AP: Clinton's India Ties Could Complicate Obama Policy

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP: Clinton's India Ties Could Complicate Obama Policy stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MATTHEW LEE and PETE YOST | 12/ 1/08 06:30 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President-elect Barack Obama introduces Secretary of State-designate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., as a news conference in Chicago, Monday, Dec. 1, 2008. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON — The close ties with India that Secretary of State-nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton forged during her years as a U.S. senator and presidential candidate could complicate diplomatic perceptions of her ability to serve as a neutral broker between India and its nuclear neighbor, Pakistan.

With tensions rising between India and Pakistan after last week's deadly terrorist attacks in Mumbai, Hillary Clinton faces an early test of her influence in South Asia, where President-elect Barack Obama on Monday said that instability and the rise of militants pose "the single most important threat against the American people."

Both Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, have maintained warm relations for years with India and the Indian-American community. As New York's senator for eight years and as a 2008 presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton toured India and visited with Indian officials and entrepreneurs, and her campaigns profited from the largesse of Indian-American fundraisers. Bill Clinton's charitable foundation has been funded by some of the same well-heeled Indian businessmen who backed his wife's campaigns.

In her new role as the nation's top diplomat, Hillary Clinton would project Obama's policies, not her own. But even foreign affairs experts who wave off suggestions that Hillary Clinton would lean toward either Asian power acknowledge that the perception of such a tilt could cause suspicions in Pakistan. South Asia experts reject the assertion of bias, but they acknowledge it exists.

"There are some who believe it, but I think most people think she is an objective observer with a good understanding of South Asia," said Walter Andersen, Associate Director of the South Asia Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University's School for Advanced International Studies. Andersen insisted perceptions of Hillary Clinton's bias toward India are "based on inaccuracy."

Karin Von Hippel, a South Asia expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, agreed, saying Hillary Clinton is "very balanced" and "understands almost better than anybody how delicate the situation is between these two countries."

Still, perceptions matter, especially in the region. "There are concerns that she is seen as pro-India, she and her husband both," said one Washington-based foreign diplomat with extensive experience in South Asia. "The Pakistanis definitely see them as closer and friendlier to India."

The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive issue of India and Pakistan, which have fought three wars _ two of them over the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir _ since winning independence from Britain.

Story continues below
advertisement

Influential members of the Indian-American community have rejoiced in Hillary Clinton's selection as secretary of state.

"Sen. Clinton will continue the close relationship between the United States and India that started with the Clinton administration and has progressed in the Bush years," said Varun Nikore, founder of the Indian-American Leadership Initiative, an independent political organization supporting Democratic candidates.

"You cannot expect that any nominee for secretary of state would have a special relationship going into this job, but we're very lucky that we have in Sen. Clinton someone who is already well-versed on one of the more important countries and emerging economies in the world," said Nikore.

A current State Department official allowed that Bill Clinton had substantially boosted engagement with India, but noted that any administration would likely have done so. The official stressed that President George W. Bush has continued that course, most recently signing a civilian nuclear pact with New Delhi.

"None of this has been meant to exclude Pakistan, but it is a zero-sum game when you are dealing with these two countries," the official said. "You can't do something with one without it affecting the other." The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal administration thinking.

Ties between the United States and India improved dramatically, as did Pakistani suspicions of pro-India bias in Washington, during Bill Clinton's administration, which embraced India as a major power and market as it opened its economy in the 1990s.

The administration's disparate treatment of India and Pakistan was most apparent during a 2000 Asian trip, with the president spending five days in India and seven hours in Pakistan.

The Clinton White House barred media coverage of the Pakistan stop and released only an official photo of Bill Clinton and Gen. Pervez Musharraf seated among aides, 12 feet across from each other. Bill Clinton admonished Pakistan's military government to retreat from its nuclear weapons course and to lower dangerous tensions with India.

In a speech to India's Parliament on that trip, Bill Clinton said he shared many of New Delhi's concerns about "the course Pakistan is taking; your disappointment that past overtures have not always met with success; your outrage over recent violence. I know it is difficult to be a democracy bordered by nations whose governments reject democracy."

Early during her presidential campaign in 2008, the former first lady pointed to the "strong partnership" that Bill Clinton forged between India and the U.S. As New York's senator, Hillary Clinton also touted her role as co-chair of the Senate India Caucus.

"As president I will work with India to make our strong friendship even stronger," Hillary Clinton promised earlier this year.

During the presidential campaign, Indian-Americans reciprocated Hillary Clinton's long-standing embrace of India by giving generously _ $2 million at a single fundraiser in New York in 2007.

At one point, the Obama camp prepared, but then disavowed, a campaign memo that carried the headline "Hillary Clinton (D-Punjab)," a mocking play on the standard reference to a candidates' party and constituency.

The memo, which created a furor in India and the Indian-American community, also referred to the Clintons' investments in India, Sen. Clinton's fundraising among Indian-Americans and the former president's $300,000 in speech fees from Cisco, a company that has moved U.S. jobs to India.

Obama called the memo "a dumb mistake" and "not reflective of the long-standing relationship I have had with the Indian-American community."

Now as president-elect, Obama has chosen Hillary Clinton to be his chief diplomat and highlighted India and Pakistan as priorities for his administration.

"The situation in South Asia as a whole and the safe havens for terrorists that have been established there represent the single most important threat against the American people," he told reporters at a news conference Monday as he unveiled his foreign policy and national security team, including Hillary Clinton.

___

Associated Press writer Devlin Barrett contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — The close ties with India that Secretary of State-nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton forged during her years as a U.S. senator and presidential candidate could complicate diplomatic per...
WASHINGTON — The close ties with India that Secretary of State-nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton forged during her years as a U.S. senator and presidential candidate could complicate diplomatic per...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
134
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- LarBear I'm a Fan of LarBear 30 fans permalink
photo

What WE the People (Of the USA and World) NEED...

I saw a Program recently on Scenarios which could potentially end Human Life on Planet Earth... Cosmic Events, Super Volcanoes, ETC... One of the Scenarios was how close WE may have come with Pakistan and India doing an all out Nuclear Exchange and bringing Global Winter to the Planet... Guess our (NIMBY) Back Yard is bigger then WE are used to thinking..­.

Seems to me Planet wide, but especially in India- Kashmir - Pakistan, what WE the People NEED to be doing, is multimillion Marches... People of ALL Religions, Ethnic Groups, ETC, Marching together, Rejecting Terrorism and Fanatics..­.

(From Wikipedia) Hinduism accounts for 80% of the population of India... The second largest religion is Islam, at about thirteen percent of the population. A Peace March rejecting the Terrorists/ Fanatics by the Mainstream of both Religions would be a very appropriate message...

Here in the USA WE the People have been a mixed example... For 27 years of the prior Pope's watch, Children were molested..­. When the Institution tried to pay those Molested to be quiet, and those who did this Molesting were NOT Prosecuted, did Catholics walk out? NO!

Did Mormons walk out when Mormon Leaders got Politically involved? Especially in another State's Laws and Election..­. NO! Religion mixed with Politics kills People... Wars almost always involves Organized Religion..­. Good Intentions and Hellish Results!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 12/02/2008
- Yermammy I'm a Fan of Yermammy 137 fans permalink
photo

Well duhhhhhhh! She isn't even CONFIRMED YET and the drama is underway. Hillary is the imperfect stitch in a perfect Persian Rug. There's a philosophy to that, but the bad stitch has the potential of unraveling the entire thing. Please put Susan Rice in this delicate post!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 12/02/2008

Saw the title and thought, oh hell...whe­n did Bill smoke cigars in India.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 12/02/2008
photo

Here's a few headlines I wish I'd seen repeated over the last 8 years:

Cheney's __________­__________­ties could complicate _________________.
Bush family's ________________ ties could complicate _________________.
Richard Pearle's ______________ ties could complicate _________________.
Paul Wolfowitz's ______________ ties could complicate _________________.
Douglas Feith's _______________ties could complicate _________________.

Add your own names from this selfish, self-serving administration and create your dream headline.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 12/02/2008
- mcantwell I'm a Fan of mcantwell 412 fans permalink
photo

I'm seeing more and more articles from the right wing MSM on HuffPo. Eventually, this will be nothing but a haven for the Rush and Hannity fans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 12/02/2008
- JDJase I'm a Fan of JDJase 6 fans permalink

Seems to me the news needs to cause some controversy, so they just take the phrase "Clinton ties to _____ could cause Obama problems" and then fill in the blank with whatever country is in the news this week

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 AM on 12/02/2008
- onenvrnos I'm a Fan of onenvrnos 29 fans permalink
photo

HuffPost: Please stop the negativity regarding this administra­tion--and, in particular, the cloud of suspicion that you constantly throw around the Clintons! Focus on the issues, please...s­top the character crap. Thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 12/02/2008
- anney I'm a Fan of anney 9 fans permalink

Hillary will be the most visible and influential member of his staff, so what she brings to the table is extremely important.

You'd rather not know about the potential problems the Clintons bring to Obama's administration? That's too much head-in-the-sand for most of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 12/02/2008
- onenvrnos I'm a Fan of onenvrnos 29 fans permalink
photo

Obama would not have picked her if he really had reservations about her performance or character. I am tired of the constant "turning over every single rock" (or let's say pebble because much of the sensationalism is that small) in regard to the Clintons. Period. I have trust in Obama in the manner in which he picked his cabinet members, in the manner in which he ran his campaign, and in the manner in which he will operate as President. All I am saying..is let's focus on the issues...t­here are lots of them. When healthcare was mentioned, there were so many excellent, informative posts. THAT is what I would like to see--discussions about our current affairs, minus all the armchair bs of the media.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 12/02/2008
- RRH I'm a Fan of RRH 2 fans permalink

It has become almost annoying to have Hillary being judged by pundits and so called strategists. There were other appointments announced yesterday, and the press cannot help themselves in belittling Hillary. She is going to be confirmed as Secretary of State and perhaps a congratulations Madam Secretary is in order. The card carrying Clinton bashers just can't help themselves. There is nothing that the former president has done that will interfere with her confirmation.
The election is over and there is little to write about, so, let us bash Hillary. ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 12/02/2008
photo

The article fails to mention Benazir Bhutto's trip to the United States where she met Bill Clinton. She had made a deal with the U.S. gov to buy a number of fighterjets for several billion dollars. Her country delivered the money, but received nojets. She came to ask for her country's money back. Bill, the s.o.b., said that they were not going to give them that either. There were other reasons, but not being able to get her money back, I think, is one of the most important reasons as to why she lost power and was eventually k i l l e d. I put that responsibility squarely on Clinton's head. It shows their incredible bias and I believe would make a Hillary a poor person to send on a peace mission to this region.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 12/02/2008
- cyndeewi I'm a Fan of cyndeewi 21 fans permalink
photo

There you go again. Please give the woman a break and try to do the try first.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 12/02/2008
- anney I'm a Fan of anney 9 fans permalink

Andersen insisted perceptions of Hillary Clinton's bias toward India are "based on inaccuracy­."

Karin Von Hippel, a South Asia expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, agreed, saying Hillary Clinton is "very balanced" and "understands almost better than anybody how delicate the situation is between these two countries.­"

Still, perceptions matter, especially in the region. "There are concerns that she is seen as pro-India, she and her husband both," said one Washington-based foreign diplomat with extensive experience in South Asia. "The Pakistanis definitely see them as closer and friendlier to India."

=====

The same might be said of her "closeness and friendliness" with Israel, as far as the Palestinians are concerned.

Perception is everything in some cases. I believe those countries who have not felt her and Bill's "closeness and friendliness" will believe that she is biased against them when it comes to settling conflicts, even if she manages to BE impartial. No doubt they'll meet with her as the US representative if needed, but trusting and working with her to come to a resolution of difficulties is another thing entirely.

I wish Obama had not named her to ANY position in his administration, as do many people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 12/02/2008
- Carsy I'm a Fan of Carsy 17 fans permalink
photo

No one in the media seemed very concerned about the Bush ties to the Bin Laden family after 9/11.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 12/02/2008
- britethere I'm a Fan of britethere 15 fans permalink

Do the Clintons have to give back the money they took for pardons. The New York Times has a story today about Holder and the Mark Rich pardon and that it could disqualify him.....we­ll who is more tainted by that pardon? The Clinton appointment is not a done deal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 AM on 12/02/2008
photo

The Clinton's strategy has always been to set up another person and let them take the fall. He did the same to the tall older AG who took the blame for Waco.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 12/02/2008
- anney I'm a Fan of anney 9 fans permalink

People have to pay money for pardons?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 12/02/2008

Major exaggeration.

How many lies before it stops!

The Sarah Palin Lies...

http://ncAne.com/ayf theliepoliTic.comm)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 AM on 12/02/2008

Well, it is over mediated..­.as is everything else these days. When the media says, "We are officially in a recession"­....the DJIA tanks. The whole country is media driven. On the other hand, there has to be something to the disadvantage of the Clintons in the White House. At least 2 of every 3 articles has some information of how the Clintons will cause havoc in the White House. That is not a great way to start a new presidency. That being said, I think the Clintons demeanor will change for the better...a­nd will be part of the change that Obama promised.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 AM on 12/02/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect