AP: Clinton's India Ties Could Complicate Obama Policy

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP: Clinton's India Ties Could Complicate Obama Policy stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MATTHEW LEE and PETE YOST | 12/ 1/08 06:30 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President-elect Barack Obama introduces Secretary of State-designate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., as a news conference in Chicago, Monday, Dec. 1, 2008. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON — The close ties with India that Secretary of State-nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton forged during her years as a U.S. senator and presidential candidate could complicate diplomatic perceptions of her ability to serve as a neutral broker between India and its nuclear neighbor, Pakistan.

With tensions rising between India and Pakistan after last week's deadly terrorist attacks in Mumbai, Hillary Clinton faces an early test of her influence in South Asia, where President-elect Barack Obama on Monday said that instability and the rise of militants pose "the single most important threat against the American people."

Both Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, have maintained warm relations for years with India and the Indian-American community. As New York's senator for eight years and as a 2008 presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton toured India and visited with Indian officials and entrepreneurs, and her campaigns profited from the largesse of Indian-American fundraisers. Bill Clinton's charitable foundation has been funded by some of the same well-heeled Indian businessmen who backed his wife's campaigns.

In her new role as the nation's top diplomat, Hillary Clinton would project Obama's policies, not her own. But even foreign affairs experts who wave off suggestions that Hillary Clinton would lean toward either Asian power acknowledge that the perception of such a tilt could cause suspicions in Pakistan. South Asia experts reject the assertion of bias, but they acknowledge it exists.

"There are some who believe it, but I think most people think she is an objective observer with a good understanding of South Asia," said Walter Andersen, Associate Director of the South Asia Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University's School for Advanced International Studies. Andersen insisted perceptions of Hillary Clinton's bias toward India are "based on inaccuracy."

Karin Von Hippel, a South Asia expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, agreed, saying Hillary Clinton is "very balanced" and "understands almost better than anybody how delicate the situation is between these two countries."

Still, perceptions matter, especially in the region. "There are concerns that she is seen as pro-India, she and her husband both," said one Washington-based foreign diplomat with extensive experience in South Asia. "The Pakistanis definitely see them as closer and friendlier to India."

The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive issue of India and Pakistan, which have fought three wars _ two of them over the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir _ since winning independence from Britain.

Story continues below
advertisement

Influential members of the Indian-American community have rejoiced in Hillary Clinton's selection as secretary of state.

"Sen. Clinton will continue the close relationship between the United States and India that started with the Clinton administration and has progressed in the Bush years," said Varun Nikore, founder of the Indian-American Leadership Initiative, an independent political organization supporting Democratic candidates.

"You cannot expect that any nominee for secretary of state would have a special relationship going into this job, but we're very lucky that we have in Sen. Clinton someone who is already well-versed on one of the more important countries and emerging economies in the world," said Nikore.

A current State Department official allowed that Bill Clinton had substantially boosted engagement with India, but noted that any administration would likely have done so. The official stressed that President George W. Bush has continued that course, most recently signing a civilian nuclear pact with New Delhi.

"None of this has been meant to exclude Pakistan, but it is a zero-sum game when you are dealing with these two countries," the official said. "You can't do something with one without it affecting the other." The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal administration thinking.

Ties between the United States and India improved dramatically, as did Pakistani suspicions of pro-India bias in Washington, during Bill Clinton's administration, which embraced India as a major power and market as it opened its economy in the 1990s.

The administration's disparate treatment of India and Pakistan was most apparent during a 2000 Asian trip, with the president spending five days in India and seven hours in Pakistan.

The Clinton White House barred media coverage of the Pakistan stop and released only an official photo of Bill Clinton and Gen. Pervez Musharraf seated among aides, 12 feet across from each other. Bill Clinton admonished Pakistan's military government to retreat from its nuclear weapons course and to lower dangerous tensions with India.

In a speech to India's Parliament on that trip, Bill Clinton said he shared many of New Delhi's concerns about "the course Pakistan is taking; your disappointment that past overtures have not always met with success; your outrage over recent violence. I know it is difficult to be a democracy bordered by nations whose governments reject democracy."

Early during her presidential campaign in 2008, the former first lady pointed to the "strong partnership" that Bill Clinton forged between India and the U.S. As New York's senator, Hillary Clinton also touted her role as co-chair of the Senate India Caucus.

"As president I will work with India to make our strong friendship even stronger," Hillary Clinton promised earlier this year.

During the presidential campaign, Indian-Americans reciprocated Hillary Clinton's long-standing embrace of India by giving generously _ $2 million at a single fundraiser in New York in 2007.

At one point, the Obama camp prepared, but then disavowed, a campaign memo that carried the headline "Hillary Clinton (D-Punjab)," a mocking play on the standard reference to a candidates' party and constituency.

The memo, which created a furor in India and the Indian-American community, also referred to the Clintons' investments in India, Sen. Clinton's fundraising among Indian-Americans and the former president's $300,000 in speech fees from Cisco, a company that has moved U.S. jobs to India.

Obama called the memo "a dumb mistake" and "not reflective of the long-standing relationship I have had with the Indian-American community."

Now as president-elect, Obama has chosen Hillary Clinton to be his chief diplomat and highlighted India and Pakistan as priorities for his administration.

"The situation in South Asia as a whole and the safe havens for terrorists that have been established there represent the single most important threat against the American people," he told reporters at a news conference Monday as he unveiled his foreign policy and national security team, including Hillary Clinton.

___

Associated Press writer Devlin Barrett contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — The close ties with India that Secretary of State-nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton forged during her years as a U.S. senator and presidential candidate could complicate diplomatic per...
WASHINGTON — The close ties with India that Secretary of State-nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton forged during her years as a U.S. senator and presidential candidate could complicate diplomatic per...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
134
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- simplify I'm a Fan of simplify 40 fans permalink
photo

More MSM negativism

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 AM on 12/02/2008
- Keith52 I'm a Fan of Keith52 38 fans permalink
photo

This is so much garbage. Next it will be "Hillary and Barack only having three meetings a week. The tension will break negotiations in Middle East....." and "Hillary only offered decaf at this week's cabinet meeting..."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 AM on 12/02/2008

I find the whole article REDICULOUS. Don't the authors need to do some research atleast.

You guys claim the right of the US to act as neutral broker in the world. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS.

1) Who has asked the US to act as brokers anywhere in the world? Elected and appointed officials are supposed to serve the people at home not play games abroad.

2) The US has officially been helping Pakistan for the last 40+ years, both monetarily and militarily, and you suddenly claim that Mrs.Clinton's image for neutrality will be spoiled because of a few campaign contributors.

3) You want the US to treat INDIA, the world's largest democracy, one of the world's oldest civilization, a secular, tolerant and multi-religious country and a booming economy with PAKISTAN, an islamic country run by military dictators, a country which promotes terror in the name of religion and independence.

4) You mention wars between INDIA and PAKISTAN - but you fail to mention that it was PAKISTAN which started and lost all the wars.

5) You fail to take into account US foreign policy in general. I don't remember a single instance where the US tried to even pretend to be a neutral broker in the world. Not ISRAEL-PALESTINE. Not the Balkans; Not IRAQ, Not Afghanistan; Not South America; Not between Russia and Georgia.

I hope you guys atleast get paid well to write such stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 AM on 12/02/2008
photo

You know what could really cause Obama trouble? Listening to pundits and the media. Barack is definitely a pragmatic cat that has his head screwed on straight. If he gets too caught up in catering to the special interests... then we'll be f*cked, as usual. If he listens to his heart (and a bit of wisdom from Michelle) we'll be A-OK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 AM on 12/02/2008
- maxfax I'm a Fan of maxfax 19 fans permalink

Bull, there goes the right wing media again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 AM on 12/02/2008

The auto industry has survived on minor revisions for the better part of a decade, but America doesn't need a recolored cozy-coupe, we need a green cozy-coupe:

http://voteforamerica.net/editorials/Comments.aspx?ArticleId=166&ArticleName=Ready%2c+Set%2c+Bailout%3f

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 12/02/2008
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 74 fans permalink

Why was no one paying attention to the last Energy Policy that was passed by our senate last year.
If you had paid attention you would have seen they mandate a 35 mpgs by the Year 2020 and it had me upset. Who dictates the CAFE Standards to the auto industry? I believe we need to ream
the politicians not the auto manufacturers first!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 12/02/2008
- mec57 I'm a Fan of mec57 3 fans permalink

Hey AP: CUT THE CRAP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 AM on 12/02/2008
- frenchie25 I'm a Fan of frenchie25 12 fans permalink

***yawn***

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 AM on 12/02/2008
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 379 fans permalink
photo

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 AM on 12/02/2008
- rcpmac I'm a Fan of rcpmac 6 fans permalink

This is nonsense. Go do some work - research a real story and get back to us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 12/02/2008
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 51 fans permalink
photo

ADD THREE MORE LINES FOR ME

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 12/02/2008
- mec57 I'm a Fan of mec57 3 fans permalink

You are on point...this drivel from the AP is one more example of the media trying to sow discord between Obama and Hillary...both are smart enough to call it out as BS...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 AM on 12/02/2008
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 35 fans permalink
photo

India is full of intellectuals... One need to know the differences...
I never had problems and trust with given right approach, understanding and cooperation...
It should work out... but do listen... do understand and able to back it up...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 12/02/2008
photo

God I wish someone would put AP out of business. While you are at it, put all the MSM out of business. This endless speculation and armchair quarterbacking is absolutely ridiculous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 12/02/2008
- chronic I'm a Fan of chronic 71 fans permalink
photo

Totally!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 AM on 12/02/2008
- mec57 I'm a Fan of mec57 3 fans permalink

Isn't it? This story is sheer bunk...
I like that Obama was not playing the Hillary-Obama rift game at his news conference today...BRAVO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 12/02/2008
- NWPoster I'm a Fan of NWPoster 2 fans permalink

I want and still would give Barack my benefit of the doubt, but I cannot shake off this feeling he made a mistake with HRC as SecState. Too much baggage - hers and Bill's. She has proven to be a TERRIBLE executive who cannot make tough decisions, did not foster teamwork and worse, cannot control Bill.

I really doubt she would put loyalty to Barack above Bill and her own ambitions. I hope I am wrong and she would be the most successful SecState we ever see, for our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 12/02/2008
- duze I'm a Fan of duze 25 fans permalink

Anyone else with this much drama and obvious connections to countries in which our relations need tdelicate relations with, would be crossed off the list. The Clinton drama has started already and she's not even confirmed by Congress. Obama supposedly has such a strict application process that even he couldn't pass it . Yet, he hires someone with nothing but a questionable past. A past that entails, law suits, impeachment,trials, scandals (4), anonymous donors, non-disclosure of funds. Questionable donations, currently being tried for fraud and the blatant Bosnia lie. Is this the person, who will be true with him regarding her position? The Constitution reveals that someone in Hillary's former position, who voted for a pay increase while serving in a certain government capacity could not run for such an office. Yet, she's still a contender. somethings up. There is no way this woman should be or be trusted with such a delicate position. What's wrong with Susan Rice, she more than proven capable and has NO BAGGAGE.
Obama must know how George Bush this makes him look. Bush defended each of his non-credible, non-prepared crooks and look where the country ended up. I thought Obama was smarter than that. If he holds onto HRC after yet another reason to let her go. Something else is definately going on, and he'll neer convince anyone otherwise. It's almost as if he has to hire her.
She'll never be loyal to her position with him. She's only loyal to Bill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 12/02/2008
- lizr I'm a Fan of lizr 254 fans permalink
photo

She will surprise you, I predict.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 AM on 12/02/2008
- mec57 I'm a Fan of mec57 3 fans permalink

You are ranting...you and the media need to sit back and stop the whining or trying to sow trouble...Obama's having none of it...I am with him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 AM on 12/02/2008
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 74 fans permalink

I think she learned from her mistake - she is not stupid. She will work out fine and make the best in her position within her power and follow the guidelines of Obama!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 AM on 12/02/2008
- dryrock I'm a Fan of dryrock 5 fans permalink
photo

Missing from this take is the Indian perspective. They have a vast and rich culture, and are much better educated than often thought. Also, they have pursued a pluralist civil society in recent times through enormous difficulties and decades of terrorist conflict within their country. It is condescending to think them naive in the arena of foreign relations. I do not see HRC as a person presenting a problem in this respect.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 12/02/2008

I don't think Clinton's relationship with India is all that special. Obama himself has many Indian connections.

A major problem will really occur if both of them try to force-feed a solution to the Kashmir problem between India and Pakistan just for US interests - ie to help control the Aflghan situation.

If they try to do that, they will make the situation much worse and sour US relations with both Pakistan and India.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 12/01/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect