Obama's National Security Team: Questions All About Clinton

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

December 1, 2008 11:35 AM


Barack Obama rolled out his national security team on Monday morning, bringing together a group of highly qualified stars tasked with carrying out his foreign policy vision.

But while six major advisory and cabinet positions were officially announced, one clearly stood out from all the rest. Sen. Hillary Clinton's appointment as Secretary of State has been greeted as everything from a shrewd political move, a tragic over-interpretation of the 'team of rivals' concept, and -- for the press -- a wonderful lifeline to stories of infighting, ideological fissures, and Bill going rogue.

During the course of the question and answer session, the President-elect was asked repeatedly to address how individuals who once criticized his gravitas (Peter Baker of the New York Times was the first to point specifically at Clinton) could now be relied upon to implement his agenda.

"This is fun for the press to try and stir up quotes that were generated from the campaign," replied Obama. "I understand, you are having fun and there is nothing wrong with that. I'm not faulting it. But if you look at the statements Hillary Clinton and I have made outside the heat of the campaign, we share a view that America has to be safe and secure and in order to do that we have to combine military power with strength and diplomacy. And we have to build and enforce stronger alliances around the world so we're not carrying the burdens and these challenges by ourselves."

It was a valiant effort and, it should be noted, a rightful poke at the press. But, in the end, Clinton was dominating the stage even if she was not fielding the questions. It did not seem coincidental that the New York Democrat was the first appointee to address the room of waiting reporters, speaking behind a lectern that was a bit too tall.

"America is a place, founded on the ideal that everyone should have the right to live up to his or her potential... while we are determined to defend our freedoms and liberties at all cost, we must also reach out to the world again," Clinton said. "I believe the best way to continue serving my country is to join President-elect Obama, Vice President-elect Biden... I am proud to join you on what will be a difficult and exciting adventure in this new century."

The remarks were the end point of several weeks of buildup towards the Clinton appointment. The New York Democrat seemed, at first, to be a long shot for the diplomatic post, owing primarily to her primary conduct. But Obama, speaking on Monday, said the decision to send her to Foggy Bottom was one of logic and prudence: "After the election was over and I began to think about my team it occurred to me she could potentially be an outstanding Secretary of State. I extended her the offer and she accepted. I know that's not as juicy a story as you were hoping for, but that's all you're going to get."

Some factions of the GOP, to their partisan credit, continued to remind reporters of the days when heads butted. Minutes before Monday's press conference, the RNC blasted out an email with the subject line: "As Sen. Clinton Accepts Secretary Of State Position, It Is Worth Noting The Many Disagreements She And Obama Have On Critical Foreign Policy Issues."

Story continues below
advertisement

But by then, such knee-jerk politicking seemed of little consequence. Several major Republicans, including Sens. Lindsey Graham and Dick Lugar, had offered praise for the Clinton appointment during the Sunday talk show circuit. The New York Democrat, they said, has the work ethic, international Rolodex, and team-player conviction to serve admirably in the post. Moreover, everyone understood that this was not a time for "partisan issues," as Joe Biden would say at the presser. "Witness the team."

Indeed, if anything would complicate the situation it wouldn't be Hillary Clinton but, rather, Bill. On this front too, however, things seemed to move smoothly. The former president has promised to release the names of more than 200,000 donors to his presidential library. The ease of this disclosure suggested that an appointment-killing revelation was not in the cards.

"As an American, I am thankful that President-elect Barack Obama has asked Hillary to be Secretary of State and that she has accepted," read a statement from his office. "As her husband, I am deeply proud."

Still, there was a certifiable obsession over the merging of one-time foes. The press kept prodding for Obama to explain how he could, say, ask someone who lambasted his pledge to meet with adversarial world leaders to spearhead that very effort. Would the message be muddled? Would the agenda be scuttled? Were too many cooks in the foreign policy kitchen?

"The buck will stop with me," Obama, a little irritated by the exercise, told the press. "And nobody who is standing here would have agreed to join this administration unless they had confidence that that vision was one that would help secure the American people."

Barack Obama rolled out his national security team on Monday morning, bringing together a group of highly qualified stars tasked with carrying out his foreign policy vision. But while six major advis...
Barack Obama rolled out his national security team on Monday morning, bringing together a group of highly qualified stars tasked with carrying out his foreign policy vision. But while six major advis...
 
Comments
189
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

So Peter Baker has a serious question about whether Hillary can be relied upon to implement Obama's policy (because she had questioned O's foreign policy gravitas during the primaries...)

I'm sorry but I think it's a stupid question. The biggest foreign policy difference between them consisted of a merely semantic argument over preconditions vs. preparations for diplomacy with the likes of Iran. For instance, niether candidate took the position that Iran must renounce nuclear ambitions, and other US objectives, before talks could begin.

This is a controversy of no substance whatsoever. It's just a poor attempt at Gotcha Journalism, masquerading as Watchdogging.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 12/02/2008

Have any of you heard about what the new administration is going to do with all the third-party war mongers and profiteers like Blackwater and Kellogg, Brown & Root (Halliburton)?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 AM on 12/02/2008

So he admits his belittling of Hillary's qualification's during the primaries was just BS uttered "in the heat of a campaign"? How much of what BHO said during the campaign will end being disavowed? He has zero qualifications other than talking ability. If his words don't count for anything then what good is he?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

PUL-LEEZE! This is so silly! All politicians say things during the campaign to diminish their opponent, some of it true and some exaggerated, and with Republicans, usually all lies. But that's generally what a campaign is about, and most people understand that. Obama was competing with Hillary for the office of the presidency, not for the office of the Secretary of State, and whatever he said about her qualifications for president is irrelevant to his assessment of her qualifications for Secretary of State, especially since she will be beholden to HIS policies. Hillary said quite a few things about Obama during the campaign as well. Do her words also count for nothing? After all, she did agree to now work FOR the man she talked so harshly about. What about Biden? When he was competing against Hillary AND Obama, he said quite a few things too about both of them. Do his words also count for nothing? You could apply this to virtually every politician who's run for office since the birth of our government. Do all their words count for nothing? This is no more a reflection of the credibility and integrity of Obama's character than your post is a reflection of an astute political observer.

Is this the first election you've participated in??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

Wow, someone has got his button stuck on stupid. Logic fails here

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 12/02/2008
photo

As if Hillary didn't have her fair share of "just BS uttered in the heat of the campaign".

Grapes sour much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 AM on 12/02/2008

Peter Baker made the case that it was Hillary's belittling of Obama that would cause the problem. Obama had merely pointed out her exagerations of her own experience.

You just can't wait to have something to pissed off about, can you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 12/02/2008

I'm just watching the press conference right now; I missed it previously. Is it just me, or does it look like Hillary is about to cry?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 12/01/2008

To the negative commentators - nobody cares what you think.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 12/01/2008
- SF13 I'm a Fan of SF13 permalink

Hillary would not have been the obvious choice to me given she has zero diplomatic experience and has yet to do anything in public life that is not accompanied by a ton of drama.

That being said, for the sake of the country I hope she is very successful. I am for utilizing anyone who has the brains to move this country forward. If they can leave their inherent drama behind the Clintons could help restore our place in the world.

Obama is right. The buck stops with him. Having read about the way he conducts meetings I think I will trust him on this. (like I have a choice ? :-) He tends to have everyone talk and nobody gets to sit it out. But he does not say his opinion in the meeting. He takes it all in then decides later. Getting lots of diverse opinions is not a bad thing. As long as when in public they toe the line of his policies.

The jury is out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

The drama is media created

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 12/02/2008

Hillary, it shoulda been me and Bill hold a grudge Clinton will never be team players.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 12/01/2008

As a New Yorker, I'm really glad she out of the senate from New York. She was never a New Yorker and was a mediocre senator. I hope Barack knows what he is doing. HRC is no team player and doesn't know what loyalty is. As long as he can keep her under control and her sort of husband's mouth sort of shut maybe she'll do a mediocre job at State also.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 12/01/2008

Oh, I see a woman who doesn't like HIllary. Tsk Tsk. Tsk

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 12/01/2008

telling the truth about the less than illustrious senate career of MRS Clinton means Nancyann doesn't like MRS Clinton? Why can't it mean that she has observed MRS Clinton and doesn't like the job she has done for NY State?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 AM on 12/02/2008

PE Obama passed over Susan Rice for SOS for a lesser qualified white woman for political reasons, not the good of the country. That's why he's elevating the role of the UN Ambassador to the cabinet. He will be sorry he asked Hillary Clinton to be SOS. This has diminished him in my eyes.

Susan Rice has been researching and writing about foreign policy issues for decades. I'm am really upset about this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 12/01/2008

Oh Hum Bug to ya all! Clinton will do just fine, and she starts with knowing the leaders and their wifes, and know what makes them tick! She can hit the ground in a full run! Go him Girl!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 12/01/2008

I am so sick of people saying she knows world leaders when she probably only met them once or twice. She knows world leaders about as much as I know you, hotstuff and I don't know you at all other than you are for Hillary being SOS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 AM on 12/02/2008

"The world is governed by people far different from those imagined by the public."


- Benjamin Disraeli

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

You could make a lot of money selling this quote as a poster or banner. A LOT of people need to read this!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

God, these comments keeps coming looking stupider and stupider. It's no surprise the US is 15 in the world in education

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 12/02/2008

Yes, the press needs to grow up, but before they will, they"ll want proof that their readers, watchers, and listeners have; they feed on and serve to the least common denominator. But look, we know how they are and though I think the "information and investigative media" for the most-part, performed its job atrociously over the last eight years, deciding what to do about the undo influence of the media is a blog unto itself.

What"s important here is to talk about the tenor of the primary process. Vetting a candidate under fire is time honored, yes, but the extent to which party members trash and use negative (read, untrue) ads against one another is not only insane, it undermines the process that the public attempts to use for making intelligent decisions; in that and other ways, it doesn"t serve the electorate. Even if misleading quotes-out-of-context, lies, and distortions, are inevitably going to run during the general election, one might think that the party machinery and perhaps a written agreement from each candidate, could keep such obfuscations out of the primaries. My questions: what does a process look like in which tough questions are asked, but Obama-styled campaigns are the order of the day and not the exception? How do we bring this about? (Problem to note: during the debates, the talking heads were bored with Obama"s style " too much substance, not enough bashing; too "wonkish"?! Remember: Substance " bad; Signifying " good).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 12/01/2008

despite all the skeletons and the baggage, Hillary will do this position much justice. Bet she wont be a push over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 12/01/2008

No she won't be a push ove she'll probably get us into war faster than GWB did, telling lies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 12/02/2008
photo

Yeah because she is POTUS. Oh wait, no its Obama and HE is the Commander in Chief. Oh my god, the US should not even be 15th in the world in terms of education, it should be dead last

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 12/02/2008

I get the impression that the press seem to be at a loss on how to handle posing questions to the Pres.-Elect. they don't want to appear sycophantic or to be engaging in too much of a love-fest, so they have to come up with "tough" questions. But the announcements and statements are so well-reasoned and well-delivered, that they just don't know how to deal with something like this. They're not used to this sort of thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 12/01/2008

A true professional, acting professionally. Who would have thought it would ever happen? Obama's a great role model.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

It's a team of intelligent people..... something that has been lacking for 8 years!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

It just shows how low the American Presidency has sunk in the last 8 years that PE Obama has to remind us that as President HE is in charge . . . that used to be sort of a given, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

Well, that was before the days when KBR and the veep were doing the president's job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 12/01/2008
photo

Some of it is just plain about r@ce. People are not accustomed to taking orders from a bl.ack man or woman. The whole intelligence and competence thing looms. Centuries of 'literature' has been produce to argue that bl.ack intelligence is inferior. That sentiment is always sitting in the background, we must admit it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 12/01/2008

I've never heard BO say that he's an African American.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 12/01/2008

It's all about Hillary Rodham Clinton. Who do you think was really negotiating this Secretary of State position? None other.

Be that as it may, will the President Elect make sure there are no lobbyists, since "the buck stops with me and its really about change"?

He could had asked Secretary of State Rice to stay on as he did Mr. Gates. He could had asked Former Secretary of State Powell for that bi-partisan experience. The President-Elect had no choice.

Always remember Honorable Ron Brown.

We have President Elect, Vice President and Secretary of State.

Let's see what the "good old boys", power elite and money brokers do to give what they promised her two years ago when it was given to her and/or John McCain on a silver platter until Iowa.

It's still, "All about Hillary Rodham Clinton."

The drama begins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 12/01/2008

We all project our own reality outward. Perhaps you are projecting a bit when it comes to HRC. The only drama that I can see is the drama coming from the media and those that are prone to conspiracy theories.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 12/01/2008

Poor Ron Brown......will we ever know the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 12/01/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect