9/11 Fund Overseer Kenneth Feinberg Floated As New Auto 'Czar'

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - 9/11 Fund Overseer Kenneth Feinberg Floated As New Auto 'Czar' stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12- 8-08 08:04 AM   |   Updated: 01- 8-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Dodd

UPDATE 3:30pm EST:
A spokeswoman for Feinberg tells Huffington Post that he has not been approached about the position. "He doesn't know anything about it." Feinberg's law firm, Feinberg Group, which specializes in the resolution of complex legal disputes, lists the Ford Motor Company
among its clients, which may represent a conflict since the auto czar would run the $15 billion auto rescue plan.

Read the AP report that Feinberg is being floated for auto 'czar':

The White House and a top Democratic lawmaker said they were likely to strike a deal Monday on a multibillion-dollar automaker bailout that would put a government "car czar" in charge of overseeing a restructuring Detroit's Big Three.

Congressional officials said Kenneth Feinberg, the lawyer who oversaw the federal Sept. 11 victims' compensation fund, is under consideration for the post.

"It sounds like we have agreement on those basic principles that would be required for a bill that the president could sign," White House press secretary Dana Perino told reporters.

The developing measure would provide about $15 billion in emergency loans, but it also would give a presidentially named overseer the power to require payback early next year if the companies failed to take the steps necessary to overhaul themselves. Congressional aides outlined the plan on condition of anonymity because it was not yet completed.

Under the plan, the carmakers' could get emergency loans on Dec. 15. Then the overseer _ a kind of "car czar" _ would write guidelines, due on the first of the year, for a restructuring of General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC. If the car companies hadn't taken enough steps to reinvent themselves by Feb. 15, the overseer could recall the money.

That would essentially mean that a person selected by President George W. Bush would set the terms for an auto industry restructuring, but the decision about whether the terms were being met would not be made until President-elect Barack Obama had been sworn in. Congressional Democrats and the White House were working to find a broadly supported candidate who could span the two administrations.

Story continues below
advertisement

Congressional officials said Feinberg was under consideration for the position.

Asked if a deal could be struck for a vote as early as Monday, Perino said, "I think it's very likely." She prodded senior Democratic lawmakers to send their proposal, particularly if they expected initial votes within 24 hours. "It seems pretty soon if we haven't seen the language yet," she said.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman, said that he, too, expected a deal by the end of the day on a proposal that would draw emergency aid from an existing loan program meant to help the automakers build fuel-efficient vehicles. House and Senate Democratic aides were finalizing the package, which was expected to provide between $14 billion and $17 billion.

"There should be agreement by the end of today," Frank said on CNBC. He said he expected the bailout would clear Congress and be signed by Bush "before the week (is) out."

Some issues remain, however.

Several lawmakers are eager to force the automakers to bring in new top executives as a condition of federal aid. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., wants a requirement in the bailout bill to separate the jobs of chairman and chief executive officer, which would strip GM's Rick Wagoner and Chrysler's Bob Nardelli of some power and bring in new people to transform the companies. Ford already splits the two positions, between CEO Alan Mulally and Executive Chairman Bill Ford Jr.

Chris Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said Sunday that Wagoner "has to move on" as part of a government-run restructuring.

"I think you have got to consider new leadership," Dodd said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

In return for the rescue money, the carmakers would have to agree to terms similar to those placed on banks that receive funds under the $700 billion Wall Street bailout: to limit their top executives' pay packages, cease paying dividends, give the government a chunk of future gains and guarantee that taxpayers would be reimbursed before any other shareholders, congressional aides said.

Some lawmakers still want to create a Cabinet-level oversight board to help run the bailout, although the proposal appeared to be losing traction, with the White House pushing for a single adviser who could send the companies into bankruptcy if the companies don't make progress on fundamental shifts.

Criticized for staying on the sidelines until now, Obama voiced support Sunday for the bailout legislation being drafted in Congress. He accused car industry executives of a persistent "head-in-the-sand approach" to long-festering problems.

___

Associated Press Writers Ben Feller and Devlin Barrett contributed to this report.

UPDATE 3:30pm EST: A spokeswoman for Feinberg tells Huffington Post that he has not been approached about the position. "He doesn't know anything about it." Feinberg's law firm, Feinberg Group, which...
UPDATE 3:30pm EST: A spokeswoman for Feinberg tells Huffington Post that he has not been approached about the position. "He doesn't know anything about it." Feinberg's law firm, Feinberg Group, which...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
150
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 163 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, put a lawyer in charge of the auto industry. That will turn them around. What's wrong with us?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 12/09/2008
- JScott I'm a Fan of JScott 20 fans permalink

What I'm wondering is does this guy's job expire when the Bush term ends? So he has a job for the next 1 1/2 mo. what then, does the next pres. reappoint, or appoint someone new, either way sounds like nothing much can happen in that short time period, and this happens only if he gets appointed, he may not get it at all, Congress may not finish the legislation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 12/09/2008
photo

I don't like the word Czar, so I think we should appoint the Auto Autocrat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 AM on 12/09/2008
- brklynivn I'm a Fan of brklynivn 16 fans permalink

GM got into the trouble it is in because short-sighted finance guys kept overruling the engineering experts when manufacturing their cars. Remember the Corvair and all the negative publicity it got because the engineers were overruled over a $15 part that would have vastly improved the cars handling? I would think any car czar should at least have some engineering know-how as well as financial experience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 AM on 12/09/2008

Can anyone name one time when appointing a "czar" accomplished anything of substance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 12/08/2008
- jneuman771 I'm a Fan of jneuman771 2 fans permalink

1st, owned nothing but American made cars. Have had no problems. No complaints.
Mileage is up to 32 mpg. on the'02 LeSabre. Get over it they are good cars.

2nd. we are both under 60 and would never support a foreign producer if we had a choice.
If it meant it could cost me a little more, tough,,, I am supporting someone in the U.S.

3rd. I believe in the union. Maybe if some of you got off your buts and organized you would have a different lifestyle. Better, health insurance, a pension, instead of a 401 that has tanked.. and you would not be so angry. YOU have been sold a bill of goods by various companies to believe the union is evil. NO, MANAGEMENT IS EVIL. They will not PAY you the middle class wages you should have, thus your bitterness. A LIVING WAGE, HEALTHE BENEFITS, RETIREMENT, ETC. iS AND SHOULD BE A HUMAN RIGHT.....NOT A PRIVELEGE FOR THE FEW. ORGANIZE....!!!!!!!

no CEO deserves more than 2 mil a year. No athlete deserves more than that......our salary structure, in this country is so out of hand....nowhere else does this happpen. We are the last modern country to not have basic human rights. Our medical care in this country is the most expensive, it is exclusive, and the most discriminatory. and we still have 50 million/ uninsured/ underinsured. What are you people thinking?!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 12/08/2008
- Pat15 I'm a Fan of Pat15 4 fans permalink

Problem we have is that repugs have managed to control congress & WH for the last 8 years. No control over the greed of CEO & The upper management ... Now the chickens have come back to roost ...Until we change how CEO run cos we will not get out of this ...We the stupid workers keep electing the Repugs ... well now we have to suffer the pain of our voting habits ....Amen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 12/08/2008
- Arthur954 I'm a Fan of Arthur954 5 fans permalink
photo

The American health care system is an anacronism, a cruel barbarity that has no place in a civilised world. In every developed country there is a national health care system that covers all people, at a fraction of the cost and aggravation.

Aside from being profoundly immoral, the US health system places US manufacturing at a COMPETITIVE DISADVANTAGE

Proper health care and retirement are a basic right , not a privilege. The Obama people should study any good European system and implement it in the US. It is so unfair and cruel what is happening now

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 12/09/2008



The CEO of Tesla who manufactures the well reviewed all electric automobile in Calif in requesting a participation in any ensuing public bailout of the industry pointed out that that enterprise need was for a capital infusion to establish a nationwide support infrastructure to market that state-if-the-art vehicle. Such an infrastructure is already in place for the big three although the capital investment largely is generated locally by the proverbial "main street" and not in Detroit. That support system could fairly be shifted from grotesquely expensive long term retooling subsidy to phase out of obsolete and inefficient vehicles at relatively little cost.

Local and dealer service support facilities operate as independent businesses, locally owned and controlled and would have only marginal input into the short term plan or any Chapter 11 options. Their servicing and marketing skills would easily transfer to electrical powered vehicles, and decisions. Major decisions would be likely be made outside their control or worse in a courtroom attended and controlled by hundreds of lawyers all trying to justify their legal fees in a largely adversarial environment from with little likelihood of success

Why not select a "Czar" of vehicular technology from the ranks of those industrialists who are on the cutting edge to oversee the remediation rather than a person whose publicly reported qualifications are unrelated to the issues to be considered in formulating and implementing a model to revive a potentially terminally ill industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 12/08/2008
- bexe I'm a Fan of bexe permalink

Oh Please please please - the Czar needs to be a proven entrepreneur!!! Please no Bureaucrats, no lawyers, no bankers or financiers, no academics. Only an entrepreneur will do and with his skin in the game!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 12/08/2008

I am totally against the idea of once again handing out money to individuals / companies who were not able to manage their corporations in a profitable manner in the first place. Designating a "Car Czar”, in my mind, is a bad idea unless he or she has the experience or back ground in the industry. It would both a waste of time and money. They, the auto companies, need to file bankruptcy and start over again with a new management team.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 12/08/2008
- Wiredwilly I'm a Fan of Wiredwilly 23 fans permalink

Sounds like a front for the Rothschild Banks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 12/08/2008

I saw Kenneth Feinberg speak once. He came across as one of the most brilliant people ever to walk the earth. Not sure about running a car fund, but it sounds like he did a good job with the 9/11 families.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 12/08/2008
- bpowell1 I'm a Fan of bpowell1 3 fans permalink

If you are going to have a czar whatever that means it should be someone who actually knows something about the car industry. It is really stupid to appoint someone who know nothing about the auto industry. It's enough stupidity already. Stop spreading this money around in such a stupid way. Again they could have given every American citizen $500k to 1million and it still wouldn't be as much money as they have blown right now. We would have went shopping repaired our homes and put money in the bank. We the American citizens would have and could have gottent his economy up and running by now. Instead they keep trying to give it to the same people that screwed it up in the first place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 12/08/2008
- Fabini I'm a Fan of Fabini 43 fans permalink
photo

I just hate this idea of "czars". It/they are ineffectual and scapegoats.
I'm sure I'm not the first to say this, but all this money flying around and the government wants to hire a czar. Maybe they should hire DemiGods, they may get better results.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 12/08/2008
- Kassandra I'm a Fan of Kassandra 95 fans permalink
photo

Read this:
http://firedoglake.com/2008/12/08/the-auto-plan-appears-to-be-intended-to-break-the-unions-and-end-pensions/#more-34751

That's an awful to of power to put into the hands of an unelected official. Bush: the gift that keeps on giving; long after he's gone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 12/08/2008
- Plank I'm a Fan of Plank 5 fans permalink

Here we go. A bunch of lawmakers appointing a lawyer to oversee complex product development and manufacturing decisions. The politicians always oversimplify the issues to score cheap points and feel good about themselves. If there's a group in need of a czar, it's got to be congress. The most inefficient and mediocre group of people in this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 12/08/2008
- Kassandra I'm a Fan of Kassandra 95 fans permalink
photo

They've had one; his name is George W Bush. that's why Congress doesn't work anymore, he sidelined it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 12/08/2008

Gee maybe if business had done their job they wouldnt have to?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 12/08/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect