O.J. Simpson sentenced to as much as 33 years (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - O.J. Simpson sentenced to as much as 33 years (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12- 5-08 08:06 AM   |   Updated: 01- 5-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Simpson

Scroll down for video

LAS VEGAS - A broken O.J. Simpson was sentenced Friday to as much as 33 years in prison for a hotel armed robbery after a judge rejected his apology and said, "It was much more than stupidity."

The 61-year-old football Hall of Famer stood shackled and stone-faced as Judge Jackie Glass rattled off the punishment. Moments before, Simpson made a rambling, five-minute plea for leniency, simultaneously apologizing for the holdup as a foolish mistake and trying to justify his actions.

He choked back tears as he told her: "I didn't want to steal anything from anyone. ... I'm sorry, sorry."

Simpson said he was simply trying to retrieve sports memorabilia and other mementos, including his first wife's wedding ring, from two dealers when he stormed a Las Vegas hotel room on Sept. 13, 2007.

But the judge emphasized that it was a violent confrontation in which at least one gun was drawn, and she said someone could have been shot. She said the evidence was overwhelming, with the planning, the confrontation itself and the aftermath all recorded on audio or videotape.

Glass, a no-nonsense judge known for her tough sentences, imposed such a complex series of consecutive and concurrent sentences that even many attorneys watching the case were confused as to how much time Simpson got.

Simpson could serve up to 33 years but could be eligible for parole after nine years, according to Elana Roberto, the judge's clerk.

Story continues below

The judge said several times that her sentence in the Las Vegas case had nothing to do with Simpson's 1995 acquittal in the slaying of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.

"I'm not here to try and cause any retribution or any payback for anything else," Glass said.

Simpson was immediately led away to prison after the judge refused to permit him to go free on bail while he appeals.

Simpson's co-defendant and former golfing buddy, Clarence "C.J. Stewart, also was sentenced to at least 15 years.

Outside court, Goldman's father, Fred Goldman, and sister, Kim, said they were delighted with the sentence.

"We are thrilled, and it's a bittersweet moment," Fred Goldman said. "It was satisfying seeing him in shackles like he belongs."

The Goldmans took a measure of credit for Simpson's fate, saying their relentless pursuit of his assets to satisfy a $33.5 million wrongful-death judgment "pushed him over the edge" and led him to commit the robbery to recover some of his sports memorabilia.

Simpson and Stewart were both brought to the courtroom in dark blue jail uniforms, their hands shackled to their waists with chains. Simpson, who looked weary and had not been expected to speak, delivered a somber statement to the judge.

As he spoke in a hoarse voice, the courtroom was hushed. His two sisters, Shirley Baker and Carmelita Durio, sat in the front row of the courtroom, along with his adult daughter.

Both men were convicted Oct. 3 of 12 criminal charges, including kidnapping and armed robbery.

"As stupid and as ill-conceived as it was, it wasn't something that was from this evil mind they teach us about," Simpson attorney Yale Galanter said before sentencing.

"Not bright, not smart, not well thought out, but certainly not from an evil mind," Galanter said.

Most of the 63 seats in the courtroom were taken by media, lawyers and family members of the defendants. Fifteen members of the public were also allowed.

After sentencing was over, the Goldmans left the courtroom and Kim threw her arms around her father and wept.

Simpson's sisters declined to comment, but Shirley Baker said on her way out: "It's not over."

Jurors who heard 13 days of testimony said after the verdict that they were convinced of Simpson's guilt because of audio recordings that were secretly made of the Sept. 13, 2007, robbery at the Palace Station casino hotel.

The confrontation involved sports memorabilia brokers Alfred Beardsley and Bruce Fromong. It was recorded by collectibles dealer Thomas Riccio, who was acting as middleman.

"Don't let nobody out of this room!" Simpson commands on the recordings, and instructs other men to scoop up items he insists had been stolen from him.

On Tuesday, Glass is scheduled to sentence four former co-defendants who took plea deals and testified against Simpson and Stewart.

Michael McClinton, Charles Cashmore, Walter Alexander and Charles Ehrlich could receive probation or prison time. McClinton could get up to 11 years; the others face less.


WATCH: Simpson apologizes to the judge before his sentencing



WATCH: Fred Goldman, Ron Goldman's father, comments on Simpson's sentence


Scroll down for video LAS VEGAS - A broken O.J. Simpson was sentenced Friday to as much as 33 years in prison for a hotel armed robbery after a judge rejected his apology and said, "It was much mor...
Scroll down for video LAS VEGAS - A broken O.J. Simpson was sentenced Friday to as much as 33 years in prison for a hotel armed robbery after a judge rejected his apology and said, "It was much mor...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1681
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (26 pages total)

Well said.While I sympathize with anyone who's lost a loved one to murder,this was about revenge.Fred Goldman should not have been allowed to attend this sentencing.Fred Goldman wants money and not justice,All the money in the world will not bring his son back.He is no hero.I can remember him making disparaging comments about Ron's mother.Real classy.The Browns weren't there.Ron and Nicole have become 2 of the most famous murder victims.I don't know of any murder victims of color receiving as much attention as these two.A lot of people seem to think that only white juries are smart enough to get it right.I think OJ is guilty but this isn't justice.Just revenge plain and simple.All of you people saying you don't care that he's getting sentenced for something he did in 1994 had better hope you never have to go before a judge and have your past come back to haunt you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 12/08/2008
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
photo

I agree with you.

My only concern is so many believe OJ guilty of murder. He was found not guilty. Our justice system does not determine innocence, only guilt.

I watched the whole trial, including pre trial stuff, it was very disturbing. Reasonable doubt could have been found for half a dozen reasons. The main one cited was the time line. At the very time the killing was taking place, according to facts, OJ was seen entering his home by the limo driver, who actually made a phone call at that very time. Gee, it's hard to be in two places at once.

That being said, there were more compelling reasons to find him not guilty: All that DNA, but NONE connecting him to the actuall murder; planted evidence by a cop who was being suied for planting evidence in another case with racial overtones; the glove that jumped over the fence all by itself! DUH! The fact that the glove didn't fit. How can it fall off if it is too tight? Then the strange story about the cut on the finger, which didn't match the tear in the glove, wonder who really made the "tear" in the glove.

I am sure that 75% of Americans are happy OJ finally went to jail, because they believe the jury was blinded by race. I am one of the 25% who believe the LA jury got it right., which is more than I can say for justice in Las Vagas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 12/22/2008

Goody, lock him up and throw away the key!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 12/06/2008

Lets lock up everyone that is stealing their own possessions and then lets double our taxes to cover it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 12/06/2008

i am a fan of oj he did not have no need to go to pirson he his a good man they are only getting back for what happened 13 years go oj is the best

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 12/07/2008

First of all...I have no love for OJ. My gut tells me that he was guilty in 1995, but the trail was fair. The many screw ups of the DA and LAPD ruined any chance of a conviction. Despite my gut feelings, I would have voted him not guilty had I been on the jury.

For the Judge in this case to hand down a 33 yr sentence...it's well, stupid. Child molesters and bank robbers get less time. How can she claim that the harsh sentence wasn't revenge for 1995?

I hope his lawyers are pulling all of her old cases for comparison.

No matter how you feel about OJ, we must protect the integrity of the legal system. We must ensure that it is fair and that justice is blind...otherwise, we could all become victims of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 12/06/2008
- ReHoover51 I'm a Fan of ReHoover51 11 fans permalink
photo

for the record ... the jury wasnt even given proper rules by the judge ... they actually believed, like most uninformed americans, that if any evidense seemed tainted, then that was reasonable doubt ... that is the farthest from the truth ... then every case would be NOT GUILTY (mistakes are always made)
in vincent bugliosis book (5 reasons why oj got away with murder) he details why the DA lost: all they had to do was introduce the OJ interogation tape ... OJ admits bleeding all over his house, his car, his driveway and contradicts himself on how and where he did it ... the left hand glove had a slit in the same finger as the deep cut he had on his left hand ...
in a 2 pg rant bugliosi gave the closing summation for the DA and it would have fonund OJ guilty with the proper evidense ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 12/06/2008
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
photo

I don't know what was writen in that book you cite, but that was not what was presented to the jury. I watched the whole trial, all the pretrial motions, even the stuff not presented to the jury. For example, the time line was the major issue. The cops sety the time line based on calls to police, and all the witnesses. They immediately went to OJs house. (and why they went there is another whole can of worms)

They entered without a valid warrent, lied on subsequant application for a warrent, planted evidence, and possibly conspired with a "witness." Then, much to their chagrin, they discovered that OJ was not home, but had left before the murder was committed.

OOOOPS!

So, believe it or not, and folks, you can't make this stuff up, the cops went back to the original witnesses, who called the police, and reported hearing, or seeing something, and had each and every one of them change their statements by one hour. Is this conforming testimony/

Even with that, the limo driver saw OJ enter his house at the time the cops claim the murder was taking place. How can you be in two places at the same time?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 12/22/2008
- ReHoover51 I'm a Fan of ReHoover51 11 fans permalink
photo

this judge was more than fair ... he had many many charges ... it was all on tape ... OJ wouldnt admit his wrong-doing ... he is 61 yrs old and still believes he can commit any kind of act and get away with it ... he is not a civilized man ... maybe 9yrs in jail will bring out the JEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESUS in him and make him a real black man with integrity and honor

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 12/06/2008
- Payin2Pay I'm a Fan of Payin2Pay 4 fans permalink
photo

All you people that are trying (yet again) to turn this into a racial issue, are disgusting! Saying that O.J. is representative of centuries of "black-oppresion", is like saying that Richard Simmons is representative of the gay community. Give me a break! Shame on all of you proffesional-ethnics! If he wanted his belongings back, call the damn Police! Go to Court! Just like the rest of us have to!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 12/06/2008

And you think the police would treat him fairlyAlmost every one hanging around him seems to be intent on making money off his notoriety. Is it possible this judge made her decision on the fact that she will be the known for putting OJ away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 12/06/2008
- ReHoover51 I'm a Fan of ReHoover51 11 fans permalink
photo

EXACTLY RIGNT ...
what is wrong with americans today?
this is about justice not race ... the judge didnt come off as racist ... oj got caught in a state that doesnt babysit criminal actions!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 12/06/2008

I disagree I think the judge enjoyed whay she was doing and the sentence was excessive for a victimless crime-My impression of her was that she wanted to be known as the person that put OJ away. IT is a travesty of justice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 12/08/2008
- GravitonX I'm a Fan of GravitonX 68 fans permalink
photo

The prison sentence was excessive. Double Jeopardy from the 1995 trial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 12/06/2008

The movement against domestic violence changed after the first OJ trial. Before the OJ case came along, people used to ask why abused spouses remain in the relationship if they don't consent to the abuse.

Why don't they just leave? -- that was the question everyone was asking. The domestic violence issue was mired in that discussion.

But Nicole Brown left. She left her abuser, divorced him, and only saw as much of him as child custody arrangements mandated.

After she and Ron were murdered, people started realizing that leaving an abusive spouse didn't solve the problem and in fact could even make the abuse turn lethal.

Police changed their attitude towards domestic violence after OJ, so at least something good came out of Nicole's and Ron's murder.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 12/06/2008
- Heru1 I'm a Fan of Heru1 25 fans permalink
photo

OJ was set up lovely. When will he learn not to trust white people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 12/06/2008

I am white and I agree with you about'my people, -we are a devious lot based on my own experience, However in this case I thought a lot of the people involeved were Afro-American-Just asking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 12/06/2008
- DeniseD I'm a Fan of DeniseD 26 fans permalink

That might be true, but many people are devious. This is not just a "white" trait.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 12/07/2008
- Heru1 I'm a Fan of Heru1 25 fans permalink
photo

was it his stuff or not?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 12/06/2008

You have to remember that the job of the legal system is not to ensure karma for a reprehensible individual but rather to be fair and consistant across the board. I wouldn't be surprized if this verdict is overturned on appeal - that is if there are still any ethical people left in our justice system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 12/06/2008
photo

Exactly. However, unfortunately, many in the legal profession have become quite jaded. Understandably, so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 12/06/2008

I agree with both QuietLight and Freedomscap. OJ should not have done what he did. However, there are two striking issues with this case. The charges were excessive and disproportionate and the jury (even the judge) were predisposed to a guilty verdict. I heard that the foreman of the jury had said that she believed that OJ should have been given life for killing his wife. This clearly shows that the verdict was influenced by this person. This in of itself should have been grounds for a new trial. No question that the verdict and sentence were payback for the not guilty verdict in the 1995 murder trial. I have a greater concern that the justice system is not working the way it should. Regardless of what we might think of Simpson, the justice system should not be a tool for exacting punishment for something that was settled in the past simply because some people did not agree with the verdict. I sincerely hope that the appeal court would reconsider and order a new trial or significantly reduce the sentence. But, I would not hold my breath.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 12/06/2008
photo

As a former battered woman, never once ... not one time, did my ex-husband's colour, religion or nationality ever enter into my mind ... he terrorized, threatened and saw to it I lost my home, my children, every cent I had and my country ... I fled to Chicago from Toronto when he threatned to kill me ... again ...and no one ... not anyone ... including my children, knew where I was ... Trust me ... the shade of Mr. Simpson's skin never entered Nicole's mind ... just the knowledge he would eventually, punish her for leaving him ... and he did get the batterer's twisted revenge ... the ultimate punishment was her slaughter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 12/06/2008

Many of the people blogging on this site who think OJ was guilty of murder when refering to the first trial point to the fact that the more than half the jury was Afro-American . When they refer to the civil trial where he was found guilty they never mention the fact that there were no African Americans on the jury and yet they feel the second trial was the gospel. They are implying that only an all white jury can come up with the right verdict. I followed the trial closely and I am white and the first jury did an excellent job . They had no choice but to acquit. In the second trial not all of the evidence was allowed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 12/06/2008

Me too. I am neither white or African descent and I did follow the murder trial without missing any of it. After the trial, I read the transcript of Rosa Lopez because I was convinced that she was telling the truth. She maintained through vigorous cross by Darden that she saw the Bronco parked at the Rockingham gate sometime after 10.00 pm but could not fix the exact time after 10.00. Darden tried to shake her testimony but did not succeed. I think the verdict was correct and anyone who followed the trial as I did would agree that Simpson could not have committed that crime any which way you look at it. Some people tell me that I am not a lawyer. Well I'll be damned. To the best of my knowledge no member on the jury are legal professionals. It is we laypeople who decide the fate of the defendant and we have to be careful how we do that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 12/06/2008
photo

Good post, I disagree with you on the outcome of the first trial..but I like how you mention that people never mention that the civil jury was all -white..meaning their decision was gospel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 12/06/2008

Thanks for the compliment.- i do not get many.FYI the reasons I think he is innocent is the time line factor,the police taking his blood to the crime scene in a test tube, Mark Furhamn tape of him laughing about planting evidence on Afro-americans, and a tape of OJ one hour before the murder where he is laughing with Nicole kisses her in friendly way on the check and looks very relaxed. This tape was taken by a tourist at a distance and he did not know he was being taped.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 12/06/2008

Thanks for you compliment. I do not often get many. FYI the reasson I think he is innocent is that there was a tape taken by a tourist about one hour before the murder of OJ kissing Nicole on the cheek looking very relaxed, both of them laughing no tension between them at all. Also the Furhman tapes where he talked I believe about planting evidence on Afro-americans followed by the test tube of OJ's blood being picked up by the police and taken to the crime scene,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 12/06/2008
- Gmoney1 I'm a Fan of Gmoney1 24 fans permalink

Something is really twisted here - how can you be found not guilty for murder and then found guilty for wrongful death - defies logic to me - and why would the justice system believe potential jurors who say, yes I believe he was guilty in the first trial, but don't worry, I 'll be fair with this one - haaaaaaaaa -

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 12/06/2008
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
photo

You are absolutely right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 12/22/2008
- GravitonX I'm a Fan of GravitonX 68 fans permalink
photo

OJ's sentence was extremely excessive. 15-33 years for robbery? No doubt, he was being sentence for a crime he supposedly committed, yet was found not guilty of, 13 years ago.

In time, this will go down as another example of the racism built into the public sentiments on Black defendants.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 12/06/2008
- luvobama I'm a Fan of luvobama 318 fans permalink

There were 12 felonies. Not just robbery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 12/06/2008

12 counts. Mandatory sentencing laws. He violated numerous laws, not just 'robbery.'

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 12/06/2008

If those sentences are mandatory in Nevada then the only way OJ could have come out of it unscathed would have had to have been declared "not guilty" by the jury. I've not researched mandatory sentencing but it's logical that you automatically get x years for commiting crime "y" then there's nothing the judge can do about that without the judge breaking a state law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 12/06/2008

And some of those chargesinclude stealing and the stuff being stolen is his own stuff, Give me a breakNevada.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 12/06/2008
- DeniseD I'm a Fan of DeniseD 26 fans permalink

Armed kidnapping is a serious offense and carries a heavy penalty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 12/07/2008

Watching Simpson give his......poor, pitiful me speech to the judge, made me wanna puke. Every time it was replayed on a news channel...I hit the mute button. The only thing this looser is sorry for...is getting caught.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 12/06/2008
- djkrlsn I'm a Fan of djkrlsn 23 fans permalink

I would say is also sorry for being convicted and facing most if not all of the rest of his life in prison.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 12/07/2008
- xmw I'm a Fan of xmw 18 fans permalink

Robert Blake had his wife murdered too. He should be in prison too. Where is all the outrage there???????? I believe is guilty as sin and should pay. On the flip side, people should be careful how far they push other people too. There are women who are terribly abused daily and are trapped financially and can't escape. Nicole was not in that situation. she yanked this man's chain every chance she got. He has both their blood on his hands but Nicole has to share Ron's. Let's not forget the way she treated OJ's wife, while they were married she flaunted herself and pursued him in front of her. Many lives have been shattered over this. No one is innocent. No let the angry replies began.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 12/06/2008
- luvobama I'm a Fan of luvobama 318 fans permalink

Now you are really reaching. Are you blaming the one that was murdered? Please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 12/06/2008
photo

Not all lawyers are jerks and some actually want to see justice applied, evenly/across the board. That's the only reason why I'm arguing that the OJ case was a travesty of justice -- from a criminal law perspective.

Nobody likes OJ -- no matter what colour.

However, trumping up charges isn't justice but a manipulation of the system, which shouldn't be applauded by liberals, not matter how much disdain you have for the particular defendant.

Prosecutorial bias, effects us all, not just OJ.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 12/06/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (26 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect