Billion?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 11/24/2008
- dcree77 I'm a Fan of dcree77 3 fans permalink

The $20,000,000,000 is in addition to the $25,000,000,000 that they already gave Citigroup. In addition to that, they are guaranteeing another $306,000,000,000 in "toxic assets." On top of that, the government has already loaned them money and will continue to loan them additional money out of ther treasury. $1 Billion would likely not even cover the bonuses of the top executives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 11/24/2008

reading your post made my stomach sink. this is such robbery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Where is corporate philanthropy in all of this? Couldn't they be playing a more active role?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Is John Deutch, the guy who used to run the C I A, still head of Citigroup?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 11/24/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

small world huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

The head of Citi is Vikram Pandit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 11/24/2008
- lobear00 I'm a Fan of lobear00 27 fans permalink

All those Corporations being "Bailed" out by the People, it should be ordered that "All Executives, their support staff, Vice presidents and so on all be placed under the " FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGE PROGRAM", remove their Million dollar wages, their golden parachutes, all their personal "Assets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

They are also incompetent. They need to be removed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 11/24/2008

Agreed. I wouldn't have a job if I had performed like them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

What a vindictive, and illegal, concept.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 11/24/2008
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 267 fans permalink
photo

Illegal maybe, but vin.dictive? I could not disagree more on that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

If they are coming for a bail out, it should be on our terms. They would have to do what we say by agreement which is not illegal at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 11/24/2008
- jaslyn I'm a Fan of jaslyn 27 fans permalink

Citigroup is so freaking big, it has no one steering the ship or even knowing what's going on in all the divisions!! The lesson here is never let any one corporation get so big that we can't let it fail. Ridiculouse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Like AT&T -- or do the telecommunications companines not count.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 11/24/2008

"Too big to fail" is why we used to have Anti-Trust laws.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 11/24/2008
- dcree77 I'm a Fan of dcree77 3 fans permalink

Not really. We have the anti-trust laws to keep companies from getting so big that they stifle competition. I think the concept of being too big to fail is a relatively new phenomenon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 11/24/2008
- GypsyRose I'm a Fan of GypsyRose 64 fans permalink

The auto industry will be bailed out. The lovely Nancy was just doing her "posturing" once again.

Here's the plan: Give us the money and we'll spend it. Oh yeah, and thanks a bunch!

The end.

Next.....The Consumers and Plasma TV's -- Why We Need So Many In Every Room Of Our Homes And Shoes Too

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

They're spending trillions on resurrecting the dead banks but you're worried about the comparatively small finances of Detroit?

In relative terms that is like ignoring that a house has no roof while complaining about the walls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 11/24/2008

Considering how many people the auto industry directly employs, it really isn't a small issue at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 11/24/2008
- loria I'm a Fan of loria 158 fans permalink
photo

How did you feel about the Citibank bailout? $300 billion, not $24 billion. Just wondering. I like consistency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 11/24/2008
- GypsyRose I'm a Fan of GypsyRose 64 fans permalink

I don't feel good about it at all, loria, not at all. And the figures being tossed about like it's $5. Where was everybody when the numbers were still in the lowly millions?

I don't trust any of them, including Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 11/24/2008
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 267 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 11/24/2008

UGH...I'd feel better if he'd simply do NOTHING.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Hey wow you could be Bush's advisor!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 11/24/2008
- loria I'm a Fan of loria 158 fans permalink
photo

He's still The Decider.

Please let me wake up and have it be January 20th. I'll skip Christmas. Oh wait, we might be skipping it anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 11/24/2008
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 267 fans permalink
photo

I know. We have to cut way back this year and we both have big families to buy for. But for me, Christmas is baking, decorating, parties...and carols!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 11/24/2008

Naked Citi
The Rise and Fall of Citigroup

http://www.counterpunch.org/martens11242008.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 11/24/2008
- anticon I'm a Fan of anticon 13 fans permalink

Great to hear Mr. Obama stating the same policies he won a mandate on.

Good stuff!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Why not just give debt relief or money to American people?

Can someone please give me a plausible argument for why this would not work?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

Because that would be treating the symptoms instead of the disease.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

How do you figure? Isn't the disease depravity? Seems to me we are treating the disease with its own bacteria.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 11/24/2008
- MIMom I'm a Fan of MIMom 110 fans permalink
photo

Someone have the Woowoo spray? They are out in force today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

The disease is at the top, actually big f a t para sites which have gobbled up all the small businesses. What the government should do is use the money to, instead, let people, small people, apply for small business loans at a very low interest rate. There would have to be standards, but if it looks like it can work, they should be given the loans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 11/24/2008
- miamia I'm a Fan of miamia 12 fans permalink

We are the slaves who will pay for all of this.

Google: "Money as Debt"
"The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 11/24/2008
- MIMom I'm a Fan of MIMom 110 fans permalink
photo

Not me, says I. Being the lazy-faire economist that I am (NOT), I have no idea how that wouldn't work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 11/24/2008

Wasn't that what the $700 Billion bail out was "supposed" to do...deal with the foreclosure crisis?

Remember Booosh and Paulson's 1-888-GET HELP plan?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 11/24/2008
- miamia I'm a Fan of miamia 12 fans permalink

Money is debt. The banks create money by creating debt. We will never get out of debt.

It's a sham..

And, it's falling apart before our eyes.

Google: "Money as Debt" or
"The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 11/24/2008
photo

You're right, and debt is money. But let's face it, until our money is backed by gold or some other tangible item, things will be that way. If we must be debt managers instead of wealth producers, why not make it easier for us all? Giving debt relief would open the debt game back up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 11/24/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (58 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect