iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

More Water Shortages Coming To The West

MIKE STARK | December 5, 2008 04:38 AM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Wednesday, March 5, 2008 file photo, water levels at the Colorado River's Horseshoe Bend begin to rise along the beaches just hours after the Glen Canyon Dam jet tubes began releasing water, in Page, Ariz. Drought, climate change and an increasing population in the West are pushing the Colorado River basin toward deep trouble in the coming decades, scientists say. (AP Photo/Matt York)

SALT LAKE CITY — Seven Western states will face more water shortages in the years ahead as climate change exacerbates the strains drought and a growing population have put on the Colorado River, scientists say.

"Clearly we're on a collision course between supply and demand," said Brad Udall, director of the Western Water Assessment at the University of Colorado.

Although there is some disagreement about when the most dire conditions will materialize, scientists at a conference in Salt Lake City said Thursday they expect less water to be available in the coming decades.

Without fundamental shifts in water management, the result will be shortages and difficult decisions about who in the seven states the river serves will get water and who will go without, said Dave Wegner, science director for the Glen Canyon Institute, which organized the one-day conference at the University of Utah.

"To me, it's not going to be a pretty debate," Wegner said.

The changes are already being seen in reduced water flows, higher air temperatures and an unrelenting demand on the Colorado, which snakes across more than 1,400 miles and provides water for farms, businesses, cities and homes. The river serves Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming and Utah, an area where 30 million people live.

Last year, officials from the seven states and Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne signed a far-reaching agreement aimed at conserving and sharing scarce Colorado River water. The 20-year plan formalized rules for cooperating during the ongoing drought.

A study released in February by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego said there's a 50 percent chance that Lake Mead, which straddles the Arizona-Nevada state line, could run dry by 2021.

Several models by different scientists have made predictions about the future flow of the Colorado, all of which forecast less water, said Tim Barnett, one of the Scripps study's authors. The prospect of warming temperatures only increases the strain on an already strained system, he said.

"The current usage is simply not sustainable," Barnett said.

Udall quibbled with Barnett's prediction about 2021 but not the overall speculation that water in the Colorado River basin will become more scarce.

"It's a question of when," he said.

Even if the West's climate doesn't get as warm as predicted, the river system will likely be faced with shortages, said Gregory McCabe, a project chief at the U.S. Geological Survey's water resources division in Denver.

Building more reservoirs to store water probably won't be enough to mitigate the effects of changes to the system _ especially warming temperatures, he said.

One of the best approaches will be to drive down demand by finding better and more ways to conserve water, McCabe said.

The Colorado has long been the source of controversy as thirsty states fight for their share to quench growing economies.

The 20th century was one of the wettest going back several centuries. But it shouldn't be assumed that water levels will remain as plentiful in the future, researchers said.

Connie Woodhouse, a University of Arizona scientist, said tree rings in the basin indicate that the amount of moisture has fluctuated widely over hundreds of years, but has tended to be drier than was seen in the last 100 years.

It's time to consider a "new normal" for shrinking water supplies in the Colorado River basin, Wegner said. That will require a sweeping re-evaluation of allocations, use, conservation, dams and legal obligations, he said.

SALT LAKE CITY — Seven Western states will face more water shortages in the years ahead as climate change exacerbates the strains drought and a growing population have put on the Colorado River,...
SALT LAKE CITY — Seven Western states will face more water shortages in the years ahead as climate change exacerbates the strains drought and a growing population have put on the Colorado River,...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
12:44 AM on 12/10/2008
End irrigation subsidies. That alone would go much of the way toward ending water shortages.
05:29 AM on 12/08/2008
My dad lives out west, and has a lawn in the middle of the desert. Thats the #$%king problem.

You know terrorists need to have only flew those airplanes into the pumping towers at the Hoover damn, it would have caused more problems because people were so short sighted as to think it was smart to build a city in the middle of a desert. No water... no city.

humans are so stupid sometimes.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
07:40 AM on 12/08/2008
Then why don't you know that places like Las Vegas have outlawed lawns on new homes.
06:54 AM on 12/06/2008
Nobody panick, here's the greatest and fastest solution to water shortage. Spread the news.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ7N-FPF0ac
05:26 AM on 12/08/2008
I eat meat.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
09:34 PM on 12/05/2008
Don't know where my other post went, but we have to slow population growth, and to do that we have to limit immigration.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
08:04 PM on 12/05/2008
We need to control our population growth and to do that we need to limit immigration. Most of our population growth comes from the direct arrival of immigrants and their higher birth rates in this country. And please address that if you want to answer me. Don't give me some puzzled question like "what does immigration have to do with this?". I just explained it.
10:14 PM on 12/05/2008
Gasparilla,

Thirty million people have no business living in a desert, regardless of whether they moved there from Mexico or Indiana. Likewise, most of the produce consumed in the United States is grown in California, while most lettuce comes from Arizona so people can eat salads in January regardless of where they live. These are the real issues in my opinion.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
06:47 AM on 12/06/2008
And what you said has no effect on what I just said. Immigration is rapidly increasing the population of our country. They are going to live somewhere. An increasing population, fueled by immigration, only makes our problems worse. It's not only affecting the southwest.
05:31 AM on 12/08/2008
I wish they would have done that a few generations ago, then you'd be posting that stupid response from some other country.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
07:38 AM on 12/08/2008
Not that you can actually argue with what I said, so I think the stupid response is yours. And there are lots of immigrant countries, every one in North and South America. You do realize this is not a hundred years ago, when the world and America's population was a fraction of now? Try to come up with something that approaches an intellectual argument.
photo
jesther
Ehn! Meh. Zuh? Ha!
01:39 PM on 12/05/2008
The gig is up. The rigs and rigging must come down.
12:26 PM on 12/05/2008
I'm telling ya, the only TOTAL fix for all our environmental concerns for the next 100yrs at least is to
Create a massive Geothermal and Solar powered system of deslinization plants at the coasts to pump trillions of gallons of salty seawater turned into mostly fresh water and pumped into the dry areas of the US West/Dry South, AFrica, Australia and dry parts of Mongolia, and into mountain regions to do :
A) Take water out of the rising oceans.
B) Wet down dry areas that continually catch fire, compounding our Air quality problem by adding CO2, and removing growth that DID take it out of the air and produce oxygen.
C) regrow plant life en masse in formerly dry areas and create new forest and savannah.
D) adding massive green growth adds to the power to remove pollution from the air.
E) shift global climate so that the Poles begin to once again grow ice caps.
F) in new wetland areas of desert, agriculture could begin to flourish to feed the hungry in those depressed areas where there is currently famine. And new water sources would be created for those 3rd world nations to rise up and create a new infrastructure to move into the 21st century and create lasting peace and prosperity.
G) a new era of Terraforming stewardship of the earth would begin and we would have a catalyst to be more efficient with our planet and less destructive.
01:36 PM on 12/05/2008
The biggest problem with irrigation or watering in naturally dry areas is that it leaves molecular SALTS on surface. That ruins the soil. There are large portions of the southwest that are seeing the soil become less compatible with plant growth. One solution they have used in past is massive rinse and drainage systems. BUT that led to festering chemical pools like Kesterson.

Another problem watering the southwest down is hydrostatic pressure causing land slippage. A considerable amount of the west is not level so that is a major consern.

The third problem is that introducing large quantities of water to a region that is not climatically a water rich area most probably will lead to climatic shift as the evaporation of that new water will cause weather change. There are several examples of water rich areas that had humans remove the plant cover only to find that the water they thought would be available for agriculture then disappeared with the loss of forest. The reverse is also true.

The environment is a very complex system that I think the current destabilization of the climate demonstrates. What I am talking about is the Law of Unforseen Consequences.

We are pretty clever monkies but we are messing with things that we have no idea what the long term effect of those interventions will be. This is just like the GMOs. That one is scary to me because of the fact that some viruses are shed DNA of other organisms.
04:28 PM on 12/05/2008
True, true, however, desalinized water distributed to a resevoir doesnt leave salt on soil for agri purposes as you mentioned... not sure you understood my idea.

As for the Unforseen, can you prove /predict with 100% accuracy the acts we've already incurred over the centuries of what would result or had resulted in the past?
Of course not. Thats why climatic shifts were a huge surprise to the world and the speed of devastation has been way faster than predicted.

Thats exactly why i say, make a decision, go for broke, and do the deed now, or we are going to perish.
Carbon Sequestration is the dumbest, most costly, least effective thing i have ever heard.
It cant even come close to competing the power of nature to remove CO2.
So help nature. grow. The way to do that, is rebuild our forests, and i dont mean by having prisoners or out of work persons go plant 500 million seedlings. I mean pump desalinized water to places that are desperate for it, create hundreds of huge bodies of water in arid dry dead locations such as deserts, and let nature bring it on.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:55 AM on 12/05/2008
One of the best approaches will be to drive down demand by finding better and more ways to conserve water, McCabe said.

That can only go so far.
Of course again no one wants to talk about limiting human population growth.
And yet all the areas served by the Colorado river STILL approve even more urban sprawl and more ag projects etc.-it's like the powers that be STILL DON'T GET IT!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shastaman
01:58 AM on 12/07/2008
J S in the 60s there was a proposal to engeineer a system to divert the living Columbia river to southern Cali. Senator Henry ( BOEING) jACKSON From Washington intervened and arrested the project. Do not be suprised to see a renewal of a similar project involving the Snake river from southern Idaho and Utah. The Bureaus of reclamation and Corps of engineers are heavily populated with LDS desciples and the states of Nevada ( Harry Reid) and Utah both rely heavily on the Colorado Water system. Water is "blue gold"

DRINK DRINK DRINK UP EVERYBODY!!!!!!
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
11:17 AM on 12/05/2008
Not mentioned in the article is that the Colorado River used to flow into the Gulf of California, but now often just dries up before reaching the sea.

I think that really exemplifies just how much water we are taking from the river - enough to actually run it dry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
10:57 AM on 12/05/2008
It is time to take a very serious look at building large scale solar generation plants that are of the central tower design. These plants concentrate the sun's energy on a central tower where very high temperatures generate steam to run electrial generators. The amount of heat generated is in excess of what is needed to power the generators but it can be used to desalindate sea water. This approach gives us a double "bang for the buck" since it helps solve the energy problem while also providing freash water (which we are running out of because of the way it is wasted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:04 PM on 12/05/2008
yeah, great idea since they use tens of millions of gallons of water each year for each plant, just for rinsing mirrors, not to mention millions of gallons a year if they are water cooled. you can't kill wilderness to save wilderness and you can't waste water to save water. there are already PV-powered desal plants that work great - why not those?