O.J. Simpson sentenced to as much as 33 years (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - O.J. Simpson sentenced to as much as 33 years (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12- 5-08 08:06 AM   |   Updated: 01- 5-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Simpson

Scroll down for video

LAS VEGAS - A broken O.J. Simpson was sentenced Friday to as much as 33 years in prison for a hotel armed robbery after a judge rejected his apology and said, "It was much more than stupidity."

The 61-year-old football Hall of Famer stood shackled and stone-faced as Judge Jackie Glass rattled off the punishment. Moments before, Simpson made a rambling, five-minute plea for leniency, simultaneously apologizing for the holdup as a foolish mistake and trying to justify his actions.

He choked back tears as he told her: "I didn't want to steal anything from anyone. ... I'm sorry, sorry."

Simpson said he was simply trying to retrieve sports memorabilia and other mementos, including his first wife's wedding ring, from two dealers when he stormed a Las Vegas hotel room on Sept. 13, 2007.

But the judge emphasized that it was a violent confrontation in which at least one gun was drawn, and she said someone could have been shot. She said the evidence was overwhelming, with the planning, the confrontation itself and the aftermath all recorded on audio or videotape.

Glass, a no-nonsense judge known for her tough sentences, imposed such a complex series of consecutive and concurrent sentences that even many attorneys watching the case were confused as to how much time Simpson got.

Simpson could serve up to 33 years but could be eligible for parole after nine years, according to Elana Roberto, the judge's clerk.

Story continues below
advertisement

The judge said several times that her sentence in the Las Vegas case had nothing to do with Simpson's 1995 acquittal in the slaying of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.

"I'm not here to try and cause any retribution or any payback for anything else," Glass said.

Simpson was immediately led away to prison after the judge refused to permit him to go free on bail while he appeals.

Simpson's co-defendant and former golfing buddy, Clarence "C.J. Stewart, also was sentenced to at least 15 years.

Outside court, Goldman's father, Fred Goldman, and sister, Kim, said they were delighted with the sentence.

"We are thrilled, and it's a bittersweet moment," Fred Goldman said. "It was satisfying seeing him in shackles like he belongs."

The Goldmans took a measure of credit for Simpson's fate, saying their relentless pursuit of his assets to satisfy a $33.5 million wrongful-death judgment "pushed him over the edge" and led him to commit the robbery to recover some of his sports memorabilia.

Simpson and Stewart were both brought to the courtroom in dark blue jail uniforms, their hands shackled to their waists with chains. Simpson, who looked weary and had not been expected to speak, delivered a somber statement to the judge.

As he spoke in a hoarse voice, the courtroom was hushed. His two sisters, Shirley Baker and Carmelita Durio, sat in the front row of the courtroom, along with his adult daughter.

Both men were convicted Oct. 3 of 12 criminal charges, including kidnapping and armed robbery.

"As stupid and as ill-conceived as it was, it wasn't something that was from this evil mind they teach us about," Simpson attorney Yale Galanter said before sentencing.

"Not bright, not smart, not well thought out, but certainly not from an evil mind," Galanter said.

Most of the 63 seats in the courtroom were taken by media, lawyers and family members of the defendants. Fifteen members of the public were also allowed.

After sentencing was over, the Goldmans left the courtroom and Kim threw her arms around her father and wept.

Simpson's sisters declined to comment, but Shirley Baker said on her way out: "It's not over."

Jurors who heard 13 days of testimony said after the verdict that they were convinced of Simpson's guilt because of audio recordings that were secretly made of the Sept. 13, 2007, robbery at the Palace Station casino hotel.

The confrontation involved sports memorabilia brokers Alfred Beardsley and Bruce Fromong. It was recorded by collectibles dealer Thomas Riccio, who was acting as middleman.

"Don't let nobody out of this room!" Simpson commands on the recordings, and instructs other men to scoop up items he insists had been stolen from him.

On Tuesday, Glass is scheduled to sentence four former co-defendants who took plea deals and testified against Simpson and Stewart.

Michael McClinton, Charles Cashmore, Walter Alexander and Charles Ehrlich could receive probation or prison time. McClinton could get up to 11 years; the others face less.


WATCH: Simpson apologizes to the judge before his sentencing



WATCH: Fred Goldman, Ron Goldman's father, comments on Simpson's sentence


Scroll down for video LAS VEGAS - A broken O.J. Simpson was sentenced Friday to as much as 33 years in prison for a hotel armed robbery after a judge rejected his apology and said, "It was much mor...
Scroll down for video LAS VEGAS - A broken O.J. Simpson was sentenced Friday to as much as 33 years in prison for a hotel armed robbery after a judge rejected his apology and said, "It was much mor...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1681
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (26 pages total)
- init I'm a Fan of init 3 fans permalink

Ah the movie Mandingo. Think I'm going out to pick up that one to put my mind back into that 1800's mindset. May be the only way to even deal with gross insecurities. I never saw this man murder anyone; nor did his jury.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 12/05/2008

The jury saw absolutely nothing. You know it. I know it. The jury knows it. And OJ knows it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 12/05/2008

This guy is nothing but a thug, albeit a rich and famous thug because he happened to excel at a sport. He chose to commit numerous criminal acts here, perhaps because "The Juice" is special? Does anyone think he actually *believed* that he had a right to do it because items were stolen from him? C'mon now, any person with more than 4 neurons firing would call the police about stolen valuables. What he really seems to believe is that he can act out his rage when he feels like it. He didn't expect to be caught on tape.

The man is a lyin' sack of s**t, like most thugs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 12/05/2008

To all people who think OJ is guilty of murder can you explain the following- 1)Mark Furhman is on tape admitting about planting evidence on Afro- Americans2) the lapd take OJ" s blood in a test tube to the crime scene, the time line which was almost humanly impossible to do the crime and also a video tape of OJ huggin and laughing with Nicole one hour before the murder -both look relaxed and enjoying each other's company as friends would do-can you explain how these make him guilty-cause I do not see it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 12/08/2008
- JimLarkin I'm a Fan of JimLarkin 7 fans permalink
photo

while o.j. in incarcerated he will begin to understand laws, personal responsibility , discipline and respect of and for others. otherwise he wont last very long. most of us learn these things early in life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 12/05/2008
- Seven7s I'm a Fan of Seven7s 2 fans permalink

You're an idiot if you think that people, "learn thier lesson" behind bars.

Please shove that "personal responsiblity" cliche back up your A$$ where it came from. If prison taught anybody any "lessons" there wouldnt be so many repeat offenders.

Save it for Court TV guy.

That said: This was obvious revenge for his aquital and peopel should be disappointed that laws were not followed. Did he really do anything that causes for 15 years in prison? OF COURSE NOT.

Just admit it is because he killed a white woman and got away with it and we can all come to a consensus. Oj is going to prison because he (maybe) murdered a white woman and got awayw ith it. And being the arrogant idiot he is he fell for the police set-up. Period.

Dont bring law & order into the conversation. revenege isnt law & order

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 12/05/2008

He murdered a Goldman too. The woman was his wfie and Robert Blake and Scott Peterson can understand why OJ did it, but Goldman, OH NO, if you kill a member of the Goldman Tribe they will make your life he//

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 12/05/2008
- GravitonX I'm a Fan of GravitonX 60 fans permalink
photo

Spare us the pontification. The criminal justice system wipes it's ass with the law everyday.

There is no way a 61 years old, first time offender of robbery, especially taking back his own stuff, get's 15-33 years. This was retribution, plain and simple.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 12/05/2008

No - it was due justice to multiple charges related to him illegally attempting to use guns & brute force to take back property that was NOT legally his. THAT is the plain & simple.

& if 61 year old with his record, his arrogant defence & iniability to see that using guns & force to take property back is an illegal act, regardless of their race or ethnic background- who has been found guilty- SHOULD get more than the minimum sentence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 12/05/2008
- PatRiley I'm a Fan of PatRiley 15 fans permalink

33 years seems a bit excessive. Some of you have written that O.J. deserves this hefty sentence because he once got away with murder. Whether or not he actually killed his ex-wife should be completely irrelevant in this case. Since he wasn't found guilty in that case, he's innocent (period). Like it or hate it, that's how our justice system works. It would be absolutely shameful if this judge was somehow trying to tack on extra punishment for past unrelated wrongs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 12/05/2008
- lizziekw I'm a Fan of lizziekw 39 fans permalink

There is no such legal finding as "innocent" there is guilty and there is not guilty. Simpson was found responsible for both murders in the civil trial. There is a multi-million dollar judgment against him for committing those murders. That's why he didn't go to the cops in Vegas.

OJ was hiding memorabilia and selling it under the table. He paid no sales tax on it, did not declare it as income and avoided turning over the proceeds of the sales to the family of his victims, as he is legally required to do. He's been doing it for years.

Whether or not you agree with it, our legal system does not exist in a vacuum. OJ Simpson's terrible crimes will follow him every day for the rest of his miserable life. If a good portion (or all) of the rest of that miserable life is spent in prison for committing armed robbery and kidnapping, I won't lose any sleep over it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

Well, the law specifically addresses the issue of whether past crimes or deeds, should be considered with the present crime or misdeed. That's how our criminal justice system is suppose to work, for all -- no matter how much you hate the defendant, which you clearly do. Why the outrage? Is it that personal to you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 12/05/2008
- tr24 I'm a Fan of tr24 6 fans permalink

Why are you overlooking the NOT GUILTY verdict in the criminal trial? If found guilty, he would have been in jail wouldn't he?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 12/05/2008
- andvoodoo2 I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 122 fans permalink
photo

A Vegas judge has dropped the charges against "Suge" Knight related to his arrest after he was spotted beating a woman while brandishing a knife.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20081205/people-suge-knight/

That's funny, many of the comments on this site swore a famous black man couldn't get justice in Vegas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

Andvoodoo2, the Mendoza case is the controlling case in Nevada, when a robbery and kidnapping charge are involved.

And the issue centers around the movement/a­sportation -- not the loaded gun, as you suggested.

Please see:

Nevada law is further complicated by its consideration of kidnapping in conjunction with robbery or other crimes. Both Pasqua and Wright concerned kidnappings associated with robberies.

The general rule on how to handle this issue is stated in Mendoza v. Nevada, 2006 Nev. LEXIS 30 (2006). The Mendoza Court presented this jury instruction:

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of both first-degree kidnapping (or second-degree kidnapping) and an associated offense of robbery, you must also find beyond a reasonable doubt either:

(1) That any movement of the victim was not incidental to the robbery;

(2) That any incidental movement of the victim substantially increased the risk of harm to the victim over and above that necessarily present in the robbery;

(3) That any incidental movement of the victim substantially exceeded that required to complete the robbery;

(4) That the victim was physically restrained and such restraint substantially increased the risk of harm to the victim; or

(5) The movement or restraint had an independent purpose or significance.

"Physically restrained" includes but is not limited to tying, binding, or taping.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 12/05/2008
- andvoodoo2 I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 122 fans permalink
photo

It is absurd to believe that physical restraint such as "tying" is a requisite for kidnapping when guns are displayed and threats to use them implicit.
The judge in OJ's case was undoubtably aware of Mendoza.

You are interpretting a case as a layman NOT an attorney. Give it a rest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 12/06/2008
- GravitonX I'm a Fan of GravitonX 60 fans permalink
photo

You're comparing apple seeds to oranges.

OJ was charged and found guilty on multiple counts. I don't think anyone to questioning the verdict. The problem is the severity of the sentencing, certainly a fairly uniform issue when the sentencing of AfricanAmericans is concerned.

Suge Knight was charged, yet found not guilty, due to flimsy evidence. There is no argument, since there is no case. If he was found guilty and sentenced similar to the norm (adjusting for reasonable mitigating or extenuating circumstances), then there, as well, would be no issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

Yes, I'm questioning the charge of kidnapping and the verdict. Read below.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 12/05/2008
- andvoodoo2 I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 122 fans permalink
photo

Knight was never "found not guilty" because the charges were dismissed by the judge due to witness problems (did you read the article?).

OJ could have gotten a much harsher sentence. Word has it he and his attorneys are glad he got so LITTLE time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 12/06/2008

Some people take matters into their own hands because they think they are above the law. Others take matters into their own hands because the law has failed them; doesn't regard their concerns; has a vendetta against them.

There was an abundance of evidence to suggest OJ's guilt in the murder trial. But keep in mind that OJ got over on the law because the law tried to get over on him. I see the sentencing in this case as an attempt to address that rather than the present circumstan­ces...and this is just another example of the inequality in justice throughout our society.

I don't trust the law or our system of justice; institutions designed to pacify the masses with a false sense of security and fairness. These ideals only exist in the mind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 12/05/2008

The DA's lost their case for OJ's murder trial when they agreed to hold the trial in downtown LA rather than in Bel Air where he lived. OJ was tried by his fans, not his peers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 12/05/2008

I am not a fan of OJ and i heard the whole trial on radio where I work and I would have voted just like the jury did in downtown LA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 PM on 12/05/2008
- GravitonX I'm a Fan of GravitonX 60 fans permalink
photo

The DA case began to spiral out of control when F. Lee Bailey blew Mark Fuhrman, the lead detective, out of the water.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

Justice denied, but inflated -- Matthews.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

ARe you guys listening to Matthews and Smerc?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 12/05/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 111 fans permalink

I am black and I see this case as "overkill". If the same thing had happened to anyone else, I believe the prosecution would not have brought the case to court. This case was so stupid, even the cops thought it was laughable.

The crimes he supposedly committed were a joke. How can you kidnap somebody in their own room? How can you threaten someone when you didn't even have a weapon. And I understand guilty by association. But these guys reminded me of the "keystone" cops. This was not an arm robbery and kidnapping and I don't care what anyone says to the contrary. This was a jury paying back OJ for something he did in the past and that's all there is to it.

In a democracy, the jury spoke at the first trial yet everybody and their mother is still blaming OJ for murder. If you didn't like the jury's verdict, your issue should be with them, not OJ. They did their job and did it according to the law. Just because the prosecution had a "jacked up" case, doesn't make OJ guilty. I saw the whole trial and agreed with the jury.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

Yes, and all these white liberal folks on this blog are saying blacks who are saying on this blog that this was a travesty of justice are f00ls and stupid and ignorant. That they have all the answers and know everything and they are right and smarter than us.

That's what our fellow liberals are telling us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 12/05/2008
- CitizenRob I'm a Fan of CitizenRob 13 fans permalink

Have you considered that the reason the justice system has more impact on blacks is because blacks commit more criminal acts?

1-in-6 blacks have served prison time, compared to 1-in-40 whites.

Now let's say that HALF of all convictions of blacks were wrongful convictions, that means 1-in-12 blacks have correctly served prison time.

Now let's also assume that TWICE as many whites got away with crimes as were convicted, that means 1-in-20 whites should have served prison time.

With those handicaps you still have 1-in-12 blacks vs 1-in-20 whites. That is a BIG difference!

Now I personally am not willing to believe that HALF of all blacks were convicted of crimes they did not commit due to judicial bias. (Nor that twice as many whites got away with crimes they should have been convicted of.) So what do the FACTS leave us with? It seems to me that blacks do in fact commit crimes at a higher rate than whites. That is as much of a problem as judicial bias.

Source: http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast/08/17/prison.stats.ap/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 12/05/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 111 fans permalink

And unless they actually SAW OJ committing the crimes, they don't know any more than we do, no matter what they say. Their opinions are no better than mine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 12/05/2008

I am a white liberal and think it was a travesty of justice, I have always felt OJ was innocent. And the judge that senrtenced him to me appeared to be enjoying herself-despite her claim the sentence had nothiing to do with OJ' past and I do not think afro-americans are fools and felel they should be very angry about the outcome of this particular trial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 12/05/2008
- Solja I'm a Fan of Solja 114 fans permalink
photo

Ditto!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

Ditto!! The lynch mob is getting bigger in this country!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 12/05/2008
- dct1999 I'm a Fan of dct1999 344 fans permalink
photo

Co-signing

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 12/05/2008

I'm white and I agree. I was practicing law during the OJ murder trial but watched when I could. The commentary was so different from the actual trial. I didn't see any of this trial but the over-charging by the DA is incredible. How could anyone believe what was charged because they watched video and listened to audio recordings made by accomplices? Those guys knew they were going to sell out OJ from before they went in to "help" him and the prosecution co-operated. Juries almost always convict. It was the incompetence of the prosecutors in the first trial that kept it from happening. I know of only one other person who agrees with me that OJ could not have committed the murder given the evidence presented by the prosecutor. I'm not a fan of OJ, but a fan of "justice" which is not synonymous with conviction no matter how sympathetic the victim or his or her family are. OJ got screwed. He's a jerk but he's not a kidnapper. So let the jury write their books or give their interviews. And if Ron Goldman's father wants to take credit as it appears he does, then maybe he ought to be prosecuted for pushing OJ's desperation. The Juice can cool his heels, he'll probably get it overturned on appeal, especially if attorneys can't even figure out what the sentence is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 12/05/2008
- eahce I'm a Fan of eahce 11 fans permalink

Can you please explain to me the televised slow speed chase when OJ was threatening suicide? It didn't seem to be the behavior of an innocent man.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 12/05/2008
- SnapShots I'm a Fan of SnapShots 43 fans permalink

A month or so ago I was watching one of those Cops shows. The film crew happened to be at a police station and guess who was brought in for booking .... OJ!

They filmed right through to putting him in the cell and locking the door.

I watched it in amazement ... OJ is creeeeeepy, man.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 12/05/2008

Guilty or not, you would think that he would have been so greatful to have his life back that he would live it to the max, keep a low profile and just be happy. But no...so his actions come back to bite him in the ass. So, Fairly or unfairly (you be the judge) he is now convicted and will have a lot of time to reflect. Please someone mail him a copy of A New Earth by Eckhard Tolle. He coul dlearn a thing or two about ego an dhow his failled him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 12/05/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 111 fans permalink

I think he was goaded into this by the mere fact that it was his personal property, not anything that should have gone to the Goldman's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 12/05/2008
- lizziekw I'm a Fan of lizziekw 39 fans permalink

Is that how you would deal with a situation where you thought someone had your property? Take some thugs with guns, hold people against their will and steal it? Personally, I'd call the cops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

I most definitely agree with that. Obviously, he needed this experience to wake up and smell the coffee. Yes, arrogance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 12/05/2008
- BetsyNZ I'm a Fan of BetsyNZ 5 fans permalink
photo

I think he was guilty of the double murder and he should have gotten life for that. But he got away with it.

I think this sentence is excessive and I think it IS retribution for the murders.

If he wasn't OJ and wasn't black would he have gotten such a harsh sentence ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 12/05/2008
- katedog I'm a Fan of katedog 9 fans permalink
photo

Oh please. Look at Scott Peterson. He's not OJ and he's not black. He's up there at San Quintein waiting for the needle. And he ain't the only one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 12/05/2008
- tr24 I'm a Fan of tr24 6 fans permalink

Oh please is right! Are you equating this case to Scott Peterson or are you equating the 1995 trial to this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 12/05/2008
- kutkreata I'm a Fan of kutkreata 61 fans permalink
photo

Scott Peterson was found guilty of murder. OJ was not & however way you try to justify it, the result is still the same. 33 years for armed robbery is an injustice and abuse of the legal system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 12/05/2008
photo

Listen to people legally trained, please. Not just you don't like or even hate OJ.

Peterson, one case that was particularly high profile and heinous and Peterson wasn't a millioniare.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 12/05/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 111 fans permalink

Your example is of a man who committed murder, Scott Peterson. What has that got to do with OJ who supposedly committed arm robbery and kidnapping? There's no correlation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 12/05/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 111 fans permalink

I just responded to you below by saying there's no correlation between the two. OJ was sentenced for arm robbery and kidnapping NOT MURDER. And 33 years is totally ridiculous due to the circumstances of this dumb crime.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 12/05/2008
- liseworks I'm a Fan of liseworks 143 fans permalink
photo

12 felony counts ? : Appropriate sentence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 12/05/2008
- MadamRoma I'm a Fan of MadamRoma 11 fans permalink

Well justice was slow but it finally arrived, I sincerely hope he is placed in the violent criminals section, he has so much to share.....­...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 PM on 12/05/2008

In the bible it says: what is hidden in darkness God will bring to light; 1Corinthians chapter 4 verse 5.
Many things that are hidden will come to light on earth, and many things will come to light when Jesus Christ comes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 12/05/2008
- iyamchazz I'm a Fan of iyamchazz 5 fans permalink
photo

Ah... He came over 2000 years ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 12/05/2008
- Solja I'm a Fan of Solja 114 fans permalink
photo

Maybe He'll come back and get all of these white racists we've got involved in our criminal justice system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 12/05/2008
- hlhicks I'm a Fan of hlhicks 10 fans permalink

Anyone who is honest will acknowledge that his conviction has nothing to do with Las Vegas and everything to do with Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman. The fact that the Goldmans showed up and spoke to the media says it all. Hopefully all of the players from this drama can rest easy and we won't have to hear from any of them again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 PM on 12/05/2008

And it was very inappropriate for them to show at this tril . A trial is supposed ly for the charges that the person has been accused of at that time not something that a person did did not do in the past. I am always curious about the Goldman's and how they were so convinced from Day One that OJ did it if they were genuinely grieving their son if iwere them I would be uncertain if it was OJ and would want the real person found. Instead they did a civil court deal where they got some money. Someone blogging here says they did not but if my memory serves me they did get a substantial amount. They should have not made an appearance at all. I do not believe the Brown family was there. Very inappropriate

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 12/05/2008
- lizziekw I'm a Fan of lizziekw 39 fans permalink

Sensible people do not have any doubt that OJ Simpson murdered Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown.

The Goldmans were there because they will never rest while that murderer walks free - and good for them. If some psychopathic football player murdered my son and got away with it, I wouldn't rest either. And I'd have a party if that psychopath was convicted and sent to prison on other charges. A big party.

As for the substantial amount of the judgment in the civil trial - where OJ was found responsible for both murders - OJ continues to be a deadbeat. He sells memorabilia under the table, pays no sales tax, doesn't declare it as income and doesn't turn over the proceeds to the family of his victim as he is legally required to do. Yeah, I'm shedding a lot of tears over OJ's fate.

Bye-bye, Orenthal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 12/05/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (26 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect