Obama Defends Cabinet: The Change Will Come From Me

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Defends Cabinet: The Change Will Come From Me stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11-26-08 11:18 AM   |   Updated: 12-27-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign message that the next president simply couldn't tap the same people for different posts.

Obama, who announced earlier that he was appointing former Fed Chairman Paul Volker to his Economic Recovery Advisory Board, took a bit of umbrage at the implication that staff assignments undermined the meme that defined his run for office.

"Understand where the vision for change comes from, first and foremost," he said. "It comes from me. That's my job, to provide a vision in terms of where we are going and to make sure then that my team is implementing [that vision]."

Watch:

The question of whether Obama's Cabinet undermines his message is, in many ways, a media creation (though there are some legitimate understandable gripes from the labor community). As the president-elect rightfully noted, the issue is a lose-lose proposition. Either he appoints some experienced hands to deal with the economic crisis (and gets labeled as more of the same) or he taps new people to handle the situation and is accused of leaving the country at risk.

"The last Democratic administration we had was the Clinton administration," said Obama. "So it would be surprising if I selected a Treasury Secretary who had had no connection with the last Democratic administration, because that would mean that the person had no experience in Washington whatsoever. And I suspect that you would be troubled and the American people would be troubled if I selected a Treasury Secretary or a chairman of the National Economic Council, at one of the most critical economic times in our history, who had no experience in government whatsoever. What we are going to do is combine experience with fresh thinking."

"I think when you ultimately look at what this advisory board looks like, you'll say this is a cross-section of opinion that in some ways reinforces conventional wisdom and in some ways breaks with orthodoxy in all sorts of ways," he went on. "And that's the kind of discussion we want. We want ideas from everybody. What I don't want to do is to somehow suggest that somehow suggest that since you served in the last Democratic administration, that you're somehow barred from serving again. Because we need people who are going to be able to hit the ground running."

Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign messag...
Speaking to reporters for the third time in three days, Barack Obama was asked directly whether the staff choices he had made for his cabinet and advisory positions conflicted with his campaign messag...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1819
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (38 pages total)
- bayside I'm a Fan of bayside 38 fans permalink
photo

Right, and everyone listens to the president.­. Baloney, Bush could not have done as much change as he did if he had put progressives in his cabinet.. Obama, you have to earn our trust because putting the same people in and expecting different results is ludicrious­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 AM on 11/27/2008
- IntExec I'm a Fan of IntExec 3 fans permalink

So, if we put in all new people (which means lacking in experience) and they did the same old stuff -- that would be change? And, they are not the same old people. The Repubs have been in power for 8 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 11/27/2008

"So, if we put in all new people (which means lacking in experience)"

New people does NOT equate lack of experience­... What a surreal place this blog has become... The stark opponents of the status quo have now become the proponents­...

"and they did the same old stuff -- that would be change?"

Of course NOT. What kind of argument is this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 11/27/2008
- Martee I'm a Fan of Martee 11 fans permalink

We could do ALOT worse than rewinding the clock 8 years!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

The trust has already been earned. And some of these people were responsible for the largest US surplus in history. So relax and let them work. You don't critise the painting before the artist gets done painting it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 11/27/2008

Looking over our shoulders at the way GW handled his people is not relavent. This man is a leader, GW was an appointer. Obama will listen, then act. They will all have their opinion...­......then Obama will set the agenda, and push it through. We have been conditioned in our mind to marginalize the President intellectually , and not expect much from him, leaving any thought processes to his hired help. Thats the way it was. And there are not conflicting universes. This government deliberately destroyed the working class. The next one will stop that process, its simple thought driving it. We don't need a brain trust for that, or a genius to know who voted in the republican job destroyers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 11/27/2008
- pc51 I'm a Fan of pc51 17 fans permalink
photo

Just like the "DECIDER!" Obama is the "VISIONER!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 11/27/2008

Who cares who's in his cabinet, as long as he runs his hands through my long blonde hair.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

You need to quit. Be respectful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Long blonde hair, ahhh oohh ahhh...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Ann Coulter, is that you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 11/27/2008

It was Obama that quoted We can make a Change not his Cabinet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 11/27/2008

Who was that 'we' again?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Bob Gates? Shame on Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 11/27/2008
- TrueSense I'm a Fan of TrueSense 11 fans permalink

Actually, I do not have a problem with Gates as much for 1 - 1.5 year layover. Gates past has not been that great but recently, he has become more reasonable. You want to ensure a smooth transition with DoD. You do not want someone finding their way in the transition. So, this is very practical and not much of a betrayal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Well, there were much better picks! Sam Nunn was against the war from the start. I would even be fine with Chuck Hagel, who was correct on the war and stood up against his own party. But no one would be more qualified than Sam Nunn.

If Rumsfeld was in DoD, would you keep HIM for the sake of a smooth transition?

So far, Obama has surrounded himself with people who supported the war. Do you really think he would have won the primaries if he had telegraphed this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 11/27/2008

What a pleasure it is to see a grown-up about to take charge. I can't wait for Jan. 20.

Today I'm giving thanks that Jan. 20 is coming.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 AM on 11/27/2008
- Martee I'm a Fan of Martee 11 fans permalink

Amen! Thank you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 11/27/2008
- Martee I'm a Fan of Martee 11 fans permalink

People on here were freaking out and trying to second guess every move Obama made during the campaign every time he dipped in the polls. Turns out he did just fine. He's proved it time and again -- It doesn't pay to second guess Obama's strategy. He's cool headed. He's thoughtful. And he gets results. 'Nuff said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 11/27/2008

Read my predictions back then, even when he was slipping in the polls...!
I still reserve my right to criticize his disastrous cabinet picks...!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 11/27/2008
- pc51 I'm a Fan of pc51 17 fans permalink
photo

Whoo-Hooo! A new kind of DECIDER! A "VISIONER!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 11/27/2008

A little vision and thought would have spared this country a lot of damage the last eight years.

Some people don't like thinking. They believe it's a sign of weakness. You seem to be one of those people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 11/27/2008
photo

Go Obama .

Good for you.

This is the 1700Th Comment BTW!

;p

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Great answer, on Obama's part!

I think it's depressing that so many people seem to have forgotten what Clinton and his administration actually did. What they accomplished. What they did(with some few exceptions) was to give the US a budget surplus that was, dare I say, historical almost! Ok. Maybe I'm exaggerating a little, but in present times and with the financial disaster we're facing, it's something to think about!
You had a great President in Clinton, who unfortunately will always be remembered for a pathetic affair or two, three... I'm hoping that in history books, in a generation or two, they will write about the actual political accomplishments, rather than a stained dress or what not...
I'm actually quite pleased with every pick so far, and have a real sense of optimism and hope, for the first time in years(8)..­. I think that Obama will be a wonderful President, and I think that he's making tough, smart choices in picking his cabinet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

And so many people forget that the 90s boom and surplus was due to the dot-com bubble economy rather than Clinton policy. Clinton was overall a very disappointing President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Yes, he was disappointing, and moved to the DLC center from his more progressive campaign rhetoric, and I give him a very bad mark just for signing the repeal of Glass Steagall Act and the passing of the Credit (Banking) Modernization Act (not sure if I've got the name right, but...) - two of the major catalysts to our economic debacle right now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 11/27/2008

I was able to afford College as a result of the Clinton administration and get a job after.

Our economy and standing around the world was far better at the end of the Clinton administration. It was far better than Reagan, Bush, Nixon. What do you expect? Perfection?

You try being the President and see if you can do any better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 11/27/2008

Genocide in Rwanda, bombings in Sudan... Watergate.­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 11/27/2008
- Melkor I'm a Fan of Melkor 16 fans permalink

To all those using the "slam dunk" argument to defend Obama that he hasn't even taken office yet so we don't know what he will do - keep in mind that the reverse is also true. You have just as little to go on about what Obama will do besides his rhetoric, your faith and your loyalty to him. Which frankly is less than what his critics have right now.

I've been wary of Obama since he signed on to the telecommunications immunity bill - because it goes against the constitution and because he vowed in the primaries that the telecom companies would be held accountable. Last week he used his political muscle to protect Lieberman - a man who has sought to undercut the Democrats at every turn. A man who is almost fully supportive of nearly all of Bush's worst policies.

I agree that we should give him a chance and see how he leads, but that doesn't mean we should scrub our minds clean. It was Obama himself that said he would be a different kind of politician because HE IS ACCOUNTABLE TO US. Don't give away that power out of ecstatic adoration. Anybody remember "we are the change we've been waiting for"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 AM on 11/27/2008
- ckfan I'm a Fan of ckfan 86 fans permalink
photo

You sound naive and uniformed. He didn't use his political muscle to protect Lieberman he used his political muscle to secure votes for policies he will launch over the next 2 years.

Quite frankly, the most important item on his agenda right now is getting the economy back in shape. Our failing economy trumps everything else.

He signed on to the FISA bill because he plans on governing from the center to the center left. He will not govern as a progressive. He has said that repeatedly.

So far, I am getting exactly what I voted for - a smart candidate who is not divisive who will not challenge every thing that is put before him just to make a political statement. That's what Hilary did and that's why I didn't vote for her. that's why her health care plan could never muster up any steam - she was trying to force it down people's throats. You can't accomplish anything in DC if you're not flexible in your thinking and your approach. You cannot accomplish anything if all you do is fight at every turn.

Did you really expect to agree with every decision from Obama? Did you really expect him to follow through on every campaign promise that was made BEFORE the economic meltdown?

If so, then you are truly naive and should move on to another candidate, another party or at the very least stop posting naive comments on a liberal Blog.

Obama is a politician not The

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 AM on 11/27/2008
- ckfan I'm a Fan of ckfan 86 fans permalink
photo

Obama is a politician not The Messiah.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

It's true that far too many people during the election were projecting what they wanted Obama to be (a great progressive reformer) as opposed to what he actually is (a typical centrist hack politician with bold speeches and weak political positions).

But even those those people duped themselves, people have every right to speak out against Obama if they do not approve of his actions. For you to argue that people should essentially sit down and shut up about Obama is probably the most naive position of all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 AM on 11/27/2008
- Melkor I'm a Fan of Melkor 16 fans permalink

Um, if he used use political muscle to protect someone who has attacked both his party, his campaign and his expressed ideals just to secure votes then his muscles are pretty flaccid. Are you saying Lieberman is holding him hostage? People like spinning that as astute leadership. Its more like weak leadership, IF that's the reason he protected Lieberman. I think its more like the old boy network protecting its own, which is sad to see from the supposed change agent.

You really think telecom immunity is a leftwing issue? Protecting the constitution is for the commies and hippies? Sad. And I'm the naive one? Its hilarious to read someone drinking kool aid in great gobs like yourself and bandying about the word "naive" as if you just found it in the thesaurus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 11/27/2008
- pc51 I'm a Fan of pc51 17 fans permalink
photo

Come on - it's so obvious that he is trying to replicate the Clinton administration - that is the extent of his brilliant "vision." Bring back the 1990's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 11/27/2008

By the way, did you use this same incisive, in-depth, probing analyis in the aftermath of 11/4/00, 11/4/2004 and the entire 8 year timeframe covered?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 11/27/2008
- Melkor I'm a Fan of Melkor 16 fans permalink

Well, yes I have. Are you trying to imply I'm a Republican? Not only is it not true, its also utterly irrelevant to the points I made and frankly not very insightful of you. I'm criticising Obama from the LEFT, not the right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 11/27/2008
- moodman I'm a Fan of moodman 2 fans permalink

Ecsatitc Adoration- you mean like what you give Palin?

Where was all this scrutiny when W stolethe Presidency in 2002 ?where was your outrage then??Where were all your questions then??I can't believe some you freaking Republican­s.You can call Obama alot of things (I know it makes you feel good, you're mad-HE WON) but don't compare him to someone who warrants 'ecstatic adoration' without a reason. I suppose if McCain had actually won and Palin was 'one heartbeat' away from the Presidency you'd be ok with that!! It just floors me that some people are so critical of Obama-what is it really??? and let's not rehash campaign talking point.What really bothers you about him??This is a man who is highly educated, well spoken and even tempered(vs Bush)---YOU CAN"T ARGUE THAT.Just the fact that he made it as far as he did is incredible­.You sound like a person who probalby voted for Bush-I think all of people owe America a big apology.Wh­y ecstatic adoration?? The 8 year nightmare is finally over!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Nothing in Melkor's post makes me think he is a Republican.

Your post, however, has the frothing tone and temperament of a freeper. But don't worry -- I won't make unfounded accusations based on tenuous assumptions like that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 11/27/2008
- Melkor I'm a Fan of Melkor 16 fans permalink

Huh? You see that's what ecstatic adoration does, it makes you bend and warp reality so that it conforms to the dreamworld you created for yourself. Exactly where did you read in my post that I support the rightwing in any form? What really bothers me about Obama? I said it quite clearly in the post above. But I'll repeat so that we can have an informed discussion.

1. Changing his position on and signing the telecom immunity bill.
2. Protecting Lieberman.

I also said that this was not enough to condemn Obama and that we should give him a chance to govern. I just don't believe in sheepish adulation. President doesn't equal king. That was what the rightwing tried to do with Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 AM on 11/28/2008
photo

Great post! I agree with all of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 11/27/2008
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 262 fans permalink

A special psychiatric retreat is planned for delusional, over-the-top, stadium-party 'BamaBots' who never got the memo that he wasn't The Second Coming... just a really smart, well-adjusted guy with a functioning conscience and principles.

... the ideal replacement -- and just in time -- for a war criminal with a missing chromosome.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Guess what's waiting for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKlkVLgarzU

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 AM on 11/27/2008
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 262 fans permalink

Trust me... life becomes infinitely more rewarding, once you learn how to read for content.

Wipe your chin and tuck in your shirt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 AM on 11/27/2008

I LOVED the way Obama put this reporter in place with his firm and assertive tone about what "change" actually implied as opposed to what the RETARDS in the media have been misinterpreting it to be, for the past few weeks!
Well, the wounded army of the republicans, both in press and politics HAD to say something about his cabinet--so what if AMERICANS aren't going to pay any heed to their empty arguments and false allegations any more? These are conservative parasites who've always thrived on negativity and ignorance and don't know any better...
WAKE UP sickos, GAME'S over, you guys LOST!!! Who cares what you think or say now...You'­re HISTORY, OBAMA is the FUTURE..He is the NEW President of the United States and you have little choice to put up with him every single day of your life for the next 8 years (God willing)!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

actually, the Republicans are loving his appointment choices. That should be a red flag right there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 11/27/2008
- kasv I'm a Fan of kasv 15 fans permalink

One reason the republicans on the Hill have no other choice but to profess confidence in Obama's appointments - their constituents. Those repubs saw that NYT "blue" map just like we did. One reason the repub talking heads have no choice but to profess confidence in O's appointments - look what their side's appointments have wrought for our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 AM on 11/27/2008
- pc51 I'm a Fan of pc51 17 fans permalink
photo

Kool-Aide IV drip emergency!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 11/27/2008
- mtracy9 I'm a Fan of mtracy9 209 fans permalink

It's good that Obama is selecting from the Clinton administration. During the Clinton years, the U.S. experienced its longest economic expansion in history, combined with a lessening in disparities in income distribution. This is the kind of change we need, after the disaster of the failed Bush administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 AM on 11/27/2008
- TKFraz I'm a Fan of TKFraz 2 fans permalink

I suppose the negative people would have preferred the 'team of lobbyist' offered by McCain & Co.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 AM on 11/27/2008
- GrainOSand I'm a Fan of GrainOSand 269 fans permalink
photo

Change You Can Believe In

Questions are already surfacing concerning Barack Obama and his message of change? How is change reflected in the most visible signs of his future presidency, his cabinet appointees? Some criticize the choice of people associated with old regimes and old mistakes. A large segment of the population could be discredited from participating in the future society governed by Barack Obama based on this rationale, based on their vote for George Bush in 2000 and again in 2004.

Change does not practice the same old exclusions and the same old delusions. It is not that Barack Obama was promising to put fresh faces in key positions just because they are different from that seen before. The reasonable took change to mean, change in applied vision, change in utilization of national resources, and change in the approach and motivations of the “competent” political appointees and other government employees who President Obama will lead and manage. It ultimately meant change of heart and mind in the American populace such that we cease settling for less in quality from government, and demand more in transparency, accountability, and policies foreign and domestic, which help, not hurt the nation. Mr. Obama repeatedly said it is not about him and he was counting on his belief in the decency of the American people to lead the way to him assuming, and being successful in the seat of power. We are the change and thus far, we are doing a fine job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 AM on 11/27/2008

Change will come from him??
Yeah..righ­t..whateve­r.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 AM on 11/27/2008
- TrueSense I'm a Fan of TrueSense 11 fans permalink

Where all of Clinton's people from the Carter admin ?

If he did not use all Carter people, then how did he manage ?
Now, his first 6 months were rough, so you could use that as an argument, but beyond security transition and some, some, economic policy advisors, I do not understand this.

The people he chooses are policy ! He may provide direction but it depends on whether his people are disposed to be able to carry it out or know how to carry it out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

Yeah, I love that bit too. All hail the wise and infallible Obama, fount from which all goodness and change flows. Just another egotistical BS politician.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

I still have not figured out how selecting people that where never cabinet members is selecting retreads. Retreads are picking the same people for the same positions. Take Geitgner for example who served in the Clinton administration but was not a cabinet member.

My question is where was Obama supposed to pick his people from if not from government?

The worse part is all you act like Obama's picks are like broken promises. For example, Obama had his economic team together before the election with these same people.

Did you really think he would choose someone from beyond this group of advisors?

The only real surprise is Hillary and yet you all sound like you were duped. One thing I heard in Obama's response was a tone like what did you expect. These were the same people that advised me during the campaign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 AM on 11/27/2008
photo

I think Hillary is the real reason they all feel duped. And yet, it's really not a surprise, at least not to me. I believe all of his choices are A+. Your point is well taken, but will be ignored by the far left because they had dreams of Kucinich..­...... a nice thought but not at all practical at this time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 11/27/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (38 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect