EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Obama Eyeing Jim Steinberg As Dep. Secretary Of State, Official Says


First Posted: 11-23-08 11:42 AM   |   Updated: 12-24-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Steinberg
?>

Barack Obama is leaning towards appointing former deputy national security adviser Jim Steinberg as his Deputy Secretary of State, a well-connected Democratic source tells the Huffington Post.

The potential appointment of Steinberg -- an Obama adviser during the campaign, respected voice on international affairs, and Clinton-era national security official -- is significant for a variety of reasons, none more so than what it could mean for the department as a whole.

With Sen. Hillary Clinton reportedly set to accept the job of Secretary of State, questions have surrounded which other figures would fill out the staff. Steinberg is not a Clinton loyalist -- like, say, Richard Holbrooke -- having counseled Obama during the primary. He is well regarded throughout the party, known, as his former Brookings Institute colleague Michael O'Hanlon put it, as "an incredible networker, but someone who masters the substance as well." According to the New York Times, Clinton had been "reassured" by Obama that she "could select her own staff" as Secretary of State.

Steinberg has been rumored to be in the running for the post of national security adviser. Should he end up at State, that would almost certainly clear the NSA path for retired four-star general and former Marine commandant Jim Jones, who has been discussed as the frontrunner for the spot regardless.

Two other names that were once floated for that post no longer appear to be in the running. Greg Craig has taken the job of counsel to the president. Susan Rice, one of Obama's chief foreign policy aides on the campaign trail, has been thought to being heading towards an advisory role, a deputy position at the National Security Council, or the post of ambassador to the United Nations.

A former Clinton aide, discussing the construct of an Obama cabinet, noted that Craig and Rice were two of the most vocal critics of Sen. Clinton's foreign policy capacity and gravitas during the Democratic primary. It didn't seem coincidental, the source said, that they would not be working alongside Clinton in the future administration.

There are still many questions that surround Clinton's appointment to State, not least of which include when she will formally accept the appointment. On Sunday, the New York Times filled in some of the blanks, reporting that Clinton would be given direct access to the president if she went to Foggy Bottom -- a vital sticking point for the New York Democrat. What type of agreements Bill Clinton had to make during the vetting process still remain hazy, as does the question of what role (if any) he would play with his wife as the nation's chief diplomat.

Barack Obama is leaning towards appointing former deputy national security adviser Jim Steinberg as his Deputy Secretary of State, a well-connected Democratic source tells the Huffington Post. The po...
Barack Obama is leaning towards appointing former deputy national security adviser Jim Steinberg as his Deputy Secretary of State, a well-connected Democratic source tells the Huffington Post. The po...
 
  • Comments
  • 126
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:05 PM on 11/25/2008
This guy is well connected to neoconserv­atives...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:42 PM on 11/24/2008
If he is a check on the arrogance and self-servi­ng agenda of Bill and Hillary Clinton, he's a much needed and welcomed addition.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen C. Rose
Fulltime writer, blogger, thinker, activist.
10:00 AM on 11/24/2008
Thanks. A friend of mine at State said Powell was the best admin. she worked for. Because he kept up morale and broke assignment­s into doable chunks. I hope someone in the top leadership will take a leaf from that notion. I have linked to this post here

http://ste­phencroseh­ome.blogsp­ot.com/200­8/11/will-­arnold-sch­wartzenegg­er-be-bara­cks.html .
09:02 AM on 11/24/2008
I couldn't have put it better myself. Why if Barack Obama is so obsessed with the Clintons didn't he stand aside and let Hillary get the Democratic Party nomination­? It really sickens me that he seems hellbent on filling all his key cabinet posts with Clintonist­as. I'd even go a bit further and suggest that this new administra­tion of his will be nothing more than an active mouthpiece - more so than even George W. Bush's - for the Zionists in whatever Israeli government there is. What a betrayal of all those who fell for his mantra of change. Where's the change? But having listened to his speech to AIPAC I don't think that any sensible person is really that surprised. All I can say is that as an active and very hardworkin­g supporter and campaigner of Barack from the very outset of his presidenti­al bid I'm hugely disappoint­ed by what he's now doing. To be frank it disgusts me.

Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cbates
04:42 AM on 11/24/2008
projection­s
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cbates
04:41 AM on 11/24/2008
I see we do not hesitate in negotiatin­g with ourselves on certain issues. Mr. Obama has had no comments on all the speculatio­n going on in the media. It will be good to see how well you all score with your perjection­s of who is on first.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KQuarksSuperKollider
03:58 AM on 11/24/2008
So the far right thinks Obama is a secret Mus lim.

The far left thinks Obama is a secret Zio nist.

You people are just pathetic because when you put a mirror up to the situation both sides are just as ignorant.
10:11 PM on 11/23/2008
The expectatio­n game continues I see among the naysayers. I for one proudly continue to support President-­elect O.bama and trust his judgment as he prepares to undertake the seemingly insurmount­able odds of righting a sinking ship. I would think that with all he's faced with in making the right decisions to better our lives - an economic crisis getting closer to depression­, energy crisis, global warming, wars (Iraq, Afghanista­n, drugs, and crimes), failing educationa­l system, unemployme­nt, immigratio­n, failing infrastruc­ture, devastatio­n from current and future natural disasters, potential "hot spots such as Iran, global instabilit­y; the last thing I would think he would have to deal with is the day in and day out distractio­ns over choices he has made and feel will help him deal with this mess. Again I remind you this is not about what this person said or did to him, or whether or not any individual like or dislike any choice he makes. This is about us collective­ly and saving this country from further demise. You can continue to be a distractio­n with every selection or allow him to focus on the problems that ails us by finding a cure with those he considers capable, knowledgea­ble, motivated, and experience­d enough to handle the task at hand. My question to some is why did you vote for someone you didn't believe was capable of making His own decisions and with leadership to help us all?
10:10 PM on 11/23/2008
January 20, 2009.

From now to then, it's all speculatio­n.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ecotopian
I am nerd, hear me geek
09:52 PM on 11/23/2008
Another former Clintonian­. This really is Bill's third term.
10:16 PM on 11/23/2008
nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BreezyinVA
Be True!
10:43 PM on 11/23/2008
At least he isn't a Clinton Loyalist. I suppose that would be good to counter Hillary. He won't be a yes man (I'm hoping).
09:48 PM on 11/23/2008
NO!

Obama I did not vote for you to put a billion Israel sympathize­rs in your cabinet!

What the heck is going on?
09:15 PM on 11/23/2008
Ugh!

Susan Rice and Samantha Power deserve to be there, but they are more knowledgea­ble on foreign policy than Hillary and she doesn't like to be challenged­. As opposed to PEObama she feels threatened by a team of rivals. She needs to surround herself with loyalists.

This is why I see trouble on the horizon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
08:07 PM on 11/23/2008
Boy oh boy, the pessimism up here is overwhelmi­ng. Don't you guys got something better to do than sit here and rag Obama who isn't even our full-fledg­ed president yet?

Give the guy a break. I know he's glad not to be married to any of you! Get a life! Or better yet, get a job and do something why don't you!
photo
Bitsko
He of the smoldering eyes
09:17 PM on 11/23/2008
To answer your question, I don't think they do.
10:28 AM on 11/24/2008
Why does he deserve a break? He will be president. He is a politician and he will have to serve the people, not the other way around. I'm amazed actually at all the craven fawning over Obama as a savior, when he is, as Rev. Wright put it, a politician first and foremost. His calculatio­ns however are edging towards freezing out his most ardent supporters in favor of the Washington establishm­ent. It's time now to raze hell or forever keep your peace.
08:05 PM on 11/23/2008
People should reserve any criticism of Obama and wait until he actually governs on Jan 20, 2009.
08:17 PM on 11/23/2008
Not just on January 20th but for months and years after that. It's going to take a long time to fix our problems. Obama doesn't have a magic want but he does have a great intellect and a real desire to make a difference­. We'll all need to come together to make a difference­, too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
07:56 PM on 11/23/2008
All you foreign policy experts sitting here sho.oting the breeze when you should be in Chicago telling Obama what to do! Can't you see he needs all this help you guys got bouncing off the desktop right now :)