Somali Pirates Fire On US Cruise Ship In Hijack Attempt

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

AP   |  By ELIZABETH A. KENNEDY   |   December 2, 2008 09:48 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It



NAIROBI, Kenya -- Pirates chased and shot at a U.S. cruise liner with more than 1,000 people on board but failed to hijack the vessel as it sailed along a corridor patrolled by international warships, a maritime official said Tuesday.

The liner, carrying 656 international passengers and 399 crew members, was sailing through the pirate-infested Gulf of Aden on Sunday when it encountered six bandits in two speedboats, said Noel Choong who heads the International Maritime Bureau's piracy reporting center in Malaysia.

The pirates fired at the passenger liner but the larger boat was faster than the pirates' vessels, Choong said.

"It is very fortunate that the liner managed to escape," he said, urging all ships to remain vigilant in the area.

The U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet, based in Bahrain, said it was aware of the failed hijacking but did not have further details.

Ship owner Oceania Cruises Inc. identified the vessel as the M/S Nautica.

In a statement on its Web site, the company said pirates fired eight rifle shots at the liner, but that the ship's captain increased speed and managed to outrun the skiffs.

All passengers and crew are safe and there was no damage to the vessel, it said.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Nautica was on a 32-day cruise from Rome to Singapore, with stops at ports in Italy, Egypt, Oman, Dubai, India, Malaysia and Thailand, the Web site said. Based on that schedule, the liner was headed from Egypt to Oman when it was attacked.

The liner arrived in the southern Oman port city of Salalah on Monday morning, and the passengers toured the city before leaving for the capital, Muscat, Monday evening, an official of the Oman Tourism Ministry said Tuesday. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

The head of a shipping agency branch in Salalah had contact with the liner there.

"They talked about pirates opening fire at their ship off the Somalian shores," Khalil Shaker told The Associated Press by telephone. He said he had no details of the attack.

It is not the first time a cruise liner has been attacked. In 2005, pirates opened fire on the Seabourn Spirit about 100 miles (160 kilometers) off the Somali coast. The faster cruise ship managed to escape, and used a long-range acoustic device -- which blasts a painful wave of sound -- to distract the pirates.

International warships patrol the area and have created a security corridor in the region under a U.S.-led initiative, but the attacks have not abated.

In about 100 attacks on ships off the Somali coast this year, 40 vessels have been hijacked, Choong said. Fourteen remain in the hands of pirates along with more than 250 crew members.

In two if the most daring attacks, pirates seized a Ukrainian freighter loaded with 33 battle tanks in September, and on Nov. 15, a Saudi oil tanker carrying $100 million worth of crude oil.

Ukraine's Foreign Ministry spokesman Vasyl Kyrylych said Monday that negotiations with Somali pirates holding the cargo ship MV Faina are nearly completed, the Interfax news agency reported.

A spokesman for the Faina's owner said Sunday that the Somali pirates had agreed on a ransom for the ship and it could be released within days.

Somalia has not had a functioning government since 1991, and pirates have taken advantage of the country's lawlessness to launch attacks on foreign shipping from the Somali coast. Around 100 ships have been attacked so far this year.

Somali prime minister Nur Hassan Hussein said Tuesday that his country has been torn apart by 18 years of civil war and cannot stop piracy alone.

"This needs a tremendous effort," Hussein told The Associated Press. He has appealed for international troops, as his government's Ethiopian allies have said they would pull out their forces by the end of the year.

Ethiopia, the region's military powerhouse, has been integral in boosting the government. But Islamic insurgents have now seized control of all of southern Somalia except for the capital and the parliamentary seat of Baidoa.

___

Associated Press writers Eileen Ng in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and Saeed al-Nahdy in Muscat, Oman, contributed to this report.

Photo courtesy of 663highland

NAIROBI, Kenya -- Pirates chased and shot at a U.S. cruise liner with more than 1,000 people on board but failed to hijack the vessel as it sailed along a corridor patrolled by international warship...
NAIROBI, Kenya -- Pirates chased and shot at a U.S. cruise liner with more than 1,000 people on board but failed to hijack the vessel as it sailed along a corridor patrolled by international warship...
 
Comments
375
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
photo

Rather than worrying that the pirates might seek asylum if captured, send em' directly to gitmo for an extended vacation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 12/10/2008

Okay, I'm usually not a war-hawk, but don't we possess the military capability to blast these thugs out of the water twenty times over? At least India had the gumption to blow away a few when they tried to attack one of her ships. When did the rest of the world lose its spine? C'mon people!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 12/05/2008

The problem is that the naval ship has to be in the right place at the right time to stop the pirates. Also calling in airsupport is a problem because everything takes time. As soon as you call it in, and the planes or helicopters take off the pirates are gone. Also NATO warships are patrolling defined shipping lanes as per Fifth Fleet. It's not as easy as you think, if it was it wouldn't be happening. Try sailing on a ship in the Gulf of Aden and see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 12/05/2008

M-
I'm sure it's not exactly easy, especially the way it's being done now, but would constant NATO air surveillance solve the problem of not responding in time? How big does the problem have to get before it would warrant this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

*Precisely* why I threw out the idea of taking a page from history; all it would take is for some enterprising navy to deploy a fast "Q-ship" with a 21st century flare, and after a few pirates met their end under the guns of such a vessel, more than a few of these clowns would think twice about their chosen trade.

The doubt that such a ship would instill amongst the pirates, the idea that maybe that freighter *isn't* really a freighter at all, may go a very long way to drastically reduce if not eliminate this problem altogether.

IMHO it beats the Hell out of the current approaches...

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 12/05/2008

German media reports that another attack on another cruise ship could only be prevented by a german warship firing on the pirates. See http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/0,1518,594521,00.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 12/04/2008
photo

Piracy: old problem easily solved by an equally old solution.

A German frigate or three could do quite a number on these hooligans...

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 12/04/2008

Most merchant vessels have a crew of 21-28 people. International law (ie most countries) make it difficult for ship owners to arm their vessels. The possibility of fines, imprisonment and holding the vessel are a factors that are being delt with when arming a merchant ship. Also armed security personnel aboard merchant vessels become a risk as they have no "international rules for engagement". Also aboard tankers carrying weapons on deck can become very dangerous as there are explosive compounds inside cargo tanks. Most vessel now carry non lethal items to stop pirates, but at night when you have a reduced crew due to sleep, and the vessel is following normal transit routes it is hard to see a small vessel moving at high speed on a 3cm or 10 cm radar. These pirates move fast and silent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 12/03/2008
photo

Ayup.. Good security measures include mixing things up a bit with unexpected route changes, doubled watch crews, searchlights, et al.

Escort vessels aggressively patrolling these routes with a declared no-go zone for any small craft coupled to a shoot to kill policy would do wonders to nip this nonsense in the bud.

Harsh, yes, but when dealing with this sort of matter experience has shown again and again and again that pirates can only be stopped from engaging in their chosen trade by offering them three choices: find a new trade, surrender to the nice warship that just trained its guns on you, or meet your maker.

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 12/04/2008

Blackwater Navy is not what everyone thinks it is. Blackwater had bought and refurbished the McArthur, a 183-ft. ship that boasts "state of the art navigation systems, full GMDDSS communications, SEATEL Broadband, dedicated command and control bas, helicopter decks, hospital and multiple support vessel capabilities." There are no real weapons aboard the vessel and it has a top cruising speed of 10 knots which is not very fast against speed boats or merchant vessels.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 12/03/2008
photo

It would make a fair base of operations, however. The helos would more than compensate for the boat's lack of speed - if they can be adequately armed with rockets and gatling guns. This could also be an effective base for their own speedboats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 12/04/2008

The main problem with private military contractors are rules of engagement. There are many problems associated with that. Also Blackwater does not have attack helicopter capabilities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 12/05/2008

In August in the Gulf of Aden, U.S. Naval Central Command has directed the establishment of a Maritime Security Patrol Area (MSPA). A force of Coalition Navy warships are patroling the area, and aircraft are flying in the airspace above. Central Command says the MSPA is being established in support of the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) ongoing efforts. It says coalition actions will "give the IMO time to work international preventative efforts that will ultimately lead to a long-term solution." "Coalition ships are in the area as part of our continual presence in this region. While they have conducted routine operations in the area in the past, the establishment of the MSPA will focus the efforts to counter destabilizing activities in the region and improve security while long-term initiatives mature," says Central Command

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 12/03/2008

Please be advised that the M/S Nautica is not an american cruise ship. The company that owns the ship is based in the US and that the ship flies a flag of convenience where the nationality of the owner is different from the country of registration. The ship is registered in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and is not required to have an american crew and conform to US rules and regulations. Also the vessel has a Vessel Security Plan VSP approved by the Flag State where the ship is registered. The flag state will then issue the vessel an International Ship Security Certificate which means it complies with security needs including pirate attacks. Also be advised most cruise ships only do 22-25 knots while a small skiff can do 35-40 knots.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 12/03/2008

It's going to happen. They'll catch a cruiser with 1000 Americans. The little girls will pose and giggle with the pirates. That's gonna be fun. I bet they'll bring on hundreds of burquas to dress the ladies on the ship properly. Then it's $1M a person or they run it T-bone full speed into the tanker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

How much would Blackwater charge to take care of this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 12/02/2008
photo

Blackwater might be good for something after all. Pirates fighting pirates. I'm sure they would charge plenty and have fun doing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 12/02/2008
photo

hard to tell them apart

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 12/03/2008
photo

Mercenaries are neither more reliable nor capable that such villains as pirates.

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 12/04/2008
photo

Law of unintended consequences applies here. We sicced the Ethiopian army on the Islamic Courts government because we feared it would be a Taliban-like aid to al-Quaeda. Christian Ethiopians freaked out the Islamic Somalians who refused to cooperate with any kind of replacement government. Nobody patrolled the fishing territory. Taiwanese factory ships moved in, fished it dry. Somalian fishing fleet has boats, guns and guys; no fish. result? Pirates. Precisely what happened when James I revoked the licenses of the English privateers who preyed on the spanish main. I think most of Georgia was settled by those crazy ScotsIrish pirates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 12/02/2008

Why not engage the pirates by having armed decoy ships that look like merchantmen and
pleasure ships. Ships with hidden weapons systems designed for neutralizing small close
in targets. The ship would be manned by trained naval crews dressed in merchant and civilian
clothing

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 12/02/2008
photo

The odds that the pirates would pick on a decoy a probably aren't that good. There are alot of ships going through that area.

http://billmel8er.wordpress.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 12/02/2008

How about fishing trawlers? They also have a reason to be loitering in an area.
A Thai fishing trawler crewed by thai special forces? Just sitting here trying to thnk
of ways to go on the offensive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 12/02/2008

The pirates have a very good intel system. They are aware of which vessels are transiting, what they are carrying and crew size.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 12/03/2008
photo

Yes they do, *and* a -ship able to transform it's superficial appearance quickly while at sea ala the commerce raiders and Q-ships of conflicts past would deter some, and probably squish others as it prowls up and down the commercial lanes, morphing its appearance as it goes along to resemble other ships known to be transiting in the area around the same time.

Such a werewolf would IMHO have a good chance of all but shutting down piracy off the coast of Somalia.

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 12/04/2008

Forget the Somali pirates. Check those figures. There was almost a l:l crew member per guest. Isn't there something wrong with this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 12/02/2008

Nope. Engineers, engine maintenance, deck maintenance, housekeeping, bars, restaurants, kitchen, laundry, hospitality and others I'm sure I'm forgetting. Don't worry about it. The cruise lines won't have one more head than they need. That's the beauty of capitalism, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 12/02/2008
photo

Those pirates are going to reap what they sow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 12/02/2008

Aargh! Would these scoff laws not make excellent target practice for one or more of our jet fighters? If so, how long would it take to dispatch them to the coast of Somalia?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 12/02/2008
photo

Well they don't float very well by themselves. They require a carrier task group. Which is probably a bit of an overkill. Best bet would probably be regular overflights from ground based search planes that could vector a destroyer or whatever is closest. I'm sure they already have much sattelite data showing the pirates patterns and of course their home bases. Also, Russia has as much interest in being rid of these pirates as anyone.

http://billmel8er.wordpress.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 12/02/2008

I agree any jet fighters would have to be dispatched from a carrier task force or a land base nearby but it looks like a short haul to me. Any experts out there?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 12/02/2008

This reminds me of the Barbary Pirates that preyed on shipping in the Meditteranean(Shores of Tripoli ring any bells?) in the 18th century. We,the United States, declared war on the pirates and destroyed their base of operations and sank their ships. We should do the same NOW to the Somali Pirates. Drop leaflets on all the fishing villages that harbor these pirates and give the civilians 24 hours to turn over the pirates or we follow up with destruction of the entire coastal area.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 12/02/2008

No oil in Somalia, or if there is, the Chinese own it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 12/02/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect