Roman Polanski Asks Court To Dismiss Child-Sex Charge

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Roman Polanski Asks Court To Dismiss Child-Sex Charge stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LINDA DEUTSCH | December 2, 2008 10:58 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Nov. 14, 2008 file photo, Polish-born filmmaker and Academy Award winner Roman Polanski arrives for the opening ceremony at the 8th Marrakech Film Festival in Marrakech, Morocco. (AP Photo/Abdeljalil Bounhar, file)

LOS ANGELES — Lawyers for Roman Polanski, a fugitive for 30 years in a notorious sex case involving a 13-year-old girl, filed a request Tuesday to dismiss the charge against him because of prosecutorial and judicial misconduct.

The motion alleges that a documentary about the filmmaker released this year revealed "a pattern of misconduct and improper communications" between the Los Angeles County district attorney's office and the judge in Polanski's case.

"This case serves as a classic example of how our justice system can be abused, and defendants' rights trampled, by an unholy alliance between courts and criminal prosecutors," said a statement from attorneys Chad Hummel and Brad Dalton. Dalton is the son of attorney Doug Dalton, who represented Polanski in the original case.

The Polish-born Polanski, 75, has been living in self-imposed exile in France since fleeing the United States in 1978 after pleading guilty to having sex with a 13-year-old girl in Los Angeles.

He was initially indicted on six felony counts and faced up to life in prison. Instead, he pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor and five other counts were dismissed.

Polanski, who had already been incarcerated for a psychological diagnosis for 42 days, skipped sentencing that would have sent him back to prison, and fled to France. The judge issued a warrant for his arrest that is still in effect.

The maximum sentence was 50 years, although prosecutors had said at the time that the typical sentence was 16 months to three years in prison.

Sandi Gibbons, spokeswoman for District Attorney Steve Cooley, said her office had not been served with the motion and heard about it only through media reports. She said the office could not take a position until they see the legal papers.

Story continues below
advertisement

"We're looking forward to seeing Mr. Polanski in Los Angeles to litigate it," she said.

A hearing on the matter is scheduled for Jan. 21 in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

Polanski, the director of "Chinatown" and "Rosemary's Baby," has continued to direct films while in exile, including the 2002 Holocaust drama "The Pianist," for which he won the best-director Academy Award.

The woman with whom Polanski admitted having sex has said that she wants the charge dropped and that Polanski should be allowed to return to the United States.

The case was a sensation when it broke. Polanski, the widower of Manson family murder victim Sharon Tate, was arrested for having sex with the girl, whom he had hired as a model for a photo shoot. He was accused of giving her Quaaludes and champagne, taking her into a hot tub nude, and having sex with her.

The new effort to wipe out the charge comes after an HBO documentary, "Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired," in which the man who prosecuted Polanski, retired Deputy District Attorney Roger Gunson, said that if he had been in Polanski's position, he also would have fled the country.

The documentary also portrayed the late Superior Court Judge Laurence J. Rittenband as a publicity hound who held news conferences and engaged in extrajudicial meetings about the case.

In a legal brief, the attorneys quoted heavily from the documentary, citing statements by former Deputy District Attorney David Wells in which he acknowledged advising the judge on how to sentence the film director, even though he was not assigned to the case.

The lawyers said that Wells' recommendation to send Polanski away for a diagnostic study was illegal without Polanski's lawyers present. They said Wells also inflamed the judge by showing him photos depicting Polanski with girls at an Oktoberfest party in Germany while he was awaiting sentencing. They said the photos were misrepresented.

"As the result of DDA Wells' illegal ... communications, Mr. Polanski has been subject to a punishment that has spanned the course of over 30 years," the motion stated, noting he has been deprived of opportunities to work on films outside France.

The lawyers said the now-43-year-old victim, who never wanted Polanski to go to prison, should have the final say. They said the law requires the courts to consider a victim's wishes.

The woman's "wishes have remained unchanged, and this court has the discretion to finally conclude this case without any further harm" to the victim or her family, the motion stated.

LOS ANGELES — Lawyers for Roman Polanski, a fugitive for 30 years in a notorious sex case involving a 13-year-old girl, filed a request Tuesday to dismiss the charge against him because of prose...
LOS ANGELES — Lawyers for Roman Polanski, a fugitive for 30 years in a notorious sex case involving a 13-year-old girl, filed a request Tuesday to dismiss the charge against him because of prose...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
236
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
photo

I remember watching an interview of the (now) woman he raped. She is dumb as a bag of doorknobs. Just because she thinks that his charges should be dropped doesn't excuse his actions. There are laws in this land and they need to throw this sexual predator under the jail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 12/03/2008
- deckard70 I'm a Fan of deckard70 3 fans permalink

But if no one was harmed, there's no rationale for calling it a crime.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 12/03/2008
photo

If you read her testimony, she told him no many times. She told him she wanted to go home many times. What part of NO don't you understand? Pressing a 13 year old to have sex with you is a crime. Pressing anyone to have sex with you after they say NO is a crime. What if she had an IQ of 74 and didn't even say NO? Is it a crime then? She was a young child who is protected by laws. Just because her mother didn't think she needed protection, just because she doesn't realize the harm this penetration can do, does not release the perpetrator from responsibility.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 12/03/2008
- Bystander I'm a Fan of Bystander 8 fans permalink

On what basis do you suggest that no one was "harmed?" Your comment sounds like the lame rationale a pedophile would give for having sex with minors! "No harm, no foul." Our society has rightly concluded that intercourse with minors is a serious and injurious crime. The rule of law should prevail irrespective of whether the predator is lusting or "loving."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 12/03/2008
- Lex10 I'm a Fan of Lex10 14 fans permalink
photo

F that. He should be in a cell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 12/03/2008

He sodomized a 13 year old girl. How much lower can you go than that? Child molesters aren't curable and seldom trainable. Does anyone seriously doubt that was the only time he did it. People with his money and celebrity rarely get caught. Does anyone doubt he could find some sleeze bag sick parent around the hollywood scene to exchange their kid's innocense for lots of money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 12/03/2008
- deckard70 I'm a Fan of deckard70 3 fans permalink

How can he be a child molester if he was told by the girl and by her mother that she was a young woman of legal age? I'm not saying he wasn't sleezy to have sex with her, but thinking she was an adult doesn't make him a child molester.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 12/03/2008

Yes, this is a pertinent point. A girl who appears sexually mature doesn't generally appeal to a "child molester."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 12/04/2008

The crime Polanski committed beyond a reasonable doubt is "statutory rape." Most likely what he did would also fit within the definition of what is known as "aggravated sexual assault" or rape by force. While I believe there are some situations that call for leniency-for example an 18 year-old and 14 year fall in love and have a baby together-the 18 year should not be treated as a sexual offender. This case cries for punishment-the age difference between Polanski and the victim as well as the fact that he drugged her indicate that the sexual intercourse was far less than consensual. Polanski's life hasn't changed from the time he fled the United States. He should be treated as any other non-citizen who commits a serious felony-he must serve his time, be deported, and face at least a 10 year ban from the United States before being even considered for a travel visa.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 12/03/2008

What happened, under the law, is that Polanski caved to the pressure to cop a plea rather than face trial from a prosecutor eager to make a name and bag a celeb. Then the prosecutors WENT BACK on the plea agreement and went for additional jail time. IOW they bargained with him in bad faith. For obvious reasons, that can't be allowed to happen or nobody would ever plea bargain. To me, logically, that means his "conviction" was arrived at unethically at least. Most of us, given the option of escaping the country without even having to hide, would do the same thing rather than enter prison.

Now, as to what really took place. I am not in favor of knowing raping underage children, and he may have knowingly done this. But think back to what the 70s were like in Southern California. It's entirely possible that it was an Errol Flynn situation (or, in a more modern fictional example, a "Californication" scenario). I'm just saying drugs and sex were everywhere and standards were different.

If anyone's worried about karmic justice, Polanski deserved NONE of the suffering he was dealt by the Holocaust and the Manson murders and so you can take that suffering as his punishment for whatever he did here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 PM on 12/03/2008

I remember the 70s in Hollywood very well. Standards were not that different that it was acceptable to drug and rape a thirteen year old child who came to you seeking employment. Post OJ/Bush/Ch­eney/Rumsf­eld/Wolfow­itz it is impossible to argue that American Law is without serious problems.N­onetheless the man did what he did and it cannot be whitewashed retroactively.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 12/03/2008
photo

Yeah standards were different in the 60's. HOWEVER, the laws clearly dictated that having sex with a 13 year old was ILLEGAL. It is still illegal. If it weren't illegal why did he plea to it? The laws are what dictates criminality. I don't care if your drug addled brain tells you having sex with a 13 year old is OKIE DOKEY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 12/03/2008

It's all about money. They actually delivered an Academy Award to this child molester.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 12/03/2008
- roshni I'm a Fan of roshni 174 fans permalink

There is a lot of pressure from Holywood to overlook his behavior because he is a talented filmmaker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 12/03/2008

Rape is rape.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 12/03/2008
- roshni I'm a Fan of roshni 174 fans permalink

As much as I admire Polanski as a film maker, he is not above the law. Throughout this incident, he blamed the victim and showed no remorse. He refused to go through the legal process and should not be allowed to get away with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 AM on 12/03/2008

Did you read the account of these events? What is your feeling about the prosecutorial misconduct?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 12/03/2008
- elizaW I'm a Fan of elizaW 51 fans permalink

He refused to go through the legal process only when it became apparent that the legal process was no longer operating - legally. All his life, Polanski survived by not depending on those in power to do the right thing. In this instance, his decision to flee was one hundred percent correct.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 12/03/2008
- bmwracer I'm a Fan of bmwracer 2 fans permalink

Screw him.

France can keep him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 12/03/2008
- BSERIUS I'm a Fan of BSERIUS 8 fans permalink

Maybe Dick Durbin Can call Pres Bush about him like he is trying to get George Ryan off... This guy only raped a 13 year old while Ryan was responsible for 6 or more deaths

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 12/03/2008
- jse17 I'm a Fan of jse17 8 fans permalink
photo

“(Not only did the girl lie about her age to Polanski; the girl's MOTHER lied about her age to Polanski..­. and that's just ONE of MANY facts to lay on the table in Mr. Polanski's defense.)”

Google “Statutory Crime” before filling a blog with nonsense! I will start you with committing a statutory crime satisfies the intent requirement and all defenses are eliminated! There, criminal common law is not that difficult is it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 12/03/2008

Polanski sodimized ("had sex with," Linda Deutsch?) a 13 year old.

The girl moved past it; exceptionally good for her!

The issue remains: Polanski was caught sodimizing a child.
And some people don't have a problem with this...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 12/03/2008
- Eric8869 I'm a Fan of Eric8869 25 fans permalink

The victim in this case has said she thinks he has suffered enough. Why shouldn't we agree - ask him to pay an inflated fine and do community services for social service agencies in the U.S.A.?

Although I have always thought it was funny that Americans can dismiss the behavior of Woody Allen just because they like his work. (and attacking Mia Farrow for no reason)

I think we are justifying his behavior because he made some great movies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 12/03/2008
- roshni I'm a Fan of roshni 174 fans permalink

The point is he is not above the law and thought himself entitled to circumvent it. I don't approve of woody Allen's behavior either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 12/03/2008

Woody got legally exonerated on the supposed molestation of his 7-year-old daughter. And Soon-Yi was an adult when their relationship began.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 12/03/2008
photo

and "Roe" of "Roe v. Wade" also thinks that abortion should be illegal now.

Fact is, Polanski committed several crimes, showed no remorse, and got away with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 12/03/2008

How dare him think he will get the same treatment as Elvis, Jerry Lee Lewis or some other well known rock star, who does he think he is a "king?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

He is a millionaire several times over, an artist, an Oscar winner, and you guys are a bunch of ignorant morons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 12/03/2008

All of you have not seen the documentary?

The Judge did enough errors of law to get anyone's case dismissed. The total craziness surrounding the trial ( think O.J. times ten) could have gotten a new venue now. The State's attorney said enough to the Press to get him dis-barred now.

Did anyone see the documentary?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 12/03/2008
- Mort I'm a Fan of Mort 38 fans permalink
photo

Did you hear him plead guilty?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 12/03/2008

So ... you're saying that it's okay for millionaires and Oscar winners to rape little girls?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 12/03/2008

You're lucky you're not in Poland Polanski. They don't take kindly to folks like you there.

Maybe Bushie will pardon you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 12/03/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect