Big Three survival bailout requests rise to $34B

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Big Three survival bailout requests rise to $34B stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS and TOM KRISHER | December 2, 2008 07:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Jim Press, president and vice chairman of Chrysler, left, talks with workers at the AMPORTS ATC Terminal before addressing a town hall rally, Tuesday Dec. 2, 2008, in Baltimore. (AP Photo/Rob Carr)

WASHINGTON — Humbled and fighting for survival, Detroit's once-mighty automakers appealed to Congress with a retooled case for a bailout as large as $34 billion Tuesday, pledging to slash workers, car lines and executive pay in return for a federal lifeline. GM and Chrysler said they needed an immediate cash infusion to last 'til New Year's, and warned they could drag the entire industry down if they fail.

Chrysler LLC said it needed $7 billion by year's end, and General Motors Corp. asked for a quick $4 billion as just the first installment of as much as $18 billion to stay afloat and weather even worse economic storms. Ford Motor Co. had a more upbeat report, but the other two members of the U.S. Big Three painted the direst portraits to date _ including the prospects of shuttered factories and massive job losses _ of what could happen if Congress doesn't quickly step in.

"Failing to act now will hurt many American families and undermine our country's economic recovery, far outweighing the costs related to supporting an industry that touches every district in every state of the nation," Chrysler said.

"There isn't a Plan B," said GM Chief Operating Officer Fritz Henderson. "Absent support, frankly, the company just can't fund its operations."

New sales figures underscored the seriousness of the situation. U.S. light vehicle sales at General Motors and Chrysler plunged more than 40 percent in November, while Ford's sales dropped 31 percent, battered by an economic storm that has sent consumer demand for new vehicles to lows not seen in decades.

Democratic leaders have said they might call Congress back next week to pass an auto bailout _ but only if the carmakers' blueprints show the carmakers have reasonable plans to stay viable with the help.

Making no commitments, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Tuesday, "We want to see a commitment to the future. We want to see a restructuring of their approach, that they have a new business model, a new business plan." She said, "it is my hope that we would" pass legislation to help the industry.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he would try to jump-start debate Monday on an auto bailout measure. "We have to make sure we do everything we can to take care of the auto industry," he said. "I hope we can do something."

Story continues below
advertisement

Nervous investors sent the Dow Jones industrials bouncing up and down all day, though they finished up 270 points, partly making up for Monday's plunge of nearly 680.

All three companies' plans envision the government getting a stake in the auto companies that would allow taxpayers to share in future gains if they recover.

Along with detailed stabilization plans, the auto executives were offering up a hefty dose of humility and a host of symbolic concessions designed to repair their images, badly tattered after they arrived in Washington last month on three separate private jets to plead for federal help.

Ford CEO Alan Mulally, GM CEO Rick Wagoner and Chrysler chief Bob Nardelli all planned to road-trip the 520 miles from Detroit to Washington in fuel-efficient hybrid cars for hearings on Thursday and Friday.

Mulally and Wagoner both said they'd work for $1 per year _ something Chrysler's plan said Nardelli already does _ if their firms took any government loan money, while Ford offered to cancel management bonuses and salaried employees' merit raises next year, and GM said it would slash top executives' pay. Ford and GM both said they would sell their corporate aircraft.

The executives are going out of their way to show deference to lawmakers and a willingness to flog themselves for past mistakes. "I think we learned a lot from that experience," Mulally told The Associated Press in an interview.

Ford, in far better shape than GM and Chrysler, asked for a $9 billion "standby line of credit" to stabilize its business but said it didn't expect to tap the funds unless one of Detroit's other Big Three went bust. Its plan projected Ford would break even or turn a pretax profit in 2011.

The company plans to cut its number of dealers by more than 600, to 3,790 by the end of the year.

The unions were preparing to make sacrifices as well. United Auto Workers leaders summoned local union leaders from across the country to an emergency meeting Wednesday in Detroit to discuss possible concessions. Up for discussion were the possibility of scrapping a much-maligned jobs bank in which laid-off workers keep receiving most of their pay and postponing the automakers' payments into a multibillion-dollar union-administered health care fund.

U.S. automakers are struggling to stay afloat heading into 2009 under the weight of an economic meltdown, the worst auto sales in decades and a tight credit market. The three burned through nearly $18 billion in cash reserves during the past quarter.

Ford's recovery blueprint said it would invest $14 billion over the next seven years to boost its vehicles' fuel efficiency, and it said it would improve the overall efficiency of its fleet by an average of 14 percent next year. The company plans to speed its rollout of electric and hybrid gas-electric vehicles.

And Ford is calling for a partnership among automakers, parts suppliers and the government to develop new battery technologies domestically, so the U.S. doesn't have to rely on foreign batteries _ as it now does on foreign oil _ to power its cars.

Besides cutting its number of dealers, it will trim its major sourcing suppliers by more than half, to 750 from 1,600.

GM said it would make huge cuts in its numbers of workers as well as reductions in its vehicle brands and plants by 2012. The auto giant is seeking a $12 billion loan to keep it running, plus a $6 billion line of credit in case market conditions worsen.

GM would focus on four brands _ Chevrolet, GMC, Buick and Cadillac. By 2012, the plan calls for 20,000 to 30,000 fewer workers, a reduction of nine facilities and 1,750 fewer dealers. The company also outlined efforts to negotiate swapping some of the company's debt for equity stakes in the automaker.

Chrysler said it would cut costs by slashing employee benefits _ including suspending its match portion of the 401(k) retirement plan and reducing its health care contribution for salaried workers _ and terminating its lease car program. It said it would also ask more productivity of each employee.

Chrysler's product plan includes the first full-function electric-drive model in 2010 and expansion to additional models by 2013. The company's market penetration of electric-drive vehicles will further increase with over 500,000 produced by 2013, the blueprint said.

GM, according to its quarterly report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, owes creditors $45 billion and it must pay more than $7.5 billion early in 2010 to a UAW-administered trust fund that will take over retiree health care payments.

Ford owes more than $26 billion, with $6.3 billion due to its UAW trust fund at the end of 2009. Chrysler, a private company, does not have to open its books, but its CEO, Nardelli, has said it would be difficult for the company to make it without federal aid. All three likely are negotiating with the UAW for delays in payments to the trusts.

The companies are resisting calls that they file for bankruptcy, arguing that no one would buy a car from an automaker that might not survive the life of the vehicle.

___

Tom Krisher reported from Detroit. AP Writer Ken Thomas contributed from Washington.

WASHINGTON — Humbled and fighting for survival, Detroit's once-mighty automakers appealed to Congress with a retooled case for a bailout as large as $34 billion Tuesday, pledging to slash worker...
WASHINGTON — Humbled and fighting for survival, Detroit's once-mighty automakers appealed to Congress with a retooled case for a bailout as large as $34 billion Tuesday, pledging to slash worker...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
44
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)
photo

That's a start. Next, impose the same or tougher requirements on every recipient of TARP funds.

No, Vikram Pandit, you don't have a say in it. You failed to manage the company and it's the company, not the C-level salaries, that are valuable to the nation. You're fired.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 12/02/2008
- RJII I'm a Fan of RJII 77 fans permalink
photo

Ohh Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you so much. How big of you. I can't believe it. Wow. Yeah.

Now how about the back end: million dollar bonuses, stock options, the fleet of jets, acres of expensive land w/ a camping retreat purchased through the company for $55K, private apts w/ staff, 24K gold plaques, pens and watches, loopholes saying you'll get this salary at retirement w/interest. etc.

How about we give you nothing and you lose your corporate bankrupting salaries anyway.
My how cavalier of them to make such sacrifices at this time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 12/02/2008

Yeah!
And just think, the Feds already handed out 2.3 Trillion dollars to a bunch of companies that Literally put themselves in the position to fail even being warned years ago about the housing bubble, and they are STILL getting Billions in Bonuses off our tax money, AIG was sending its people on Vacations to Spas and resorts after we bailed them out, and All their execs and management continue to receive end of year bonuses in the hundreds of millions as well as continued to pay out Dividends after we handed them Tax money.

The financial industry Backend: Billion dollar bonuses, Stock options, Fleets of jets and limos, Thousands of Company owned vacation resorts in the caribbean, Europe, Mediterannean, asia, private homes and apartments with complete staffs, Platinum Plaques, Pens, & diamond Watches, Loopholes Saying they'll get 10x the salary when they decide to leave whenever they feel like they've sucked it dry enough. My how Cavalier.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 12/02/2008
- spinns17 I'm a Fan of spinns17 42 fans permalink

and i think canada ,china ,and mexico,and japan should kick some money in.there country depnds on ,these companies for jobs to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 12/02/2008
- RJII I'm a Fan of RJII 77 fans permalink
photo

wonderful point

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 12/02/2008
- jaslyn I'm a Fan of jaslyn 24 fans permalink

How about returning bonuses for any year they were non profitable? They continued giving themselves bonuses while knowing they were incurring giant debts. In the 'real world' a performance bonus actually means 'performance', not a truckload of money for putting your business in the tank. Arrogant, greedy crooks. The execs should be fired, and punished for allowing the workers who depended on their good judgment to keep the companies going, to lose jobs and pensions. They're nothing more than criminals who knowingly perpetrated fraud and theft.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 12/02/2008

Wagoner should be riding a Chevy Volt (if they don't have a working prototype by now they will not be shipping in 2010) and Mulally could come in the Ford Focus hybrid prototype which they have been advertising for years.

If they can't, there is something seriously wrong with this picture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 12/02/2008

You may have to lower that expection. WAGONer will be driving a 2-wheeled CHARIOT WAGON volting its way to Congress and MULELALLY certainly with his prototype savior, MULE CAR-T horsepowered by a dynamo called Black Beauty.

And NarDELAY..­......... he offers NADA, he need not offer a plan because he has NONE, but will stick to fearmongering, a strategy to scare the he// out Congress.

But you can see them with hats of their hands.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 12/02/2008
- Tom95134 I'm a Fan of Tom95134 53 fans permalink
photo

And only get a bonus when they have returned the company to profitability for a minimum of 3 quarters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 12/02/2008
- ChaiKat I'm a Fan of ChaiKat 8 fans permalink
photo

Okay, so their salary would be $1. But what happens at the end of the year when they want to give themselves a bonus of $20 million? Or what happens if they want to expense a $50k trip to Europe, or a swanky resort?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 12/02/2008
- BBackSoon I'm a Fan of BBackSoon 40 fans permalink
photo

I agree that this is a problem but we have not asked the same of the Bank CEO’s that have been given checks.

Anyone in the top 1 percent as far as wealth goes should not get a paycheck for Executive positions until the economy recovers. I am not sure how to gauge that but it needs to be that severe. And this needs to be for any company or bank receiving bailout money. If you take the money it is an admission of bad decisions and a penalty must be paid.

And no post-recession bonuses amounting to more than 40 times what the lowest paid worker makes in a year will be allowed. So if the lowest guy makes $20k a year then the bonuses cannot and will not exceed $800k.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 12/02/2008
- jaslyn I'm a Fan of jaslyn 24 fans permalink

Even that's too much. The bonuses should be based on actual performance, on a sliding scale, and until they have enough money to cover themselves and their workers for an agreed upon period of time put away for downturns, and the workers get appropriate pay increases as profitability increases, the hell with the execs and their bonuses. No exec. perks at all. They've gotten paid more than they're worth for many many years, and that money has been stolen from the company and the workers. It needs to be paid back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 12/02/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

George Washington refused a salary as our first president but he requested an expense account which cost us a fortune, and included his purchase of a coach by Daimler which cost the equivalent of 16, 1967 Cadillacs.­..!

I never trust this $1 bovine scatology better to just reduce your salary the same degree or more as the workers who will suffer the brunt of this...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 12/02/2008

It sounds kind of unlikely that George Washington who died in 1799 ordered a coach from Daimler (the modern company of that name) which wasn't founded until some 80 or ninety years later.

Was there another Daimler company which made horse drawn carriages at the time? Cool. Hadn't heard of that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 12/02/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

When I read George Washington's Expense Account many years ago I remember taking note of his grossly extravagant and expensive carriage being made by Daimler...

But that it cost the equivalent of 16 Cadillacs I am certain of...his expense account as these CEO's of the big 3 will no doubt need and invoke cost our infant nations millions..­.!

I love Washington for many reasons, but he was a real rascal...t­ruly...aft­er he killed 1,500 western Pennsylvanian and Ohio farmers and destroyed 1,500 stiles in the Whiskey Rebellion he promptly returned to Mount Vernon and started a distillery which became a hugely successful business..­.!

They are only recently unearthing it's remains today he made and sold Rye Whiskey..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 12/02/2008
- nibblybits I'm a Fan of nibblybits 14 fans permalink

Why are all three companies being considered as one entity? Hire a management consultant or an oversight committee to review each company's business/r­estructuri­ng plan. Tell them one of them has to be the sacrificial lamb. Bail out the best one or two, let the other one go into bankruptcy and see which one recovers better. Hey, it's capitalism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 12/02/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect