Newest Mortgage Crisis Victims: Malls, Hotels

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Newest Mortgage Crisis Victims: Malls, Hotels stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MATT APUZZO | November 27, 2008 09:14 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — The full scope of the housing meltdown isn't clear and already there are ominous signs of a new crisis _ one that could turn out the lights on malls, hotels and storefronts nationwide.

Even as the holiday shopping season begins in full swing, the same events poisoning the housing market are now at work on commercial properties, and the bad news is trickling in. Malls from Michigan to Georgia are entering foreclosure.

Hotels in Tucson, Ariz., and Hilton Head, S.C., also are about to default on their mortgages.

That pace is expected to quicken. The number of late payments and defaults will double, if not triple, by the end of next year, according to analysts from Fitch Ratings Ltd., which evaluates companies' credit.

"We're probably in the first inning of the commercial mortgage problem," said Scott Tross, a real estate lawyer with Herrick Feinstein in New Jersey.

That's bad news for more than just property owners. When businesses go dark, employees lose jobs. Towns lose tax revenue. School budgets and social services feel the pinch.

Companies have survived plenty of downturns, but economists see this one playing out like never before. In the past, when businesses hit rough patches, owners negotiated with banks or refinanced their loans.

But many banks no longer hold the loans they made. Over the past decade, banks have increasingly bundled mortgages and sold them to investors. Pension funds, insurance companies, and hedge funds bought the seemingly safe securities and are now bracing for losses that could ripple through the financial system.

Story continues below
advertisement

"It's a toxic drug and nobody knows how bad it's going to be," said Paul Miller, an analyst with Friedman, Billings, Ramsey, who was among the first to sound alarm bells in the residential market.

Unlike home mortgages, businesses don't pay their loans over 30 years. Commercial mortgages are usually written for five, seven or 10 years with big payments due at the end. About $20 billion will be due next year, covering everything from office and condo complexes to hotels and malls.

The retail outlook is particularly bad. Circuit City and Linens 'n Things have sought bankruptcy protection. Home Depot, Sears, Ann Taylor and Foot Locker are closing stores.

Those retailers typically were paying rent that was expected to cover mortgage payments. When those $20 billion in mortgages come due next year _ 2010 and 2011 totals are projected to be even higher _ many property owners won't have the money.

Some will survive, but those property owners whose loans required little money up front will have less incentive to weather the storm.

Refinancing formerly was an option, but many properties are worth less than when they were purchased. And since investors no longer want to buy commercial mortgages, banks are reluctant to write new loans to refinance those facing foreclosure.

California, New York, Texas and Florida _ states with a high concentration of mortgages in the securities market, according to Fitch _ are particularly vulnerable. Texas and Florida are already seeing increased delinquencies and defaults, as are Michigan, Tennessee and Georgia.

The worst-case scenario goes something like this: With banks unwilling to refinance, a shopping center goes into foreclosure. Nobody can buy the mall because banks won't write mortgages as long as investors won't purchase them.

"Credit markets have seized up," corporate securities lawyer Michael Gambro said. "People are not willing to take risks. They're not buying anything."

That drives down investments already on the books. Insurance companies are seeing their stock prices fall on fears they are too invested in commercial mortgages.

"The system has never been tested for a deep recession," said Ken Rosen, a real estate hedge fund manager and University of California at Berkeley professor of real estate economics.

One hope was that the U.S. would use some of the $700 billion financial bailout to buy shaky investments from banks and insurance companies. That was the original plan. But Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has issued a stunning turnabout, saying the U.S. no longer planned to buy troubled securities. For those watching the wave of commercial defaults about to crest, the announcement was poorly received.

"He's created havoc in the marketplace by changing the rules," Rosen said. "It was the stupidest statement on Earth."

The Securities and Exchange Commission is considering another option that might ease the crisis, one that would change accounting rules so banks don't have to declare huge losses whenever the market declines.

But the only surefire remedy is for the economy to stabilize, for businesses to start expanding and for investors to trust the market again. Until then, Tross said, "There's going to be a lot of pain going forward."

WASHINGTON — The full scope of the housing meltdown isn't clear and already there are ominous signs of a new crisis _ one that could turn out the lights on malls, hotels and storefronts nationwi...
WASHINGTON — The full scope of the housing meltdown isn't clear and already there are ominous signs of a new crisis _ one that could turn out the lights on malls, hotels and storefronts nationwi...
Filed by Marcus Baram  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
83
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
photo

Oh no, Ann Taylor is in trouble? That horrible. Love that store.

As for malls, its time they get replaced by stand alone boutique. They are god awful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 11/28/2008
- aweissnet I'm a Fan of aweissnet 26 fans permalink
photo

They encourage efficient and rampant shopping.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 AM on 11/29/2008
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 168 fans permalink

The economy as we know it is finished. By next summer, Obama will either get out in front and lead the revolution or get run over by it. We shouldn't really shed too many tears for neoliberalism. It never worked as advertised, and now it's time for something completely different.

It's time to realize that we don't have to allocate credit and investment, resources and materials, or labor and income using the same market institutions we use to allocate goods and services.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 11/28/2008

Neoliberalism isn't that what people outside the U.S. call Neoconservatism?
Have you read Naomi Klein's "The Shock Doctrine"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 AM on 11/28/2008
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 168 fans permalink

Neoconservativism is just neoliberalism plus the enforcement of supposedly "Christian" morality.

I haven't read "The Shock Doctrine", but Ms. Klein isn't really breaking any new ground with her work. If you want to dig deeper into the belly of the beast, I suggest reading up on the work of Michael Ruppert. It's important to understand that the "war on terror" is as much about drugs as it is about oil, and that the CIA is essentially an international terrorist organization operated by Wall Street.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 11/28/2008

What actually happens to the properties, building, houses, malls, whatever..­.if they all go bankrupt?

The properties themselves will still exist, so maybe some smart people will come up with ways to make them useful and AFFORDABLE so that people and small and medium-sized business not being bailed out can occupy some of them, and people with some, but not huge amounts, of money can live in them.

My rent on my crummy apartment has gotten ridiculously inflated.

It seems to me that the many better places that are unable to pay their loans would be better off renting space to people like me than doing nothing.

Or is that me being naive, and is it in fact more profitable in the long run for the very rich to have things go empty and belly up?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 11/27/2008
- Twinkie I'm a Fan of Twinkie 3 fans permalink

With houses it's simple, the banks auction them. It's a bit more difficult with businesses. The premises and stock are auctioned but the business itself just dies. If the business was just renting then they just close down, stock is auctioned for debtors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 11/28/2008

Back in the S&L bailout days commercial property was auctioned off at new lower prices from that new lower investment point rents became lower and all was feasible again.
And the rich players made a killing on the backs of the taxpayers and original investors.­..again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 AM on 11/28/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Nobody will be able to afford the utility bills to keep commercial buildings running. Most such buildings are horribly inefficient, they rely on big profits from the stores within to pay the staggering electricity bills. These buildings are good for nothing else. You can't put housing in them; they do not meet zoning and safety requirements for residences. They will have to be torn down in the long term.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 AM on 11/28/2008

Retro fit the buildings for more efficiency ...a whole new business.
Zoning and building codes will change with the stroke of a pen.
I'll bet I could be almost self sufficient in one of those would be Bio Spheres

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 AM on 11/28/2008
- aweissnet I'm a Fan of aweissnet 26 fans permalink
photo

All the homeless will need a place to live. Guess they can be shelters for us all. Soup kitchens and the like.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 AM on 11/29/2008
- apoyo I'm a Fan of apoyo 41 fans permalink

How's that for irony. Banks and investors no longer trust the market they themselves created. And they expect you and me to bail them out while refusing to lend us our own money. All the while paying themselves bonuses for a job well done.

You can't make this stuff up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 11/27/2008
photo

Banks created markets? Thats news to me

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 11/28/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Banks can create markets quite easily by throwing money at them. It's what banks do. The housing market as we know it would not exist without banks to front the money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 11/28/2008
- toypiano I'm a Fan of toypiano 12 fans permalink
photo

Well, there are too many malls as it is. Please, no mall bailouts!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 11/27/2008
photo

Yeah, malls are ugly, let definitely get rid of them. I prefer stand alone stores, much better

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 11/28/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Stand alone stores suck because you have to burn gas and create traffic to get between them. Malls could be great for one-stop shopping if they actually sold stuff that people want instead of stupid gimmicky trash.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 11/28/2008
- Davwbaird I'm a Fan of Davwbaird 24 fans permalink
photo

chaos will soon prevail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 11/27/2008

YAHOO.....­.turn off the pilot light Mother ; I'm riding the Range tonight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 AM on 11/28/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect